U.S. Congress - H.R.1036 Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act
H.R.1036 - Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act
To amend title 17, United States Code, to make technical corrections relating to copyright royalty judges. view all titles (6)
All Bill Titles
- Short: Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act as passed house.
- Short: Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act as reported to senate.
- Short: Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act as passed senate.
- Short: Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act as enacted.
- Official: To amend title 17, United States Code, to make technical corrections relating to copyright royalty judges. as introduced.
- Official: To amend title 17, United States Code, to make technical corrections relating to Copyright Royalty Judges, and for other purposes. as amended by house.
This Bill currently has no wiki content. If you would like to create a wiki entry for this bill, please Login, and then select the wiki tab to create it.
Bill's Views
- Today: 4
- Past Seven Days: 5
- All-Time: 567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Official Summary
7/19/2006--Passed Senate, amended. (There are 4 other summaries)(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the Senate on July 13, 2006. The summary of that version is repeated here.)Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act - (Sec. 3) Amends provisions regOfficial Summary
7/19/2006--Passed Senate, amended. (There are 4 other summaries)
(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the Senate on July 13, 2006. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Copyright Royalty Judges Program Technical Corrections Act -
(Sec. 3)
Amends provisions regarding copyright royalty judges to:(1) make technical changes;
(2) provide that when the last day of a time limit for performance of an action with or by the Copyright Royalty Judges (CRJs) falls on a nonbusiness day, the action may be taken on the next succeeding business day;
(3) provide that CRJs are to act in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act;
(4) include prior determinations and interpretations of copyright arbitration royalty panels that are not inconsistent with a decision of the Librarian of Congress or the Register of Copyrights among the precedents that CRJs must consider;
(5) allow participation in a proceeding to determine distribution of royalty fees without the payment of a filing fee if the petition to participate is accompanied by a statement that the petitioner (individually or as a group) will not seek a distribution of more than $1000, in which case the amount distributed to the petitioner shall not exceed $1000;
(6) allow CRJs to order a discovery schedule in connection with written rebuttal statements;
(7) allow CRJs to issue an amendment to a written determination to correct any technical or clerical errors in the determination or to modify terms, without approval of the Register; and
(8) require that the Librarian receive authorization from the CRJs before distributing statutory licensing fees for secondary transmissions by cable systems or satellite carriers even when no controversy about such distribution exists.
(Sec. 5)
Allows Copyright Royalty Judges to make a partial distribution of cable and satellite royalty fees at any time after the filing of claims for distribution of such fees. (Current law authorizes a partial distribution during the pendency of a distribution proceeding.)(Sec. 6)
Makes this Act effective as if it were included in the Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2004, except the partial distribution of royalty fees provisions are effective upon enactment of this Act....Read the Rest
Recent News Coverage
Hmmmm, no news coverage found for this bill at this time. This means that this this bill has not yet been mentioned on a publicly-searchable news website by either its official number (for example, "H.R. 3200") or title (for example, "America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009"). As soon as that changes, our daily automated search across the Web will catch it and include it here. If this bill is of interest to you, you can write a letter to the editor referring to this bill by name, and if your letter is published on the Web, a link back your letter will appear here within about one day. Or, if you know of a news article about this bill to display here, email us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: Our editorial team will post relevant links as quickly as possible. Thanks for helping to build public knowledge about Congress.
Recent Blog Coverage
H.R.1036: Job Creation and Innovation Investment Act of 2011 ...
For this reason, it is unlikely that this distinction drawn in the Bibray bill (H.R.1036) would have much practical relevance, and the overwhelming majority of funds would consequently qualify for the zero percent rate. ... breaking news and blog coverage,
H.R.1036: Job Creation and Innovation Investment Act of 2011 ...
For this reason, it is unlikely that this distinction drawn in the Bibray bill (H.R.1036) would have much practical relevance, and the overwhelming majority of funds would consequently qualify for the zero percent rate. ... breaking news and blog coverage,
H.R.1036: Veterans Physical Therapy Services Improvement Act of ...
Reference: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act; Bill HR 1036 ; vote number 2003-124 on Apr 9, 2003. •Voted NO on decreasing gun waiting period from 3 days to 1. Reference: Bill introduced by McCollum, R-FL; ... Source: Northwoods Wanderings ... Ope
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
