Blog - Six GOP Co-Sponsors of PIPA Ask Reid to Cancel Vote 
OpenCongress Blog
Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds
Six GOP Co-Sponsors of PIPA Ask Reid to Cancel Vote
January 13, 2012 - by Donny ShawIn an incredible turn of events, six Republican Senators have asked Majority Leader Harry Reid not to hold a vote on PIPA, the Senate version of SOPA.
They write, “Prior to committee action, some members expressed substantive concerns about the bill, and there was a commitment to resolve them prior to floor consideration. That resolution has not yet occurred.”
And as an amazing validation of the grassroots response to SOPA, led by groups like Fight for the Future, EFF, Public Knowledge, and Demand Progress, they write, “Since the mark-up, we have increasingly heard from a large number of constituents and other stakeholders with vocal concerns about possible unintended consequences of the proposed legislation, including breaches in cybersecurity, damaging the integrity of the Internet, costly and burdensome litigation, and dilution of First Amendment rights.”
Senators Charles Grassley, Orrin Hatch, Jeff Sessions, John Cornyn, Mike Lee, and Tom Coburn signed the letter.
Here’s the text of the letter. PDF is here.
January 13, 2012
Dear Majority Leader Reid:
We write to express our concerns with your decision to file cloture on the motion to proceed to the PROTECT IP Act (S, 968), We strongly believe that the theft of American intellectual property is a significant problem that must be addressed to protect property rights. However, for both substantive and procedural reasons, the process at this point is moving too quickly and this step may be premature.
As you know, on May 26. 2011. the Senate Judiciary- Committee favorably reported the bill by voice vote. Prior to committee action, some members expressed substantive concerns about the bill, and there was a commitment to resolve them prior to floor consideration. That resolution has not yet occurred.
Since the mark-up, we have increasingly heard from a large number of constituents and other stakeholders with vocal concerns about possible unintended consequences of the proposed legislation, including breaches in cybersecurity, damaging the integrity of the Internet, costly and burdensome litigation, and dilution of First Amendment rights. Moreover, in light of potential cybersecurity implications, we believe hearing from the Administration and relevant agencies is imperative, As always, our current fiscal crisis demands we carefully consider legislation that would cost taxpayers up to $48 million according to the Congressional Budget Office, These are serious issues that must be considered in an informed, deliberative and responsible manner. This underscores the need to resolve as many outstanding concerns as possible prior to proceeding to floor consideration.
Furthermore, we want to ensure that S. 968 will be afforded full and fair consideration on the Senate floor. It is important that the bill be fully debated and amendments not limited. We would like a firm commitment that once the Senate considers S. 968, the amendment process will be open, with senators being able to offer their amendments without the filling of the amendment tree, and that cloture will not be prematurely filed on the bin.
We are all in agreement that the online distribution and sale of pirated content and counterfeit goods impose a huge cost on the American economy in terms of lost jobs, lost sales, lost innovation and lost income. We also believe, however, that we need to arrive at the right solution in the right way on this important issue. To do so, we must have adequate time to properly analyze and resolve these concerns to the best extent possible prior to proceeding to the bill.
While we remain fully committed to addressing outstanding issues with S. 968, we believe that, at this point, the scheduled consideration of the bill on January 24, 2012, may not permit Oslo work through many of the concems that have been raised.
Sincerely,
Charles Grassley, Orrin Hatch, Jeff Sessions, John Cornyn, Mike Lee, Tom Coburn
UPDATE: And Sen. Ben Cardin [D, MD] adds his name to the list of co-sponsors walking back their support. Full up-to-date vote tally here.
UPDATE 2: Welcome, Reddit! We love you!
Get Blog Updates by Email
Want a simple way to stay on top of what's happening in Congress?
Subscribe to this blog!Send Us a Tip
-
I've been watching a lot of...
Submitted by Robert Schwartzman on Dec 9
-
Proposed Bill HR-2674 Prote...
Submitted by Mary on Jun 16
-
Amendment No. 601 to the Om...
Submitted by Winifred on Mar 3
You can submit a tip anonymously, or attributed to your own name and e-mail, whichever you prefer. Read more about submitting a tip.
Recent Posts
- Endless Blockade for the Senate ... January 25, 2013
- One Year Ago We Killed SOPA -- H... January 18, 2013
- Senate Democrats Looking to End ... January 08, 2013
- Welcome the 113th U.S. Congress:... January 03, 2013
- Secretive Conference Committee F... December 20, 2012
Archives
See All ArchivesBlogroll
- A plain blog about politics
- The Baseline Scenario
- Capital Eye
- The Caucus
- CBO Director's Blog
- Congress Matters
- The Corner
- CREW Blog
- Crooks and Liars
- Jamie Dupree
- Election Law Blog
- FDL News Desk
- Glenn Greenwald
- Hot Air
- Irregular Times
- Little Sis
- Naked Capitalism
- The Moderate Voice
- OMB Watch
- Open House Project
- Party Time
- Plum Line
- Political Animal
- Political Wire
- ProPublica
- Real Clear Politics
- RedState
- Secrecy News
- Sunlight Foundation Blog
- Talking Points Memo
- techPresident
- 2chambers
- Unanimous Consent
- The Weekly Standard
Sort By
Comments
Displaying 1-30 of 37 total comments.
It’s shake and bake, and I helped.
منتديات بلاك بيري youtube
Spam Comment
I don’t really care what they do with this one. If they leave the internet as is, I will continue to use it, if they restrict usage I will stop using it, cancel my ISP service and deprive the economy of that much more money. SIMPLE!
Which is exactly what they WANT you to do. Now you can go back to using Television for all of your information, with its 30% of air time as advertisements (42 min/60 min are the programming you want to see), and where your corporate masters control what is broadcast into your home.
Spam Comment
PIPA is justified and have a very valid point in asking usb floppy drive Reid to Cancel Vote , so in future their floppy to usb demands are meet quickly.
Spam Comment
“bobsweep reviews:”http://bobsweepreview.zoomblog.com/
Spam Comment
A majority of these Jordans For Cheap are priced approximately around $150; however, Air Jordan 12 Sale the actual price varies depending on the model Air Jordan 16 Sale, style, and size that one takes. Sometimes the price range also goes more expensive, but it just seems affordable for sports lovers who want to own their pair at any cost.
This is wonderful information. Please post more…
custom thesis | dissertation | Admission essay
What a good post… keep coming
custom essay | Admission essays
You got a really efficacious diary I have been here city for about an period. I am a newbie and your success is rattling overmuch an aspiration for me
birthday wishes
Spam Comment
This is WONDERFUL news!!!! I’m glad something was done about this ridiculous bill. Although, I imagine this will resurface sometime in the near future, it’s inevitable.
Charleston Wedding Photographers | Tri-Cities Wedding Photographers
Spam Comment
Some States have also enacted a voluntary program to pay up to 7 additional weeks (20 weeks maximum) of Extended Benefits during periods of extremely high unemployment. Since June 2008, when Congress first created the Emergency Unemployment Compensation program, nearly 18 million Americans have at some point received federally funded extended unemployment benefits.kral oyun araba oyunları friv
Personally, I wonder how issues like this will be handled moving into the elections this fall. I like many, think the SOPA bill threatens freedom of speech, although I can understand why companies are pushing the issue ( money).
Dee in Texas
Spam Comment
Spam Comment
Spam Comment
Spam Comment
Spam Comment
Spam Comment
Spam Comment
Spam Comment
Spam Comment
Spam Comment
Spam Comment