Energy and Climate Change Primer for the 111th Congress
March 18, 2009 - by Avelino MaestasThe AIG bonus scandal is burning through the media universe, but Congress is also continuing work on the legislative agenda. Some of the big pieces in the coming months will be on the energy front. New details were recently released about a proposed renewable energy standard (which would require utilities to produce a percentage of their power via renewable sources, like solar and wind). How that RES bill will move through the House and, more importantly, the Senate, is a bit confusing and very political. So, here’s an OpenCongress primer on the looming energy/climate change battle.
For starters, let’s look at the big-name players in the game. In the House, you’re talking about Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. He waged a successful campaign to uproot former Energy Committee Chair Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) at the start of the 111th Congress, and there’s general agreement that climate change legislation was one reason why. Waxman is an ally of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), and will play a major role in shaping any energy or climate change legislation in the House. Also keep an eye on Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.), who introduced an RES bill last month.
In the Senate, things start to get complicated. Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.) is chair of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Bingaman introduced renewable energy standard legislation in the 110th Congress, which was removed from a larger energy bill amid Republican opposition. Bingaman wants to proceed on separate bills for RES, for energy in general, and for climate change (likely in the form of a cap-and-trade bill).
Until recently, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) seemed to be fine with that idea. After President Barack Obama called for climate change legislation during his address to Congress, however, Reid changed his tune. He is now pushing for a comprehensive bill that will include all three elements. Bingaman has argued that each piece of the agenda will require finesse to reach the 60-vote Senate cloture threshold, and he’s reluctant to combine the different objectives.
The wildcard in all this might be the Obama Administration itself. In February, an Obama energy adviser not-so-subtly warned that the Environmental Protection Agency may impose regulations on emissions from cars and smokestacks (as a result of a 2007 Supreme Court ruling). That’s an option with little appeal to lawmakers, and one that might encourage them to work quickly to pass climate change legislation, a renewable energy standard, or both.
You can stay tuned to this space for more, and you can always track what’s happening in these issue areas through OpenCongress. If you’re a registered user, check out climate change, energy or more than 4,000 other issues.
Image (used under a Creative Commons license) by Chandra Marsono.

Blog - Energy and Climate Change Primer for the 111th Congress




Sort By
Comments ?
What's this?
OpenCongress comment boards are an open forum for discussion. Let's build public knowledge about Congress together, so please keep the discussion civil -- no harsh language, subject to our community Comment Policy. Do not post any information here (for example, your name or email) that you do not wish to be public.
Filter Comments to a Rating of at least
What's this?
The Ratings Filter allows you to determine how many user comments to view on pages here on OpenCongress. Setting the filter higher (towards 10) allows you to see only the comments rated "most helpful" by users, while setting the filter lower (towards 0) allows you to see more comments on a page.
This will be the next HUGE method of wrenching money from our pocketbooks via taxation, and it is all based on a LIE! There is not, nor has there been, Global warming, caused by mankind's actions on this or any other planet in the solar system!!! The effects we have seen are strictly due to the sunspots that periodically occur. So the taxes proposed are based on a flat-out, toxic lie.
We, most literally, have to pin a face on the lie, and that face is Al Gore's. We need to know exactly what, and how much money he currently has invested in the "technology" that he will be making his big bucks off of, using our tax money. Because that's what it is all about. Putting money in Democrat's pockets and bank accounts.
Great overview, would love to see this as a monthly recurring piece since it seems to be a very major topic.
I'll definitely try to keep on top of the issue, and if you have any other feedback let me know:
http://www.opencongress.org/users/Avelino_Maestas/profile