OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

Stop Wall Street From Occupying Congress

November 10, 2011 - by Donny Shaw

It’s no coincidence that over the past few years we’ve experienced the largest and most sustained activations of grassroots political protest that this country has seen in decades. We’re beginning to rebel against a political system that tries to placate us while the government and corporations collude to secure extraordinary powers for themselves.

Our democracy is broken. Congress’ approval rating is at a record low, and the leadership structure in Washington D.C. is designed to protect the status quo while preventing those who want real reform from gaining power. 

That’s why Occupy Wall Street and PPF take to the streets, and it’s why we must capitalize on this moment of power to attack the root cause of our broken democracy — the corrupting influence of money in politics. The Participatory Politics Foundation and OpenCongress.org support the Occupy Wall Street movement and its momentous protests against a political system compromised by powerful corporations.

One first step is cleaning up elections, and there exists a way to do that: the Fair Elections Now Act (H.R. 1404 in the House, S. 750 in the Senate). The bill already has some support from members of Congress, but we need them to fight harder, and we need more co-sponsors of this basic reform.

The Fair Elections Now Act would allow candidates for the Hose and Senate to run for office without having to raise money from lobbyists, corporate bundlers, and wealthy donors. Instead, candidates would qualify for public matching funds if they raise a substantial number of small donations.

Under the Fair Elections system, candidates would raise a large number of small-donor contributions in order to receive additional public funding — $900,000 split 40/60 between the primary and general elections. Fair-Elections candidates would be eligible for additional public funds — five dollars for every 1 dollar raised — if they continue to raise more small donations, so there is a strong incentive for candidates to continually reach out to as many people as possible. Donations would be capped at $100, so there would be no incentive for candidates to focus their campaigns on a select group of wealthy donors and moneyed interests. The best value for candidates would be in connecting with as many people in the community as possible.

The system would be funded through a small fee on government contractors and through an auction of unused broadcast spectrum.

If you agree with PPF that the first step to restoring our democracy is reforming the election financing process, please take a minute to use our new, dirt-simple Contact-Congress platform to tell your lawmakers to co-sponsor the Fair Elections Now Act. And if they are already co-sponsoring the bill, thank them and urge them to do more to get it passed.

Click here to support Fair Elections Now

After you’ve contacted Congress, share this message with your social networks to help get more people to take up the fight against corporate ownership of Congress (Facebook and Twitter). Then go out and find a rally, protest or occupation you support and join that too.

The people at large have a rare opportunity right now to come together around a fundamental restructuring of who has power in our democracy. Let’s not squander this moment.

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.
 

Comments

  • drm 11/10/2011 12:35pm

    OpenCongress Staff

    The Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501c3 non-profit, is proud to be listed as a “supporting organization”:
    http://fairelectionsnow.org/supporters on FairElectionsNow.org – which also includes details of how the bill would work and a long list of its many diverse supporting organizations.

    This bill’s current status is that it was referred to the House Administration Committee, which is chaired by Rep. Dan Lungren [R, CA-03], full membership here. Contact these reps using OC and encourage them to take up h.r. 1404 — and be certain in your letters to reference the money trail behind the bill.

  • CurtisNeeley 11/10/2011 1:14pm

    Why can’t I contact Congress through OC except the members based on my address? Congress of United States no longer represents the people and United States Courts no longer represent most people due to age.

    There should be an upper age for Supreme Court Justices just as there is a minimum age for citizen’s to vote. I suggest 70 years or five years after Social Security retirement age.

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • itiswhatitisnt 02/12/2012 8:09pm

    Thank you for the website. I enjoyed the information and the comments of your visitors.
    roofing contractor benicia

Due to the archiving of this blog, comment posting has been disabled.