Individual AMT Repeal Act of 2007
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the alternative minimum tax on individuals.
Other Bill Titles (2 more) 3/7/2007--Introduced.
Individual AMT Repeal Act of 2007 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to eliminate the alternative minimum tax on individual taxpayers for taxable years beginning after 2006.
See Full Bill Text
Committees
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Bill Status
| Introduced | ![]() | Voted on by House | ![]() | Voted on by Senate | ![]() | Considered By President | ![]() | Bill Becomes Law |
| March 07, 2007 |
In the News
We are not currently finding any news articles on this topic using our daily automated search of Google News. However, if you know of a relevant news article to display here, OpenCongress site editors have the ability to add it manually. Simply e-mail us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: We'll post relevant links as quickly as possible. Also, if this topic is important to you, you could write a letter to the editor -- if a news article refers this specific topic by name, a link to that news article is likely to appear here soon.
Blog Coverage
October 01, 2008 California Chronicle | BONO MACK: HARDWORKING AMERICANS DESERVE ...
Bono Mack has joined over fifty of her colleagues in sponsoring the Individual AMT Repeal Act of 2007 (H.R. 1366), in addition to several related bills to protect Americans from paying the AMT on their 2007 incomes (H.R.3818, ...
Source: California Chronicle
January 21, 2008 DownWithTyranny!: JOHN SHADEGG CAUGHT WITH HIS PANTS DOWN IN AZ-03 ...
H.R. 1366 - CRSC for Chapter 61 Retirees Under 20 NO H.R. 1222 - Keep Our Promise to American's Military Retirees Act NO H.R. 968 - Paid-Up SBP NO H.R. 783 - Reducing Reserve Retirement Age NO H.R. 303 - Full Concurrent Receipt NO ...
Source: DownWithTyranny!
January 20, 2008 the truth about john mccain âmy friendsâ; killer of freedom of ...
baeslerâs own campaign âreform â bill (hr 1366, in 1998) would have prohibited such expenditures, but he hypocritically made no effort to oppose the expenditures on his behalf. analysis of s. 27, âmccain-feingold 2001,â â page










