OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

The Alternate Engine That Just Won't Die

May 5, 2011 - by Donny Shaw

For years, both parties in Congress insisted on funding the $500-million-per-year F-35 alternative engine program that nobody besides the defense contractors that benefit from it seem to want, not even the Pentagon. Then, earlier this year, against the wishes of Speaker Rep. John Boehner [R, OH-8], a bipartisan coalition of Democrats and freshman Republicans won an amendment to the 2011 spending bill to cut funding for the program. But now that appropriators have begun working on spending bills for 2012, they’re trying to secure funds for the program once again.

Ryan Grim at HuffPo reports:

The House Armed Services Committee released its spending outlines for the coming fiscal year Tuesday, and the second engine is right back in.

The budget for the Air and Land Forces Subcommittee, chaired by Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-Md.), includes language that bars funding for engine unless “two options for such propulsion system are obligated or expended.”

“The fat lady hasn’t sung yet,” Lisa Wright, a spokeswoman for Bartlett, told HuffPost. […]

The alternate engine will also appear in HASC Chairman Buck McKeon’s (R-Calif.) official budget, Wright said.

The nearly-$600-billion-per-year Defense budget is one of the only areas of discretionary spending that Republicans are planning to increase in 2012, so I suppose that if there’s money to waste anywhere, it’s here.

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.
 

Comments

  • rosegray 05/06/2011 2:57am

    I’m almost sure that Dawkins has noticed (and even commented on it in at least ….. design their buildings and engine compartments with lots of space around, ….. stuff out of wood won’t have anything that lasts long enough to notice. …

  • bluecollarjohn 05/06/2011 12:46pm

    Pursuing new technologies is always an area where government and business can waste a lot of money. The question is what kind of promise does this engine have for future use and how will it impact national security? Since national security is the primary role of government, this is not an area I feel comfortable skimping on.

Due to the archiving of this blog, comment posting has been disabled.