Bill's Page Views

This Week: 4   All-Time: 39

H.R.2660

0 Comments

My Vote  All Votes
AyeAyes:0
NayNays:0

2007 Civil Rights Pay Fairness Act

To amend title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to extend the period for filing charges of discrimination in violation of such title and to provide relief for certain current injuries arising from compensation calculations attributable to compensation decisions made at any time in violation of such title.

6/11/2007--Introduced.
2007 Civil Rights Pay Fairness Act - Amends the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to increase the length of time an aggrieved person has to file a charge of an alleged unlawful employment practice. Declares that, for enforcement of unlawful employment practices provisions more...

All Bill Titles See Full Bill Text Show All Actions

Amendments

This bill has no amendments.


Bill Status

Make a Bill Status Widget (What's this?)
IntroducedresultVoted on by HouseresultVoted on by SenateresultConsidered By PresidentresultBill Becomes Law
June 11, 2007

In the News feed

We are not currently finding any news articles on this topic using our daily automated search of Google News. However, if you know of a relevant news article to display here, OpenCongress site editors have the ability to add it manually. Simply e-mail us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: We'll post relevant links as quickly as possible. Also, if this topic is important to you, you could write a letter to the editor -- if a news article refers this specific topic by name, a link to that news article is likely to appear here soon.

Blog Coverage feed

May 08, 2008 Abortion / Cloning, What's the Difference? What does Team Ose know ...

H Amdt 221 to HR 2660 Roll Call #352, July 2003 - Prohibit Taxpayer Money for sex research - Ose voted No. Now that we have de-funded abstinence programs, we need to study the results with more tax dollars, right? To be continued...

Source: PLACER
Was this article useful? Yes or No


May 07, 2008 Abortion / Cloning, What's the Difference? What does Team Ose know ...

H Amdt 221 to HR 2660 Roll Call #352, July 2003 – Prohibit Taxpayer Money for sex research – Ose voted No. Now that we have de-funded abstinence programs, we need to study the results with more tax dollars, right? To be continued…

Source: PCRA Weblog
Was this article useful? Yes or No


February 21, 2008 Ose is a BIG spender... (Lew Uhler missed the memo)

... Francisco’s Asian Prostitutes/Masseuses”, “American Indian Transgender Research”, and “Child Health and Human Development Study on Pandas” (HR 2660, roll call # 352, 7/10/03), all paid for courtesy of the Placer County tax

Source: PCRA Weblog
Was this article useful? Yes or No


5 more posts...
See highest rated blog posts

Information made available by:

Technorati

For more info about the campaign contributions behind this bill, visit its page on Maplight.org

OpenCongress is a joint project of the Participatory Politics Foundation and the Sunlight Foundation. Questions? Comments? Contact Us

Data made available by:

Govtrack.US

Help Open Up Congress:

The OpenHouse Project