Freedom of Choice Act
To protect, consistent with Roe v. Wade, a woman's freedom to choose to bear a child or terminate a pregnancy, and for other purposes.
Other Bill Titles (2 more) 4/19/2007--Introduced.
Freedom of Choice Act - Declares that it is the policy of the United States that every woman has the fundamental right to choose to:
(1) bear a child;
(2) terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal viability; or
(3) terminate a pr... moreSee Full Bill Text
Committees
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Bill Status
| Introduced | ![]() | Voted on by House | ![]() | Voted on by Senate | ![]() | Considered By President | ![]() | Bill Becomes Law |
| April 19, 2007 |
Users tracking H.R.1964 (11) are also tracking:
| People | Bills | Issues |
|---|---|---|
|
In the News
We are not currently finding any news articles on this topic using our daily automated search of Google News. However, if you know of a relevant news article to display here, OpenCongress site editors have the ability to add it manually. Simply e-mail us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: We'll post relevant links as quickly as possible. Also, if this topic is important to you, you could write a letter to the editor -- if a news article refers this specific topic by name, a link to that news article is likely to appear here soon.
Blog Coverage
July 21, 2008 An act of dishonesty
This implies that as a bill (which existed in the House as HR 1964 and the Senate as S. 1173) this legislation would move on to the president. Whereas Sen. Obama has promised that his first act would be to make it law. ...
July 07, 2008 Shipwreck knowledge base
Lonsdale, Adrian L., Kaplan, HR 1964. A guide to sunken ships in American waters. VK1270 .L6 1964 Winslow, Ron. 1978. Hard aground : the story of the Argo Merchant oil spill. GC1212.M4 W56 1978 Historic Shipwreck Management: Meeting of ...
Source: scuba diving
June 16, 2008 FOCA
HR 1964 IH 110th CONGRESS 1st Session HR 1964 To protect, consistent with Roe v. Wade, a woman's freedom to choose to bear a child or terminate a pregnancy, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 19, 2007 ...
Source: Prolife America








Rating Filter: 5
(Close help)
Comments
(Close help)
Abortion is not just the private choice of the mother. There are others that are involved: the baby, the father, the grandparents, the brothers and/or sisters, aunts, uncles, friends. There is a choice and that choice is whether to end a life or not.
As long as the female body is capable of breeding, it is the source of life and that must be respected. Pro-life should mean respecting all life and the decisions that go into empowering women with choice; choosing when to take on the 18 year to life long commitment of raising a family. When Pro-Life = Pro-Fetus, it is insulting to female empowerment and family planning.
Fathers, grandparents, brothers & sisters, aunts & uncles, and friends: Preserve the sanctity of life by being there for our mothers to be. They need our love and support to know they have made the right CHOICE, and they will.
The power of creating life was granted to women by God, and that needs to be respected. Please support the life givers of this world, and support this bill.
All these people think they are GOD. They think it is okay for a woman in America to kill an American child before they are born. Vote every one of these suckers out of office
in Jesus name. Amen
May GOD bless all of us, U. S.
John Wieder
The choice of a woman to have an abortion or not needs to be preserved. Just because it is legal to have an abortion, doesn't mean that people will have them, solely because it is legal, as some people think. Attempting to make a decision harder for a woman by legislating your belief, especially in a higher power is a violation of human rights, because you are taking away the choice of a woman whether or not to have a child.
Add A Comment