H.R.1708 - To amend title 49, United States Code, to expand passenger facility fee eligibility for noise compatibility projects.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.

A project of the Participatory Politics Foundation and the Sunlight Foundation
U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.1708 as Introduced in House To amend title 49, United States Code, to expand passenger facility fee eligibility for...A non-profit, non-partisan public resource
Everyone can be an insider. Learn how.Use the options to the right to narrow down your search results.
Sessions:
112th CongressSearch in:
The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate Now
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 1708 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend title 49, United States Code, to expand passenger facility fee eligibility for noise compatibility projects.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Ms. HARMAN (for herself and Ms. WATERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and InfrastructureCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend title 49, United States Code, to expand passenger facility fee eligibility for noise compatibility projects.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(7) NOISE MITIGATION FOR CERTAIN SCHOOLS-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(A) IN GENERAL- In addition to the uses specified in paragraphs (1), (4), and (6), the Secretary may authorize a passenger facility fee imposed under paragraph (1) or (4) at a large hub airport (as defined in section 47102) that is the subject of an amended judgment and final order in condemnation filed on January 7, 1980, by the Superior Court of the State of California for the county of Los Angeles, to be used for a project to carry out noise mitigation for a building, or for the replacement of a relocatable building with a permanent building, in the noise impacted area surrounding the airport where such building is used primarily for educational purposes, notwithstanding the air easement granted or any terms to the contrary in such judgment and final order, if--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(i) the Secretary determines the building is adversely affected by airport noise;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(ii) the building is owned or chartered by the school district that was the plaintiff in Case No. 986,442 or Case No. 986,446 that was resolved by such judgment and final order;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(iii) the project is for a school identified in the settlement agreements effective February 16, 2005, between the airport and the school districts;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(iv) in the case of a project to replace a relocatable building with a permanent building, the eligible project costs are limited to the actual structural construction costs necessary to mitigate aircraft noise in instructional classrooms to an interior noise level meeting current standards of the Federal Aviation Administration; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(v) the project otherwise meets the requirements of this section for authorization of a passenger facility fee.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(B) ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS- In subparagraph (A)(iv), the term `eligible project costs' means the difference between the cost of standard school construction and the cost of construction necessary to mitigate classroom noise to the standards of the Federal Aviation Administration.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
OpenCongress is a free and open-source project of the Participatory Politics Foundation, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization with a mission to increase civic engagement. The non-profit Sunlight Foundation is the Founding and Primary Supporter of OpenCongress.