Save the Lives of Americans in Close Combat Act of 2007
To reiterate the authority of the United States Armed Forces to use riot control agents as a legitimate, legal, and non-lethal alternative to the use of lethal force under the general rules of engagement in effect for contingency operations of the Armed Forces conducted outside of the United States.
Other Bill Titles (2 more) 5/16/2007--Introduced.
Save the Lives of Americans in Close Combat Act of 2007 - Expresses the policy of the United States that:
(1) riot control agents are not chemical weapons, but rather legitimate, legal, and non-lethal alternatives to the use of lethal force; and />(2) members of the Armed Forces may use such agents under the general rules of engagement in effect for a contingency operation conducted outside of the United States.
... moreSee Full Bill Text
Committees
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Bill Status
| Introduced | ![]() | Voted on by House | ![]() | Voted on by Senate | ![]() | Considered By President | ![]() | Bill Becomes Law |
| May 16, 2007 |
In the News
We are not currently finding any news articles on this topic using our daily automated search of Google News. However, if you know of a relevant news article to display here, OpenCongress site editors have the ability to add it manually. Simply e-mail us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: We'll post relevant links as quickly as possible. Also, if this topic is important to you, you could write a letter to the editor -- if a news article refers this specific topic by name, a link to that news article is likely to appear here soon.
Blog Coverage
May 23, 2007 HR 2344 Enrolled
In memory of US Army Specialist Hatim S. Kathiria of Fort Worth.
May 15, 2007 HR 2344, To reiterate the authority of the United States Armed ...
HR 2344 would reiterate the authority of the United States Armed Forces to use riot control agents as a legitimate, legal, and non-lethal alternative to the use of lethal force under the general rules of engagement in effect for ...










Rating Filter: 5
Comments
No Comments
Add A Comment