HR 2436 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To strengthen the capacity of eligible institutions to provide instruction in nanotechnology.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

May 22, 2007

Ms. HOOLEY (for herself, Mr. WU, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. HONDA, Mr. LIPINSKI, and Mr. KIND) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science and TechnologyCommentsClose CommentsPermalink

To strengthen the capacity of eligible institutions to provide instruction in nanotechnology.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Nanotechnology in the Schools Act'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink

SEC. 2. NANOTECHNOLOGY IN SCHOOLS.

(a) Findings- Congress makes the following findings:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) The rapidly growing field of nanotechnology is generating scientific and technological breakthroughs that will benefit society by improving the way many things are designed and made.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) Nanotechnology is likely to have a significant, positive impact on the security, economic well-being, and health of Americans as fields related to nanotechnology expand.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) In order to maximize the benefits of nanotechnology to individuals in the United States, the United States must maintain world leadership in the field, including nanoscience and microtechnology, in the face of determined competition from other nations.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(4) According to the National Science Foundation, foreign students on temporary visas earned 32 percent of all science and engineering doctorates awarded in the United States in 2003, the last year for which data is available. Foreign students earned 55 percent of the engineering doctorates. Many of these students expressed an intent to return to their country of origin after completing their study.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(5) To maintain world leadership in nanotechnology, the United States must make a long-term investment in educating United States students in secondary schools and institutions of higher education, so that the students are able to conduct nanoscience research and develop and commercialize nanotechnology applications.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(6) Preparing United States students for careers in nanotechnology, including nanoscience, requires that the students have access to the necessary scientific tools, including scanning electron microscopes designed for teaching, and requires training to enable teachers and professors to use those tools in the classroom and the laboratory.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(b) Purpose- The purpose of this section is to strengthen the capacity of United States secondary schools and institutions of higher education to prepare students for careers in nanotechnology by providing grants to those schools and institutions to provide the tools necessary for such preparation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(c) Definitions- In this section:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) DIRECTOR- The term `Director' means the Director of the National Science Foundation.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) ELIGIBLE INSTITUTION- The term `eligible institution' means an institution that is--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) a public, private, parochial, or charter secondary school that offers 1 or more advanced placement science courses or international baccalaureate science courses;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) a community college, as defined in section 3301 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7011);CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(C) a 4-year institution of higher education or a branch, within the meaning of section 498(j) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1099c(j)), of such an institution; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(D) a informal learning science and technology center.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) QUALIFIED NANOTECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT- The term `qualified nanotechnology equipment' means equipment, instrumentation, or hardware that is--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) used for teaching nanotechnology in the classroom; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) manufactured in the United States at least 50 percent from articles, materials, or supplies that are mined, produced, or manufactured, as the case may be, in the United States.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(d) Program Authorized-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(1) PROGRAM AUTHORIZED- The Director shall establish a nanotechnology in the schools program to strengthen the capacity of eligible institutions to provide instruction in nanotechnology. In carrying out the program, the Director shall award grants of not more than $150,000 to eligible institutions to provide such instruction.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(2) ACTIVITIES SUPPORTED-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) IN GENERAL- An eligible institution shall use a grant awarded under this section--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(i) to acquire qualified nanotechnology equipment and software designed for teaching students about nanotechnology in the classroom;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(ii) to develop and provide educational services, including carrying out faculty development, to prepare students or faculty seeking a degree or certificate that is approved by the State, or a regional accrediting body recognized by the Secretary of Education; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(iii) to provide teacher education and certification to individuals who seek to acquire or enhance technology skills in order to use nanotechnology in the classroom or instructional process.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) LIMITATIONS-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(i) USES- Not more than 1/4 of the amount of the funds made available through a grant awarded under this section may be used for software, educational services, or teacher education and certification as described in this paragraph.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(ii) PROGRAMS- In the case of a grant awarded under this section to a community college or institution of higher education, the funds made available through the grant may be used only in undergraduate programs.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(3) APPLICATIONS AND SELECTION-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) IN GENERAL- To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, an eligible institution shall submit an application to the Director at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by such information as the Director may reasonably require.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) PROCEDURE- Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall establish a procedure for accepting such applications and publish an announcement of such procedure, including a statement regarding the availability of funds, in the Federal Register.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(C) SELECTION- In selecting eligible institutions to receive grants under this section, and encouraging eligible institutions to apply for such grants, the Director shall, to the greatest extent practicable--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(i) select eligible entities in geographically diverse locations;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(ii) encourage the application of historically Black colleges and universities (meaning part B institutions, as defined in section 322 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1061)) and minority institutions (as defined in section 365 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1067k)); andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(iii) select eligible institutions that include institutions located in States participating in the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (commonly known as `EPSCoR').CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(4) MATCHING REQUIREMENT AND LIMITATION-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) IN GENERAL-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(i) REQUIREMENT- The Director may not award a grant to an eligible institution under this section unless such institution agrees that, with respect to the costs to be incurred by the institution in carrying out the program for which the grant was awarded, such institution will make available (directly or through donations from public or private entities) non-Federal contributions in an amount equal to 1/4 of the amount of the grant.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(ii) WAIVER- The Director shall waive the matching requirement described in clause (i) for any institution with no endowment, or an endowment that has a dollar value lower than $5,000,000, as of the date of the waiver.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) LIMITATION-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(i) BRANCHES- If a branch described in subsection (c)(1)(C) receives a grant under this section that exceeds $100,000, that branch shall not be eligible, until 2 years after the date of receipt of the grant, to receive another grant under this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(ii) OTHER ELIGIBLE INSTITUTIONS- If an eligible institution other than a branch referred to in clause (i) receives a grant under this section that exceeds $100,000, that institution shall not be eligible, until 2 years after the date of receipt of the grant, to receive another grant under this section.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(5) ANNUAL REPORT AND EVALUATION-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(A) REPORT BY INSTITUTIONS- Each institution that receives a grant under this section shall prepare and submit a report to the Director, not later than 1 year after the date of receipt of the grant, on its use of the grant funds.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(B) REVIEW AND EVALUATION-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(i) REVIEW- The Director shall annually review the reports submitted under subparagraph (A).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(ii) EVALUATION- At the end of every third year, the Director shall evaluate the program authorized by this section on the basis of those reports. The Director, in the evaluation, shall describe the activities carried out by the institutions receiving grants under this section and shall assess the short-range and long-range impact of the activities carried out under the grants on the students, faculty, and staff of the institutions.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(C) REPORT TO CONGRESS- Not later than 6 months after conducting an evaluation under subparagraph (B)(ii), the Director shall prepare and submit a report to Congress based on the evaluation. In the report, the Director shall include such recommendations, including recommendations concerning the continuing need for Federal support of the program carried out under this section, as may be appropriate.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink





(e) Authorization of Appropriations- There are authorized to be appropriated to the Director to carry out this section $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2008, and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 2009 through 2011.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink