Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008
To amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to extend expiring provisions under the Medicare Program, to improve beneficiary access to preventive and mental health services, to enhance low-income benefit programs, and to maintain access to care in rural areas, including pharmacy access, and for other purposes.
Other Bill Titles (7 more)Hide Other Bill Titles- Short: Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 as enacted.
- Short: Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 as passed senate.
- Short: Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 as passed house.
- Short: Medicare Improvement for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 as passed house.
- Short: Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 as introduced.
- Popular: Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 as introduced.
- Official: To amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to extend expiring provisions under the Medicare Program, to improve beneficiary access to preventive and mental health services, to enhance low-income benefit programs, and to maintain access to care in rural areas, including pharmacy access, and for other purposes. as introduced.
7/15/2008--Public Law. (This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the House on June 24, 2008. The summary of that version is repeated here.) Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 - Title I: Medicare - Subtitle A: Beneficiary Improvements - Part 1: Prevention, Mental Health, and Marketing -
(Sec. 101) Amends title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act (SSA), as amended by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, to cover additional preventive services. Includes body mass index and end-of-life planning among initial preventive physical examinations.
(Sec. 102) Specifies stages for gradual elimination by 2014 of copayment rates for Medicare psychiatric services.
(Sec. 103) Prescribes prohibitions on certain sales and marketing activities under Medicare Advantage (MA) plans and prescription drug plans, including:
(1) the provision of gifts or prizes as enrollment inducements;
(2) unsolicited means of direct contact;
(3) cross-selling (the sale of other non-health related products, such as annuities and life insurance, during any sales or marketing activity or presentation conducted with respect to an MA plan); or
(4) the provision of meals to prospective plan enrollees. Requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish limitations under MA plans of certain other marketing activities, including co-branding. Requires the inclusion of the plan type in the plan name. Imposes requirements on MA organizations relating to the exclusive use of licensed agents and brokers and compliance with state information requests in order to enable states to collaborate with the Secretary to address fraudulent or inappropriate marketing practices.
(Sec. 104) Directs the Secretary to provide for implementation of the changes in the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) model law and regulations approved by NAIC in its Model #651 on March 11, 2007, as modified to reflect the changes made under this Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008. Requires a Medigap policy issuer to make available to an eligible individual at least Medicare supplemental policies classified as "C" or "F." Part II: Low-Income Programs -
(Sec. 111) Extends the qualifying individual (QI) program through December 2009. Extends the total amount available for allocation with respect to state coverage of Medicare cost-sharing for additional low-income Medicare beneficiaries.
(Sec. 112) Provides for application of a full low-income subsidy (LIS) assets test under the Medicare Savings Program.
(Sec. 113) Requires Social Security Administration assistance with Medicare Savings Program and LIS program applications. Makes appropriations for Administration costs related to such assistance.
(Sec. 114) Eliminates Medicare part D (Voluntary Prescription Drug Benefit Program) late enrollment penalties payable by subsidy-eligible individuals.
(Sec. 115) Eliminates estate recovery under Medicaid of state-paid medical assistance for Medicare cost-sharing.
(Sec. 116) Prohibits support and maintenance furnished in kind from being counted as income with respect to eligibility for low-income subsidies under Medicare part D (Voluntary Prescription Drug Benefit Program). Excludes life insurance policies from being counted as a resource under the Supplemental Security Income program (thus precluding their use in determining resources under the Medicare part D program).
(Sec. 117) Provides for judicial review of decisions of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Medicare part D program.
(Sec. 118) Requires translation into 10 languages (other than English) of the model application form for medical assistance for Medicare cost-sharing.
(Sec. 119) Directs the Secretary to make grants to states for state health insurance assistance programs, area agencies on aging, and aging and disability resource centers. Requires the Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Aging, to make a grant to, or contract with, a qualified, experienced entity to:
(1) maintain and update web-based decision support tools, and integrated, person-centered systems, designed to inform older individuals about the full range of benefits for which they may be eligible under federal and state programs; and
(2) develop an information clearinghouse on best practices and the most cost-effective methods for finding and informing older individuals with greatest economic need about such programs. Subtitle B: Provisions Relating to Part A -
(Sec. 121) Authorizes the Secretary to award grants to states for increasing the delivery of mental health services or other health care services to meet the needs of veterans of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom living in rural areas. Extends the authorization for FLEX (Medicare rural hospital flexibility program) grants through FY2010. Includes among FLEX grant purposes providing support for critical access hospitals for quality improvement, quality reporting, performance improvements, and benchmarking. Authorizes the Secretary to award grants to eligible critical access hospitals to assist them to transition to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and assisted living facilities.
(Sec. 122) Permits substitution of a specified rebased target amount for the amount ordinarily calculated in Medicare payments to sole community hospitals for inpatient hospital services.
(Sec. 123) Directs the Secretary to establish a demonstration project for development and testing of new community health integration models in certain rural counties for the delivery of acute care, extended care, and other essential health services to Medicare beneficiaries. Authorizes appropriations for FY2010-FY2012.
(Sec. 124) Amends the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, as amended by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, to extend through FY2009 the reclassification of certain hospitals.
(Sec. 125) Amends SSA title XVIII to repeal the unique deeming authority under which an insitution accredited as a hospital by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals shall be deemed to be a hospital eligible for Medicare payments. Subtitle C: Provisions Relating to Part B - Part 1: Physicians' Services -
(Sec. 131) Increases the update for physicians' payments for the second half of 2008 and for 2009. Modifies the Physician Assistance and Quality Initiative Fund to eliminate funding for FY2013 and, if a specified contingency occurs, FY2014. Revises requirements for and extends the quality reporting system for 2010 and subsequent years, including increased incentive payments. Includes qualified audiologists as eligible professionals who must report data of quality measures. Directs the Secretary to establish a Physician Feedback Program, under which the Secretary shall use claims data to make confidential reports to physicians that measure the resources involved in furnishing care to individuals. Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on the Physician Feedback Program.
(Sec. 132) Provides for incentive payments for electronic prescribing of medicine.
(Sec. 133) Amends the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 to authorize the Secretary to expand the duration and the scope of the Medicare Medical Home Demonstration Project if such expansion is expected to:
(1) improve the quality of patient care without increasing spending under the Medicare program; and
(2) reduce spending under the Medicare program without reducing the quality of patient care. Provides funding.
(Sec. 134) Amends SSA title XVIII, as amended by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, to extend through calendar 2009 the 1.0 floor on the Medicare work geographic adjustment under the Medicare physician fee schedule.
(Sec. 135) Establishes an accreditation requirement for advanced diagnostic imaging services. Directs the Secretary to conduct a demonstration project to assess the appropriate use of imaging services.
(Sec. 136) Amends the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000, as amended by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, and the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, to extend through 2009 specified treatment of certain physician pathology services under Medicare.
(Sec. 137) Makes permanent the exception to the 60-day limit on Medicare reciprocal billing arrangements between two physicians over a longer continuous period during all of which one of them is ordered to active duty as a member of a reserve component of the armed forces.
(Sec. 138) Directs the Secretary to increase by 5% the fee schedule otherwise applicable for specified psychotherapy services during the period from July 1, 2008, through December 31, 2009.
(Sec. 139) Sets forth a special 100% fee schedule payment rule for teaching anesthesiologists. Directs the Secretary to make specified adjustments to payments to teaching certified registered nurse anesthetists. Part II: Other Payment and Coverage Improvements -
(Sec. 141) Amends SSA title XVIII, as amended by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, to extend the exceptions process for Medicare physical therapy caps through December 31, 2009.
(Sec. 142) Extends the payment rule for brachytherapy and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals through December 31, 2009.
(Sec. 143) Defines covered outpatient speech-language pathology services.
(Sec. 144) Provides for coverage of pulmonary and cardiac rehabilitation items and services, including an intensive cardiac rehabilitation program. Repeals the requirement that ownership of oxygen equipment be transferred from the supplier to the individual user after the 36th continuous month of its use. Requires continuous:
(1) furnishing of such equipment by the supplier after the 36th month for the remainder of the equipment's useful lifetime; and
(2) Medicare payment for the rental of the equipment.
(Sec. 145) Repeals the Medicare competitive bidding demonstration project for clinical laboratory services. Specifies a reduction in the clinical laboratory test fee schedule update adjustment for 2009 through 2013.
(Sec. 146) Extends increased Medicare payments for ground ambulance services. Sets forth a special payment rule for air ambulance services under the ambulance fee schedule.
(Sec. 147) Extends and expands the Medicare hold harmless provision under the prospective payment system for hospital outpatient department (HOPD) services for certain hospitals.
(Sec. 148) Provides that clinical diagnostic laboratory services furnished by a critical access hospital shall be treated as being furnished as part of outpatient critical access services without regard to whether the outpatient is physically present in the critical access hospital, or in a skilled nursing facility (SNF) or a clinic (including a rural health clinic) operated by such a hospital, at the time the specimen is collected.
(Sec. 149) Adds a hospital-based or critical access hospital-based renal dialysis center, a SNF, and a community mental health center as originating sites for purposes of payment for telehealth services.
(Sec. 150) Directs the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MEDPAC) to study and report to Congress on the feasibility and advisability of establishing a Medicare Chronic Care Practice Research Network that would serve as a standing network of providers testing new models of care coordination and other care approaches for chronically ill beneficiaries.
(Sec. 151) Directs the Secretary, in the case of services furnished by federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), to establish payment limits with respect to services furnished:
(1) in 2010 at the limits otherwise established for such year increased by $5; and
(2) in a subsequent year at the limits established for the previous year increased by the percentage increase in the Medicare Economic Index (MEI). Requires the Comptroller General to study and report to the Congress on the effects and adequacy of the Medicare FQHC payment structure.
(Sec. 152) Amends the Public Health Service Act to direct the Secretary to establish pilot projects to increase public and medical community awareness of and screening for chronic kidney disease, as well as enhance surveillance systems to better assess its prevalence and incidence. Authorizes appropriations. Extends Medicare coverage to kidney disease patient education services.
(Sec. 153) Revises requirements for payments for renal dialysis services. Reduces the composite rate factor in the updates for renal dialysis services furnished during calendar 2009, and those furnished on or after January 1, 2010. Directs the Secretary, for dialysis services furnished on or after January 1, 2011, to implement a (bundled) payment system under which a single payment is made to a service provider or a renal dialysis facility for renal dialysis services in lieu of any other payment. Institutes a system of quality incentives for service providers and renal dialysis facilities in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) program. Directs the Comptroller General to report to Congress on implementation of the ESRD bundling payment system and quality initiative.
(Sec. 154) Delays generally until after 2011 full implementation of the Medicare competitive acquisition program for the purchase of durable medical equipment (DME), prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS). Revises requirements for such program, dividing its implementation into two rounds, and specifying covered item updates for 2009-2014. Prescribes requirements for application of accreditation in implementing quality standards. Requires suppliers to disclose subcontractors. Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide for a competitive acquisition ombudsman within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to respond to complaints and inquiries by suppliers and individuals. Specifies topics for the Comptroller General's required study and report to Congress on the impact of competitive acquisition of DME on suppliers, manufacturers, and patients. Sets forth a special rule for the competitive acquisition program for diabetic testing strips. Subtitle D: Provisions Relating to Part C -
(Sec. 161) Provides for phase-out of indirect costs of medical education (IME) from capitation rates.
(Sec. 162) Revises requirements for certain non-employer Medicare Advantage (MA) private fee-for-service plans, as well as MA plans for special needs individuals, including, respectively, among other changes, requirements to assure access to network coverage and care management requirements for all special needs plans.
(Sec. 163) Requires MA private fee-for-service and Medicare Savings Account (MSA) plans to have a quality improvement program
(Sec. 165) Places a limitation on out-of-pocket costs (cost-sharing) for dual eligibles and qualified Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in a specialized MA plan for special needs individuals.
(Sec. 166) Amends SSA title XVIII, as amended by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, to decrease the amount of funding available to the Medicare Advantage Regional Plan Stabilization Fund during 2014.
(Sec. 167) Extends through January 1, 2010, reasonable cost reimbursement contracts the Secretary may enter with organizations whose capacity to bear the risk of potential losses under a risk-sharing contract is in doubt. Modifies the requirement that at least two MA regional plans be offered in the service area for the prohibition against the extension or renewal of a reasonable cost contract on or after January 1, 2010, to apply. Requires that such plans not be offered by the same MA organization. Changes the minimum enrollment requirements applicable to such a plan. Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on the reasons, if any, why reasonable cost reimbursement contracts are unable to become MA plans under Medicare part C.
(Sec. 168) Requires MEDPAC to study and report to Congress on how comparable measures of performance and patient experience (quality measures) can be collected and reported by 2011 for the MA program and the original Medicare fee-for-service program.
(Sec. 169) Directs MEDPAC to study and report to Congress on the correlation between:
(1) the costs that Medicare Advantage organizations incur in providing Medicare Advantage plan coverage for items and services covered under the original Medicare fee-for-service program, as reflected in plan bids; and
(2) county-level spending under such original Medicare fee-for-service program on a per capita basis. Requires study of:
(1) alternate approaches to payment with respect to a Medicare beneficiary enrolled in an MA plan other than through county-level payment area equivalents;
(2) the accuracy and completeness of county-level estimates of per capita spending under the original Medicare fee-for-service program; and
(3) ways to improve the accuracy and completeness of such county-level estimates. Subtitle E: Provisions Relating to Part D - Part I: Improving Pharmacy Access -
(Sec. 171) Requires prompt payment of clean claims by prescription drug plans (PDPs) and MA-Prescription Drug plans under Medicare part D. Requires interest payments on late claims.
(Sec. 172) Requires each PDP contract with a PDP sponsor to provide that the pharmacy located in, or having a contract with, a long-term care facility shall have between 30 and 90 days to submit claims to the sponsor for reimbursement.
(Sec. 173) Requires each contract with a PDP sponsor using a pharmacy reimbursement prescription drug pricing standard to require a weekly update of the standard to reflect accurately the market price of acquiring the drug. Part II: Other Provisions -
(Sec. 175) Includes barbiturates and benzodiazepines as covered part D drugs.
(Sec. 176) Directs the Secretary to identify categories and classes of drugs for which:
(1) restricted access would have major or life threatening clinical consequences for individuals who have a disease or disorder treated by them; and
(2) there is significant clinical need for such individuals to have access to multiple drugs within a category or class because of unique chemical actions and pharmacological effects of such drugs, such as drugs used in the treatment of cancer. Requires PDP sponsors to include all covered part D drugs in a formulary in categories and classes identified by the Secretary, unless the Secretary establishes exceptions according to a specified process. Subtitle F: Other Provisions -
(Sec. 181) Allows the use of information provided to the Secretary under contracts with PDP sponsors for the general purposes of Medicare part D, improving public health through research. Requires such information to be made available to congressional support agencies for congressional oversight of the part D program.
(Sec. 182) Revises the definition of "medically accepted indication for drugs."
(Sec. 183) Directs the Secretary to:
(1) contract with a consensus-based entity (e.g., the National Quality Forum) for certain activities relating to health care performance measurement; and
(2) evaluate and report to Congress on approaches for the collection of data regarding health care disparities. Provides funding. Requires the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on the performance and costs of such entity.
(Sec. 184) Authorizes the Secretary to develop alternative methods of payment for items and services provided under clinical trials and comparative effectiveness studies sponsored or supported by an agency supported by an agency of the Department of Health and Human Services to the extent such alternative methods are necessary to preserve the scientific validity of such trials or studies, such as in the case where masking the identity of interventions from patients and investigators is necessary to comply with the particular trial or study design.
(Sec. 185) Directs the Secretary to:
(1) evaluate approaches for the collection of data that allow for the ongoing, accurate, and timely collection and evaluation of data on disparities in health care services and performance on the basis of race, ethnicity, and gender; and
(2) implement the most effective ones.
(Sec. 186) Directs the Secretary to establish a demonstration project to determine the greatest needs and most effective methods of outreach to Medicare beneficiaries who were previously uninsured.
(Sec. 187) Directs the Inspector General to prepare and publish a report on:
(1) the extent to which Medicare providers and plans are complying with the Office for Civil Rights' Guidance to Federal Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons and the Office of Minority Health's Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS) Standards in health care; and
(2) a description of the costs associated with or savings related to the provision of language services.
(Sec. 188) Creates the Medicare Improvement Fund. Provides funding.
(Sec. 189) Directs the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to participate in the Federal Payment Levy Program and ensure that all Medicare provider and supplier payments are processed through it, in specified graduated percentages, by the end of FY2011. Requires any disbursing official of the Department of Health and Human Services to apply administrative offsets with respect to Medicare provider or supplier payments. Title II: Medicaid -
(Sec. 201) Amends the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 to extend through June 30, 2009, the transitional medical assistance (TMA), and the abstinence education program under SSA title XIX (Medicaid).
(Sec. 202) Amends SSA title XVIII to extend the Medicaid disproportionate share hospital (DSH) allotment for Tennessee and Hawaii.
(Sec. 203) Delays until October 1, 2009, the application of the new payment limit for multiple source drugs under Medicaid.
(Sec. 204) Amends SSA title XI to entitle states to receive reconsideration of a claim disallowance.
(Sec. 205) Amends the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 to exempt Medicaid health insuring organizations operated by public entities in Ventura and Merced Counties, California, from the requirement that they be Medicaid managed care organizations meeting certain criteria. Declares that such exemption shall not apply with respect to any period for which the number of Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled with such health insuring organizations exceeds 16% (currently 14%) of the number of such beneficiaries in California. Title III: Miscellaneous -
(Sec. 301) Amends the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 to extend through FY2009 supplemental grants under SSA title IV part D (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) (TANF).
(Sec. 302) Amends SSA title IV part E (Federal Payments for Foster Care and Adoption Assistance) to set at 70% the federal matching rate for foster care and adoption assistance for the District of Columbia.
(Sec. 303) Amends the Public Health Service Act to extend through FY2011 special diabetes grant programs for Type I diabetes and for Indians.
(Sec. 304) Directs the Secretary to contract with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academies to identify, and report to the Secretary and Congress on, the methodological standards for conducting systematic reviews of clinical effectiveness research on health and health care in order to ensure that reviewing organizations have objective, scientifically valid, and consistent information on methods. Requires the Secretary to contract with the IOM, also, to study and report to the Secretary and the appropriate congressional committees on the best methods used in developing clinical practice guidelines in order to ensure that organizations developing such guidelines have objective, scientifically valid, and consistent information on approaches.
... morehide bill summarySee Full Bill Text
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Amendments to H.R.6331
| Number | Status | Purpose |
|---|
Bill Status
![]() |
||
| OpenCongress widgets allow you to display information about bills and issue areas on your own website or blog. First, select which bill or issue you want to track, then customize the appearance of the panel, and finally paste a simple chunk of HTML into your site. Now your community will have an easy, up-to-date way to track the status of important bills and issues in Congress. | ||
| Introduced | ![]() | Voted on by House | ![]() | Voted on by Senate | ![]() | Considered By President | ![]() | Override Attempted | ![]() | This Bill Has Become Law |
| June 20, 2008 | June 24, 2008 | July 09, 2008 | July 15, 2008 | July 15, 2008 | July 15, 2008 |
Latest Vote
| July 15, 2008Roll call number 177 in the Senate | |||
| Question: On Overriding the Veto (Shall H.R. 6331 Pass, the objections of the President of the United States to the contrary notwithstanding? ) | |||
| Required percentage of 'Aye' votes: 2/3 (66%) | Percentage of 'aye' votes: 70% | Result: Veto Overridden | |
Democrats Voting 'Aye'
Sen. Daniel Akaka [D, HI]Sen. Max Baucus [D, MT]
Sen. B. Evan Bayh [D, IN]
Sen. Joseph Biden [D, DE]
Sen. Jeff Bingaman [D, NM]
Sen. Barbara Boxer [D, CA]
Sen. Sherrod Brown [D, OH]
Sen. Robert Byrd [D, WV]
Sen. Maria Cantwell [D, WA]
Sen. Benjamin Cardin [D, MD]
Sen. Thomas Carper [D, DE]
Sen. Robert Casey [D, PA]
Sen. Hillary Clinton [D, NY]
Sen. Kent Conrad [D, ND]
Sen. Christopher Dodd [D, CT]
Sen. Byron Dorgan [D, ND]
Sen. Richard Durbin [D, IL]
Sen. Russell Feingold [D, WI]
Sen. Dianne Feinstein [D, CA]
Sen. Thomas Harkin [D, IA]
Sen. Daniel Inouye [D, HI]
Sen. Tim Johnson [D, SD]
Sen. John Kerry [D, MA]
Sen. Amy Klobuchar [D, MN]
Sen. Herbert Kohl [D, WI]
Sen. Mary Landrieu [D, LA]
Sen. Frank Lautenberg [D, NJ]
Sen. Patrick Leahy [D, VT]
Sen. Carl Levin [D, MI]
Sen. Blanche Lincoln [D, AR]
Sen. Claire McCaskill [D, MO]
Sen. Robert Menendez [D, NJ]
Sen. Barbara Mikulski [D, MD]
Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA]
Sen. Ben Nelson [D, NE]
Sen. Bill Nelson [D, FL]
Sen. Mark Pryor [D, AR]
Sen. John Reed [D, RI]
Sen. Harry Reid [D, NV]
Sen. John Rockefeller [D, WV]
Sen. Ken Salazar [D, CO]
Sen. Charles Schumer [D, NY]
Sen. Debbie Ann Stabenow [D, MI]
Sen. Jon Tester [D, MT]
Sen. Jim Webb [D, VA]
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse [D, RI]
Sen. Ron Wyden [D, OR]
Republicans Voting 'Aye'
Sen. Lamar Alexander [R, TN]Sen. Christopher Bond [R, MO]
Sen. C. Saxby Chambliss [R, GA]
Sen. Thad Cochran [R, MS]
Sen. Norm Coleman [R, MN]
Sen. Susan Collins [R, ME]
Sen. Bob Corker [R, TN]
Sen. John Cornyn [R, TX]
Sen. Elizabeth Dole [R, NC]
Sen. Kay Hutchison [R, TX]
Sen. John Isakson [R, GA]
Sen. Richard Lugar [R, IN]
Sen. Mel Martinez [R, FL]
Sen. Lisa Murkowski [R, AK]
Sen. Pat Roberts [R, KS]
Sen. Gordon Smith [R, OR]
Sen. Olympia Snowe [R, ME]
Sen. Arlen Specter [R, PA]
Sen. Ted Stevens [R, AK]
Sen. George Voinovich [R, OH]
Rep. Roger Wicker [R, MS-1]
Republicans Voting 'Nay'
Sen. Wayne Allard [R, CO]Sen. John Barrasso [R, WY]
Sen. Robert Bennett [R, UT]
Sen. Samuel Brownback [R, KS]
Sen. Jim Bunning [R, KY]
Sen. Richard Burr [R, NC]
Sen. Thomas Coburn [R, OK]
Sen. Larry Craig [R, ID]
Sen. Michael Crapo [R, ID]
Sen. Jim DeMint [R, SC]
Sen. Pete Domenici [R, NM]
Sen. John Ensign [R, NV]
Sen. Michael Enzi [R, WY]
Sen. Lindsey Graham [R, SC]
Sen. Charles Grassley [R, IA]
Sen. Judd Gregg [R, NH]
Sen. Charles Hagel [R, NE]
Sen. Orrin Hatch [R, UT]
Sen. James Inhofe [R, OK]
Sen. Jon Kyl [R, AZ]
Sen. Mitch McConnell [R, KY]
Sen. Jefferson Sessions [R, AL]
Sen. Richard Shelby [R, AL]
Sen. John Sununu [R, NH]
Sen. John Thune [R, SD]
Sen. David Vitter [R, LA]
Voting History
| Date | Chamber | Question | Aye | Nay | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 15, 2008 | Senate |
H.R.6331 Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 On Overriding the Veto (Shall H.R. 6331 Pass, the objections of the President of the United States to the contrary notwithstanding? ) |
70 | 26 | Veto Overridden | See Vote |
| July 15, 2008 | House |
H.R.6331 Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 Passage, Objections of the President Not Withstanding: H R 6331 Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act |
383 | 41 | Passed | See Vote |
| July 09, 2008 | Senate |
H.R.6331 Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 On the Cloture Motion (Upon Reconsideration, Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to Consider H.R. 6331 ) |
69 | 30 | Cloture Motion Agreed to | See Vote |
| June 26, 2008 | Senate |
H.R.6331 Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to Consider H.R. 6331 ) |
58 | 40 | Cloture Motion Rejected | See Vote |
| June 24, 2008 | House |
H.R.6331 Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended: H R 6331 Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act |
355 | 59 | Passed | See Vote |
All Bill Actions
- Passed roll in the House on Jul 15, 2008. Two-thirds of the Members present having voted in the affirmative the bill is passed, Passed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 383 - 41 (Roll no. 491).
- Jul 15, 2008: The Chair announced the unfinished business to be the consideration of the veto.
- Jul 15, 2008: POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate, the Chair put the question on passage, the objections of the President to the contrary notwithstanding, and pursuant to the rule the yeas and nays were ordered. The Chair announced that further proceedings on the question would resume at a time to be announced.
- Jul 15, 2008: DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the question of passage, the objections of the President to the contrary, notwithstanding.
- Jul 15, 2008: The Chair laid before the House the veto message from the President.
- Enacted on Jul 15, 2008. Became Public Law No: 110-275.
- Jul 15, 2008: Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Passed roll in the Senate on Jul 15, 2008. Passed Senate over veto by Yea-Nay Vote. 70 - 26. Record Vote Number: 177.
- Jul 15, 2008: Veto Message considered in Senate.
- Jul 15, 2008: Veto message received in Senate. Ordered held at the desk.
- Vetoed on Jul 15, 2008. Vetoed by President..
- Jul 10, 2008. Presented to President.
- Jul 09, 2008. Cleared for White House.
- Jul 09, 2008: Message on Senate action sent to the House.
- Passed by Unanimous Consent in the Senate on Jul 09, 2008. Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Jul 09, 2008: Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.
- Jul 09, 2008: Motion to proceed to consideration of measure agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
- Jul 09, 2008: Upon reconsideration, cloture on the motion to proceed invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 69 - 30. Record Vote Number: 169.
- Jul 09, 2008: Motion by Senator Reid to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure was not invoked (Record Vote Number 160) agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
- Jul 09, 2008: Motion to proceed to the motion by Senator Reid to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure was not invoked (Record Vote Number 160) agreed to in Senate.
- Jun 26, 2008: Returned to the Calendar. Calendar No. 836.
- Jun 26, 2008: Motion to proceed to consideration of measure withdrawn in Senate.
- Jun 26, 2008: Motion by Senator Reid to reconsider the vote by which cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure was not invoked [Record Vote Number 160] entered in Senate.
- Unknown action
- Jun 26, 2008: Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate.
- Jun 26, 2008: Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate.
- Added to calendar on Jun 25, 2008: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 836..
- Passed roll in the House on Jun 24, 2008. On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 355 - 59 (Roll no. 443).
- Jun 24, 2008: DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6331.
- Jun 24, 2008: Considered under suspension of the rules.
- Jun 24, 2008: Mr. Pallone moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- Jun 24, 2008: Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
- Jun 20, 2008: Referred to House Ways and Means
- Jun 20, 2008: Referred to House Energy and Commerce
- Jun 20, 2008: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Introduced on Jun 20, 2008.
Related Bills:
Related Issue Areas:
- Terminal care
- Subsidies
- Psychotropic drugs
- Psychotherapy
- 150 more
- Physical examinations
- Pensions
- Oxygen
- Obesity
- Mental depression
- Medical savings accounts
- Managed care
- Living wills
- Life insurance
- Language and languages
- Indian medical care
- Hearing
- Health information systems
- Gifts
- Genetics
- Discrimination in medical care
- Civil rights
- Capitation (Medical care)
- California
- Armed forces reserves
- Appropriations
- Annuities
- Women's health
- Women
- Welfare eligibility
- Welfare
- Veterans' medical care
- Veterans
- Transportation
- Translating and interpreting
- Terrorism
- Telemedicine
- Telecommunication
- Technology
- State and local government
- Standards
- Speech disorders
- South Asia
- Sexual abstinence
- Rural health
- Rural affairs
- Quality of care
- Public contracts
- Psychiatry
- Preventive medicine
- Prescription pricing
- Post-traumatic stress disorder
- Politics and government
- Physicians
- Pharmacies
- Performance measurement
- Nursing homes
- Nuclear medicine
- Minority health
- Minorities
- Military operations
- Military occupation
- Middle East and North Africa
- Mental health services
- Medigap
- Medicine
- Medicare
- Medically uninsured
- Medical tests
- Medical supplies
- Medical statistics





Rating Filter: 5
Comments
I thought congress was going to look over this bill again yesterday. Did that not happen? I sure hope it did because cutting Medicare reimbursement another 10.6% would be terrible for our elderly citizens and doctors throughout the country!!
- TR
Passed the Senate on July 9. President has promised to veto, but there are likely enough votes to override.
I am curious why President Bush would veto this? What is his problem with this bill?
The problem is, this bill would substantially cut the funds paid to private insurance companies that sell "medicare advantage" plans. These are plans sold by private insurance companies that administer the Medicare benefits with out of pocket expenses that are significantly lower than original Medicare coverage for Medicare beneficiares. Passage of this bill could cause plan premiums to raise to levels many seniors won't be able to afford. Unfortunately, what congress is viewing as the alternative to this bill is another bill that proposes cutting payments to doctors by as much as 10%. This is also not a good idea because if this happens many doctors will simply stop seeing people with Medicare. If that happens, it won't matter if these people have coverage or not, they simply won't be able to access medical care as easily as they do now. There are cuts that can be made that can effect savings, however these cuts won't work.
This legislation would stop any reduction for physician reimbursements for care provided under traditional Medicare. Approximately 80% of medicare subscribers are enrolled in traditional medicare.
The insurance industry is direrctly involved in Private Fee for Service Medicare Advantage plans. It appears these plans have been quite profitable to the industry & the industry objects to ANY legislation that would REDUCE payments to the Medicare Advantage plans. Many objective observers believe Medicare Advantage plans cost the Medicare program more than traditional medicare pays for physician patient care.
This legislation attempts to deal with the inequality in cost to Medicare & shift some of that increased cost to Physicians to avoid a decline in payment to physicians under traditional medicare.
I would also suggest that Congress examine the need to STANDARDIZE medicare advantage plans being offered. We have standardization in traditional Medigap plans that makes it possible for the consumer to make intelligent choices among the many medigap providers.
Under the PFFS Medicare advantage program it is currently impossible for consumers to compare plans due to the lack of standardization.
Medicare Advantage Private Fee For Service is just one type of Medicare Advantage plan, and by all appearances, the one that spoiled the system because many of the plans have benefits that are only slightly better than original fee for service Medicare, and yes, it costs the government more than oringal Medicare. Part of what this legislation is doing is adding provisions that would make the PFFS plans more cost effective...however those same provisions are essentially turning them into something that already exists, Medicare Advantage PPOs and HMOs, plans with proven track records of delivering benefits better than original Medicare in a cost effective manner.
Standardization of Medicare Advantage, like so many other "solutions" sounds good on the surface, however the purpose of have Medicare Advantage plans is to deliver choices to seniors that help them meet their own personal health care needs. Standardization could limit choices.
Another consideration would be to limit the amount of money Medicare Advantage plans can pay to insurance agents and brokers in commission. With the advent of the PFFS plan came enormous commissions, more than ever paid for a Medicare plan before. Much of what PFFS plans were paid by the government in the first month of a beneficiaries coverage under the plan was paid out in broker commissions. A limit of $20 per member per month, or $250 flat sum per application would be a reasonable amount to pay to insurance producers, and would put more money into the plan itself, which would allow for more generous payments to medicare providers. This in turn would make health care more available to all seniors.
Jump to: navigation, search
For the 4 Non Blondes song, see What's Up (song).
For the Boston, Massachusetts street newspaper, see Whats Up Magazine
What's up? is an informal question meaning, depending on situation and emphasis: "What are you doing?", "How are you?", "What is happening?" or "What gives?" It is sometimes used as an informal, casual greeting in itself. This expression was made popular by the cartoon character Bugs Bunny who used it as early as 1940 as part of his catch phrase "What's up Doc?" (where each word was pronounced distinctly).
Whassup (sometimes spelled Wussup or wassup) is also a commonly used African American Vernacular English term of the same meaning. It was the central theme of an advertising campaign for Anheuser-Busch owned "Budweiser" beer brand in the early 2000s.
The phrase is often shortened to "sup", and this term is commonly used as internet slang.
It also sometimes but very rarely used to mean "nice to meet you"
"What's up?" is now rephrased in many ways, mostly for Internet slang and chatting. A few include:
"sup"
"wassapening"
"waz up"
"waz^"
"wts up"
"wts new"
"waz happenin"
"WUZZAH!!"
"wuzzup"
"whussup"
"wuzzgoinon"
"wattup"
"Zappening"
"Zup"
[edit] See also
What's Up, Doc?
What's Up Fox
[edit] External links
Look up what's up in
Wiktionary, the free dictionary.A video of a myna bird at Honolulu Zoo imitating human speech, including several instances of "What's up?"
"What's up" at Urban Dictionary
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What%27s_up%3F"
Categories: Slang | Greeting words and phrases | Sociolinguistics | Language varieties and stylesViewsArticle Discussion Edit this page History Personal toolsLog in / create account Navigation
Main Page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Search
Interaction
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact Wikipedia
Donate to Wikipedia
Help
Toolbox
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Printable version
Permanent link
Cite this page
HR 6331 pased!!!! 40-26 4 non votes
This is a letter I sent to Senators who voted no on HR 6331:
Dear Senator,
As a physician, citizen of the United States, and a father, a son, and husband, I would like to personally reprimand you for violating the trust of those who elected you to office by prioritizing the agenda of your party and cronies rather than the health and well-being of your constituents in your action regarding HR 6331. Despite you and your partisan fellow’s attempts to block it, and your unending stall tactics, the collapse of the medical system in America has been postponed temporarily by the members of Congress who are loyal to those they are supposed to serve.
Most people, including physicians and politicians, do not fully appreciate the impact that a cut in Medicare reimbursement will have on the delivery of medical care in America. Nearly all insurance companies base their reimbursement upon some percentage of the Medicare rate: refusing to care for Medicare patients is not only unethical and anathema to our commitment; it is a pathetic and futile gesture that will do nothing but harm the populace and tarnish the image of the medical community. Reducing the Medicare reimbursement rate will essentially reduce every physician’s gross income across the board by the same percentage as the cut. As most physician’s overhead expenses range from 50% to 80%, a 10.5% reduction in reimbursement will decrease physician net income by 55% to 73%. Physicians are currently fairly well compensated, although our incomes relative to inflation have dropped more than 25% in the past 20 years while other professional incomes have increased. Despite this, there are very few physicians who will be able to weather a precipitous 70% decrease in income. Downsizing in a failing economy is unfeasible; selling the SUV and the million-dollar house are not options in this economy, and the inevitable outcome will be mass bankruptcy for most of the physicians who work in our cities. Rural physicians, with more modest incomes and lower overhead, will fare better, but many will succumb. Physicians who began their practices before 1985, who remember earning twice as much at the start of their practice, will retire in droves. The physicians who remain will have no choice but to try to get by, strapped with upside-down urban mortgages and monumental education debt. Rural physicians will no longer be able to transfer their sickest patients to tertiary care centers in the city: there will no longer be doctors on staff there. Most physicians work more than 60 hours a week currently. Attempting to take care of two to three times as many sick people, and having to try to manage a rapidly growing number of severely ill patients beyond their level of competence will crush the remaining physicians in short order. The United States, once home of the world’s gold standard of medical care, will become a medical wasteland.
It is already difficult to get medical care. My mother, who is 72 and has supplemental insurances in addition to Medicare, languished for 3 days in California hospitals before an Orthopedic Surgeon could be found to come to the hospital to reduce her dislocated hip. The Orthopedic Staff at the hospital where my mother was had dropped from 5 to 3 in the previous 12 months, and none of the remaining staff Orthopedists accepted Medicare. I seriously considered flying in from Texas, getting temporary privileges, and reducing my mother’s dislocation myself. I knew, however that this would be impossible as Medicare will not reimburse hospitals for services rendered to a family member, and treating family is against hospital policy for that reason. We asked for my mother to be transferred to a larger hospital where Orthopedic services would be available, but when she arrived there the situation was the same. This was not in a small town in the middle of nowhere: this happened in a community 40 miles from Los Angeles.
I implore you: look inside your heart to see if there is any desire to serve the people of the United States rather than your party and the special interest groups to whom you are beholden. If so, PLEASE attempt to redeem yourself by immediately applying the energy you exerted trying to shoot down Representative Rangel’s attempt to do the right thing to finding a permanent, workable solution to the Medicare crisis. Physicians have answered a calling--that calling came with a promise of community respect and a comfortable life for both the physician and his family, to compensate for long hours, 10-13 years of expensive secondary education, and constant exposure to deadly diseases and spurious lawsuits. Do not think that doctors will continue to answer the call if those promises are revoked. A 20% cut looms in only 18 months. Physicians all over the country are very upset that this disaster was not diverted until the last possible minute. Imagine how you and your family would feel if you had a heart attack, and the doctor stood by, dictating medical records, until 4 minutes had passed (the point at which irreversible brain and organ damage occurs), and only then started resuscitation. Our professional lives, and the ACTUAL lives of every citizen of the United States, are at stake here, Senator. If you can’t find it in you to work for the good of America and try to make it right, you might at least just abstain next time a vote comes up, like Senators McCain and Obama did.
Sincerely,
Steven G. Ballinger, M.D.
As a lifelong Republican I'm ashamed and dismayed by President Bush's veto and my two Republican state senators McConnell and Bunning for voting against the bill as well. However, thanks to a strong grassroots effort, espcially by AARP that veto was overridden. Thank God our system of government still works occassionally! I am definitely going to reconsider my Party affiliation after this one.
Did members of Congress know that Lincare, ROTECH, the Scooter Store and Option Care, providers in the DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program Contract Suppliers Manual for Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach-FL had all been charged with Medicare fraud by the OIG? When did we start rewarding companies for bad behavior...the problem with our government is lifetime politicians. We need to limit terms and then we may see truly realize change in our country.
ROOFERS 149
BOB PETERSON
6/1/07-5/31/08
P.O. BOX 32800
MARK PETERSON
BASE WAGE
28.21$
DETROIT, MI 48232
BOB DOYLE
VACATION (tax)
4.00
313-961-6093
HEALTH & WELFARE
7.35
SUPP. H & W
0.95
www.unionroofers.com
PENSION
6.10
APP. TRAINING
0.20
SMRCA/RIPF
0.30
TOTAL WAGE PKG.
47.11$
I REALLY WANT TO BE A ROOFER!
Pass HR6331 NOW!!!
When will it take affect?
Add A Comment