OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

Frank and His Wall Street Buds

June 13, 2011 - by Donny Shaw

Given how extreme the failure of Wall Street was that caused the 2008 crisis, the financial reform bill passed by Congress last year, Dodd-Frank, is pretty weak tea. It’s riddled with giant loopholes, defers many of the biggest decisions to the same regulatory agencies who failed us in the first place, and, most significantly, allows the banks that needed a $4.6 trillion bailout because they were “too big to fail” to become even bigger. Dodd-Frank was largely an exercise in passing a bill for the sake of appearing to have done something. Unfortunately, Congress seem to have fooled a lot of people out there, especially those who work for popular newspapers, into believing that they have fixed the problems.

Case in point. The New York Times’ Deal Book blog reported last week on a several-thousand-dollar-per-ticket Wall Street fundraiser held by Rep. Barney Frank [D, MA-4], after whom the financial reform bill is partially named, with guests from Chase, Goldman Sachs, and others. The reporter calls the bankers in attendance Frank’s “longtime foes,” noting that Frank recently authored a “sweeping crackdown on the financial industry.” However, the legislative and campaign-finance records suggest that Frank and Wall Street are in state of symbiosis, with bankers providing a majority of the funds for Franks’ biennial campaigns, and Frank suppressing anti-Wall Street sentiment in Congress and funneling it into mild legislation. Corporations and special interest groups don’t give their foes in Congress money for their re-election campaigns. This should be plainly obvious. But the fact that Frank has his name on the legislative response to the financial crisis seems to be making the NYT reporter assume there must be something contentious happening when Frank and Wall Street folks meet up. If only…

Fact is, Wall Street has invested heavily in Frank over the years, likely because they know that if a different Democrat ever took over the chairmanship of the House Financial Services Committee they would almost certainly face much more of a threat. Bill Allison at the Sunlight Foundation, who brought my attention to the NYT post in the first place, goes over the extent to which Frank’s congressional career has been funded by Wall Street:

Frank’s “longtime foes” are among the top donors to his campaigns over the years—among industries, Securities and Investments Houses, Real Estate, Insurance and Commercial Bankers rank one, two, three and five, respectively (lawyers and lobbyists come in at number four). Among individual firms, Frank foes in his top twenty career donors include the likes of FMR Corp., J.P. Morgan Chase and Co., Bank of America and State Street Corp. And the sponsor—one of the most vocal advocates on Dodd-Frank, is also among Frank’s most generous career supporters. (Huge thanks to the Center for Responsive Politics for these numbers.)

Frank voted in favor of TARP and has continued to support the status quo on Wall Street ever since. His recent fundraiser on Wall Street was not some sort of awkward meeting between foes as the NYT would have you believe; it was just the latest installment in a long history of tightening between a for-profit industry and the politician with power of setting the rules.

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.
 

Comments

  • mr_share 06/13/2011 9:59am

    thank share http://68share.com/

  • Naame 06/13/2011 11:35am

    There are 2 things to take away from both the loopholes and Frank’s history of donors:

    1. The loopholes do need to be understood and plugged up. In general, what the Dodd Frank legislation needs is not reform as much as it needs an amendment that adds teeth to the current legislation. Enforcement is lacking big time. What they are trying to enforce is not the problem. This means that amending Dodd Frank by removing or replacing sections (or getting rid of it entirely) is wasteful. Adding enforcement provisions will help a lot though.

    2. Frank’s donors are a good reason to be more detail focused and critical of his legislation, but such is true about most politicians. Identifying these loopholes is what is needed. We as voters now need to threaten the job security our representatives if they do not add teeth to Dodd Frank.

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • monique27a 10/17/2011 11:57am

    This was really such a very interesting and helpful article its crazy. This was really very special and fun to me. Yukos

Due to the archiving of this blog, comment posting has been disabled.