HR 2597 IH
To provide that human life shall be deemed to exist from conception.
June 6, 2007
Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
To provide that human life shall be deemed to exist from conception.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Sanctity of Life Act of 2007'.
SEC. 2. FINDING AND DECLARATION.
(a) Finding- The Congress finds that life exists from conception.
(b) Declaration- Upon the basis of this finding, and in the exercise of the powers of the Congress--
(1) the Congress declares that--
(A) human life shall be deemed to exist from conception, without regard to race, sex, age, health, defect, or condition of dependency; and
(B) the term `person' shall include all human life as defined in subparagraph (A); and
(2) the Congress recognizes that each State has the authority to protect lives of unborn children residing in the jurisdiction of that State.
SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
(a) In General- Chapter 81 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
`Sec. 1260. Appellate jurisdiction; limitation
`Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 1253, 1254, and 1257, the Supreme Court shall not have jurisdiction to review, by appeal, writ of certiorari, or otherwise, any case arising out of any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, practice, or any part thereof, or arising out of any act interpreting, applying, enforcing, or effecting any statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or practice, on the grounds that such statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, practice, act, or part thereof--
`(1) protects the rights of human persons between conception and birth; or
`(2) prohibits, limits, or regulates--
`(A) the performance of abortions; or
`(B) the provision of public expense of funds, facilities, personnel, or other assistance for the performance of abortions.'.
(b) Conforming Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 81 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
`1260. Appellate jurisdiction; limitation.'.
SEC. 4. LIMITATION ON DISTRICT COURT JURISDICTION.
(a) In General- Chapter 85 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
`Sec. 1370. Limitation on jurisdiction
`Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the district courts shall not have jurisdiction of any case or question which the Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction to review under section 1260 of this title.'.
(b) Conforming Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 85 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
`1370. Limitation on jurisdiction.'.
SEC. 5. FEDERAL COURT DECISIONS NOT BINDING ON STATE OR LOCAL COURTS.
Any decision of a Federal court, to the extent that the decision relates to an issue removed from Federal jurisdiction under the amendments made by sections 3 and section 4, is not binding precedent on the court of--
(1) any State or subdivision thereof;
(2) the District of Columbia; or
(3) any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States, or any subdivision thereof.
SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply to any case pending on such date of enactment.
SEC. 7. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this Act or the amendments made by this Act, or the application of this Act or such amendments to any person or circumstance, is determined by a court to be invalid, the validity of the remainder of this Act and the amendments made by this Act and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected by such determination.





Rating Filter: 5
Comments
What I don't understand about abortion is how a killing a fetus once it has been born is considered murder, when one second ago, killing the fetus is considered a medical procedure.
We're legislating science now?
Filtered Comment [show]
berner24 yes that is going to be you
burn-er 24 hours a day in hell. What is the matter no gonads? Man you need to wake up. That child that is unborn is an American. Since they have started this nonsense 50,000,000 have died, been murdered and another 50,000,00 were not born which leaves a big vacuum that is being filled with illegal aliens. Social Securtiy is shot because of that too. Almost every problem we have. It is too bad that your mother did not do that to you, it might have been the only way you would have made it to heavan. Your not going to make it like this. May GOD bless all of us,U.S. Too!!! In Jesus name!!! Amen
tags: nextag,tx22,tx-22,22,John Wieder, John, Wieder, Pro Life, weider, Right to Life
You moron. Everytime you squirt in your sock you are slaughtering umpteen million spermatazoan-Americans by letting them dry out and suffocate.
No, what's abosolutely unconstitutional is the selfish taking of life because of one's own petty selfishness.
i love babies. they're cute.
I hate babies.
I'll kill everyone of them!
i'll give you an abortion! bahahaha
I'm going to get pregnant just so I can kill babies!
Filtered Comment [show]
Anonymous yes that is going to be you
Anonymous is 24 hours a day in hell. What is the matter no gonads? Man you need to wake up. That child that is unborn is an American. Since they have started this nonsense 50,000,000 have died, been murdered and another 50,000,00 were not born which leaves a big vacuum that is being filled with illegal aliens. Social Securtiy is shot because of that too. Almost every problem we have. It is too bad that your mother did not do that to you, it might have been the only way you would have made it to heavan. Your not going to make it like this. May GOD bless all of us,U.S. Too!!! In Jesus name!!! Amen
tags: nextag,tx22,tx-22,22,John Wieder, John, Wieder, Pro Life, weider, Right to Life
The cornerstone of all laws that protect human life is that all laws are put in place to ensure the freedom of a citizens of our nation. You cannot enjoy a freedom at the expense of another person's freedom which is why smoking in public places is now illegal in most states. So the freedom that women now currently enjoy at the expense of their unborn child should also be treated in the same fashion. Life begins at conception, there is no disputing that fact. I do not believe that banning abortion is about woman rights but rather the rights of the most vunerable of all humans, that of the unborn child. We must protect the rights of all human beings without sacrificing the rights of others.
Life does not begin at conception, people. Life begins when you are BORN. Can we please shift our focus to more substantive issues now?
When are we born?
Does it occur when the umbilical cord is cut? When we take or first breath of air? When the top of our head is exposed to air? When mother's water breaks? When labor starts and the mother begins to push the child out? When the fetus's lungs are strong enough that it is capable of surviving just fine without the umbilical cord?
You can see this is not a closed issue, and it seems harsh to answer these questions based on the convenience of the mother.
Add A Comment