OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

The Vast Majority of Bills Go Nowhere

August 25, 2009 - by Donny Shaw

Every once in a while we get an email from someone concerned about some obscure bill they have found on OpenCongress that they think poses a direct threat to their freedoms and liberties. Common examples include H.R.45, a bill to establish a nation-wide firearms licensing system, and H.J.Res.5, a bill to repeal presidential term limits. They cite these bills as evidence that Congress is trying to take away their guns, or that Congress is trying to make Obama king for life.

But this kind of analysis is based on a misunderstanding of what bills in Congress are. Each of the 535 members of Congress can propose any kind of bill they want. They don’t need consent or support from anyone – they just drop a piece of legislation in a box, called “the hopper,” and congressional workers assign it an official bill number and file it away with all the others bills. The only test a proposal has to pass before becoming a bill in Congress is the judgment of the individual member of Congress who introduced it.

The vast majority of bills are essentially dead upon arrival. In any given two-year session of Congress, ten-thousand or more bills are introduced. But only about 4 percent of them become law. Take away bills that do things like naming post offices and designating days of the year as commemorative holidays and it’s probably more like one percent.
Sunlight Labs has done an analysis of what happened to all the bills that were introduced in the previous session of Congress (110th session). Of the 11,056 bills that were introduced, 9,904, were referred to a committee by default, never saw any action, and died there.

So, why do people introduce bills that have no chance of becoming law? Maybe they are addressing concerns that are unique to their district. For example, a draconian gun-control law probably makes more sense in inner-city Chicago than it does in rural New Hampshire. Or perhaps they just trying to put new ideas out into the public discourse. Or perhaps they want to take a radical stance on an issue as a purely political tactic, to show their constituents that they are “serious” about something. Nobody is going to introduce a bill they don’t believe in, but they might introduce a bill that nobody but them will get behind.

It’s hard to know sometimes what is a viable bill that might be considered, and what is a bill that will just die in committee. Here are a few metrics you can use to make a guess:

1) Co-sponsors – if the bill has zero co-sponsors, it probably isn’t viable. If it does have co-sponsors, especially if the list includes members of the leadership and committee chairmen, it probably has a chance of seeing some action. Bipartisanship in co-sponsor lists is a good sign that a bill is viable, especially if the bill is introduced by the minority party.

2) Actions – Bills go through dozens of “actions” before they become law. If the only actions you see for a bill are referrals to committees, for example on H.R. 45, it’s a sign that it’s probably not going anywhere. But if you see any other kinds of actions, like “forwarded by subcommittee to full committee by voice vote,” “hearings scheduled,” or “committee consideration and mark-up session held,” then the bill is starting to move and has a chance becoming law.

3) News and blogs – this is tricky, but can be useful. On OpenCongress you can see which bills are getting the most buzz in the news media and on the blogs. Now, it’s true that bills can get talked about a lot even if Congress isn’t actually considering them, but taken together with the metrics above, this can be helpful. For example, the bill H.R. 1207, to increase transparency of the Federal Reserve, doesn’t have much in the way of actions, but it has an impressive co-sponsor list and a ton of buzz in the blogs. This means there is grass roots energy around this bill which, coupled with the co-sponsors list, indicates that it could possibly see some movement.

With OpenCongress, you can track any bill with a free “My OpenCongress” account (register of log-in). On any bill page (like this one, for example) click “Track With MyOC” in the right-hand sidebar, and the bill will be added to your page of tracked items. Then you can subscribe by RSS or email to get an alert as soon as there is a new action, comment, blog post, or news article. See my page of tracked items to get a sense of how it works.

Read all blog posts here, or subscribe to our RSS feed to keep up with what’s really happening in Congress.

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.
 

Comments

Displaying 1-30 of 40 total comments.

Anonymous 08/29/2009 7:58am

Very informative – thank you for eloquently describing the, at times, elusive mechanics of Congress!!

Anonymous 08/29/2009 7:15pm

Last year, while prowling the halls of Congress lobbying as a private citizen, I happened to notice in one office (Hoyer’s, I think), a selection of government publications for citizens to take with them for free.

I grabbed a copy of “How Our Laws are Made” from 2003 (2007 edition available) that answers in great detail how bills get through the process (or, as you say, more likely don’t) in Washington.

When you referred to “the hopper” it rang a bell from my reading of this booklet – from which I created a flowchart to make the process clearer to myself. The booklet is about 60 pages long and is available at bookstore.gpo.gov for $5.50

Thank you for your very concise description of part of the process. For those who want the nitty gritty, get this booklet.

oderintdummetuant 08/25/2009 11:50am

You know Donny, this is literally the best piece I’ve ever read from you. Not knocking your work, but this particular blog is completely devoid of partisanship. I understand that some partisanship in your blog is probably necessary to evoke emotions from readers so they get involved and open some discussion. The numerous bills that go nowhere and more importantly that people may get incensed about do have their place in discussions. H.R. 45 and H.J. Res 5 are important if for no other reason than to let voters know their elected officials opinions on these topics because like you said, “Nobody is going to introduce a bill they don’t believe in”. Well written Donny and appreciated.

Anonymous 08/29/2009 12:57pm

Wow. I’m impressed. Even if you people are “radical’s”. Keep it coming.

snappy69 03/21/2010 1:53pm
in reply to Anonymous Aug 25, 2009 4:08pm

ABSOLUTELY! We the people, lend OUR power to the elected representatives not the other way around. This American is sick and tired of the nonsense (and in some instances TREASON) that is running rampant on capitol hill. As I review many of the “hot” bills being debated it is ABUNDANTLY clear that several of them do not have public support. So why aren’t they DOA?

I’ll tell you why. Because our elected representatives aren’t representing the people but instead have chosen to support an oligarchy. It is high time that many of them were replaced with common men and women who will simply listen to their constituency and vote accordingly.

Anonymous 09/09/2009 6:43am

It’s a good article – no question, But isn’t it an attitude of: “it won’t matter anyway” that has and will continue to cause this country so much heartache? I believe anything that has been submitted to become a law, or for that matter anyone who steps into the light to govern, should (and must) be taken seriously. If we keep making excuses and downplaying…we may wake up in a country full of laws that couldn’t possibly pass…and rulers – who couldn’t possibly win…

Anonymous 08/26/2009 10:22am

@ Anonymous: Any bill which proposes a Constitutional Ammendment is, by very definition, both ‘unconstitutional’ (in that it proposes a ‘rewrite’ of the constitution) and ‘constitutional’ (in that the process is part of the written constitution)!

@ Donny: I always loved School House Rock! :-)

TJ

mavric 10/14/2009 6:12am

This is just another stupid bill to waste time and money, I also understand the IRS is trying to get a chunk of money from it. As the old saying goes , you get my guns from my dead body. Dave Erickson USMC retired

Moderated Comment

Anonymous 09/12/2009 6:14am

This country is so screwed up. I am sad for the Americans who call this country home. The complete disregard for honesty along with the constant corruption in politics makes me ashamed to admit I am American. When I read about the complete and total waste of my money for stupid reasons, it is just plain thivery by the politicians. Want to talk about health insurance. OK, here’s what I want, I want the same insurance Obama has, thats all, just as good as he gets.

lfandja 09/12/2009 10:37am
in reply to Anonymous Sep 05, 2009 1:12am

I agree, our public servants have promoted themselves from public servents to celebraties and could careless about the people who elect them. Besides many of our dignitaries are common thieves, perverts, tas cheats, serious criminals that hide money in their freezer, solicit illicit sex in a public bathroom, use their apartment as a brothel for homosesuals, do not pay their income tax and a multitude of petty criminals who accept kickbacks in return for favors many of which are undoubtedly illegal and for which we insignificant little people would most likely go to jail. For the above reasons I and many others have decided to vote against all incumbents, Democrats or Republicans at least in the upcoming elections.

jeffharris 10/01/2009 5:18am

You shouldn’t hate America – you should love it. Problem is, with politicians like this and these type of bills being proposed and many passed, we are not America anymore. Love America and hope she returns someday.

Anonymous 10/01/2009 8:24am

Iam so sick of public elected idots. We have nothing to elect but these self serving theves. The only ones who run for office are already bought and paid for.While I struggle to keep my business going, city ,state and federal goverment figure a way to tax us more. I have never been more discouraged for both my family’s future and this country.

Anonymous 10/11/2009 8:38pm

I agree with most of what I have read above but fail to understand why most all of those who have expressed their feelings do so anonymously. If rhey honestly feel as they have expressed themselves then why do they not identify themselves? Are they so fearsome of retaliation from some government entity
that they are afraid to do so. We are guranteed yhe right to free speech aren,t we? I am a veteran who believes we can take back this country. shall we? Eric V. Brummitt

columbianna 08/28/2009 5:12am
in reply to Anonymous Aug 27, 2009 5:50am

I don’t agree. I think Obama’s heart is in the right place and that he really wants to help Americans and America. I do agree that drastic change needs to take place in Washington. I think a complete house-cleaning is in order and to start fresh with a whole new Congress and to make sure anyone who is voted in to office knows up front that the American people aren’t going to take any more bullcrap from Washington, whether they are Democrat or Republican and if they can’t abide by what we the people say, then hit the road! Get them out of there!

deadeye303 11/14/2009 10:15am
in reply to Anonymous Oct 06, 2009 8:05pm

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State” is the preamble to “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” which is the actual right affirmed by the second amendment. This, of course, is the subject of much argument and the excuse for the anti-self-defense forces for attempting to disarm us for their true purpose, to ensure their political power.

OKcop 12/07/2009 7:25am

Debating the exact meaning of the constitution over 200 years later is mute on this issue. Did the government control or try to control the weapons of AMERICANS during or after our constitution was formed. The answer is “NO”. That came later with the greed and corruption that has truly ruined this great country. Any government that would say that a man has no right to protect himself or his family by being armed is a government formed of tyrannical thugs.
This was understood by most of those that signed the constitution if NOT ALL.
Do you feel it was their intent after a separation from England to be victimized without FIGHT ? You’d better think again. I fly my Gadsden flag proudly. The meaning is clear. Free mens own guns, slaves don’t. Honest law abiding AMERICANS should never have to fear their government taking away their guns or ammunition. But we all know about governments don’t we. “To sin by slience, when one should protest makes cowards of men.” Thank you Mr. Lincoln.

Anonymous 09/15/2009 10:00am

What a waste of time. What a waste of money.

Moderated Comment

Anonymous 10/13/2009 5:15am

I am a koeran vet.I belive in the right to bear arms,any bill put to congress to do away with this,is a slap in the face to all the brave men who died on the battlefields to keep AMERICA-AMERICA.Are we going to let these men down?? did they die in vain??i pray not,i belive in AMERICA,wake up before its too late.thank you-GOD bless AMERICA.

Moderated Comment

Moderated Comment

Anonymous 09/07/2009 12:39pm

I am curious — how much does each “going nowhere” bill initiation cost in administration in the initiating Legislature’s office; in the Congressional administration office(s); in the respective committee/subcommittee administration office(s); etc etc. Since it seems that there are some 10,000 “going nowhere” bills, our elected officials are creating a lot of expense for no reason. Does the Congressional Budget Office know the cost of these “going nowhere” bills? Makes a person want to start over with our Legislative bodies.

Moderated Comment

Anonymous 10/06/2009 8:05pm
in reply to Anonymous Aug 25, 2009 4:08pm

Your opinion of what is constitutional needs a bit of work. Do you have a degree in Constitutional Law? Did the people who introduced legislation to have 3/5ths of a human provision stricken from the constitution act unpatriotically? The second amendment says we have the right to a well ordered militia and to bear arms accordingly Our right to bear arms outside of the militia was introduced as legislation by….could it be …unpatriotic americans?

jesnon 01/06/2012 10:01am

Hey, I think your blog is good! I really enjoyed reading this great website. I think I will come back one day.
Canon 5d vs 7d

chaory39 01/30/2012 6:08am

I was looking for some clear explanation of what was probably going to happen with this. Thanks.
construction barrie

Spam Comment

Anonymous 09/13/2009 7:20am
Link Reply
+ -1

Politicians – real quick – exempt from the health care they want us to have, exempt from gun laws, exempt from Social Securtiy, anymore? Oh forgot, exempt from real work (former Sen. Kennedy and others)

Anonymous 09/15/2009 3:52pm
Link Reply
+ -1

As a Patriot we need to take back our Government and stop these morons who have no moral fiber in their beings. If you don’t see it then let me spell it out for you. No Democracy aka “Representative Republic” has ever survived. These are facts! If we want our Republic to survive another 250- 500 years we need to act now. That means using the government system we have to impeach, recall, and try “trials” for treason/sedition those who disregard our Constitutional laws. We have tons of laws that do nothing but extort our freedoms and our wealth; what little some of us have and its time we take back something that belongs to us “We the People!”. Perhaps its sensible to have States seceding like Texas, Montana, Kansas, and Tennessee and a rebellion and/or revolution is well past its time.

Col Gadsden
Patriot
USA


OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.