<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : News Articles for H.R.269 STOP bill</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h269/atom_news" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h269/news" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2007-09-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/news/40304</id>
  <entry>
    <title>VEAP vs. MGIB Benefits</title>
    <link href="http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,149517,00.html?wh=wh" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-17:/commentary/1222245</id>
    <updated>2007-09-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Military.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
What happened with HR 269? I am one of the vets that falls into the gap as discussed in your column. "The opportunity to convert to the Montgomery GI Bill ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,149517,00.html?wh=wh"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The First Amendment is a Nonpartisan Issue</title>
    <link href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2007/07/the_first_amendment_is_a_nonpa.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-14:/commentary/893046</id>
    <updated>2007-07-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ScienceBlogs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
He did it again in the 110th, (HR 269). This time around, he has only 35 cosponsors, but that includes 16 other Democrats. There have been other, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2007/07/the_first_amendment_is_a_nonpa.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
