OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

New Cybersecurity Bill

August 28, 2009 - by Donny Shaw

After his first cybersecurity bill, S. 773, introduced earlier this session of Congress was widely panned as a broad power-grab of the internet for the federal government, Sen. Jay Rockefeller [D, WV] is back with a revised version of the bill. Declan McCullagh of CNET got his hands on a copy of the revised bill and, well, it doesn’t sound much better than the original:

The new version would allow the president to “declare a cybersecurity emergency” relating to “non-governmental” computer networks and do what’s necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for “cybersecurity professionals,” and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.

An excerpt (.pdf) of the revised bill has been published online so you can read the language for yourself.

The Obama Administration and the Senate are clearly looking to get this cybersecurity law update done this session of Congress. It’s going to be hard for them to get the public behind their proposals no matter how much tweaking and revising they do to this basic formulation of a bill. More than almost any other issue, people from across the political spectrum are skeptical of the government’s ability to involve itself smartly in issues involving the internet. The internet is a realm of opportunity and freedom, and people have the sense that it is that way because there is no overarching authority involved. Marc Ambiner writes: “The internet is to citizens today what guns were to civilian militias of the founding era – the trenchline against┬átyranny.”

The benefits of strong cybersecurity laws is not immediately obvious to most people. How will Obama and Congress win this one when they have so much trouble passing bills increasing government involvement when the benefits are so obvious, like healthcare and climate change?

Note the level of support for Rockefeller’s original cybersecurity bill among OpenCongres users – only 3 percent; 408 opposed, 13 in favor.

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.


  • Anonymous 08/29/2009 10:04am

    “How will Obama and Congress win this one when they have so much trouble passing bills increasing government involvement when the benefits are so obvious, like healthcare and climate change?”
    I thought this was a bipartisan website? This statement is definitely ideological. The health care and climate change bills are only beneficial if you agree with a large, ever powerful, all providing government.

  • oderintdummetuant 09/01/2009 1:22pm

    Previous poster, see the blog author. Donny Shaw has proven himself to be so far left he actually twirls about himself. Keep reading his post every now and then he does something non-partisan but best guess is its either when he’s tired or just not paying attention.

  • Anonymous 09/02/2009 7:39am

    The “shut down” aspects of this bill, to say nothing of many other aspects, are a practical impossibility. The Internet and the connectivity to it are based on the largest form of technology anarchy the world has ever seen. If the Pres. issued a shut down order for any segment of the Internet, large or small, for any reason whatsoever, it would be unenforceable simply because the Internet was designed and effectively operates today as a self-healing alternate routing utility. If I loose my office LAN connectivity, I simply boot up my wireless. If ATT were declared a terrorist organization and ordered off the air, the automatic peering and route switching of the backbone would render the effect almost negligible. China can enforce such controls because China Telecom owns all copper, fiber and infrastructure equipment. The US gov. owns only its own LANs and defense backbones. All the rest is widely distributed across private industry. Rockefeller needs better advice.

Due to the archiving of this blog, comment posting has been disabled.