OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

Senators Say DOJ is Lying About the PATRIOT Act

September 22, 2011 - by Donny Shaw

It’s always nice to see members of Congress challenging secrecy, lies, and privacy violations from the executive branch. As Charlie Savage reports at the New York Times, Democratic Senators Ron Wyden [OR] and Mark Udall [CO] wrote to Attorney General Eric Holder yesterday accusing him of using secret legal opinions to miselad the public on how the PATRIOT Act is really being used.

Mr. Wyden and Mr. Udall have for months been raising concerns that the government has secretly interpreted a part of the Patriot Act in a way that they portray as twisted, allowing the Federal Bureau of Investigation to conduct some kind of unspecified domestic surveillance that they say does not dovetail with a plain reading of the statute.

The dispute has focused on Section 215 of the Patriot Act. It allows a secret national security court to issue an order allowing the F.B.I. to obtain “any tangible things” in connection with a national security investigation. It is sometimes referred to as the “business records” section because public discussion around it has centered on using it to obtain customer information like hotel or credit card records.

But in addition to that kind of collection, the senators contend that the government has also interpreted the provision, based on rulings by the secret national security court, as allowing some other kind of activity that allows the government to obtain private information about people who have no link to a terrorism or espionage case.

This “other kind of activity” likely involves geolocation monitoring using data from people’s cell phones. As Julian Sanchez describes in the excellent post at Cato@Libery, all the evidence points to the existence of a secretive and massive geolocation datamining program that includes suspected terrorists, people they may communicate with, people those people may communicate with, and so on down the line. Such a program woud require the government to have access to private information involving millions of innocent civilians.

Unfortunately, the PATRIOT Act was reauthorized by Congress this summer until June of 2015 with no reforms. Sen. Wyden has introduced standalone legislation, the GPS Act, to require a specific court order for the government to obtain geolocation tracking data on an individual under the PATRIOT Act and any other program, but so far the bill has not attracted any co-sponsors.

Meanwhile, Congress is advancing new legislation that could give the government access to more private information about innocent civilians. The Protecting Children from Internet Pornographers Act, which has been approved by the Judiciary Committee, would require all internet service providers to retain customer records and hand them over to law enforcement agents for any purpose. Just like how the PATRIOT Act is not used exclusively, or even primarily, for going after terrorism, the Protecting Children from Internet Pornographers Act would not be used only for catching child pornographers. When ow of the bill’s primary co-sponsors, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz [D, FL-20], was asked by NPR whether she would add language to the bill to limit it to just child pronography cases, she responded, “um, no.”

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.
 

Comments

  • ssari30 09/22/2011 2:28pm

    It’s okay to help out other countries with money we don’t have. But yet Congress is refusing to help out it’s own people? I don’t care what anyone says, if they just implicated the 99ers into the last unemployment extension or create some real jobs. Then we wouldn’t be in this mess in the first place.

  • Moderated Comment

  • Comm_reply
    Gabitza 12/09/2011 8:18am

    The PATRIOT Act was reauthorized by Congress this summer until June of 2015 with no reforms.
    Free Jailbreak

  • Comm_reply
    MikeLee 02/24/2012 1:27am

    Your comment really makes some sense. If the congress would really take some constructive measures to help us unemployed people in finding new jobs or attending some skills training classes, just take the operation of wood pellet mill. People that lose their job can regain a well-off life sooner.

  • sandcastles 09/22/2011 4:17pm

    Too bad they both voted for it – twice this year.

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2011-19

    http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=1&vote=00075

    For months, maybe even before they voted the second time for it, I keep seeing this story pop up on the web, and they get good publicity for coming out against the privacy invasions they voted for. Makes me sick.

  • Comm_reply
    donnyshaw 09/22/2011 11:50pm

    Should be noted that they did both vote against the 4-year extension that is currently in effect.

  • Comm_reply
    troy34 11/24/2012 2:05pm

    For months, maybe even before they voted the second time for it, I keep seeing this story pop up on the web, even try internet faster sites, and they get good publicity for coming out against the privacy invasions they voted for. Makes me sick.

  • Spam Comment

Due to the archiving of this blog, comment posting has been disabled.