National Security Letters Reform Act of 2007
To establish reasonable procedural protections for the use of national security letters, and for other purposes.
Other Bill Titles (2 more) 7/26/2007--Introduced.
National Security Letters Reform Act of 2007 - Prohibits a national security letter (letter) (a request for information sought by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in connection with a criminal investigation) from being issued unless the issuing official ... moreSee Full Bill Text
Committees
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Bill Status
| Introduced | ![]() | Voted on by House | ![]() | Voted on by Senate | ![]() | Considered By President | ![]() | Bill Becomes Law |
| July 26, 2007 |
Users tracking H.R.3189 (2) are also tracking:
| People | Bills |
|---|---|
In the News
April 16, 2008 FBI Tells Congress That New Policies Have Solved NSL Lapses
The House Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties is considering a bill, HR 3189, that would reform the use of NSLs by the FBI. ...
September 25, 2007 ACLU Welcomes Proposed NSL Fix in Senate
In the House, Representatives Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Jeff Flake (R-AZ) have introduced their own NSL fix, HR 3189, also called the National Security ...
Blog Coverage
June 23, 2008 Judiciary Constitution Subcommittee to Consider Subpoena for ...
HR 3189, the National Security Letters Reform Act of 2007, was introduced by Rep. Nadler, along with Reps. Jeff Flake (AZ-06), William Delahunt (MA-10) and Ron Paul (TX-14). This bipartisan bill would provide crucial checks against the ...
May 21, 2008 National Security Letters
Roy went on to call for the passage of the National Security Letters Reform Act of 2007 (HR 3189) âfor meaningful Congressional oversight of these risky law enforcement tools.â ACLU staff attorney Melissa Goodman noted, âIt appears that ...
Source: What SIS faculty are reading
May 19, 2008 FBI Needs Outside Supervision of National Security Letters
The House counterpart, the National Security Letters Reform Act (HR 3189), would not require judicial approval, but it would impose a time limit and tighter requirements on issuance of gag orders. The House bill would also return to the ...
Source: Firedoglake








Rating Filter: 5
(Close help)
Comments
(Close help)
No Comments
Add A Comment