<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for H.R.3053 Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2007</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h3053/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h3053/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-05-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/45236</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Recommended Credit Cards To Establish Credit</title>
    <link href="http://creditskycreditgraphics.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/recommended-credit-cards-to-establish-credit/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-18:/commentary/2320284</id>
    <updated>2008-05-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Credit Rebuilding Card Applications </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
These bills would legalize sweeping business-to-business exceptions for credit bureaus stop aiding and abetting identity theft or hr 3053 is expected to be re-introduced shortly over these bills give consumers tools. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://creditskycreditgraphics.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/recommended-credit-cards-to-establish-credit/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>League of California Cities</title>
    <link href="http://www.cacities.org/index.jsp?displaytype=11&amp;amp;story=27070" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-17:/commentary/2945279</id>
    <updated>2008-01-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>League of California Cities All Stories feed </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While little action is expected on eminent domain this session, three measures have been introduced on the issue: the Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2007 (HR 3053/S 48) and the Strengthening the Ownership of Private Property ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cacities.org/index.jsp?displaytype=11&amp;amp;story=27070&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Eminent Domain and Private Property Rights</title>
    <link href="http://newsblaze.com/story/20080107123226tsop.nb/topstory.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-13:/commentary/3754150</id>
    <updated>2008-01-13T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NewsBlaze.com Current News - Book Publishing </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I support the &quot;Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2007 (HR-3053 IH) introduced in the 110th Congress by members of both major parties. The Act would prohibit any state or local government from exercising its power of Eminent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newsblaze.com/story/20080107123226tsop.nb/topstory.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This shows what is wrong with the current tax system.</title>
    <link href="http://bleap.blogspot.com/2007/07/this-shows-what-is-wrong-with-current.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-28:/commentary/3143765</id>
    <updated>2007-07-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>What the bleap? Bleap - Bleap - Bleap!! </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Listing of 2000 bills containing your phrase exactly as entered. 1 . [101st] To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow taxpayers to designate $1 of their income tax liability and some or all of their income tax refunds, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bleap.blogspot.com/2007/07/this-shows-what-is-wrong-with-current.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR 3053 - Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2007</title>
    <link href="http://delawarecurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2007/07/hr-3053-private-property-rights.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-24:/commentary/904087</id>
    <updated>2007-07-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Delaware Curmudgeon </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Status: 7/16/2007 &#8211; Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON EMINENT DOMAIN ABUSE BY STATES. (a) In General- No State or political subdivision of a State shall exercise its power of eminent domain, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://delawarecurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2007/07/hr-3053-private-property-rights.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>River bill prompts a partisan flood: The Swamp</title>
    <link href="http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/07/river_bill_prompts_a_partisan.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-22:/commentary/3400048</id>
    <updated>2007-07-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Swamp </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
However, with the recently offering of H.R. 3053, the re-introduction of the Private Property Rights Protection Act (previously H.R. 4128 from the 109th Congress), legislatures have the tools to do what is necessary to enact federal ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/07/river_bill_prompts_a_partisan.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Random bill roundup</title>
    <link href="http://www.landofbile.com/blog/2007/07/23/random-bill-roundup-11/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-22:/commentary/896724</id>
    <updated>2007-07-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>blog of bile </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 3053: Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2007. To protect private property rights. This sounds reasonable but it looks as if a state is not responsible for the &#8216;political subdivision.&#8217; Since the federal withholding appears to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.landofbile.com/blog/2007/07/23/random-bill-roundup-11/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The 110th Congress and Privacy: Week 28 (July 16 - July 20)</title>
    <link href="http://www.pogowasright.org/blogs/dissent/?p=543" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-20:/commentary/3143764</id>
    <updated>2007-07-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chronicles of Dissent </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This is the bill proposed by the DOJ. Once a bill number is available, it will be linked from the legislation tracking file. 3. Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2007. HR 3053. 4. Tax Collection Responsibility Act of 2007. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pogowasright.org/blogs/dissent/?p=543&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WashingtonWatch.com - H.R. 3053, The Private Property Rights ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/200506564.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-16:/commentary/3551231</id>
    <updated>2007-07-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Subject: Foreign aid </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
US Congress: HR 3053, The Private Property Rights Protection Act of 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/200506564.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>bill action: introduced: hr 3053: to protect private property rights.</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-3053" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-14:/commentary/3143763</id>
    <updated>2007-07-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Introduced Legislation -- Monitored by govtrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
rep. maxine waters [d-ca] introduced this bill. [this event matched these monitors: introduced legislation ]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-3053&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR 3053, To protect private property rights</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_3053.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-14:/commentary/871400</id>
    <updated>2007-07-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Welcome to WashingtonWatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 3053 would protect private property rights....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_3053.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

