OpenCongress Blog

Blog Feed Comments Feed More RSS Feeds

Cracking Down on the Credit Card Companies

April 22, 2009 - by Donny Shaw

Congress is switching gears a bit, turning their attention from hearings on the financial crisis to markups on legislation that would protect consumers against credit card companies. The House Financial Services Committee today approved a bill, the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights, that seeks to restrict interest rate hikes, penalties and fees. The vote was 48-19, with 9 of the 29 Republicans in the Committee voting in favor. All Democrats supported the bill.

Here’s the committee’s summary:

Ends Unfair, Arbitrary Interest Rate Increases.

* Prevents card companies from unfairly increasing interest rates on existing card balances — retroactive increases are permitted only if a cardholder is more than 30 days late, if a pre-agreed promotional rate expires, or if the rate adjusts as part of a variable rate.
* Requires card companies to give 45 days notice of all interest rate increases so consumers can pay off their balances and shop for a better deal.

Lets Consumers Set Hard Credit Limits, Stops Excessive “Over-the-Limit” Fees.

* Requires companies to let consumers set their own fixed credit limit.
* Prevents companies from charging “over-the-limit” fees when a cardholder has set a limit, or when a preauthorized credit “hold” pushes a consumer over their limit.
* Limits (to 3) the number of over-the-limit fees companies can charge for the same transaction — some issuers now charge virtually unlimited fees for a single limit violation.

Ends Unfair Penalties for Cardholders Who Pay on Time.

* Ends unfair “double cycle” billing – card companies couldn’t charge interest on debt consumers have already paid on time.
* If a cardholder pays on time and in full, the bill prevents card companies from piling additional fees on balances consisting solely of left-over interest.

Requires Fair Allocation of Consumer Payments.

* Many companies credit payments to a cardholder’s lowest interest rate balances first, making it impossible for the consumer to pay off high-rate debt. The bill bans this practice, generally requiring payments to be allocated proportionally to balances that have different rates.

Protects Cardholders from Due Date Gimmicks.

* Among other measures, requires card companies to mail billing statements 25 calendar days before the due date (up from the current 14 days), and to credit as “on time” payments made before 5 p.m. local time on the due date.

Prevents Companies from Using Misleading Terms and Damaging Consumers’ Credit
Ratings.


* Establishes standard definitions of terms like “fixed rate” and “prime rate” so companies can’t mislead or deceive consumers in marketing and advertising.
* Gives consumers who are pre-approved for a card the right to reject that card prior to activation without negatively affecting their credit scores.

Protects Vulnerable Consumers From High-Fee Subprime Credit Cards.

* Prohibits issuers of subprime cards (where total yearly fixed fees exceed 25 percent of the credit limit) from charging those fees to the card itself. These cards are generally targeted to low-income consumers with weak credit histories.

Bars Issuing Credit Cards to Vulnerable Minors

* Prohibits card companies from knowingly issuing cards to individuals under 18 who are not emancipated minors.

Swift Implementation of Provisions

* Legislation would be implemented 3 months following the President signing the legislation into law.

The Wall Street Journal has some details on the four Democrat-sponsored amendments to the bill that were approved today:

Under an amendment approved by the panel, credit-card companies, beginning 90 days after the bill’s signing, would have to give consumers 45 days’ notice of any rate increases.

The panel adopted another amendment to require small issuers to include on the monthly statement a toll-free telephone number, Internet address or Web site where consumers can request the balance on the account.

The panel also approved an amendment requiring the Fed to report back within six months on whether issuers had reduced credit limits or raised interest rates in the three years before the bill’s enactment.

Another approved change would require card issuers to insert a notice allowing consumers to opt out of over-the-limit protection in the monthly statement rather than in a separate mailing.

All Republican-sponsored amendments were rejected.

The Republican support in Committee today on the bill, as amended, indicates that it will have no problem getting through the full House. In the Senate, however, where a somewhat tougher version (S. 414) passed the Banking Committee without a single Republican vote, it will face an uphill climb and may end up being weakened.

Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank [D, MA-4] told reporters that he expected the bill to pass the House next week with additional amendments that are being recommended by the Obama administration. He didn’t say what those amendments would be.

Related from NYT: Banks Sway Bills to Aid Consumers

Like this post? Stay in touch by following us on Twitter, joining us on Facebook, or by Subscribing with RSS.
 

Comments

Anonymous 04/25/2009 10:47pm

“We had a card that went from 11.5 to 19 to 27.5 % based on late payments of 2-4 days. That’s called Usury and it is inherently unjust.”
It is criminal for them to raise interest rates pass 20% on people paying off their cards on time. HOW DO THEY EXPECT the credit to ever be paid off…but of course they don’t and that is why they resemble predators or LOAN SHARKS. Credit cards and banks don’t resemble their original use anymore…it is all imploding from greed.
Most Americans should look at CREDIT in northern European countries. Germany for example has complete oversight on what banks can and cannot do to protect the consumer…you develop a history with them. Our so called—- american consumer freedom is wounded beyond repair in my opinion. The credit card companies won’t let go of their greed unless they are forced too. ANd who knows when that will happen…we all better start saving again…but who wants to support these banks anymore either…

Anonymous 04/25/2009 10:47pm

“We had a card that went from 11.5 to 19 to 27.5 % based on late payments of 2-4 days. That’s called Usury and it is inherently unjust.”
It is criminal for them to raise interest rates pass 20% on people paying off their cards on time. HOW DO THEY EXPECT the credit to ever be paid off…but of course they don’t and that is why they resemble predators or LOAN SHARKS. Credit cards and banks don’t resemble their original use anymore…it is all imploding from greed.
Most Americans should look at CREDIT in northern European countries. Germany for example has complete oversight on what banks can and cannot do to protect the consumer…you develop a history with them. Our so called—- american consumer freedom is wounded beyond repair in my opinion. The credit card companies won’t let go of their greed unless they are forced too. ANd who knows when that will happen…we all better start saving again…but who wants to support these banks anymore either…

STRIKER1776 04/28/2009 3:57am

I use to have so many credit cards offers everyday that my mail delivery couldnt close my mailbox.This should be a crime.

jlohman 04/23/2009 3:26am

It doesn’t add the one action the credit card industry could add to drastically reduce credit card fraud. The companies should send the cardholder an email every time their card is used. I can handle the 30 or so emails I might generate every month, but if my card is being used be someone else I’ll find out today, not 30 days from today when I look at my bill. Once their computers are programmed, this is a FREE process!!! I can only believe that they make money on fraud, because they charge it back to the retailers (and consumers). I’ve suggested this to several fraud departments and all I received in return is a yawn.

Anonymous 04/23/2009 10:56am

Why wasn’t CC industry checked like the mortgage industry? Obama and ACORN sued them too, so the lending should be the same for everyone, Obama’s predatory lending was just banks treating people equally, so why didn’t CC collapse like the mortgage industry? Why can’t we sell this to China? Joe’s Delaware banks and foreign aid loans at Treasury are different?

Why didn’t we write off mortgages and CCs like foreign aid loans? How much is that? Why did we have to treat the wealthy the same as everyone else? This is predatory? Foreign aid loans at Treasury written of like China’s write offs after the promised bailout of mortgages(government backed)? Write off foreign aid loans is a deal?

Anonymous 04/24/2009 7:02pm

There should also be a provision to limit the number of points that can be increased at any one time. We had a card that went from 11.5 to 19 to 27.5 % based on late payments of 2-4 days. That’s called Usury and it is inherently unjust.

Anonymous 04/25/2009 4:20am

Now they need to look a the banks Like Wells Fargo with the policy of cashing large checks first and getting the largest possible overdraft income from low income families. It should be up to the individual how their account functions.

Anonymous 06/16/2009 8:47pm

This has got to stop! These credit card companies are tearing this country down.Some of the companies aren’t even in American.Then when you have a problem,you get connected with someone you can’t understand.What is going on in this counttry? It appears that they are trying to charge these fees before President Obama’s act is in.I can only pay what I have been paying and not a cent more.It seems the banks are running this country.Something to think about.I know my credit score will drop,but I can’t afford to pay these high fees.

Due to the archiving of this blog, comment posting has been disabled.