Senate Passes Bailout Bill

September 30, 2008 - by Donny Shaw

Update 3, 9:45pm ET: CNN reports that the Senate version of the bailout bill passed, 74-25. Click here to See how each senator voted.

UPDATE: The Senate bailout bill is here:

H.R. 1424 – Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008

Original post…

After a stunning failure in the House on Monday, Congress will resume action on the $700 billion bailout for the nation’s troubled financial systems on Wednesday.

The Senate has scheduled two votes on the bailout for 7:30 pm. The first vote will be on a slightly revised version of the bailout bill that was defeated by the House on Monday. The second vote will be on an amendment from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) to levy a 10 percent surtax on the income of individuals above $500,000 a year. Both votes will require 60 “aye” votes to pass. The main bailout vote will require 60 “aye” votes to pass, while the Sanders amendment will be voted on by voice vote, which allows senators to vote against it without going on the record.

The version of the bailout bill that the Senate will consider adds an increase in the size of bank deposits that the FDIC is authorized to insure. Echoing endorsements by both Barack Obama (D-IL) and John McCain (R-AZ) on Tuesday, the bill would raise the FDIC’s insurance limit from $100,000 to $250,000.

“While [the $100,000] guarantee is more than adequate for most families, it is insufficient for many small businesses that maintain bank accounts to meet their payroll, buy their supplies, and invest in expanding and creating jobs," Obama said on Tuesday. He added, “the current insurance limit of $100,000 was set 28 years ago and has not been adjusted for inflation.” The FDIC is funded by the banking industry, so taxpayers would only feel the impact of the provision through the possibility that banks could have less money available to offer as loans.

The bailout is going to be considered as a substitute amendment to a mental health parity bill that Democrats in Congress havr\e been working to pass for the past few years. But the bailout amendment will include the mental health parity bill within it, so if the amendment passes, the mental health bill will tag along on the legislative ride and, pending approval by the House and President, eventually be signed into law. The bill would mandate that any mental health coverage provided by an insurer cannot be more restrictive, in any way, than the treatment they provides for medical and surgical benefits.

Also included in the bailout amendment will be a package of tax extenders that Congress has been working to pass. The tax extensions include a renewable energy and conservation tax credit bill, tax relief for disaster victims, a one-year patch of the alternative minimum tax, and more. Again, if the bailout passes, the tax extenders pass as well.

Including the alternative minimum tax patch is supposed to give the bill more Main St. appeal. If Congress doesn’t pass an ATM patch, it could increase taxes on about 20 million middle-to-upper class Americans next year. “Adding this tax relief will ensure that regular working Americans get the financial help they need in this time of crisis,” Max Baucus (D-MT), the chairman of the Senate Committee on Finance, said in a statement on Tuesday. And since the ATM patch is basically a big tax cut, Republicans like it as well.

Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) likes the addition of the tax extenders bill as well. “This is a brilliant move by Harry, and I believe it will help pick up votes on both sides of the aisle,” he said

But has the public changed their minds about this? The underlying financial systems bailout is essentially the same as the one that was killed by the House. It would still put massive amounts of taxpayer money at risk, and it still does nothing to help those struggling with foreclosures and unemployment. The public outcry against bailing out Wall Street without doing anything to help Main St. has been unprecedentedly huge, and I’m guessing it will continue that way throughout the day Wednesday.

Still, only a third of the Senate is up for re-election in November, so senators may be more willing to vote for an unpopular bill like this if it improves their standing in the eyes of the leadership that supports it. Plus, the unpopular bailout bill is being combined with two bills that have huge targeted appeal to senators on both sides of the aisle.

Obama and McCain will both be back in the Senate tomorrow pushing their colleagues to vote for the bill, and reports are suggesting that it’s going to pass. I’ll be watching and updating as things develop.

UPDATE 2: Both parties in the Senate are confident at this point that the bailout will pass tonight.

So, looking ahead and assuming the Senate is successful, the bailout bill, H.R. 1424, will bounce back to the House for a vote on Friday. House consideration will be on the same bill the Senate is voting on tonight. Pending any amendments the House may try to add, the House’s vote on Friday will essentially be on a motion to concur to the Senate amendment (a.k.a. the bailout) to H.R. 1424.

The big question remaining that will determine whether or not the bailout becomes law is what happens in the House on Friday. Like in the Senate, the addition of the alternative minimum tax patch will help attract Republican support. But it could cause some fiscally-conservative Blue Dog Democrats to balk.

Some Blue Dogs are opposing the addition of the AMT patch because there is no mechanism in the bill to pay for it. The last time the House voted on an unpaid for AMT patch, 30 Blue Dogs voted against it, including Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD).

Hoyer, for example, voted in favor of the bailout on Monday. Losing votes like his for the Friday vote in the House could mean that the bailout gets rejected once again.

Overall, an additional 12 “aye” votes above Monday’s vote will be needed for the House to pass the bill Friday and send it to President Bush for his signature.

Update 3, 9:45pm ET: CNN reports that the Senate version of the bailout bill passed, 74-25. We will update this post with a link to the Senate roll call as soon as it becomes available tonight - - until then, Politico has the list of Senators who voted “no”.

 

Comments ?

Close

What's this?

OpenCongress comment boards are an open forum for discussion. Let's build public knowledge about Congress together, so please keep the discussion civil -- no harsh language, subject to our community Comment Policy. Do not post any information here (for example, your name or email) that you do not wish to be public.

resize

Filter Comments to a Rating of at least

Close

What's this?

The Ratings Filter allows you to determine how many user comments to view on pages here on OpenCongress. Setting the filter higher (towards 10) allows you to see only the comments rated "most helpful" by users, while setting the filter lower (towards 0) allows you to see more comments on a page.

resize
5

  • SnowflakeSeven Oct 01, 2008 1:50am
    Overall Rating: 5.0  |  Login to Rate

    No matter how much honey you drizzle on a cow patty, it will still smell like a cow patty, taste like a cow patty and be a cow patty.

    It is simply wrong to tack on these unrelated amendments to such a historic bill just to sweeten the bitter pill.

  • jomama Oct 01, 2008 4:41am
    Overall Rating: 5.0  |  Login to Rate

    "only a third of the Senate is up for re-election in November, so senators may be more willing to vote for an unpopular bill like this if it improves their standing in the eyes of the leadership that supports it."
    Seems the Senators don't care about their standings in the eyes of the voters.
    This bill is still the same, raising the FDIC limit isnt's going to solve anything.

  • gman86428 Oct 01, 2008 8:24am
    Overall Rating: 5.0  |  Login to Rate

    This bill will be an acid test for my voting in November. My representative and senator are both up for reelection this year. A yea vote for this bill will certainly be a no vote for my incumbant this November. The answer is to re-establish Glass Stegal ACT of 1933. This will fix the problem once again. This situation was caused by the removal of all the rules of this act in 1999. Both congress and President Clinton approved this. I guess we just never learn!

  • relinquish Oct 01, 2008 11:33am
    Overall Rating: 5.0  |  Login to Rate

    "Because the bill must originate in the House, the Senate is attaching the rescue plan to a bill that deals with renewable energy tax incentives. This would allow the Senate to vote before the House to approve a bailout bill."

    Whether you're for or against the bailout, every American should be pissed about the above quote.

    They are skipping the House and getting the Senate to pass this bill. If the Senate passes this bill, then they will use the victory in the Senate to put further pressure on the House to pass this. Do not let Congress cave in! We have to show Washington who their bosses are, and that we will not stand for any more of these special favors that the rich do for each other.

  • Anonymous Oct 01, 2008 12:26pm
    Overall Rating: 5.0  |  Login to Rate

    I wrote to my Senator & couldn't write to my House rep because the web site has been taken down. Forutnately she already voted no.
    I know my vote & voice don't really make a difference, but I'm still going to try to convince everyone I know to vote against my Senator if he supports this.
    You can't hide a $700 billion corporate welfare bill by bundling it with a couple unrelated items. Just because the press keeps calling us idiots doesn't mean we actually are.

  • Anonymous Oct 01, 2008 1:43pm
    Overall Rating: 5.0  |  Login to Rate

    Our House is so blind to their responsibilities to the country that they will combine necessities such as the AMT provision to this "bailout". Then, if this amendment is true,they are going to a "voice" vote to avoid public scrutiny when they vote to raise taxes again. OMG - I can not believe our leaders are so arrogant.

  • scuba69 Oct 01, 2008 1:55pm
    Overall Rating: 5.0  |  Login to Rate  |  1 of 1 found useful.

    I called my Senators this morning. At Senator Cantwell's office I got an answering machine. At Senator Murry's office I got a rude guy that told me he was tired of all the calls of people objecting to the bailout plans. He then hung up on me. Guess they really don' want any more input from voters.

  • Anonymous Oct 01, 2008 7:01pm
    Overall Rating: 5.0  |  Login to Rate

    I have written both of my senators in Maine. I oppose this senseless Bailout. I hear that the house has an alternative that is potentially better suited to relieve the problem. Our governing bodies took their time to get us into this mess. I say they should take a moment to recognize other solutions.

  • avi Oct 02, 2008 8:30am
    Overall Rating: 5.0  |  Login to Rate  |  1 of 1 found useful.

    It's really funny. When I spoke to people about the FDIC limit be ing raised to $250,000, not one person realized it was temporary until Dec. 31, 2009 under this bill. See page 91 of the amended HR 1424. Plus, no one seems concerned with the costs associated with the raising of insurance and how the banks will offset that. What, do you think they won't pass those costs to you somehow? Great job media, way to pass all the important facts onto the public.

    Not one Senator voting on this bill really read through it and trusted their advisers to make an educated decision for key parts. We called and pleaded against this legislation, but they still did not take us seriously. I guess we need to cast a serious vote for them in November. So happy this is the one time everyone WILL remember and vote because of this issue.

  • Anonymous Oct 04, 2008 5:49pm
    Overall Rating: 5.0  |  Login to Rate

    I wonder how many of the Senators and Congressmen would purchase these toxic assets from their own funds or recommend them to their family and friends.

    I hardly think so.

    Vote out all incumbants who supported this bill. Don't vote for Obama or McCain, vote for an Independent.

  • PorterE Feb 16, 2009 3:09am
    Overall Rating: 5.0  |  Login to Rate

    It seems that everyday a new American industry is asking from US government a bailout because of impending financial exigency. In order to stave off a possible depression, the government created the $750 billion TARP program to bailout troubled financial institutions. This is like how getting a payday loan in order to hold you over until your next payday can also stave off a possible depression. A string of catastrophic bank failures would just make things worse, but it seems hard to justify giving the banks funds after they use those funds to give out corporate bonuses and buy corporate jets. You don't see people doing this with a <a href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/02/09/banks-bailout-money-payday-loan/">payday loan</a> now, do you?

  • PorterE Feb 16, 2009 3:11am
    Overall Rating: 5.0  |  Login to Rate

    It seems that everyday a new American industry is asking from US government a bailout because of impending financial exigency. In order to stave off a possible depression, the government created the $750 billion TARP program to bailout troubled financial institutions. This is like how getting a payday loan in order to hold you over until your next payday can also stave off a possible depression. A string of catastrophic bank failures would just make things worse, but it seems hard to justify giving the banks funds after they use those funds to give out corporate bonuses and buy corporate jets. You don't see people doing this with a payday loan now, do you? http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/02/09/banks-bailout-money-payday-loan/

  • Moderated Comment



OpenCongress is a free and open-source joint project of two non-profit organizations, the Participatory Politics Foundation and the Sunlight Foundation.