Blog - Pence Bill Would Strip Fed of "Maximum Employment" Mandate

Way. To. Go. Pence!

I don’t think Bernanke and the rest of the Board of Governors would operate any differently pre or post HR 6406. If Congress isn’t allowed to fully audit the Federal Reserve it doesn’t know what the fed has done in the past and is unlikely to have any oversight influence in the future.

HR 1207, S 604 – Audit the Fed.

Let’s see if I can understand this one. The republicans block EVERY SINGLE Bill that the democrats put forward to create jobs. It worked! The republican will control the house.

So the only option left is to buy billions of dollars worth of treasury’s to try and instill confidence in the market so banks will start lending again and employers hiring.

What options do they have left if they can not legislate because they can not get any bills through to help small business.

They will jump start this economy one way or the other. They would not had to do this if there legislation had gone forward and started creating jobs.
It probably wont work anyway.

Here’s a great article on the Fed QEII

http://moneymorning.com/2010/11/19/federal-reserves-quantitative-easing-strategy-save-the-us-economy/

CR

Extending unemployment does not create jobs. It encourages fiscal irresponsibility and pays people to not work.

“pays people to not work” tell that to the middle class families trying to find work from the people at the top, who have enjoyed the Bush Tax credits these last few years and, who have not been using their extra cash to hire.

I AM from a middle class family. I grew up with my dad working his butt off. Not only that, he doesn’t have to work for “the people at the top.” He works for himself which is much harder. Businesses don’t hire people because they have spare money; they hire people because it is cost effective. If tax rates are too high or the revenue stream isn’t there, they are not going to hire new people. Take a legit economics class some time.

Almost all people in America have fond memories of growing up with their families working hard to support them… this is just as true for the child of a minimum-wage custodian as it is for the child of a ‘tortured’ small business owner. The argument that people are unemployed because they are fiscally irresponsible or lazy is baseless, and it always has been.

The point of unemployment insurance has NEVER been to create jobs; its purpose is to lessen temporary economic shocks to laid off workers, their families, and the economy as a whole. There are currently over 5 people seeking work in this country for every open job- what would your ‘legit economics class’ say about what happens to the weak economy if the other 80% of the people on unemployment simply drop out of the economy and stop spending altogether?

One less thing the Fed Reserve can get their dirty little banker hands on is a good thing indeed. Yet, what ever happened to lowering taxes so the poor can keep more of their money?

What ever happened to lowering taxes so the poor can keep more of their money? It’s getting the middle finger from the ususal Republican suspects on the floor of the House.

As “ususal”, I wish we could correct our posts here.

Really a educative and informative post, the post is good in all regards,I am glad to read this post.

http://www.cellhub.com/t-mobile-cell-phones/blackberry-9780-bold-black.html

Economics ( also known as the “dismal science”) traditionally holds that growth is good, but too much growth is not good. Job growth is good, but too much job growth is not. In 1978 the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act instructed the Fed to seek stable prices to fight inflation and maximize sustainable growth for the economy, while also seeking to maximize employment. Until the economic boom of the mid-1990s, economic orthodoxy said that the unemployment rate could not fall below 6 percent without provoking dangerous levels of inflation. In the classic economic textbook view, a certain amount of unemployment is necessary, even desirable, because it limits rising labor costs. Well Elvis has left the building, so what is “sustainable” growth, and what`s " maximum" employment ? That`s a question the republicans seem to dodge on capital hill. And so that I`me not misunderstood the president could always invoke executive privilege, instead of blaming congress, it`s an old trick.

When are we going to wake up and audit the Fed? [I’d love to see who is jailed after an audit!] Nationalize the Fed and many problems will disappear…

This is really cool story as well i like it which is belongs to Maximum Employment.

http://www.bizeso.com/Kapil
http://blognation.co.za/members/garybransonhere/
http://sangita12.hubpages.com/hub/BeCarefulWhileLookingforInvestors
http://sangita12.hubpages.com/hub/Clever-Advertising
http://www.articlesengine.com/Article/World-s-Biggest-Business—Entertainment—-Social-Networking-Site-/873919/1#.Tn4z1kufakU.facebook
http://www.gleeforum.com/garybransonhere-m42963.html
http://www.twistarticle.com/32189/368/Need-For-a-Common-Platform-for-Business-Professional-Career-and-Social-Networking.html