Del.icio.us
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Reddit
Newsvine
co.mments
Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act
A bill to amend the Clean Air Act to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, and for other purposes.
Other Bill Titles (2 more) 1/16/2007--Introduced.
Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act - Amends the Clean Air Act to set forth provisions concerning global warming pollution emissions. Directs the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to:
(1) set milestones to reduce the aggregate net levels of em... moreSee Full Bill Text
Committees
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Bill Status
| Introduced |  | Voted on by Senate | | Voted on by House | | Considered By President | | Bill Becomes Law |
| January 16, 2007 |
Users tracking S.309 (110) are also tracking:
| People | Bills | Issues |
|---|---|---|
In the News
October 09, 2007 Editorial: It's time for a bolder move on climate change
Boxer, who chairs the Senate Environment Committee, has co-sponsored S. 309, the Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act. The bill calls for a 15 percent ...
September 28, 2007 Barbara Boxer, the Senate's New Al Gore
Boxer is also a co-sponsor of the "Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act" (S.309). The title, and much of the text of the bill, is inappropriate since, ...
August 20, 2007 Bernie Sanders: Progress (But not Enough)
As a member of the Environment and Public Works Committee I will do everything I can to see that the bill that I introduced, S.309, the strongest and most ...
Source: All American Patriots (press release), Sweden
Blog Coverage
August 13, 2008 The âFume is Filthyâ Ad-Pigeon
Better self concupiscence under the impression be met with case-hardened authorize unlimited calefactive formula, image in such wise the Sanders-Light heavyweight saving clause(S. 309) that a accessory MIT sanctum sanctorum concludes ...
Source: Catherinesimone's Weblog
August 13, 2008 The âFume is Filthyâ Ad-Pigeon
Better self concupiscence under the impression be met with case-hardened authorize unlimited calefactive formula, image in such wise the Sanders-Light heavyweight saving clause(S. 309) that a accessory MIT sanctum sanctorum concludes ...
Source: Catherinesimone's Weblog
August 10, 2008 Serviformica sp. beobachten u. erkennen
Vielleicht gibt es hier Parallelen zu den nahe verwandten Waldameisen, wo bei einigen Arten die Arbeiterinnen polygyner Nester durchschnittlich deutlich kleiner sind, als jene in monogynen Nestern (Seifert 2007, S. 309). ...
Source: Ameisenforum.de
93 more posts...
See most useful blog posts
Information made available by:
Rating Filter: 5
(Close help)
Comments
(Close help)
Filtered Comment [show]
sere
science hasnt proven that abyss. but even if climate change is 100% natural, you must understand that no matter the cause it could have dire consequences for millions of people. We know that CO2 has an impact, so EVEN IF its a natural cycle, we know that it is within our capability to alter/lessen the negative effects by cutting emissions.
think about it this way, if we could have stopped hurricane katrina, or altered it to be less devastating shouldnt we have? or would you still argue that because it was a natural occurrence that we shouldnt have done anything to change it or prepare for it? Climate change is already effecting people, a year ago an island in the pacific that was once home to 15,000 people 10 years ago is now underwater.
We can either prepare ourselves or we can do nothing and gamble lives and cities. I vote that we should use our knowledge and tech.
and "Exposed: The Climate of Fear" is by glenn beck, who has proved over and over again that he is clueless about climate change. He reported a few nights ago about an increase in cooling in some areas and said that it proves climate change is wrong, when in fact scientists have said that not all places will warm, and that some places will indeed become cooler because of the effects on weather systems. (like england for example because of the change in the gulf stream.)
I agree even if its natural we need to do something!!!!!
Warm earthers.
We 'need to do something'? We've 'done something' for a couple of thousand years and it has had absolutely ZERO effect on the climate- Science is hsowing that CO2 has absolutely zero effect on the climate, and we've pumped tons and tons of 'greenhouse gases' into the environment ever since the industrial age started, and it has once again had zero effect on climate- Nature plods along just fine regardless of what we do- so if 1000's of years of industry hasn't been able to sway the climate one way or the other- what in the heck are we suppoed to 'do' to affect it now? This whole 'man-caused global warming' crap is nothign but a gigantic scam aimed at bilking money from hard working folks and will have again, absolutely zero effect on climate- but amazingly, people are swallowing up the global wamring lies hook line and sinker and will gladly hand over their money for a 'problem' that isn't infact a problem, and hwich is not the fault of mankind! The climate changes! period! Global Warming advocates are preying on the emotions of the public knowing that the public feels htis great sense of 'moral obligation' to do something- and these shysters are getting away with one of the biggest LIES ever! Go to epw.senate.org and read up on global warming- you'll be amazed at just how natural it is and how that there is absolutely nothing we can do to affect the climate one way or the other- and lest you think this is a minority view- I would liek to point you to 190,000 climate scientists who agree!
Cold earthers.
NASA says we can't stop global warming, warm earthers; but that's because of the Geospacial Intelligence Agency and the cold earthers having to explain that global warming is not human caused, but temperature changes that are natural, not a warmer earth.
Add A Comment