OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

Food Safety Overhaul Faces Defunding

May 31, 2011 - by Donny Shaw

Last session, one of the few truly bipartisan things Congress accomplished was enacting new food safety legislation, designed to increase the Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory authority over the food chain in order to prevent food-borne illness outbreaks. It passed 73-25 in the Senate and 283-142 in the House. But under the House Republicans’ proposed budget, the FDA would not receive the extra money authorized by Congress last year to start implementing the new food safety law. In fact, they would see their budget cut below current operating levels.

WaPo today:

To carry out the new law, President Obama is seeking $955 million for food safety at the FDA in the fiscal year that starts Oct. 1.

Last week, the House Appropriations subcommittee that oversees the FDA pared back that amount to $750 million, which is $87 million less than the figure the agency is currently receiving for food safety. […]

Food safety advocates said that without additional money — let alone the current funding FDA receives — the agency will not be able to meet many requirements of the new law, including increased inspections of food manufacturing plants, better coordination with state health departments, and developing the capacity to more quickly respond to food-borne illnesses and minimize their impact.

The proposed budget cuts would also hinder the FDA’s ability to increase scrutiny of imported foods, according to food safety advocates. The new law requires the FDA to create a system of third-party certifiers to ensure that food coming into the United States meets the same safety standards as food produced domestically. Without additional funding, the FDA cannot create that system, said Erik Olson, director of food and consumer product safety programs at the Pew Health Group, part of a coalition of public health advocates and food makers. […]

“These cuts could seriously harm our ability to protect the food supply,” said Olson, who is hoping the money will be restored by the Senate, which has not proposed its spending plan.

The House Ag Appropriations Subcommittee is holding a mark-up of the bill this evening. Chairman Rep. Jack Kingston [R, GA-1] is calling the cuts the beginning of “making some of the tough choices necessary to right the ship.” Very true. As the military budget continues to rise year after year and the effective tax rates for both corporations and individual remain historically low, the tough choices are clearly leaning in the direction of cuts to social services and public safety programs.

It’s just about salmonella season. Eat with caution.

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.


prakasharige 02/06/2013 3:10am

I agree with Food safety advocates opinion. The budget cuts will have adverse effect on FDA. FDA need to have additional funds to meet the requirements of the new law.
City Express

paulfulton 11/16/2011 6:50am

Just by reading this article, you will learn a lot about congress. Thanks for sharing. kill candida

pjlatombo 11/14/2011 7:28am

I appreciate your speculation as it attracts more people to discuss. wheat intolerance

Spam Comment

AnnieJames 06/04/2011 6:56am

We still have a food supply that’s 99.99 percent safe … No one wants anybody to get sick, and we should always strive to make sure food is safe. But the case for a $1.4 billion expenditure isn’t there.We have the basic structure here, but what it looks like in the end depends on the attitude of the congressional funders and how vigorously the agency chooses to implement it.A bill that’s signed by the president is an unfinished clay pot.Annie

pjmerc 05/31/2011 5:46pm

Good! The FDA needs to have some overhaul or something to keep it from being in the pockets of big ag and the corporate food industry.
They have their priorities all screwed up. They can track a sick cow to the place it was born, but they allow legal drugs on the market whose side affects include things like death!
The huge “entitlement” to the FDA also allowed them to raid more small farms because it and the USDA don’t like people actually thinking that they can eat or drink raw food items that are nutrient dense….and really good for them. They also don’t believe that people’s food choices are a “right”.
Maybe the fact that the FDA and the USDA got slapped at a bit for accepting Monsanto’s studies stating that genetically modified seeds don’t do any harm, without outside research, woke some people up. Really, would you accept a product or allow it to be produced based solely on studies done by the manufacturer, without outside independent studies?

Due to the archiving of this blog, comment posting has been disabled.