The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.5038 - Caging Prohibition Act of 2008
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent the election practice known as caging, and for other purposes.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 5038 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent the election practice known as caging, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
January 17, 2008
Mr. CONYERS (for himself, Mr. EMANUEL, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. NADLER, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. COHEN, Mr. HOLT, Mr. HONDA, Ms. KILPATRICK, and Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent the election practice known as caging, and for other purposes.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Caging Prohibition Act of 2008'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. VOTER CAGING AND OTHER QUESTIONABLE CHALLENGES PROHIBITED.
(a) In General- Chapter 29 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`Sec. 618. Voter caging and other questionable challenges
`(a) Definitions- In this section--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(1) the term `voter caging document' means--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(A) a nonforwardable document that is returned to the sender or a third party as undelivered or undeliverable despite an attempt to deliver such document to the address of a registered voter or applicant; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(B) any document with instructions to an addressee that the document be returned to the sender or a third party but is not so returned, despite an attempt to deliver such document to the address of a registered voter or applicant, unless at least two Federal election cycles have passed since the date of the attempted delivery;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(2) the term `voter caging list' means a list of individuals compiled from voter caging documents; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(3) the term `unverified match list' means a list produced by matching the information of registered voters or applicants for voter registration to a list of individuals who are ineligible to vote in the registrar's jurisdiction, by virtue of death, conviction, change of address, or otherwise; unless one of the pieces of information matched includes a signature, photograph, or unique identifying number ensuring that the information from each source refers to the same individual.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(b) Prohibition Against Voter Caging- No State or local election official shall prevent an individual from registering or voting in any election for Federal office, or permit in connection with any election for Federal office a formal challenge under State law to an individual's registration status or eligibility to vote, if the basis for such decision is evidence consisting of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(1) a voter caging document or voter caging list;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(2) an unverified match list;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(3) an error or omission on any record or paper relating to any application, registration, or other act requisite to voting, if such error or omission is not material to an individual's eligibility to vote under section 2004 of the Revised Statutes, as amended (
`(4) any other evidence so designated for purposes of this section by the Election Assistance Commission,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
except that the election official may use such evidence if it is corroborated by independent evidence of the individual's ineligibility to register or vote.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(c) Requirements for Challenges by Persons Other Than Election Officials-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(1) ATTESTATION OF FIRST-HAND KNOWLEDGE OF INELIGIBILITY- No person, other than a State or local election official, shall submit a formal challenge to an individual's eligibility to register to vote in an election for Federal office or to vote in an election for Federal office unless that challenge is supported by personal, first-hand knowledge regarding the grounds for ineligibility which is--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(A) documented in writing; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(B) subject to an oath or attestation under penalty of perjury that the individual who is the subject of the challenge is ineligible to register to vote or vote in that election.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(2) PROHIBITING CHALLENGES BASED ON CERTAIN EVIDENCE- No person, other than a State or local election official, shall submit a formal challenge to an individual's eligibility to register to vote in an election for Federal office or to vote in an election for Federal office if the basis for such challenge is evidence consisting of--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(A) a voter caging document or voter caging list;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(B) an unverified match list;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(C) an error or omission on any record or paper relating to any application, registration, or other act requisite to voting, if such error or omission is not material to an individual's eligibility to vote under section 2004 of the Revised Statutes, as amended (
`(D) any other evidence so designated for purposes of this section by the Election Assistance Commission.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(d) Penalties for Knowing Misconduct- Whoever knowingly challenges the eligibility of one or more individuals to register or vote or knowingly causes the eligibility of such individuals to be challenged in violation of this section with the intent that one or more eligible voters be disqualified, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both, for each such violation. Each violation shall be a separate offense.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`(e) No Effect on Related Laws- Nothing in this section is intended to override the protections of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections for chapter 29 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
`618. Voter caging and other questionable challenges.'.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 3. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this Act or any amendment made by this Act, or the application of a provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act and the amendments made by this Act, and the application of the provisions to any person or circumstance, shall not be affected by the holding.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
OC Blog Articles Related To This Bill
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.5038 as Introduced in House Caging Prohibition Act of 2008



