OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

Should Congress Go Paperless?

March 8, 2010 - by Donny Shaw

Rep. Chris Lee [R, NY-26] and the 39 bipartisan co-sponsors of his recently introduced STOP the OverPrinting Act” think so.

Currently, when a bill is introduced into Congress, the Government Printing Office (GPO) automatically prints five copies of the entire text for the office of each co-sponsor. That means that for H.R. 3962, the House’s health care bill, which is 2,070 pages long and has 7 total sponsors, the GPO printed out a total of 72,450 pages. That’s 151 reams.

The STOP the Overprinting Act would only allow bills to be printed by the GPO if they are specifically requested by a member of Congress or a committee. According to Lee, “the Congressional Research Service estimates the potential cost savings of Lee’s legislation would be upwards of $2.2 million in 2010 alone.” Every bill is already made available to members of Congress and the public on the internet. Sites like OpenCongress, Thomas and GovTrack post them, as does the GPO itself through their GPO Access website. For lawmakers who find paper copies of bills easier to read and digest, Lee’s bill would accommodate them.

Presumably, since this isn’t law yet, 5 copies of the STOP the OverPrinting Act” were printed up by the GPO and distributed to each of its 40 sponsors. But it’s a short bill — only 3 pages long — so it only amounted to 600 pages, or one and a quarter reams.

Image used under CC license from pawpaw67.

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.
 

Comments

  • justamick 03/08/2010 11:53am

    Yes, 100%. If the government is willing to crack down on Fraud Waste and Abuse, then they MUST do this. 5 Copies per co-sponsor is nothing short of waste at it’s worst.

  • theplaz 03/08/2010 1:20pm

    Absolutely. They need Kindles which fetch the latest info off the web instantly. If they want a printed copy then than print on on their office laser printer. In fact the whole GPO should be renamed the Government Publishing Office or dissolved and turned over to the individual entities. For example there is no reason that THOMAS does not have the bill in PDF and instead tells you that they are forwarding to the GPO. It’s really annoying – especially because they are telling you. That forwarding law is good for privately owned sites, but should not be required for government owned sites.

  • Spam Comment

  • jolenealbert63e 01/09/2012 1:57pm

    It is important that our government search for ways to avoid waste. Thank you for an interesting perspective.
    Aquaristik


OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.