OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

Banning Flavored Tobacco - Why Not Menthol?

May 20, 2008 - by Donny Shaw

The New York Times ran an excellent article about a monumental bill to regulate the tobacco industry that Congress is set to consider:

>Some public health experts are questioning why menthol, the most widely used cigarette flavoring and the most popular cigarette choice of African-American smokers, is receiving special protection as Congress tries to regulate tobacco for the first time.
>
>The legislation, which would give the Food and Drug Administration the power to oversee tobacco products, would try to reduce smoking’s allure to young people by banning most flavored cigarettes, including clove and cinnamon.
>
>But those new strictures would exempt menthol — even though menthol masks the harsh taste of cigarettes for beginners and may make it harder for the addicted to kick the smoking habit. For years, public health authorities have worried that menthol might be a factor in high cancer rates in African-Americans.
>
>[…]
>
>“My recollection is that we were able to eliminate the use of flavored cigarettes, strawberry, mocha, and all this stuff that is clearly targeted at young kids and to start them smoking tobacco,” Mike DeWine, the former Ohio senator who helped arrange a series of negotiations between Philip Morris and an influential antismoking group, the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said in a recent telephone interview. “Where the compromise was made as I recall was on menthol,” Mr. DeWine said.

A former official from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is quoted in the article as saying, “I think we can say definitively that menthol induces smoking in the African-American community and subsequently serves as a direct link to African-American death and disease.” The evidence seems strong – though Phillip Morris scientists have published a scientific review seeking to counter it.

This strikes me as the kind of policy decision that Lawrence Lessig has been talking about in his work on corruption. Banning menthol along with the other flavors seems like an easy question – just like the the flavors, menthol cigarettes mask the harshness of tobacco and constitute a serious public health risk – but, because of the enormous influence of corporate interest and money, Congress may get the question wrong. The tobacco lobby is notoriously influential, and Phillip Morris’ parent company, the Altria Group, is by far the largest contributor to members of Congress’ political campaigns.

And the fact that Phillip Morris is willing to accept some regulation isn’t surprising if you look at what the’yre getting out of the deal. The paragraphs below suggest that they have brokered a bill that allows their menthol cigarettes to stay on their course of becoming the country’s leading brand and protects their position as the industry leader for regular flavored cigarettes:

>A tobacco company spokesman, Brendan J. McCormick, said menthol was “an ingredient and a flavor preference that is widely preferred by more than a quarter of adult smokers out there, and it’s got a long history of use.”
>
>Mr. McCormick works for the Altria Group, the parent company of Philip Morris USA, whose Marlboro Menthol is the second-largest menthol brand in this country and also the fastest growing.
>
>Its support of the tobacco legislation has put Philip Morris at odds with other cigarette companies, which generally oppose regulation. As the American industry’s biggest player, Philip Morris says it is willing to let the F.D.A. oversee tobacco because as the company tries to develop products that are less harmful, it wants a regulatory agency to evaluate and approve those products. The company also says it would prefer national tobacco regulations rather than a hodgepodge of state and local rules. But the company’s rivals complain that the legislation could help Philip Morris, with its best-selling Marlboro franchise, further entrench itself as the industry’s dominant player by placing new restrictions on cigarette marketing, making it difficult for rivals to use advertising to catch up. Besides banning the marketing of cigarettes on the basis of most flavorings — other than menthol — the new rules would also place additional limits on the types and placement of signs and magazine advertising for tobacco products.

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.
 

Comments

  • steve_hunt_okc 05/24/2008 5:26pm

    Funnier than a comic strip.

  • Comm_reply
    Anonymous 09/25/2009 11:53am

    Here’s the Federal Register article that was posted today regarding the ban on flavored cigarettes effective 09/22/09

    The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act), as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA), establishes a tobacco standard special rule for cigarettes. This special rule for cigarettes prohibits a cigarette or any of its component parts (including the tobacco, filter, or paper) from containing, as a constituent (including a smoke constituent) or additive, an artificial or natural flavor (other than tobacco or menthol) or an herb or spice, including strawberry, grape, orange, clove, cinnamon, pineapple, vanilla, coconut, licorice, cocoa, chocolate, cherry, or coffee, that is a characterizing flavor of the tobacco product or tobacco smoke.

    74 FR 48974 — Sep. 25, 2009 FDA source: http://www.FederalRegister.com or http://www.cyberregs.com/pub/cr/inside-cyberregs/ehs.htm

  • Anonymous 07/05/2008 5:32am

    Best thing is the archive feature calls as a promptly viewpoint to old and pertinent things. Content rich in any aspect. I love the way people who reads it leaves their comment. I like the method in which the author resolves the most complex of concepts effortlessly. Enjoying the fact how this site confers an option to any to have a comment. Quality over quantity is the motto on this site certainly. The color mixture and the design in the site are an entertain to watch. This blog is as a microscope it shows even the littlest of details on the subject. Helpful info that everyone needs to know concerning this subject.
    http://www.swedsnus.com

  • Anonymous 08/05/2009 4:13pm

    the government has no right to tell anyone whether or not they can smoke. this country is a joke and the joke is on us…

  • Anonymous 09/23/2009 7:57am

    It has nothing to do with what you can or can’t do as a person. It has to do with what you can or can’t sell and manufacture. If congress wasn’t so controlled by tabacco industry money , anything that causes cancer and all the health problems assiciated with cigarettes would have been banned 100% 40 years ago.

Due to the archiving of this blog, comment posting has been disabled.