OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

Six GOP Co-Sponsors of PIPA Ask Reid to Cancel Vote

January 13, 2012 - by Donny Shaw

In an incredible turn of events, six Republican Senators have asked Majority Leader Harry Reid not to hold a vote on PIPA, the Senate version of SOPA.

They write, “Prior to committee action, some members expressed substantive concerns about the bill, and there was a commitment to resolve them prior to floor consideration. That resolution has not yet occurred.”

And as an amazing validation of the grassroots response to SOPA, led by groups like Fight for the Future, EFF, Public Knowledge, and Demand Progress, they write, “Since the mark-up, we have increasingly heard from a large number of constituents and other stakeholders with vocal concerns about possible unintended consequences of the proposed legislation, including breaches in cybersecurity, damaging the integrity of the Internet, costly and burdensome litigation, and dilution of First Amendment rights.”

Senators Charles Grassley, Orrin Hatch, Jeff Sessions, John Cornyn, Mike Lee, and Tom Coburn signed the letter.

Here’s the text of the letter. PDF is here.

January 13, 2012

Dear Majority Leader Reid:

We write to express our concerns with your decision to file cloture on the motion to proceed to the PROTECT IP Act (S, 968), We strongly believe that the theft of American intellectual property is a significant problem that must be addressed to protect property rights. However, for both substantive and procedural reasons, the process at this point is moving too quickly and this step may be premature.

As you know, on May 26. 2011. the Senate Judiciary- Committee favorably reported the bill by voice vote. Prior to committee action, some members expressed substantive concerns about the bill, and there was a commitment to resolve them prior to floor consideration. That resolution has not yet occurred.

Since the mark-up, we have increasingly heard from a large number of constituents and other stakeholders with vocal concerns about possible unintended consequences of the proposed legislation, including breaches in cybersecurity, damaging the integrity of the Internet, costly and burdensome litigation, and dilution of First Amendment rights. Moreover, in light of potential cybersecurity implications, we believe hearing from the Administration and relevant agencies is imperative, As always, our current fiscal crisis demands we carefully consider legislation that would cost taxpayers up to $48 million according to the Congressional Budget Office, These are serious issues that must be considered in an informed, deliberative and responsible manner. This underscores the need to resolve as many outstanding concerns as possible prior to proceeding to floor consideration.

Furthermore, we want to ensure that S. 968 will be afforded full and fair consideration on the Senate floor. It is important that the bill be fully debated and amendments not limited. We would like a firm commitment that once the Senate considers S. 968, the amendment process will be open, with senators being able to offer their amendments without the filling of the amendment tree, and that cloture will not be prematurely filed on the bin.

We are all in agreement that the online distribution and sale of pirated content and counterfeit goods impose a huge cost on the American economy in terms of lost jobs, lost sales, lost innovation and lost income. We also believe, however, that we need to arrive at the right solution in the right way on this important issue. To do so, we must have adequate time to properly analyze and resolve these concerns to the best extent possible prior to proceeding to the bill.

While we remain fully committed to addressing outstanding issues with S. 968, we believe that, at this point, the scheduled consideration of the bill on January 24, 2012, may not permit Oslo work through many of the concems that have been raised.

Sincerely,

Charles Grassley, Orrin Hatch, Jeff Sessions, John Cornyn, Mike Lee, Tom Coburn

UPDATE: And Sen. Ben Cardin [D, MD] adds his name to the list of co-sponsors walking back their support. Full up-to-date vote tally here.

UPDATE 2: Welcome, Reddit! We love you!

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.
 

Comments

Displaying 1-30 of 37 total comments.

  • Panthertron 01/13/2012 11:46pm

    It’s shake and bake, and I helped.

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • ACRScout 01/14/2012 8:55am

    I don’t really care what they do with this one. If they leave the internet as is, I will continue to use it, if they restrict usage I will stop using it, cancel my ISP service and deprive the economy of that much more money. SIMPLE!

  • Comm_reply
    jsimsnewchapter 01/16/2012 12:27pm

    Which is exactly what they WANT you to do. Now you can go back to using Television for all of your information, with its 30% of air time as advertisements (42 min/60 min are the programming you want to see), and where your corporate masters control what is broadcast into your home.

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • PhilipDean 03/21/2012 5:24pm

    This is WONDERFUL news!!!! I’m glad something was done about this ridiculous bill. Although, I imagine this will resurface sometime in the near future, it’s inevitable.

    Charleston Wedding Photographers | Tri-Cities Wedding Photographers

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • djb678 04/15/2012 2:13pm

    Personally, I wonder how issues like this will be handled moving into the elections this fall. I like many, think the SOPA bill threatens freedom of speech, although I can understand why companies are pushing the issue ( money).

    Dee in Texas

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • Spam Comment

  • thomasjames 04/27/2012 2:00pm

    This is a great story about the politics and i am very much happy to see the details that are presented about the voting process.
    Regards,
    senior life insurance

  • Spam Comment

  • thomasjames 04/28/2012 4:02am

    Politics is a bad game and there always some of the problems in making new bills and laws as it is not possible to pass them without the majority of the members.
    Regards,
    professional liability insurance cost

  • Spam Comment

  • jesswong 08/20/2012 2:29pm

    So glad something is being done about this ridiculous act. Wondering how these issues will resurface during the elections coming up.

    J

  • digall 09/10/2012 12:45am

    I’m grateful to see performers lastly with a speech in the gov’t. www.instantcashforme.com As a photography I have individuals try to grab my perform all enough some time to I cannot do anything about it when I capture them.

  • digall 09/10/2012 12:45am
    www.instantcashforme.comI’m grateful to see performers lastly with a speech in the gov’t. As a photography I have individuals try to grab my perform all enough some time to I cannot do anything about it when I capture them.

Due to the archiving of this blog, comment posting has been disabled.