The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.2698 - Federal Aviation Research and Development Reauthorization Act of 2007
To authorize appropriations for the civil aviation research and development projects and activities of the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes.
| Version | Word Count | Changes From Previous Version | Percent Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced in House | 6,072 | n/a | n/a |
| Reported in House | 6,523 | 32 Show Changes Hide Changes | 17% |
Key: changed or removed text inserted or modified text

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 2698 IHRHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To authorize appropriations for the civil aviation research and development projects and activities of the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
June 13, 2007
Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself and Mr. GORDON of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science and TechnologyCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
September 17, 2007
Additional sponsor: Mr. BARTLETT of MarylandCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
September 17, 2007
Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printedCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]
[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 13, 2007]
To authorize appropriations for the civil aviation research and development projects and activities of the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Federal Aviation Research and Development Reauthorization Act of 2007'. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
As used in this Act-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the term `Administrator' means the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the term `Director' means the Director of the Joint Planning and Development Office; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) the term `FAA' means the Federal Aviation Administration; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) the term `NASA' means the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) the term `National Research Council' means the National Research Council of the National Academies of Science and Engineering; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) the term `NOAA' means the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) the term `NSF' means the National Science Foundation; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(8) the term `Office' means the Next Generation Air Transportation System Joint Planning and Development Office; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(9) the term `Secretary' means the Secretary of Transportation. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
(1) in paragraph (11)(L), by striking `and'; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in paragraph (12)(L), by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(13) for fiscal year 2008, $335,191,000, including-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(A) $7,350,000 for fire research and safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(B) $4,086,000 for propulsion and fuel systems; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(C) $2,713,000 for advanced materials and structural safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(D) $3,574,000 for atmospheric hazards and digital system safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(E) $14,931,000 for aging aircraft; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(F) $2,202,000 for aircraft catastrophic failure prevention research; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(G) $14,651,000 for flightdeck maintenance, system integration, and human factors; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(H) $9,517,000 for aviation safety risk analysis; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(I) $15,254,000 for air traffic control, technical operations, and human factors; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(J) $6,780,000 for aeromedical research; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(K) $19,888,000 for weather programs; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(L) $6,310,000 for unmanned aircraft systems research; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(M) $18,100,000 for the Next Generation Air Transportation System Joint Planning and Development Office; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(N) $13,755,000 for wake turbulence; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(O) $20,469,000 for environment and energy; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(P) $1,184,000 for system planning and resource management; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(Q) $3,415,000 for the William J. Hughes Technical Center Laboratory Facility; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(R) $74,200,000 for the Center for Advanced Aviation System Development; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(S) $2,000,000 for the Airport Cooperative Research Program--capacity; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(T) $3,000,000 for the Airport Cooperative Research Program--environment; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(U) $5,000,000 for the Airport Cooperative Research Program--safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(V) $3,600,000 for GPS civil requirements; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(W) $5,000,000 for runway incursion reduction; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(X) $6,500,000 for system capacity, planning, and improvement; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(Y) $3,000,000 for operations concept validation; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(Z) $1,000,000 for NAS weather requirements; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(AA) $4,000,000 for the Airspace Management Lab; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(BB) $5,000,000 for airspace redesign; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(CC) $4,000,000 for wind profiling and weather research, Juneau; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(DD) $1,000,000 for the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS); CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(EE) $15,000,000 for Safe Flight 21, Alaska Capstone; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(FF) $20,000,000 for NextGen demonstration; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(GG) $8,907,000 for airports technology research--capacity; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(HH) $9,805,000 for airports technology research--safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
and`(14) for fiscal year 2009, $481,554,000, including-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(A) $8,457,000 for fire research and safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(B) $4,050,000 for propulsion and fuel systems; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(C) $2,686,000 for advanced materials and structural safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(D) $3,568,000 for atmospheric hazards and digital system safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(E) $14,683,000 for aging aircraft; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(F) $2,158,000 for aircraft catastrophic failure prevention research; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(G) $37,499,000 for flightdeck maintenance, system integration, and human factors; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(H) $8,349,000 for aviation safety risk analysis; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(I) $15,323,000 for air traffic control, technical operations, and human factors; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(J) $6,932,000 for aeromedical research; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(K) $22,336,000 for weather program; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(L) $6,738,000 for unmanned aircraft systems research; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(M) $18,100,000 for the Next Generation Air Transportation System Joint Planning and Development Office; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(N) $11,560,000 for wake turbulence; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(O) $35,039,000 for environment and energy; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(P) $1,847,000 for system planning and resource management; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(Q) $3,548,000 for the William J. Hughes Technical Center Laboratory Facility; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(R) $85,000,000 for Center for Advanced Aviation System Development; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(S) $5,000,000 for the Airport Cooperative Research Program--capacity; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(T) $5,000,000 for the Airport Cooperative Research Program--environment; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(U) $5,000,000 for the Airport Cooperative Research Program--safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(V) $3,469,000 for GPS civil requirements; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(W) $5,000,000 for runway incursion reduction; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(X) $6,500,000 for system capacity, planning and improvement; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(Y) $3,000,000 for Operations Concept Validation; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(Z) $1,000,000 for NAS weather requirements; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(AA) $4,000,000 for the Airspace Management Lab; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(BB) $3,000,000 for airspace redesign; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(CC) $20,000,000 for Safe Flight 21, Alaska Capstone; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(DD) $12,000,000 for NextGen demonstration; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(EE) $102,000,000 for NextGen system development; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(FF) $8,907,000 for airports technology research--capacity; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(GG) $9,805,000 for airports technology research--safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
and`(15) for fiscal year 2010, $486,502,000, including-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(A) $8,546,000 for fire research and safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(B) $4,075,000 for propulsion and fuel systems; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(C) $2,700,000 for advanced materials and structural safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(D) $3,608,000 for atmospheric hazards and digital system safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(E) $14,688,000 for aging aircraft; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(F) $2,153,000 for aircraft catastrophic failure prevention research; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(G) $36,967,000 for flightdeck maintenance, system integration, and human factors; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(H) $8,334,000 for aviation safety risk analysis; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(I) $15,471,000 for air traffic control, technical operations, and human factors; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(J) $7,149,000 for aeromedical research; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(K) $23,286,000 for weather program; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(L) $6,236,000 for unmanned aircraft systems research; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(M) $18,100,000 for the Next Generation Air Transportation System Joint Planning and Development Office; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(N) $11,412,000 for wake turbulence; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(O) $34,678,000 for environment and energy; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(P) $1,827,000 for system planning and resource management; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(Q) $3,644,000 for William J. Hughes Technical Center Laboratory Facility; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(R) $90,000,000 for the Center for Advanced Aviation System Development; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(S) $5,000,000 for the Airport Cooperative Research Program--capacity; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(T) $5,000,000 for the Airport Cooperative Research Program--environment; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(U) $5,000,000 for the Airport Cooperative Research Program--safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(V) $3,416,000 for GPS civil requirements; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(W) $5,000,000 for runway incursion reduction; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(X) $6,500,000 for system capacity, planning and improvement; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(Y) $3,000,000 for operations concept validation; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(Z) $1,000,000 for NAS weather requirements; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(AA) $4,000,000 for the Airspace Management Lab; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(BB) $3,000,000 for airspace redesign; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(CC) $20,000,000 for Safe Flight 21, Alaska Capstone; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(DD) $12,000,000 for NextGen demonstration; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(EE) $102,000,000 for NextGen system development; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(FF) $8,907,000 for airports technology research--capacity; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(GG) $9,805,000 for airports technology research--safety; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(16) for fiscal year 2011, $514,832,000, including-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(A) $8,815,000 for fire research and safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(B) $4,150,000 for propulsion and fuel systems; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(C) $2,747,000 for advanced materials and structural safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(D) $3,687,000 for atmospheric hazards and digital system safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(E) $14,903,000 for aging aircraft; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(F) $2,181,000 for aircraft catastrophic failure prevention research; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(G) $39,245,000 for flightdeck maintenance, system integration and human factors; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(H) $8,446,000 for aviation safety risk analysis; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(I) $15,715,000 for air traffic control, technical operations, and human factors; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(J) $7,390,000 for aeromedical research; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(K) $23,638,000 for weather program; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(L) $6,295,000 for unmanned aircraft systems research; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(M) $18,100,000 for the Next Generation Air Transportation System Joint Planning and Development Office; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(N) $11,471,000 for wake turbulence; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(O) $34,811,000 for environment and energy; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(P) $1,836,000 for system planning and resource management; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(Q) $3,758,000 for William J. Hughes Technical Center Laboratory Facility; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(R) $114,000,000 for Center for Advanced Aviation System Development; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(S) $5,000,000 for the Airport Cooperative Research Program--capacity; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(T) $5,000,000 for the Airport Cooperative Research Program--environment; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(U) $5,000,000 for the Airport Cooperative Research Program--safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(V) $3,432,000 for GPS civil requirements; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(W) $2,000,000 for runway incursion reduction; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(X) $6,500,000 for system capacity, planning and improvement; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(Y) $3,000,000 for operations concept validation; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(Z) $1,000,000 for NAS weather requirements; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(AA) $4,000,000 for the Airspace Management Lab; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(BB) $3,000,000 for airspace redesign; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(CC) $20,000,000 for Safe Flight 21, Alaska Capstone; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(DD) $12,000,000 for NextGen demonstration; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(EE) $105,000,000 for NextGen system development; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(FF) $8,907,000 for airports technology research--capacity; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(GG) $9,805,000 for airports technology research--safety; and.'. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 4. NEXT GENERATION AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM JOINT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OFFICE.
(a) Status of Director and Responsibilities of Office- Section 709 of the Vision 100--Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act (
(1) in subsection (a)-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the following: `The head of the Office shall be the Director. The Director shall report to the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and shall serve as Associate Administrator for the Next Generation Air Transportation System, and shall be a voting member and co-chair of the Joint Resources Council.'; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) by amending paragraph (2)(C) to read as follows: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(C) creating a transition plan for the implementation of that system that includes date-specific milestones for the implementation of new capabilities into the national airspace system;'; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) in paragraph (2)(G), by striking `; and' and inserting a semicolon; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) in paragraph (2)(H), by striking the period at the end and inserting `; and'; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) by adding at the end of paragraph (2) the following: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(I) establishing specific quantitative goals for the safety, capacity, efficiency, performance, and environmental impacts of each phase of Next Generation Air Transportation System implementation activities and measuring actual operational experience against those goals, taking into account noise pollution reduction concerns of affected communities to the greatest extent practicable in establishing the environmental goals; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(J) working to ensure global interoperability of the Next Generation Air Transportation System; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(K) integrating aviation weather information and space weather information into the Next Generation Air Transportation System as soon as possible; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(L) overseeing, with the Administrator, the selection of products or outcomes of research and development activities that would be moved to the next stage of a demonstration project through the Joint Resources Council; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(M) maintaining a baseline modeling and simulation environment for testing and evaluating alternative concepts to satisfy Next Generation Air Transportation enterprise architecture requirements; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(N) pursuing the integration of unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system through research and demonstration programs under the auspices of a public and private partnership.'; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in subsection (e), by striking `2010' and inserting `2011'. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Accountability- Such sectionection 709(a) is further amended-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) in paragraph (3), by inserting `(A)' after the paragraph designation; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) by adding at the end of paragraph (3) the following: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(B) The Administrator, the Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of NASA, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the head of any other Department or Federal agency from which the Secretary of Transportation requests assistance under paragraph (A) shall designate a senior official in the department or agency to be responsible for-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(i) implementing the department's or agency's Next Generation Air Transportation System activities with the Office, including the execution of all aspects of the department's or agency's work on developing and implementing the integrated plan described in section 709(2)(A); and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(ii) ensuring that the department or agency meets its obligations as set forth in the memorandum of understanding executed by or on behalf of the department or agency under subparagraph (D). CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(C) The head of any such department or agency shall-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(i) establish an office within the department or agency to carry out its responsibilities under the memorandum of understanding under the supervision of the designated official; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(ii) ensure that the designated official has sufficient budgetary authority and staff resources to carry out the department's or agency's Next Generation Air Transportation System responsibilities as set forth in the integrated plan under section 709(b). CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(D) Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of the Federal Aviation Research and Development Reauthorization Act of 2007, the head of each department or agency that has responsibility for carrying out any activity under the integrated plan under section 709(b) shall execute a memorandum of understanding with the Office obligating that department or agency to carry out those activities.'. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Integrated Plan- Section 709(b) of the Vision 100--Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act (
(1) by striking the first sentence and inserting `The integrated plan shall be designed to ensure that the Next Generation Air Transportation System meets anticipated future air transportation safety, security, mobility, efficiency, and capacity needs and accomplishes the goals under subsection (c).'; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in paragraph (3)(C), by striking `; and' and inserting a semicolon; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) in paragraph (4) by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) by adding at the end the following: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(5) Date-specific timetables for the partial and complete implementation of planned Next Generation Air Transportation System capabilities, including but not limited to Automated Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast, Unmanned Aircraft Systems operations, Next Generation Enabled Weather system, Next Generation Data Communications, NAS Voice Switch, System Wide Information Management system, and space weather information, and including any necessary certification activities, and including an evaluation of the costs and benefits of accelerating any of the implementation and certification timetables; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(6) Identification of planned demonstration projects and date-specific timetables for the conduct of the demonstration projects and subsequent certification activities and an evaluation of the costs and benefits of accelerating any of the demonstration projects and certification activities; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(7) Date-specific timetables for meeting the environmental requirements identified in subsection (I); and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(8) Identification, on an annual basis, of each entity that will be responsible for each component of any research, development, or implementation activity.'. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Annual Report- Section 709(d) of the Vision 100--Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act (
`(d) Annual Reports- The Director of the Office shall transmit a report annually to the Committee on Science and Technology and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate at the time of the President's budget request describing the progress in carrying out the plan required under subsection (b) and any changes to that plan. The annual report shall include-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(1) the updated integrated plan developed under subsection (b); CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(2) a detailed description of the progress made in carrying out the integrated plan and any changes made to that plan since the previous annual report, and identifying any changes resulting from funding shortfalls or limitations set by the Office of Management and Budget; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(3) any deviation from previously established development and implementation milestones, the reasons for the deviation, and the impact of the deviation; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(4) the relevant programs and activities for the previous fiscal year and the proposed programs and activities under the President's budget request, of each participating Federal agency and department; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(5) the levels of funding for each participating Federal agency and department devoted to the programs and activities in paragraph (4) for the previous fiscal year and under the President's budget request.'. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(e) Senior Policy Committee- Section 710(a) of the Vision 100--Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act (
(f) Budget Preparation- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) Each Federal agency and department participating in the office shall, as part of its annual request for appropriations to the Office of Management and Budget, submit a report to the Office of Management and Budget which-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) identifies each element of its work program which contributes directly to Next Generation Air Transportation System initiative; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) states the portion of its request for appropriations that is allocated to each such element. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) The Office of Management and Budget shall review each such report in light of the goals, priorities, and agency and departmental responsibilities set forth in the annual report submitted under the amendment made by subsection (d), and shall include, in the President's annual budget estimate, a statement of the portion of each appropriate agency's or department's annual budget estimate relating to its activities undertaken pursuant to the Next Generation Air Transportation System initiative. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(g) Contingency Planning- The Director shall, as part of the design of the Next Generation Air Transportation System, develop contingency plans for dealing with the degradation of the Next Generation Air Transportation System in the event of a natural disaster, major equipment failure, or act of terrorism. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(h) Environmental Research- The Director shall establish environmental requirementobjectives for noise, emissions, and energy consumption to be satisfied in the Next Generation Air Transportation System through a combination of technologies and operational procedures. The Director shall assign primary responsibility for the research, development, and demonstration of the applicable technologies in a relevant environment to NASA and primary responsibility for demonstration of optimized operational procedures to the FAA. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) Government Accountability Office Assessment and Report- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) SCOPE- The Comptroller General shall assess compliance with the requirements of section 709 of the Vision 100--Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act (
(A) the effectiveness of the Next Generation Air Transportation System Joint Planning and Development Office in meeting the deadlines and milestones of the integrated plan under that section; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the adequacy and effectiveness of the memoranda of understanding executed by Federal departments and agencies under that section. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) REPORT- Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter until the Next Generation Air Transportation System is fully operational, the Comptroller General shall transmit a report to the Committee on Science and Technology and the Committee on Transportation and Infrsaastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate containing the Comptroller General's findings, conclusions and recommendations related to the assessment in paragraph (1). CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(j) Unmanned Aircraft Systems- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) RESEARCH INITIATIVE- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) IMPROVED MANNED AND UNMANNED AIRCRAFT-
(i) in subsection (a), by inserting `unmanned and manned' after `improve'; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) in subsection (b)(6), by striking `and' after the semicolon; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) in subsection (b)(7) by striking the period and inserting `; and'; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iv) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(8) in conjunction with other Federal agencies as appropriate, to develop technologies and methods to assess the risk of and prevent defects, failures, and malfunctions of products, parts, and processes, for use in all classes of unmanned aerialircraft systems that could result in a catastrophic failure of the unmanned aircraft that would endanger other aircraft in the national airspace system.'. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) SYSTEMS, PROCEDURES, FACILITIES, AND DEVICES- Section 44505(b) of such title is amended-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) in paragraph (4), by striking `and' after the semicolon; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) in paragraph (5)(C), by striking the period and inserting a semicolon; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(6) to develop a better understanding of the relationship between human factors and unmanned aircraft systems safety; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(7) to develop dynamic simulation models for integrating all classes of unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system without any degradation of existing levels of safety for all national airspace system users.'. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) ROADMAP- Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall develop and transmit an unmanned aircraft systems research, development, demonstration and implementation `roadmap' to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) IN GENERAL- Not later than 3 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with the National Research Council for an assessment of the status of unmanned aircraft systems that shall include consideration of-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) human factors regarding unmanned aircraft systems operation; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) `detect, sense and avoid technologies' with respect to both cooperative and non-cooperative aircraft; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) spectrum issues and bandwidth requirements; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iv) operation in suboptimal winds and adverse weather conditions; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(v) mechanisms for communicating unmanned aircraft system location; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(vi) airworthiness and system redundancy; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(vii) flight termination systems for safety and security; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(viii) technologies for unmanned aircraft systems flight control; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ix) technologies for unmanned aircraft systems propulsion; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(x) unmanned aircraft systems operator qualifications, medical standards, and training requirements; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(xi) unmanned aircraft systems maintenance requirements and training requirements; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(xii) any other unmanned aircraft systems-related issue the Administrator believes should be addressed; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(xiii) recommendations for integrating unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system in a timely manner without any degradation of existing levels of safety for all national airspace system users. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) REPORT- Not later than 12 months after initiating the study, the National Academy shall submit its report to the Administrator, the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and the House of Representatives Committee on Science and Technology containing its finding and recommendations. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) PILOT PROJECTS FOR TRANSITIONING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT RESULTS- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) IN GENERAL- The Administrator shall establish pilot projects in sparsely populated, low-density Class G air traffic airspace to conduct experiments and collect data in order to accelerate the safe integration of unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system without any degradation of existing levels of safety for all national airspace system users. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) USE OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP- In conducting the pilot projects, the Administrator shall encourage the formation of a public-private partnership. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) REPORT- Not later than 90 days after completing the pilot projects, the Administrator shall transmit a report to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, setting forth the Administrator's findings and conclusions concerning the projects. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- In addition to amounts authorized to be appropriated by the amendments made by this Act, tThere is authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator for fiscal years 2008 and 2009 such sums as may be necessary to carry out the pilot projects under this paragraph. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 5. INTERAGENCY RESEARCH INITIATIVE ON THE IMPACT OF AVIATION ON THE CLIMATE.
(a) In General- The Administrator, in coordination with NASA and the United States Climate Change Science Program, shall establish a research initiative to assess the impact of aviation on the climate and, if warranted, to evaluate approaches to mitigate that impact. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Research Plan- Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the participating Federal entities shall jointly develop a plan for the research program that contains the objectives, proposed tasks, milestones, and 5-year budgetary profile. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Review- The Administrator shall have the National Research Council conduct an independent review of the interagency research program plan and provide the results of that review to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Authorization of Appropriations- In addition to amounts authorized to be appropriated by the amendments made by this Act, tThere is authorized to be appropriated $2,000,000 for fiscal year 2008, and $5,000,000 in each of the fiscal years 2009 through 2011, for the interagency research program established under this section. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 6. RESEARCH PROGRAM ON RUNWAYS.
(a) Establishment of Research Program- The Administrator shall establish a program of research grants to universities and non-profit research foundations for research and technology demonstrations related to-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) improved runway surfaces; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) engineered material restraining systems for runways at both general aviation airports and airports with commercial air carrier operations. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Authorization of Appropriations- In addition to amounts authorized to be appropriated by the amendments made by this Act, tThere is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 2011 to carry out this section. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 7. RESEARCH ON DESIGN FOR CERTIFICATION.
(a) Joint Program- Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the FAA and NASA shall establish a joint research program on methods to improve both confidence in and the timeliness of certification of new technologies for their introduction into the national airspace system. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Research Plan- Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, as part of the activity described in subsection (a), the FAA and NASA shall jointly develop a plan for the research program that contains the objectives, proposed tasks, milestones, and five-year budgetary profile. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Review- The Administrator shall have the National Research Council conduct an independent review of the joint research program plan and provide the results of that review to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 8. CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE.
(a) Amendment-
`(f) Government's Share of Costs- The United States Government's share of establishing and operating the center and all related research activities that grant recipients carry out shall not exceed 75 percent of the costs. The United States Government's share of an individual grant under this section shall not exceed 90 percent of the costs.'. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Annual Report- The Administrator shall transmit a report annually to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate at the time of the President's budget request that lists-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the research projects that have been initiated by each Center of Excellence in the preceding year; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the amount of funding for each research project and the funding source; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) the institutions participating in each project and their shares of the overall funding for each research project; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) the level of cost-sharing for each research project. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 9. AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM.
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking `establish a 4-year pilot' in paragraph (1) and inserting `maintain an'; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) in paragraph (4)-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) by striking `expiration of the program' and inserting `expiration of the pilot program'; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) by striking `program, including recommendations as to the need for establishing a permanent airport cooperative research program' and inserting `program'. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 10. RESEARCH GRANTS PROGRAM INVOLVING UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS.
(a) In General- The Administrator shall establish a program to utilize colleges and universities, including Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Hispanic Serving Institutions, tribally controlled colleges and universities, and Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian serving institutions in conducting research by undergraduate students on subjects of relevance to the FAA. Grants may be awarded under this section for-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) research projects to be carried out primarily by undergraduate students; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) research projects that combine undergraduate research with other research supported by the FAA; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) research on future training requirements related to projected changes in regulatory requirements for aircraft maintenance and power plant licensees; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) research on the impact of new technologies and procedures, particularly those related to aircraft flight deck and air traffic management functions, and on training requirements for pilots and air traffic controllers. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Authorization of Appropriations- In addition to amounts authorized to be appropriated by the amendments made by this Act, tThere is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 2011, for research grants under this section. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 11. BUDGET FORMULATION.
`(g) Budget Formulation- (1) The Department of Transportation's annual budget request for the Federal Aviation Administration shall identify all of the activities carried out by the Administration within the categories of basic research, applied research, and development, as classified by the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-11. Each activity in the categories of basic research, applied research, and development shall be identified regardless of the budget category in which it appears in the budget request. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(2) The budget request specified in paragraph (1) shall be submitted to the Committee on Science and Technology and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate at the same time as the President's Budget Request is submitted to the Congress.'. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 12. RESEARCH PROGRAM ON SPACE WEATHER AND AVIATION.
(a) Establishment- From amounts made available under
(1) conduct or supervise research projects on impacts of space weather to aviation, including communication, navigation, avionic systems, and on airline passengers and personnel; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) facilitate the transfer of technology from space weather research programs to Federal agencies with operational responsibilities and to the private sector. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Use of Grants or Cooperative Agreements- The Administrator may use grants or cooperative agreements in carrying out this section. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Authorization of Appropriations- In addition to amounts authorized to be appropriated by the amendments made by this Act, there is authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 2011 to carry out this section. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 13. AVIATION GAS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.
(a) Continuation of Program- The Administrator, in coordination with the NASA Administrator, shall continue research and development activities into technologies for modification of existing general aviation piston engines to enable their safe operation using unleaded aviation fuel. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Roadmap- Not later than 120 days of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall develop a research and development roadmap for the program continued in subsection (a), containing the specific research and development objectives and anticipated timetable for achieving the objectives. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Report- Not later than 130 days of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall provide the roadmap specified in subsection (b) to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Authorization of Appropriations- In addition to amounts authorized to be appropriated by the amendments made by this Act, tThere is authorized to be appropriated $750,000 for each of the fiscal years 2008 through 2010, to carry out this section. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 14. RESEARCH REVIEWS AND ASSESSMENTS.
(a) Review of FAA's Energy- and Environment-Related Research Programs- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) STUDY- The Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with the National Research Council for a review of the FAA's energy- and environment-related research program. The review shall assess whether-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) the programs have well-defined, prioritized, and appropriate research objectives; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) the program are properly coordinated with the energy- and environment-related research programs of NASA, NOAA, and other relevant agencies; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) the program have allocated appropriate resources to each of the research objectives; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) there exist suitable mechanisms for transitioning the research results into the FAA's operational technologies and procedures and certification activities. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) REPORT- A report containing the results of the review shall be provided to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate within eighteen months of the enactment of this Act. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Assessment of the Impact of Space Weather on Aviation- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) STUDY- The Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with the National Research Council for a study of the impacts of space weather on the current and future United States aviation industry, and in particular, to examine the risks for Over-The-Pole (OTP) and Ultra-Long-Range (ULR) operations. The study shall-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) examine space weather impacts on at least the following areas: communications, navigation, avionics, and human health in flight; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) assess the benefits of space weather information and services to reduce aviation costs and maintain safety; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) provide recommendations on how NASA, NOAA, and the NSF can most effectively carry out research and monitoring activities related to space weather and aviation; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) provide recommendations on how to integrate space weather information into the Next Generation Air Transportation System. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) REPORT- A report containing the results of the study shall be provided to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 15. REVIEW OF FAA'S AVIATION SAFETY-RELATED RESEARCH PROGRAMS.
(a) Review- The Administrator shall enter into an arrangement with the National Research Council for an independent review of the FAA's aviation safety-related research programs. The review shall assess whether-- CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the programs have well-defined, prioritized, and appropriate research objectives; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) the programs are properly coordinated with the safety research programs of NASA and other relevant Federal agencies; CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) the programs have allocated appropriate resources to each of the research objectives; and CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) there exist suitable mechanisms for transitioning the research results from the programs into the FAA's operational technologies and procedures and certification activities in a timely manner. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Aviation Safety-Related Research Programs To Be Assessed- The FAA aviation safety-related research programs to be assessed under the review shall include, at a minimum, the following: CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) Air traffic control/technical operations human factors. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) Runway incursion reduction. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) Flightdeck/maintenance system integration human factors. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) Airports technology research--safety. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) Airport cooperative research program--safety. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(6) Weather program. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(7) Atmospheric hazards/digital system safety. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(8) Fire research and safety. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(9) Propulsion and fuel systems. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(10) Advanced materials/structural safety. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(11) Aging aircraft. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(12) Aircraft catastrophic failure prevention research. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(13) Aeromedical research. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(14) Aviation safety risk analysis. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(15) Unmanned aircraft systems research. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(16) Safe Flight 21--Alaska Capstone. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Report- Not later than 14 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall submit to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the results of the review. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Authorization of Appropriations- In addition to amounts authorized to be appropriated by the amendments made by this Act, there is authorized to be appropriated $700,000 for fiscal year 2008 to carry out this section. CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Union Calendar No. 205CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To authorize appropriations for the civil aviation research and development projects and activities of the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
September 17, 2007
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
OC Blog Articles Related To This Bill
- With SOPA Shelved, Congress Readies its Next Attack on the Internet Feb 13, 2012
- Anti-Web Censorship Bill Protest from Our Perspective at OC Feb 08, 2012
- Senate Passes Indefinite Military Detention Bill Over Obama Veto Threat Dec 03, 2011
- Supercommittee Failure and Stimulus Nov 22, 2011
- Supercommittee to Admit Failure Nov 21, 2011
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.2698 as Reported in House Federal Aviation Research and Development Reauthorization Act of 2007



