OpenCongress Blog
Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds
Blue Dogs Threaten to Block the Healthcare Bill
July 16, 2009 - by Donny Shaw
The America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 is scheduled for three separate committee mark-ups today. Congress Matters has the links for streaming the sessions live online.
Of the three, the most interesting one to watch will be the Energy and Commerce Committee, where conservative Blue Dog Democrats have the numbers and are threatening to vote down the bill if the Chairman, Rep. Henry Waxman [D, CA-30], doesn’t agree to make some major changes. The Hill reports:
Seven Blue Dogs on the House Energy and Commerce Committee have banded together to draft amendments that they’ll co-sponsor in the committee markup, which starts Thursday. Rep. Mike Ross (D-Ark.), the Blue Dogs’ point man on healthcare, says if those changes aren’t accepted, they’ll vote down the bill.
“We cannot support the current bill,” Ross said. “Last time I checked, it took seven Democrats to stop a bill in Energy and Commerce.”
Ross knows of three additional Democrats on the committee who won’t support the bill in its current form, creating a base of 10 Democratic opponents. The committee has 59 members: 23 Republicans and 36 Democrats.
You can read about their specific concerns with the legislation in a letter they sent last week to the Democratic leadership. Essentially, they are against the bill’s plan to tax businesses that don’t provide insurance for their employees and the public option that would pay out Medicare-like rates. More on the Blue Dogs’ specific concerns they want addressed can be found via Arkansas News.
Many centrists say that much of the frustration stems from the vote on the climate change bill just before the Fourth of July break, and the feeling that it was “jammed down the throat” of centrist lawmakers.
Pelosi cut deal after deal with individual lawmakers to squeak the bill out of committee and to the floor. Then lawmakers flew home and had to battle criticism from voters at the same time Republicans were saying Democrats passed an “energy tax.”
“They went home and got beat up about energy,” said a senior aide to a Blue Dog lawmaker. “Now you’re going to jam healthcare down their throat and send them home for a month?”
One of the goals of having the seven Blue Dog members band together is to guard against leadership picking centrists off one by one with side deals, as they feel was done during the energy vote.
The group includes all the Blue Dogs on the committee except for Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.). They are Reps. John Barrow (D-Ga.), Bart Gordon (D-Tenn.), Baron Hill (D-Ind.), Jim Matheson (D-Utah), Charlie Melancon (D-La.), Ross, and Zack Space (D-Ohio).
The strange thing about their line of reasoning here is that some of these Blue Dogs on the committee, and Blue Dogs in general, represent districts with exceptionally high rates of uninsured constituents. With the climate bill, they may have had a case. As Nate Silver points out “38 of the 48 [Blue Dogs] have per capita carbon output rates above the national median, and 36 of the 48 have an above-median concentration of jobs in the manufacturing and agricultural sectors.”
On health care, Silver’s analysis shows that of the 48 Democrats who represent conservative districts that were won by McCain, “31 (roughly two-thirds) have an above-median number of uninsured.” For example, Blue Dog Health Care Task Force Chairman Rep. Mike Ross [D, AR-4], a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, has a 21.8% uninsured rate, which is well above the 14.6% median.

Blog - Blue Dogs Threaten to Block the Healthcare Bill




Sort By
Comments
I’m glad to see some democrats have some backbone to stand up to Pelosi and are willing to put a halt to all the crazy spending that’s going on in d.c.
a lifelong dem
I’m tired of seeing such complex issues being dumbed down to gradeschool level just so those opposed can pander to their lowest common denominator.
Rather than debating intricacies, nuances and specifics, the republicans would rather provide the equivalent of grunting, farting and belching noises to the discussion. No wonder the country is in the crapper.
As for the Blue Dogs voting against the better interests of their own constituency, I guess I’m not surprised. They seem unable to extricate themselves from the tried and true tactic of dumbing it down and are therefore not able to see the forest for the trees.
Yes! Finally!! Do the right thing Blue Dogs!!
Yoder, I’m tired of liberals who have a grandiose view of themselves and their own ideals. Who arrogantly believe that they know what is right for everyone else. The fact that every argument is framed in a condescending tone is nauseating and we’re tired of it!
And I’m tired of those who are tired.
It is the conservatives with their noses in the air, saying “my way or the highway”.
The art of debate and the ability to compromise have become dead to the republican party. It’s become all or nothing, which does no one any good.
Being a former Republican, I hate seeing what they have become.
I’m not a Democrat either, because for the most part they have also lost sight of what they have been put there to do.
If the government wants to offer health care then they should start a business with their money and offer what they believe are affordable rates. The last time I checked I did not have 1 trillion dollars in the bank to fund this bill. Sure their only going to tax the “rich”. The “rich” will then pass their new burden on to me the consumer. Even if the cost of this proposal was not astronomical I do not want the govenment telling me what I can and cannot do with my health care which is exactly what will happen when they railroad the private insurers out of business
We have far too many in the governing sector. Our government is way too bloated, too much governing and not enough workers. Perhaps we should reduce the size by cutting the government in half. We could cut Obama in half and then perhaps cut Pelosi in half. Less government is more, I absolutely agree, let’s start cutting them for a change.
Parroting right wing talking points that have no basis in reality. Is that the best anyone can do here? Really?
First, public managed health care is a less expensive, more efficient use of our money.
Second, public managed health care will give you more access to more doctors.
Third, public managed health care will not result in long waits for service (that is pathetic fear mongering at its best).
Grow up.
If you don’t feel like investigating this any further than the lobbyist talking points, that’s fine. That’s your choice. Just don’t get all whiny when people call you on it.
None of this has anything to do with how great the government manages anything, and everything to do with how badly the health insurance and pharma industries have done in providing health care.
Thank you congressmen for using common sense , You have my utmost respect.