OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

Just 12% Support the Health Care bill on OpenCongress - What Does it Mean?

August 3, 2009 - by Donny Shaw

  • “Poll Shows Obama’s Clout on Health Care is Eroding” (New York Times, 7/29/09)

These are typical of the headlines we’ve been seeing recently as members of the House leave Washington for their month-long recess with a health care vote looming as soon as they return. Putting aside some of the quirks of the polls – Obama doesn’t have a health care plan, it’s Congress’ through and through – these polls reflect a growing trend of unease about elements of the health care proposals in Congress.

But on OpenCongress approval for the House’s health care bill is absurdly low. Out of the approximately 1,250 people that have cast their vote on the site, just 12 percent voted in favor of the bill. Eighty-eight percent voted against it. The reason is simple: unlike a good poll, the OpenCongress vote count doesn’t represent a cross-section of Americans. People come to the site voluntarily to cast their vote – there’s no random sampling involved.

So, what is the vote count on OpenCongress worth? I think it gives us a sense of the energy behind the drive for health care reform a la the Democrats’ bill as well as the energy behind the opposition to the bill. More specifically, it shows us that people opposing the Democrats’ health care reform bill are much more active than the supporters. For this unscientific analysis – with actual public support is split about 50/50 – the 12 percent approval rating on OpenCongress indicates that the opposition is about four times more energized than the support.

This is especially important right now because members of Congress will be in their districts for the entire month of August to touch base with their constituents about what’s going on in Congress. You can bet that health care reform is going to overshadow just about every issue. Pundits and political activists have already declared the August recess the make-or-break moment for Congress’ push to reform health care. If persuadable members of Congress come back from recess with the impression that the majority of the people in their district oppose the health care bill, they are going to be more likely to vote against it.

So, we know that opponents to the health care bill are more likely to cast their vote on a website, but are they also more likely to make their voice heard at town halls and other events with members of Congress this month? So far, it does seems like the OpenCongress vote count is a fairly good representation of where the August energy is on health care. Below are a couple videos from district meetings last weekend with Rep. Lloyd Doggett [D, TX-25] and Sen. Arlen Specter [D, PA]where health care reform opponents overwhelmed supporters:

Read all blog posts here, or subscribe to our RSS feed to keep up with what’s really happening in Congress.

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.
 

Comments

  • yoder 08/03/2009 2:23pm

    I think the 12% would make more sense if you were able to see where your users were on the fiscal and social spectrum. If 90% of Open Congress users are conservatives, then the 12% means one thing. If 50% are conservatives, the 12% means something else.

  • nowickedwitch 08/03/2009 3:58pm

    The bill is not complete. First they need to stop the coercive insurance corporations, make them liable to the anti trust laws, regulated them. It is unethical the way health care is run in this country. Those who provide health care should not have financial interest in corporate entities that benefit from either more testing or less, should not be held to patient quotas, and so forth. Health care should be should be pay for service. People should not be charged 350 for a service if they have insurance and $775 if they don’t. That gives the insurance company an advantage – holding guns to people heads in a way and that is coercion. It’s like giving a Ruby and getting a half of a glass of sand, and it should be illegal.

    The bill isn’t cooked enough. Please explain to people that the bill can be a work in progress.

  • Anonymous 08/04/2009 7:25am

    more than likely, open congress devotees are overwhelmingly Libertarian in their leanings…

  • falconrider 08/04/2009 4:51pm

    This bill is HUGE, it gives GOVERNMENT instead ol the PEOPLE the power over their health-care. We have that power when WE chose our medical plan from an open competitive marketplace of plans. The government has NO business dictating how WE do business with the marketplace. The government only looks for POWER, not validity (consistency), Accuracy (truth) or Equity (fairness). Socialism POSES as an act of assured fairness, but robs the people of the right of selfishness. We have the right to determine how we spend our available funds on WHOM! Under socialism, every worthless bum gets the same benefit as those who produce wealth for a living. There is no relation to MERIT of SERVICE! Socialized medicine (HR3200) is just a PRETENSE of solution. It will become the NEW problem. What does government bureacracy do well now, anything?


OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.