Lawmakers Fear New Ethics RuleMarch 16, 2007 - by Donny Shaw
Today is the deadline, as set forth by David Obey (D-WI) for members of the House to submit their earmark requests to the Appropriations Committee. However, some lawmakers suddenly have cold feet. They are stumped by a new rule which requires that they sign off on their requests, certifying that neither they nor their spouse has a “financial interest” in it.
The new rule was passed in the first 100 hours of legislative business as part of the House ethics package. But, according to Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) (pictured at right), the Ethics Committee failed to offer further guidance and clarification as to what exactly constitutes “financial interest.”
Lawmakers also want to know exactly what constitutes a request for an earmark. From looking at e-mails like this, one might think that the process of requesting an earmark is fairly official and clear cut. But, the fact that this question is arising suggests that there is more informality and wheeling and dealing in the process than what we know.
It is important for the exact definitions of rules like this to be made clear. Intentions could be misconstrued and lawmakers would be left defenseless. However, it is hard to keep from wondering if some of the hesitation is caused by the requirement of lawmakers’ certification. If it was discovered that a lawmaker was benefiting financially from an earmark of theirs, they would then be guilty of outright deception, rather than simply trying to slip one by.
>"The failure of the ethics committee to provide essential guidance to Members in a timely manner has placed Members seeking to advocate for much needed funds in a dangerous and untenable position," Boehner wrote. “I hope you will agree with me that this situation is completely unacceptable, and will take whatever steps are necessary to rectify it.”