To authorize the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to accept, as part of a settlement, diesel emission reduction Supplemental Environmental Projects, and for other purposes.
10/4/2007--Introduced.
Authorizes the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to accept, as part of a settlement of any alleged violations of environmental law, diesel emissions reduction Supplemental Environmental Projects if the projects:
(1) protect h more...
Users Tracking [1]
Users who are tracking this bill are also tracking:
Committees
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Bill Status
| Introduced | ![]() | Voted on by House | ![]() | Voted on by Senate | ![]() | Considered By President | ![]() | Bill Becomes Law |
| October 04, 2007 |
In the News
We are not currently finding any news articles on this topic using our daily automated search of Google News. However, if you know of a relevant news article to display here, OpenCongress site editors have the ability to add it manually. Simply e-mail us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: We'll post relevant links as quickly as possible. Also, if this topic is important to you, you could write a letter to the editor -- if a news article refers this specific topic by name, a link to that news article is likely to appear here soon.
Blog Coverage
April 14, 2008 This Week on the Hill
Though a date has not been noticed as of this writing, the Energy and Commerce Committee has announced a full committee mark-up of HR 3754, a bill that authorizes the EPA to accept a diesel emissions reduction plan. ...
Source: ClimateIntel.com - Legal & policy intellige...
Was this article useful?
Yes or
No
October 03, 2007 HR 3754, To authorize the Administrator of the Environmental ...
HR 3754 would authorize the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to accept, as part of a settlement, diesel emission reduction Supplemental Environmental Projects....
Source: WashingtonWatch.com - Welcome to WashingtonWatc...
Was this article useful?
Yes or
No







Rating Filter: 5 (What's this?)(Close help)
Comments
(What's this?)(Close help)
The EPA has stopped protecting the environment. Its anti-science bias of recent years is widely known and deplored.
Good stewards are vital to the earth, now more than ever before in our history.
EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson overrules his science advisers to make decisions that pander to corporate interests and clearly weaken efforts to reduce pollution.
Johnson must go. I call on Congress to ask the President to replace him with a more science-oriented, protective administrator without delay.
Sincerely,
Alan J.
Add A Comment