<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for H.R.5577 Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h5577/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h5577/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2011-03-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/49612</id>
  <entry>
    <title>About Judge Goodwin&amp;#39;s chemical plant expert &#8230; &#171; Sustained Outrage</title>
    <link href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2011/03/10/about-judge-goodwins-chemical-plant-expert/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-03-10:/commentary/11449650</id>
    <updated>2011-03-10T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Ken Ward Jr.</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Actually, the legislation being commented on &#8212; the Chemical Security Act of 2008 (http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h5577/text ) did not use the specific terminology &#8220;inherently safer technologies&#8221; or &#8220;inherently safer design,&#8221; as Mannan   men&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2011/03/10/about-judge-goodwins-chemical-plant-expert/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ye Olde Journalist: A Labeling Law with so many loopholes, there ...</title>
    <link href="http://mrscottyl.blogspot.com/2010/08/labeling-law-with-so-many-loopholes.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-08-03:/commentary/11449649</id>
    <updated>2010-08-03T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>mrscottyl</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This is another article in my series on how the4 government is poisoning our food supply. This article actually deals with how that the government is allowing companies that are selling organic food that are labeled as such, .... which the   food is derive&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mrscottyl.blogspot.com/2010/08/labeling-law-with-so-many-loopholes.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H.R.5577: Genetically Engineered Food Right to Know Act - U.S. ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h5577/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-06-21:/commentary/10587908</id>
    <updated>2010-06-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Or, if you know of a news article about this bill to display here, email us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: Our editorial team will post relevant links as quickly as possible. Thanks for helping to build pub&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h5577/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Chemical Facility Security News: More Discussion about Chemical ...</title>
    <link href="http://chemical-facility-security-news.blogspot.com/2009/01/more-discussion-about-chemical-security.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-01-04:/commentary/3913882</id>
    <updated>2009-01-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The article frequently points to HR 5577 as the model for legislation in the upcoming Congress. The authors note that HR 5577 was held up by the Democrats last summer because it would be easier to pass in a Congress more dominated by ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://chemical-facility-security-news.blogspot.com/2009/01/more-discussion-about-chemical-security.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>OUTLOOK &#226;&#8364;&#8482;09: Tougher US chemical security rules ahead</title>
    <link href="http://www.icis.com/Articles/2008/12/30/9180909/outlook-09-tougher-us-chemical-security-rules-ahead.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-29:/commentary/3916342</id>
    <updated>2008-12-29T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ICIS Americas news headlines </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
That existing replacement legislation, HR-5577, is viewed by industry as burdensome because it expressly allows individual states to enact their own, tougher chemical security laws and because it mandates the use of inherently safer ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icis.com/Articles/2008/12/30/9180909/outlook-09-tougher-us-chemical-security-rules-ahead.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Chemical Facility Security News: SOCMA Takes on IST</title>
    <link href="http://chemical-facility-security-news.blogspot.com/2008/12/socma-takes-on-ist.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-29:/commentary/3874573</id>
    <updated>2008-12-29T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This will put SOCMA on a collision course with the House Homeland Security Committee that included a moderate IST requirement in its Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act (CFATA) of 2008 (HR 5577) last year. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://chemical-facility-security-news.blogspot.com/2008/12/socma-takes-on-ist.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Chemical Facility Security News: Chemical Facility Security ...</title>
    <link href="http://chemical-facility-security-news.blogspot.com/2008/12/chemical-facility-security-legislation.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-25:/commentary/3834958</id>
    <updated>2008-12-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In so far as HR 5577 did specifically do that, ACC can claim support for the legislation. They had previously expressed concerns about some of the other components of HR 5577, specifically the IST provisions and the wording of the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://chemical-facility-security-news.blogspot.com/2008/12/chemical-facility-security-legislation.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog &#194;&#187; Blog Archive &#194;&#187; Report ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=935" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-24:/commentary/3500542</id>
    <updated>2008-11-24T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Beyond Pesticides Daily News Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In March the House Homeland Security Committee adopted the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008 (H.R. 5577) in a bipartisan vote. H.R. 5577 addresses many of the flaws in the interim law. However, according to the letter, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=935&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Chemical Industry Weighs in With Dingell in Battle With Waxman ...</title>
    <link href="http://chemguide.asia/news/top/2008/11/19/chemical-industry.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-18:/commentary/3373013</id>
    <updated>2008-11-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ChemGuide </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SOCMA opposes the bill (HR 5577) by House Homeland Chairman Bennie Thompson , D-Miss., that includes inherently safer technology (IST) language, which would empower the DHS secretary to require them to reformulate products, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://chemguide.asia/news/top/2008/11/19/chemical-industry.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Chemical Facility Security News: Dingell/Waxman Battle and ...</title>
    <link href="http://chemical-facility-security-news.blogspot.com/2008/11/dingellwaxman-battle-and-chemical.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-18:/commentary/3373012</id>
    <updated>2008-11-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Part of this discussion is driven by the failure of the Energy and Commerce Committee to report HR 5577 (or even HR 5533) to the House floor. Now I have written extensively about this issue (see: &#226;&#8364;&#339;The Continuing Saga of CFATA&#226;&#8364;* for my ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://chemical-facility-security-news.blogspot.com/2008/11/dingellwaxman-battle-and-chemical.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CQ Politics | Chemical Industry Weighs in With Dingell in Battle ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=hsnews-000002987111" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-17:/commentary/3464899</id>
    <updated>2008-11-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Top Stories from CQ </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SOCMA opposes the bill ( HR 5577 ) by House Homeland Chairman Bennie Thompson , D-Miss., that includes inherently safer technology (IST) language, which would empower the DHS secretary to require them to reformulate products, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=hsnews-000002987111&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Make Congress tighten up on Chemical Security</title>
    <link href="http://www.care2.com/news/member/830646067/950093" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-11:/commentary/3288346</id>
    <updated>2008-11-11T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Care2 News Network - Newly Submitted </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Send your local members of Congress a message to &quot;tighten up&quot; on Chemical Security by supporting HR 5577, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008 and other strong chemical security Submitted by June Marshall to Environment ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.care2.com/news/member/830646067/950093&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Greenpeace - Take Action</title>
    <link href="http://members.greenpeace.org/action/start/120/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-07:/commentary/3330579</id>
    <updated>2008-11-07T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Greenpeace Online Actions </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Send your local members of Congress a message to &quot;tighten up&quot; on Chemical Security by supporting H.R. 5577, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008 and other strong chemical security legislation in the 111th Congress. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://members.greenpeace.org/action/start/120/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Daniel Kessler: Three leaders who could follow Greenspan and do a ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-kessler/three-people-who-should-f_b_136576.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-23:/commentary/3330581</id>
    <updated>2008-10-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Full Feed from HuffingtonPost.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Secretary Chertoff can correct the wrong by actively working to pass the &quot;Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008&quot; (H.R. 5577), a bill that addresses the wrongs of the temporary law. Thus far, he's not moved as fast as we'd like on .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-kessler/three-people-who-should-f_b_136576.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Greenpeace Continues Pressure</title>
    <link href="http://chemical-facility-security-news.blogspot.com/2008/10/greenpeace-continues-pressure.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-22:/commentary/3077645</id>
    <updated>2008-10-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Move Forward on HR 5577 Having said all of that, I do agree with Rick Hind that Congress does need to take action. I agree completely with his final statement; &#226;&#8364;&#339;It's not too late for Congress to redeem itself when members return to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://chemical-facility-security-news.blogspot.com/2008/10/greenpeace-continues-pressure.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Homeland Security Today - news and analysis - Groups Push New ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.hstoday.us/content/view/5583/149/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-14:/commentary/3593138</id>
    <updated>2008-10-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Joomla! powered Site </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Bennie Thompson (D-MS), Chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, introduced the &quot;Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008&quot; (H.R. 5577) after his committee adopted the bill on March 6, 2008. This bill amends the Homeland ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hstoday.us/content/view/5583/149/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Push for New Chemical Facility Security Law</title>
    <link href="http://chemical-facility-security-news.blogspot.com/2008/10/push-for-new-chemical-facility-security.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-13:/commentary/3035343</id>
    <updated>2008-10-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Or, more importantly, if they work against the re-election of the people responsible for the failure of HR 5577 to come to a floor vote, the Speaker and the Democratic Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://chemical-facility-security-news.blogspot.com/2008/10/push-for-new-chemical-facility-security.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Continuing Saga of CFATA</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/10/06/the-continuing-saga-of-cfata/3724" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-05:/commentary/2971731</id>
    <updated>2008-10-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While the financial system bailout played out over the last week or so Speaker Pelosi has continued to extend the time that the limit given to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce to &#226;&#8364;&#732;act&#226;&#8364;&#8482; on HR 5577. After the last extension I ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/10/06/the-continuing-saga-of-cfata/3724&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CHEMICALS: EPA vs. DHS question just one obstacle to facility ...</title>
    <link href="http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&amp;amp;orgId=574&amp;amp;topicId=25151&amp;amp;docId=l:861085917&amp;amp;isRss=true" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-30:/commentary/2942088</id>
    <updated>2008-09-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>War on Terror - Homeland Security </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... or the Homeland Security Committee and the Department of Homeland Security. Homeland Security Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) introduced HR 5577 earlier this year, which would rewrite the nation's chemical facility security laws.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&amp;amp;orgId=574&amp;amp;topicId=25151&amp;amp;docId=l:861085917&amp;amp;isRss=true&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR 5577 Status Update &#226;&#8364;&#8220; 9-29-08</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/09/29/hr-5577-status-update--9-29-08/3607" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-28:/commentary/2927118</id>
    <updated>2008-09-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Speaker Pelosi continues to play games with the HR 5577, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008. She extended, twice this weekend, the time limit for the Committee on Energy and Commerce to complete its review of the bill. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/09/29/hr-5577-status-update--9-29-08/3607&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Infrastructure Protection v.2.0 &#226;&#8364;&#8220; Forward to the Past?</title>
    <link href="http://infracritical.blogspot.com/2008/09/infrastructure-protection-v20-forward.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-21:/commentary/2909776</id>
    <updated>2008-09-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Infracritical </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Since HR 1, the House Homeland Security Committee has reported a bill (HR 5577) to make CFATS even tougher, and Congress has passed legislation requiring DHS to regulate the sale of ammonium nitrate. As others have noted, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://infracritical.blogspot.com/2008/09/infrastructure-protection-v20-forward.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DHS Contract Inspectors</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/09/19/dhs-contract-inspectors/3474" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-18:/commentary/2862459</id>
    <updated>2008-09-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Especially if the Department uses a large number of companies for this purpose as is envisioned in HR 5577. As I noted in an earlier blog (see: &#226;&#8364;&#339;Third Party Entities under HR 5577&#226;&#8364;*) the proposed legislation requires that: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/09/19/dhs-contract-inspectors/3474&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR 5577 and Congressional Charades</title>
    <link href="http://iinetwork.net/hr-5577-and-congressional-charades/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-14:/commentary/2839682</id>
    <updated>2008-09-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Hot News from across the net </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This is a brief political note about the games that Speaker Pelosi is playing with chemical facility security and HR 5577. Tags: information, scoop, image, pictures, gossip, pics, news, videos, images, pictures.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://iinetwork.net/hr-5577-and-congressional-charades/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR 5577 and Congressional Charades</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/09/15/hr-5577-and-congressional-charades/3409" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-14:/commentary/2839681</id>
    <updated>2008-09-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Speaker Pelosi and the Democratic House Leadership continue to play silly games with HR 5577, the bill that that House Homeland Security Committee has designed to make the current CSAT regulations permanent while correcting some of the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/09/15/hr-5577-and-congressional-charades/3409&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DHS Inspections: Contract Inspectors</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/09/09/dhs-inspections-contract-inspectors/3289" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-08:/commentary/2817274</id>
    <updated>2008-09-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This is not a new idea, and certainly not my idea. It was incorporated into the stalled HR 5577 legislation (see: &#226;&#8364;&#339;Third Party Entities under HR 5577&#226;&#8364;* that would extend and make permanent the CFATS regulations. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/09/09/dhs-inspections-contract-inspectors/3289&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress Back in Session 9-08-08</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/09/05/congress-back-in-session-9-08-08/3241" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-05:/commentary/3120872</id>
    <updated>2008-09-05T12:37:25Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Congress returns to work next Monday. Well, the Senate never actually adjourned the way the House did, ...  or &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;H.R.5577&lt;/strong&gt; &#8211; CFATS Reauthorization     These two bills are different methods of extending the CFATS&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/09/05/congress-back-in-session-9-08-08/3241&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CRS &#226;&#8364;&#8221; Terrorism and Security Issues Facing the Water ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.docuticker.com/?p=22002" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-14:/commentary/2677354</id>
    <updated>2008-08-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Docuticker </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
One bill (HR 5533) would preserve an existing exemption for water utilities, while another (HR 5577) would include them in the scope of DHS security rules. Continuing attention to these issues is possible, along with interest in how the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.docuticker.com/?p=22002&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Terrorism and Security Issues Facing the Water Infrastructure Sector</title>
    <link href="http://everybodyopinion.blogspot.com/2008/08/terrorism-and-security-issues-facing.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-08:/commentary/2645863</id>
    <updated>2008-08-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>everybodyhasanopinion </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
another (HR 5577) would include them in the scope of DHS security rules. Continuing attention to these issues is possible, along with interest in how the federal. government coordinates its own activities and communicates policies and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://everybodyopinion.blogspot.com/2008/08/terrorism-and-security-issues-facing.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Groups Press Sen. Collins on HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://artaxerx.com/blogs/setting-namespace-security/19711/groups-press-sen-collins/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-07:/commentary/2831248</id>
    <updated>2008-08-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Setting namespace security </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
First, Senator Collins (Ranking Republican on the Senate Homeland Defense and Government Operations Committee) has a long history of supporting comprehensive chemical facility security legislat...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://artaxerx.com/blogs/setting-namespace-security/19711/groups-press-sen-collins/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Groups Press Sen. Collins on HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://digg.com/politics/Groups_Press_Sen_Collins_on_HR_5577" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-07:/commentary/2637184</id>
    <updated>2008-08-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Digg / upcoming </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This is a brief article about reports of pressure being applied to Senator Collins (R, Maine) to support HR 5577, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/politics/Groups_Press_Sen_Collins_on_HR_5577&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>new government documents at milner, july 2008</title>
    <link href="http://governmentdocuments.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/new-government-documents-at-milner-july-2008/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-06:/commentary/3120871</id>
    <updated>2008-08-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Government Documents </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
title: chemical facility anti-terrorism act of 2008 : report together with minority, additional, and dissenting views (to accompany hr 5577) (including cost estimate of the congressional budget office). author: united states. congress. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://governmentdocuments.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/new-government-documents-at-milner-july-2008/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR5577 Lobbying Effort</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/07/24/hr5577-lobbying-effort/2824" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-23:/commentary/2551909</id>
    <updated>2008-07-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Greenpeace is running a grassroots lobbying effort to get HR 5577 (Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008) passed. Their &amp;#39;Action Center&#226;&#8364;&#8482; has a brief blurb touting the IST provisions of the bill and a form letter that will be ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/07/24/hr5577-lobbying-effort/2824&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Update HR 5577 07-11-08</title>
    <link href="http://www.chemicalengineeringconsulting.com/2008/07/update-hr-5577-07-11-08/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-13:/commentary/2501907</id>
    <updated>2008-07-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Engineering </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Global Public Articles wrote an interesting post today on Here&#226;&#8364;&#8482;sa quick excerpt The House Leadership has once again caved on their responsibility to see to it that important security legislation moves through the Congress. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chemicalengineeringconsulting.com/2008/07/update-hr-5577-07-11-08/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Update HR 5577 07-11-08</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/07/14/update-hr-5577-07-11-08/2772" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-13:/commentary/2491171</id>
    <updated>2008-07-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
They provided the House Committee on Energy and Commerce another extension for the review of HR 5577. This extension runs until September 12th. This ensures that this bill will not make it to a floor vote during the current session. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/07/14/update-hr-5577-07-11-08/2772&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ACC Response to Lobbying Criticism</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/07/09/acc-response-to-lobbying-criticism/2738" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-08:/commentary/2464756</id>
    <updated>2008-07-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This makes them generally opposed to the passage of HR 5577. Their justification is that, before changes are made to the CFATS program, the current regulations need to be fully implemented and then evaluated. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/07/09/acc-response-to-lobbying-criticism/2738&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Who&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s holding up the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act?</title>
    <link href="http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/whos-holding-up-the-chemical-facility-anti-terrorism-act/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-19:/commentary/2381736</id>
    <updated>2008-06-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Security Debrief - a blog of homeland security... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... News: CFATA Delays There is an interesting article by Samuel Loewenberg on Politico.com blaming the chemical industry and DHS for the congressional delays in taking up the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008 (HR 5577). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://securitydebrief.adfero.com/whos-holding-up-the-chemical-facility-anti-terrorism-act/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CFATA Delays</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/06/19/cfata-delays/2676" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-18:/commentary/2350613</id>
    <updated>2008-06-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
There is an interesting article by Samuel Loewenberg on Politico.com blaming the chemical industry and DHS for the congressional delays in taking up the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008 (HR 5577). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/06/19/cfata-delays/2676&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Energy and Commerce Subcommittee Hears Testimony on Chemical ...</title>
    <link href="http://homestation.typepad.com/home_station/2008/06/energy-and-comm.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-17:/commentary/2347994</id>
    <updated>2008-06-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Untitled </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials conducted a hearing on June 12, 2008 concerning &amp;quot;HR 5533, the Chemical Facilities Act of 2008, and HR 5577, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://homestation.typepad.com/home_station/2008/06/energy-and-comm.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Subcommittee Hearing on HR 5533 and HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/fmillar1/ReRoute-NOW/entries/2008/06/15/house-subcommittee-hearing-on-hr-5533-and-hr-5577/205" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-14:/commentary/2584428</id>
    <updated>2008-06-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ReRoute NOW </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
House Subcommittee Hearing on HR 5533 and HR 5577 : I hope that you, as one conscientiously interested in improving facility security and helping your readers understand the choices, and perhaps interested in mandating consideration of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/fmillar1/ReRoute-NOW/entries/2008/06/15/house-subcommittee-hearing-on-hr-5533-and-hr-5577/205&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>congressional activities: week of june 9, 2008 here is this week&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s ...</title>
    <link href="http://international-live.blogspot.com/2008/06/congressional-activities-week-of-june-9.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-13:/commentary/3304068</id>
    <updated>2008-06-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>international </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
house committee on energy and commerce (subcommittee on environment and hazardous materials) hearing on hr 5533, the chemical facilities act of 2008, and hr 5577, the chemical facility anti-terrorism act of 2008. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://international-live.blogspot.com/2008/06/congressional-activities-week-of-june-9.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Subcommittee Hearing on HR 5533 and HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/06/14/house-subcommittee-hearing-on-hr-5533-and-hr-5577/2660" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-13:/commentary/2330989</id>
    <updated>2008-06-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The House Homeland Security Committee has already conducted extensive hearings about HR 5577 and submitted a very detailed committee report, House Report 110-550. The delays in the conduct of this initial hearing before the House ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/06/14/house-subcommittee-hearing-on-hr-5533-and-hr-5577/2660&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Protect Americans from Chemical Threats</title>
    <link href="http://usactions.greenpeace.org/action/start.php?action_id=197&amp;amp;source=RSS" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-11:/commentary/2364435</id>
    <updated>2008-06-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Greenpeace Online Actions </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Take action and urge your Representative to get behind and vote for the chemical security bill (HR 5577) that would take advantage of safer technologies to address these disasters. Congress has the power to pass a strong permanent law ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://usactions.greenpeace.org/action/start.php?action_id=197&amp;amp;source=RSS&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congresspedia Preview: This Week in Congress (June 6-13, 2008 ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.prwatch.org/node/7428" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-09:/commentary/3330582</id>
    <updated>2008-06-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Center for Media and Democracy blogs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
House Committee on Energy and Commerce: Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials hearing on the following bills: H.R. 5533, Chemical Facilities Act of 2008; and H.R. 5577, Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prwatch.org/node/7428&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>the week ahead: the week of june 9</title>
    <link href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2008/06/09/the-week-ahead-the-week-of-june-9/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-08:/commentary/3120869</id>
    <updated>2008-06-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Shopfloor </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
a separate subcommittee on thursday hears the following bills: hr 5533, chemical facilities act of 2008; and hr 5577, the chemical facility anti-terrorism act of 2008. the full financial services committee holds a hearing wednesday on ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shopfloor.org/2008/06/09/the-week-ahead-the-week-of-june-9/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congressional Activities: Week of June 9, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.acsblog.org/news-and-announcements-congressional-activities-week-of-june-9-2008.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-08:/commentary/2307219</id>
    <updated>2008-06-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>acsblog: The Blog of the American Constitution... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
House Committee on Energy and Commerce (Subcommittee on Environment and Hazardous Materials) hearing on HR 5533, the Chemical Facilities Act of 2008, and HR 5577, the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acsblog.org/news-and-announcements-congressional-activities-week-of-june-9-2008.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Science and Technology Policy Events Next Week</title>
    <link href="http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/06/events-jun9/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-05:/commentary/3330583</id>
    <updated>2008-06-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Science Progress </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R.5533, the &#226;&#8364;&#339;Chemical Facilities Act of 2008&#226;&#8364;&#179;; and H.R.5577, the &#226;&#8364;&#339;Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008.&#226;&#8364;* House Energy and Commerce Committee Environment and Hazardous Materials Subcommittee 2322 Rayburn House Office Building. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scienceprogress.org/2008/06/events-jun9/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR 5577 Status Update &#226;&#8364;&#8220; 5-29-08</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/05/29/hr-5577-status-update--5-29-08/2607" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-28:/commentary/2257232</id>
    <updated>2008-05-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On the status page for HR 5577 it gives the following information:. &amp;quot;5/30/2008 1:02pm:. &amp;quot;House Committee on Energy and Commerce Granted an extension for further consideration ending not later than July 11, 2008. &amp;quot; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/05/29/hr-5577-status-update--5-29-08/2607&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Chemical Industry Lobby Stalling Efforts to Secure Hazardous ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.netnewspublisher.com/chemical-industry-lobby-stalling-efforts-to-secure-hazardous-materials-from-attacks/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-06:/commentary/2170743</id>
    <updated>2008-05-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Net News Publisher </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In March, a comprehensive bill (HR 5577) that would replace the temporary law currently in place moved out of the Homeland Security Committee. If passed, it would require the highest risk chemical plants to use safer chemicals or ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.netnewspublisher.com/chemical-industry-lobby-stalling-efforts-to-secure-hazardous-materials-from-attacks/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Aol Version 9</title>
    <link href="http://yicape19.blogspot.com/2008/05/aol-version-9.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-02:/commentary/2150700</id>
    <updated>2008-05-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Yicape19 </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Actually, I think that the case can be made that the current version of HR 5577 does have a fairly wide consensus of support. As Chairman Thompson pointed out, there are minor issues that remain to be resolved in the amendment process, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://yicape19.blogspot.com/2008/05/aol-version-9.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Inherently Safer Technology Implementation under HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://www.headlinegenie.com/terrorism/inherently-safer-technology-implementation-under-hr-5577/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-30:/commentary/2177232</id>
    <updated>2008-04-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Terrorism </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A brief discussion of the Secretary of DHS to require to implement inherently safer technology under the provisions of the recently introduced Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Act of 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.headlinegenie.com/terrorism/inherently-safer-technology-implementation-under-hr-5577/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Inherently Safer Technology Implementation under HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/05/01/inherently-safer-technology-implementation-under-hr-5577/2343" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-30:/commentary/2142298</id>
    <updated>2008-04-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As noted in an earlier blog in this series (see: &amp;quot;Ranking of Chemical Facilities by HR 5577&amp;quot;) the Secretary is required to establish at least four risk based tiers for covered facilities, one of which (again at least) will be designated ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/05/01/inherently-safer-technology-implementation-under-hr-5577/2343&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Inherently Safer Technology Assessment under HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/04/29/inherently-safer-technology-assessment-under-hr-5577/2339" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-28:/commentary/2130771</id>
    <updated>2008-04-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
All facilities that are required to complete a site security plan (SSP) under section 2103 (see: &amp;quot;Ranking of Chemical Facilities by HR 5577&amp;quot;) are required to conduct an assessment of the methods to reduce the consequences of a terrorist ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/04/29/inherently-safer-technology-assessment-under-hr-5577/2339&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Third Party Entities under HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/04/28/third-party-entities-under-hr-5577/2335" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-27:/commentary/2126314</id>
    <updated>2008-04-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Alternative security plans are authorized under HR 5577. Before they can be approved by the Secretary they must be reviewed to ensure that they comply with all of the minimum requirements for plans covered in this legislation. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/04/28/third-party-entities-under-hr-5577/2335&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Response to Complaints about CFATS</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/04/22/a-response-to-complaints-about-cfats/2324" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-21:/commentary/2100094</id>
    <updated>2008-04-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Ms. Maurer lauds the House Homeland Security Committee for the introduction of HR 5577, a bill that will &amp;quot;replace this limited temporary program with a comprehensive chemical security program.&amp;quot; She is correct that this bill will replace ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/04/22/a-response-to-complaints-about-cfats/2324&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Protected Information under HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://www.headlinegenie.com/terrorism/protected-information-under-hr-5577/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-13:/commentary/2058144</id>
    <updated>2008-04-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Terrorism </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A discussion of the provisions of the recently introduced Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Act of 2008 that apply to protected information under that legislation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.headlinegenie.com/terrorism/protected-information-under-hr-5577/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Protected Information under HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/04/14/protected-information-under-hr-5577/2309" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-13:/commentary/2058143</id>
    <updated>2008-04-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CFATA of 2008 Introduced as HR. 5577; Personnel Background Checks and HR 5577; Ranking of Chemical Facilities by HR 5577; General SVA and SSP Requirements under HR 5577; Minimum SVA Requirements under HR 5577; Minimum SSP Requirements ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/04/14/protected-information-under-hr-5577/2309&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Federal Preemption Rules under HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/04/08/federal-preemption-rules-under-hr-5577/2300" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-07:/commentary/2023487</id>
    <updated>2008-04-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CFATA of 2008 Introduced as HR. 5577. &#194;&#183; Personnel Background Checks and HR 5577. &#194;&#183; Ranking of Chemical Facilities by HR 5577. &#194;&#183; General SVA and SSP Requirements under HR 5577. &#194;&#183; Minimum SVA Requirements under HR 5577 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/04/08/federal-preemption-rules-under-hr-5577/2300&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Penalties allowed under HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/04/07/penalties-allowed-under-hr-5577/2299" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-06:/commentary/2018592</id>
    <updated>2008-04-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CFATA of 2008 Introduced as HR. 5577. &#194;&#183; Personnel Background Checks and HR 5577. &#194;&#183; Ranking of Chemical Facilities by HR 5577. &#194;&#183; General SVA and SSP Requirements under HR 5577. &#194;&#183; Minimum SVA Requirements under HR 5577 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/04/07/penalties-allowed-under-hr-5577/2299&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H.R. 5577</title>
    <link href="http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=9059" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-31:/commentary/3330580</id>
    <updated>2008-03-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CBO's Latest 10 Documents </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 5577. Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008. As introduced by the House of Representatives on March 11, 2008. SUMMARY. H.R. 5577 would authorize the appropriation of $900 million over the 2010-2012 period for ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=9059&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DHS Review of SVA&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s and SSP&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s under HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/28/dhs-review-of-svas-and-ssps-under-hr-5577/2281" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-27:/commentary/1956808</id>
    <updated>2008-03-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CFATA of 2008 Introduced as HR. 5577. &#194;&#183; Personnel Background Checks and HR 5577. &#194;&#183; Ranking of Chemical Facilities by HR 5577. &#194;&#183; General SVA and SSP Requirements under HR 5577. &#194;&#183; Minimum SVA Requirements under HR 5577 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/28/dhs-review-of-svas-and-ssps-under-hr-5577/2281&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Petition: Healty Communities: Full-court press for chemical ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.care2.com/news/member/366153879/686843" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-27:/commentary/1936769</id>
    <updated>2008-03-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Care2 News Network </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On March 11, the House Homeland Security Committee formally introduced the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008 (HR 5577) with 19 co-sponsors. We want 16 more co-sponsors by the end of this month. Please sign this letter to your ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.care2.com/news/member/366153879/686843&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Record Keeping and Site Inspections under HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/26/record-keeping-and-site-inspections-under-hr-5577/2277" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-25:/commentary/2001359</id>
    <updated>2008-03-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CFATA of 2008 Introduced as HR. 5577. &#194;&#183; Personnel Background Checks and HR 5577. &#194;&#183; Ranking of Chemical Facilities by HR 5577. &#194;&#183; General SVA and SSP Requirements under HR 5577. &#194;&#183; Minimum SVA Requirements under HR 5577 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/26/record-keeping-and-site-inspections-under-hr-5577/2277&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Background Checks</title>
    <link href="http://singlesinlalomoana-as.blogspot.com/2008/03/background-checks.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-25:/commentary/1956809</id>
    <updated>2008-03-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Singles In Lalomoana As </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... posted by the US Department of Education at www.ope.ed.gov/accreditation The Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Act of 2008 (HR 5577) has a rather lengthy section (Section 2114) dealing with the requirements for background checks for ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://singlesinlalomoana-as.blogspot.com/2008/03/background-checks.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Risk Based Performance Standards under HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/24/risk-based-performance-standards-under-hr-5577/2274" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-23:/commentary/1905968</id>
    <updated>2008-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CFATA of 2008 Introduced as HR. 5577. &#194;&#183; Personnel Background Checks and HR 5577. &#194;&#183; Ranking of Chemical Facilities by HR 5577. &#194;&#183; General SVA and SSP Requirements under HR 5577. &#194;&#183; Minimum SVA Requirements under HR 5577 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/24/risk-based-performance-standards-under-hr-5577/2274&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Farm Bill and the Budget Process</title>
    <link href="http://immigrationlaw-zero.blogspot.com/2008/03/farm-bill-and-budget-process.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-23:/commentary/1843039</id>
    <updated>2008-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IMMIGRATION LAW </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Costs $0.00 per family. HR 1759 The Managing Arson Through Criminal History (MATCH) Act of 2007 Costs $0.15 per family. HR 5487 The Affordable Homeownership Preservation Fund Act of 2008 Costs $2.28 per family. HR 5577 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://immigrationlaw-zero.blogspot.com/2008/03/farm-bill-and-budget-process.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR 5577, Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc.cfm?index=9059&amp;amp;type=1" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-17:/commentary/2018593</id>
    <updated>2008-03-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Recent CBO Cost Estimates </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Cost estimate for the bill as introduced by the House of Representatives on March 11, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc.cfm?index=9059&amp;amp;type=1&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ranking of Chemical Facilities by HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/15/ranking-of-chemical-facilities-by-hr-5577/2257" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-14:/commentary/1732517</id>
    <updated>2008-03-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CFATA of 2008 Introduced as HR. 5577. &#194;&#183; Personnel Background Checks and HR 5577. Substance of Concern. Sub-paragraph &#226;&#8364;&#732;a&#226;&#8364;&#8482; allows the Secretary to designate &#226;&#8364;&#339;any chemical substance as a substance of concern&#226;&#8364;&#8482; and set screening threshold&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/15/ranking-of-chemical-facilities-by-hr-5577/2257&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Personnel Background Checks and HR 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/14/personnel-background-checks-and-hr-5577/2254" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-13:/commentary/1729363</id>
    <updated>2008-03-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Act of 2008 (HR 5577) has a rather lengthy section (Section 2114) dealing with the requirements for background checks for employees and contractors at covered chemical facilities. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/14/personnel-background-checks-and-hr-5577/2254&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CFATA of 2008 Introduced as HR. 5577</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/13/cfata-of-2008-introduced-as-hr.-5577/2243" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-12:/commentary/1725763</id>
    <updated>2008-03-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... deserve a very detailed review over a number blogs. I will try to do that over the coming weeks, certainly before this comes up for a real vote. Tags: Chemical Facility Security, Chemical Facility Anti-terrorism Act of 2008, HR 5577.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/13/cfata-of-2008-introduced-as-hr.-5577/2243&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CFATA of 2008 and Pre-emption</title>
    <link href="http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/12/cfata-of-2008-and-pre-emption/2240" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-11:/commentary/1720024</id>
    <updated>2008-03-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chemical Facility Security News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
LATE NOTE: As I started to upload this I was notified that the CFATA has been officially introduced as HR 5577. More on this later. Tags: Chemical Facility Security, CFATA of 2008, Federal Pre-emption.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://journals.aol.com/chemplantsec/chemical-facility-security-news/entries/2008/03/12/cfata-of-2008-and-pre-emption/2240&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H.R.5577: Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008 - U.S. ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h5577/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-09:/commentary/10587907</id>
    <updated>2008-03-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Official government data, breaking news and blog coverage, public comments and user community for H.R.5577 Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act of 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h5577/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Status as of March 11, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5577.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-09:/commentary/2032706</id>
    <updated>2008-03-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Status Updates for... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
3/11/2008: Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5577.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

