OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

Key Democrat in Health Care Talks Receives Most Health Industry Contributions in 2009

September 2, 2009 - by Paul Blumenthal

As the summer of the Democrats’ discontent winds to a close, the head count for health care reform in the Senate begins in earnest. One of the key Democratic senators on the fence is Sen. Blanche Lincoln, a member of the Senate Finance Committee and one of the most vulnerable Democrats in the 2010 election. Lincoln jumped into the news today with a quote to a reporter stating her opposition to a public option plan in a health care reform bill. “I would not support a solely government-funded public option. We can’t afford that,” Lincoln said. The senior Arkansas senator is also the top recipient of campaign contributions from the health industry among senators this year.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Lincoln has received $325,350 in contributions from the health industry, as of June 30. The large amount in contributions underlies a constantly shifting position by the senator on health care reform.

One of Lincoln’s biggest contributors this cycle is the insurance giant Blue Cross Blue Shield. The company’s political action committee and employees have combined to give the senator $29,500 this year alone. Blue Cross Blue Shield and their parent company Wellpoint are vocal opponents of the inclusion of a public option plan in any health care reform bill. Blue Cross Blue Shield is the dominant insurer in Arkansas holding a 75 percent market share.

Blue Cross Blue Shield does not need to only rely on campaign contributions to reach Sen. Lincoln, as they retain Lincoln’s former top health care policy adviser as a lobbyist. Elizabeth Barnett worked for Lincoln from 2000 to 2007 before leaving to become the top Democratic lobbyist for Blue Cross Blue Shield. Earlier this year, Barnett left Blue Cross to work for Avenue Solutions, where she retains Blue Cross Blue Shield as a client. Avenue Solutions’ profile of Barnett notes that she “had primary responsibility for representing [Blue Cross Blue Shield] and its 39 member plans before the Senate Finance Committee, Senate Democratic Leadership, and other key Senate committees and offices.” Barnett also represents other health industry organizations including UnitedHealth Group, Aetna, Bravo Health, Healthcare Leadership Council, Medco and the National Health Policy Group.

Barnett is not the only former Lincoln staffer working as a lobbyist for the health industry. Lincoln’s former chief of staff Kelly Bingel is a lobbyist specializing in health care at Mehlman Vogel Castagnetti Inc, the lobbying firm of Sen. Max Baucus’ former chief of staff David Castagnetti. Bingel represents a who’s who of the health care industry including America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) and Pharmaceutical Researchers & Manufacturers of America (PhRMA). AHIP and PhRMA have been largely supportive of health care reform this year. PhRMA, in particular, has supported the current legislation with positive advertising after receiving concessions from the White House and the Senate Finance Committee. Bingel also represents the Business Roundtable, a group that has voiced opposition to health care reform.

Throughout this year, Lincoln has benefited from countless fundraisers thrown by lobbyists. The Party Time database lists one fundraiser thrown by health care lobbyists for Lincoln. On July 24, Ernst & Young feted Lincoln with a fundraiser hosted by health care lobbyists Nick Giordano (formerly of Sen. Baucus’ staff), Dick Meltzer (since moved on to Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s staff), LaBrenda Garrett-Nelson, Holly Bode, Francis Grab, Dave Koshgarian and Jeff Petrich. Contributions from this fundraiser will not be publicly available until the third quarter finance reports are filed.

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.
 

Comments

Anonymous 09/02/2009 12:05pm

I want you to vote for the Healthcare reform bill.

reginajackson 09/03/2009 1:55pm

She is exactly the reason that “government for the the people,” does not work. Until and unless we get money out of politics, the well heeled (corporations) will control our government to benefits themselves with help from legislators like her.

oderintdummetuant 09/02/2009 6:03pm

I don’t want you to vote for H.R. 3200 with a public option.

OneVote 09/03/2009 6:08am

Health care reform is needed, and the answer is simple: cover those who have NO health Insurance. Remove the public option (it is Not needed). Make the bill simple, so that a senior high student can comprehend it easily, without any hidden agenda.
Health reform is necessary. However, HR3200 has yet to be read by the very people that we have elected to represent us. They have delegated the reading and comprehension to their staffers. What saddens me the most: through reconciliation this will be FORCED upon the American people and the American Taxpayer (businesses, private, and yes, anyone who keeps their insurance …. read the bill).
Senate and Congress: read what you Vote on yourself. If you are unable to comprehend what is in the Bill, discuss, dialog, work it out, but do NOT force upon us (your neighbors, your cousins, your parents, and all other Americans) the very health care that you yourself are immune from receiving.

dml341 09/06/2009 10:14am
in reply to reginajackson Sep 03, 2009 1:55pm

There is opportunity for compromise. If everyone wants competition (in order to reduce costs), let insurers compete across state lines. Currently, only public options (Medicare as well as proposed options) can function across state lines. Allowing public plans to compete nationally but not private options is NOT a level playing field.

Creating new options for individuals to purchase their own insurance eliminates the dependance on employers. Then people can accept a job because it is consistent with their interests and skill rather than the health insurance plan.

Allowing individuals to purchase their own plan would also provide important information and incentives for individuals to take charge of their own health. Losing weight, not smoking, etc. would result in lower premiums.

No program – public or private – can care for an individual who makes unhealthy choices for themselves or their children.

Anonymous 10/14/2009 7:33am

The woman should be drawn and quartered,

Anonymous 10/02/2009 9:17am

We need the public option, otherwise average citizen’s will once again have no voice. Without the public option we will be in the hands of greedy insurance companies. Why do you think greedy Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats are being paid so much money to oppose the public option? If healthcare is going to be reformed I would rather have a choice in healthcare then no choice at all. That is what capitalism is really about, not letting insurance companies tell us weather or not we are insurable candidates. Americans should all be insurable, no matter what your health situation may be.

Due to the archiving of this blog, comment posting has been disabled.