The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.1650 - Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2007
To amend the Federal antitrust laws to provide expanded coverage and to eliminate exemptions from such laws that are contrary to the public interest with respect to railroads.
| Version | Word Count | Changes From Previous Version | Percent Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced in House | 1,476 | n/a | n/a |
| Reported in House | 1,532 | 134 Show Changes Hide Changes | 71% |
Key: changed or removed text inserted or modified text

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 1650 IH
Union Calendar No. 556CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
110th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. R. 1650CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[Report No. 110-860, Part I]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend the Federal antitrust laws to provide expanded coverage and to eliminate exemptions from such laws that are contrary to the public interest with respect to railroads.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
March 22, 2007CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. WALZ of Minnesota, and Mr. BAKER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concernedCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
September 18, 2008CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary with an amendmentCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
September 18, 2008CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure and Energy and Commerce discharged; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printedCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on March 22, 2007]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend the Federal antitrust laws to provide expanded coverage and to eliminate exemptions from such laws that are contrary to the public interest with respect to railroads.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `‘Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2007'8’. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. INJUNCTIONS AGAINST RAILROADAPPLICATION OF THE ANTITRUST LAWS TO RAIL COMMON CARRIERS.
(a) Application of the Antitrust Laws- The proviso in section 16 of the Clayton Act (
(b) Definition- The term ‘antitrust laws’ has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of the 1st section of the Clayton Act (
SEC. 3. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS OF RAILROADS.
The sixthlast undesignated paragraph of section 7 of the Clayton Act (
SEC. 4. ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY.
Section 11(a) of the Clayton Act (
SEC. 5. INJUNCTIONS AGAINST RAILROAD COMMON CARRIERS.
The proviso in section 16 of the Clayton Act (
SEC. 4. LIMITATION6. REMOVAL OF PRIMARY JURISDICTION AS LIMITATION.
The Clayton Act (
`‘Sec. 29. In any civil action against a common carrier railroad under section 4, 4A, 4C, 15, or 16 of this Act, the district court shall not be required to defer to the primary jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board.'’. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 5. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ENFORCEMENT.(a) Clayton Act- Section 11(a) of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 21(a) ) is amended by striking `subject to jurisdiction' and all that follows through the first semicolon and inserting `subject to jurisdiction under subtitle IV of title 49, United States Code (except for agreements described in section 10706 of that title and transactions described in section 11321 of that title);'.(b) FTC Act- 7. UNFAIR METHODS OF COMPETITION.
Section 5(a)(2) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (
‘For purposes of this paragraph with respect to unfair methods of competition, the term ‘common carrier’ excludes a common carriers by rail subject to the by railroad that is subject to jurisdiction of the Surface Transportation Board under subtitle IV of title 49, of the United States Code, without regard to whether such railroads have filed rates or whether a complaint challenging a rate has been filed.'.’. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 78. TERMINATION OF EXEMPTIONS IN TITLE 49.
(a) In General-
(1) in subsection (a)-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) in the 3d sentence of paragraph (2)(A), by striking ` by striking ‘, and the Sherman Act (
(B) in paragraph (4)-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) by striking the second sentence; and(ii) by striking `However, the' in the third sentence and inserting `The';2d sentence, and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) in the 3d sentence by striking ‘However, the’ and inserting ‘The’, and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) in paragraph (5)(A), by striking ` by striking ‘, and the antitrust laws set forth in paragraph (2) of this subsection do not apply to parties and other persons with respect to making or carrying out the agreement'; and(2’, CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in subsection (d) by striking the last sentence, and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(e) Application of Antitrust Laws-`(1) IN GENERAL-‘(e) Nothing in this section exempts a proposed agreement described in subsection (a) from the application of the Sherman Act (
et seq.), the Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1 , 14 et seq.), the antitrust laws (as defined in subsection (a) of the 1st section of the Clayton Act, but including section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.), section 73 or 74 of the Wilson Tariff Act ( 15 U.S.C. 41 and 9), or the Act of June 19, 1936 ( 15 U.S.C. 8 , 13a, 13b, 21a).`(2) ANTITRUST ANALYSIS TO CONSIDER IMPACT-to the extent such section 5 applies to unfair methods of competition). CommentsClose CommentsPermalink 15 U.S.C. 13 ‘(f) In reviewing any such proposed agreement for the purpose of any provision of law described in paragraph (1), the Board and any other reviewing agencydescribed in subsection (a), the Board shall take into account, among any other considerations, the impact of the proposed agreement on shippers, on consumers, and on affected communities.' The Board shall make findings regarding such impact, which shall be-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) made part of the administrative record; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) submitted to any other reviewing agency for consideration in making its determination; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) available in any judicial review of the Board’s decision regarding such agreement.’. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Combinations-
(1) in subsection (a)-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) by striking `The authority' in the first sentence and inserting `‘The authority’ and inserting ‘Except as provided in sections 4 (
(B) in the 3d sentence by striking ‘is exempt from the antitrust laws and from all other law,' in the third sentence and inserting `’ and inserting ‘is exempt from all other law (except the antitrust laws referred to in subsection (c)),';laws referred to in subsection (c)),’, and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by adding at the end the following: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(c) Application of Antitrust Laws-`(1) IN GENERAL-‘(c) Nothing in this sectionubchapter exempts a transaction described in subsection (a) from the application of the Sherman Act (
et seq.), the Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1 , 14 et seq.), the antitrust laws (as defined in subsection (a) of the 1st section of the Clayton Act, but including section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.), section 73 or 74 of the Wilson Tariff Act ( 15 U.S.C. 41 ), or the Act of June 19, 1936 ( 15 U.S.C. 8-9 , 13a, 13b, 21a).`(2) ANTITRUST ANALYSIS TO CONSIDER IMPACT- In reviewing any suchto the extent such section 5 applies to unfair methods of competition). The preceding sentence shall not apply to any transaction for the purpose of any provision of law described in paragraph (1), the Board and any other reviewingrelating to the pooling of railroad cars approved by the Surface Transportation Board or its predecessor agency pursuant to section 11322. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink 15 U.S.C. 13 ‘(d) In reviewing any transaction described in subsection (a), the Board shall take into account, among any other considerations, the impact of the transaction on shippers and on affected communities.'’. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Conforming Amendments- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) HEADING- The heading for
(2) ANALYSIS OF SECTIONS- The item relating to such section in the chapter analysis at the beginninganalysis of sections of chapter 107 of such title is amended to read as follows:`by striking the item relating to section 10706 and insert the following: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘10706. Rate agreements.'’. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 89. EFFECTIVE DATE.
(a) In General- Subject to the provisions ofExcept as provided in subsection (b), this Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Conditions-(1) PREVIOUS CONDUCTLimitation- A civil action under section 4, 15, or 16 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C.4A, 4C, 15, 25, 26) oror 16 of the Clayton Act, or a complaint under section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (
(1) occurs before the expiration of the 180-day period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act that; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) was previously exempted from the antitrust laws as defined in section 1exempted from the antitrust laws (as defined in subsection (a) of the 1st section of the Clayton Act (
(2) GRACE PERIOD Union Calendar No. 556 CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
110th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. R. 1650CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[Report No. 110-A civil action or complaint described in paragraph (1) may not be filed earlier than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Ac860, Part I]CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend the Federal antitrust laws to provide expanded coverage and to eliminate exemptions from such laws that are contrary to the public interest with respect to any previously exempted conduct or activity or previously exempted agreement that is continued subsequent to the date of enactment of this Act.railroads.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
September 18, 2008CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Reported from the Committee on the Judiciary with an amendmentCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
September 18, 2008CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure and Energy and Commerce discharged; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printedCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
OC Blog Articles Related To This Bill
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.1650 as Reported in House Railroad Antitrust Enforcement Act of 2007



