<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for H.R.5804 Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability, and Consistency Act of 2008</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h5804/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h5804/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-11-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/50036</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Record Numbers Hear Hollrah in Fourth NARMS Webinar | NARMS</title>
    <link href="http://www.narms.com/2008/11/record-numbers-hear-hollrah-in-fourth-narms-webinar/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-21:/commentary/3389899</id>
    <updated>2008-11-21T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NARMS </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The recently completed elections come into play due to the introduction of several pieces of legislation, the Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability, and Consistency Act of 2008, H.R. 5804 and the Independent Contractor Proper ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.narms.com/2008/11/record-numbers-hear-hollrah-in-fourth-narms-webinar/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Contractor and Employee Misclassification Risk: New developments ...</title>
    <link href="http://careers.myndsl.cn/careers/contractor-and-employee-misclassification-risk-new-developments-in-proposed-legislation-and-their-potential-impacts-on-workers-and-industries.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-12:/commentary/3282084</id>
    <updated>2008-11-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Careers Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 5804 has been introduced and is in the initial phase of legislation. This bill seeks to clarify if certain individuals are to be treated as independent contractors or employees. Also referred to as the Taxpayer Responsibility, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://careers.myndsl.cn/careers/contractor-and-employee-misclassification-risk-new-developments-in-proposed-legislation-and-their-potential-impacts-on-workers-and-industries.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Independent Contractors Are Key to Limiting Damage from Economic ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.cficf.org/news-updates/independent-contractors-are-key-to-limiting-damage-from-economic-crisis-says-cficf-2008-10-104" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-01:/commentary/2942740</id>
    <updated>2008-10-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Coalition for Independent Contractor Freedom </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
At the federal level, a bill currently before Congress (HR 5804) would repeal a 1978 law that protects independent contractors from &#226;&#8364;&#339;overzealous&#226;&#8364;&#157; IRS actions. And, several powerful unions have gone to court to force companies to convert ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cficf.org/news-updates/independent-contractors-are-key-to-limiting-damage-from-economic-crisis-says-cficf-2008-10-104"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nannies are NOT independent Contractors! Congress wants to make ...</title>
    <link href="http://centralfloridanannies.blogspot.com/2008/09/nannies-are-not-independent-contractors.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-07:/commentary/2828637</id>
    <updated>2008-09-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CENTRAL FLORIDA NANNIES BLOG </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(Originally from Bob King of Legally Nanny) As part of Legally Nanny&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s continuing Legal Alert series, I wanted to let you know about HR 5804, the Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability and Consistency Act of 2008. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://centralfloridanannies.blogspot.com/2008/09/nannies-are-not-independent-contractors.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Threats to Independent Contractors</title>
    <link href="http://216.17.102.240/~main/cficf.org/news-updates/new-threats-to-independent-contractors-2008-09-55" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-05:/commentary/2828638</id>
    <updated>2008-09-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Coalition for Independent Contractor Freedom </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Earlier this year, a bill (HR 5804) was introduced in Congress that would repeal a 1978 law that protects independent contractors from &#226;&#8364;&#339;overzealous&#226;&#8364;&#157; actions by the Internal Revenue Service to reclassify them as employees. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://216.17.102.240/~main/cficf.org/news-updates/new-threats-to-independent-contractors-2008-09-55"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IRS Targeting Independent Contractors</title>
    <link href="http://216.17.102.240/~main/cficf.org/news-updates/irs-targeting-independent-contractors-2008-09-9" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-04:/commentary/2847867</id>
    <updated>2008-09-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Coalition for Independent Contractor Freedom </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Earlier this year, a bill (HR 5804) was introduced in Congress that would repeal a 1978 law that protects independent contractors from &#226;&#8364;&#339;overzealous&#226;&#8364;&#157; actions by the Internal Revenue Service to reclassify them as employees. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://216.17.102.240/~main/cficf.org/news-updates/irs-targeting-independent-contractors-2008-09-9"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Contractor and Employee Misclassification Risk: New developments ...</title>
    <link href="http://poptat-careers.blogspot.com/2008/07/contractor-and-employee.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-05:/commentary/2482527</id>
    <updated>2008-07-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Careers </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 5804 has been introduced and is in the initial phase of legislation. The potential for mistreatment can include, but is not restricted to, employees being paid less than minimum wage, being ineligible for benefits plans, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://poptat-careers.blogspot.com/2008/07/contractor-and-employee.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Contractor and Employee Misclassification Risk: New developments ...</title>
    <link href="http://employmentarticles.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/contractor-and-employee-misclassification-risk-new-developments-in-proposed-legislation-and-their-potential-impacts-on-workers-and-industries/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-02:/commentary/3133397</id>
    <updated>2008-07-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Employmentarticles&amp;#39;s Weblog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 5804 has been introduced and is in the initial phase of legislation. This bill seeks to clarify if certain individuals are to be treated as independent contractors or employees. Also referred to as the Taxpayer Responsibility, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://employmentarticles.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/contractor-and-employee-misclassification-risk-new-developments-in-proposed-legislation-and-their-potential-impacts-on-workers-and-industries/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Win for Nannies.</title>
    <link href="http://nannygossip.com/2008/06/28/a-win-for-nannies/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-28:/commentary/2443102</id>
    <updated>2008-06-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Nanny Gossip </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Congress has recently introduced HR 5804, the Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability and Consistency Act of 2008. This new act could impose stiff penalties for families who class nannies as &#226;&#8364;&#339;independent contractors&#226;&#8364;&#157; instead of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://nannygossip.com/2008/06/28/a-win-for-nannies/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nannies are not Independent Contractors, Congress wants to make ...</title>
    <link href="http://nannybuzz.blogspot.com/2008/06/nannies-are-not-independent-contractors.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2398965</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Nanny Buzz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As part of Legally Nanny&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s continuing Legal Alert series, I wanted to let you know about HR 5804, the Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability and Consistency Act of 2008. This bill, recently introduced in the US House of Representatives ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://nannybuzz.blogspot.com/2008/06/nannies-are-not-independent-contractors.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Contractors</title>
    <link href="http://contractors2.blogspot.com/2008/06/contractors_24.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-25:/commentary/2386438</id>
    <updated>2008-06-25T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Contractors </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Contractors State License Board California HR 5804 would significantly increase penalties for employers who misclassify workers as independent contractors instead of correctly classifying them as employees. Additionally, the bill places ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://contractors2.blogspot.com/2008/06/contractors_24.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Yet More Reasons for Nanny Tax Compliance...</title>
    <link href="http://www.4nannytaxes.com/blog/2008/06/yet-more-reasons-for-nanny-tax.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/2386437</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Nanny Tax &amp;amp; Payroll Updates! HomeWork... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Bob King, Esq., President of Legally Nanny reports that HR 5804, the Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability and Consistency Act of 2008, recently introduced in Congress, could impose stiff penalties for families misclassifying nannies ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.4nannytaxes.com/blog/2008/06/yet-more-reasons-for-nanny-tax.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nannies Are NOT Independent Contractors!</title>
    <link href="http://seasidenannies.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/nannies-are-not-independent-contractors/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/2381879</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Seaside Nannies Web Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As part of Legally Nanny&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s continuing Legal Alert series, I wanted to let you know about HR 5804, the Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability and Consistency Act of 2008. This bill, recently introduced in the US House of Representatives ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://seasidenannies.wordpress.com/2008/06/24/nannies-are-not-independent-contractors/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nannies are NOT Independent Contractors!</title>
    <link href="http://seasidenannies.blogspot.com/2008/06/nannies-are-not-independent-contractors.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-23:/commentary/2381880</id>
    <updated>2008-06-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Seaside Nannies Inc. San Diego&amp;#39;s Resource... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Legal Alert: HR 5804 Could Impose Stiff Penalties on Clients Misclassifying Nannies As Independent Contractor By Bob King President, LegallyNanny.com As part of Legally Nanny&amp;#39;s continuing Legal Alert series, I wanted to let you know ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://seasidenannies.blogspot.com/2008/06/nannies-are-not-independent-contractors.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>task force on the underground economy and misclassification at a ...</title>
    <link href="http://anti-union.blogspot.com/2008/05/task-force-on-underground-economy-and.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-31:/commentary/3133398</id>
    <updated>2008-05-31T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Joe&amp;#39;s Union Review </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
ask your us representative to support hr 5804, the taxpayer responsibility, accountability, and consistency act. charles lazette is a contributer/administrator of union review and a politically active member of ubc local 370 in upstate ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://anti-union.blogspot.com/2008/05/task-force-on-underground-economy-and.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>More questions about who gets a W-2 or 1099</title>
    <link href="http://www.financeregs.com/more-questions-about-who-gets-a-w-2-or-a-1099/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-30:/commentary/2302915</id>
    <updated>2008-05-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FinanceRegs.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Are those vendors A/P&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s been paying actually employees? The feds have been threatening it for awhile, and now here it is: The first bill aimed at making it harder for your company to justify classifying any workers as independent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.financeregs.com/more-questions-about-who-gets-a-w-2-or-a-1099/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Changes ahead: Who gets a W-2, 1099</title>
    <link href="http://www.financeregs.com/changes-ahead-who-gets-a-w2-a-1099/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-30:/commentary/2261946</id>
    <updated>2008-05-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FinanceRegs.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Among other changes, the bill (HR 5804) would shift the burden of proof so that companies like yours would have to proveworkers were actually ICs &#226;&#8364;&#8221; that&#226;&#8364;&#8482;sa change from the current system where IRS has to prove that they aren&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t ICs. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.financeregs.com/changes-ahead-who-gets-a-w2-a-1099/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AFL-CIO NOW BLOG | &#226;&#8364;&#732;Independent Contractor&#226;&#8364;&#8482;&#226;&#8364;&#8221;Another Word for ...</title>
    <link href="http://blog.aflcio.org/2008/05/27/independent-contractoranother-word-for-employer-free-ride/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-27:/commentary/3358607</id>
    <updated>2008-05-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>AFL-CIO NOW BLOG </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Legislation in the House and Senate (H.R. 5804 and S. 2044) would eliminate that tax provision. Earlier this year, as part of the AFL-CIO Building and Construction Trades Department&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s (BCTD&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s) legislative conference, hundreds of union ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.aflcio.org/2008/05/27/independent-contractoranother-word-for-employer-free-ride/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Street Talk: A Timeshare Blog for News &amp; Gossip &#194;&#187; Blog Archive ...</title>
    <link href="http://streettalkblog.com/?p=2542" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-23:/commentary/3358602</id>
    <updated>2008-05-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Street Talk: A Timeshare Blog for News &amp; Gossip </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
If passed, The Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability, and Consistency Act (H.R. 5804), among other things, would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the &#226;&#8364;&#339;Code&#226;&#8364;&#157;) by adding a new Section 3511 containing rules regarding employers&#226;&#8364;&#8482; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://streettalkblog.com/?p=2542"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Legislation Proposed to Modify Rules Regarding Employers ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=6926" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-15:/commentary/2208357</id>
    <updated>2008-05-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Federal Employment Law Articles </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This may soon end if the Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability, and Consistency Act (HR 5804) is enacted. It was introduced on April 15, 2008, by Democratic Representatives Jim McDermott, John Tiery, and Richard Neal, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.elinfonet.com/newscount.php?popID=6926"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Teamsters: Anti-Small Business?</title>
    <link href="http://pressblog.org/npc/SteveOHearn/2008/05/05/teamsters-anti-small-business-big-shocker/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-05:/commentary/2161848</id>
    <updated>2008-05-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Steve O&amp;#39;Hearn </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
According to several newsletters I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;ve received from law firms, the Teamsters and other labor unions are putting a lot of energy behind a proposed law (HR 5804) in the House of Representatives that will have the effect of shutting down ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://pressblog.org/npc/SteveOHearn/2008/05/05/teamsters-anti-small-business-big-shocker/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>McGuireWoods LLP | News</title>
    <link href="http://www.mcguirewoods.com/news-resources/item.asp?item=3284" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-01:/commentary/3358601</id>
    <updated>2008-05-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Federal Employment Law Articles </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 5804, among other things, would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the &#226;&#8364;&#339;Code&#226;&#8364;&#157;) by adding a new Section 3511 containing rules regarding employers&#226;&#8364;&#8482; classification of individuals as independent contractors. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mcguirewoods.com/news-resources/item.asp?item=3284"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability, and Consistency Act of ...</title>
    <link href="http://washlaborwire.com/2008/05/01/taxpayer-responsibility-accountability-and-consistency-act-of-2008-hr-5804/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-01:/commentary/2142251</id>
    <updated>2008-05-01T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Washington Labor &amp;amp; Employment Wire </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Core Provisions: HR5804 is intended to make it more difficult for employers to classify workers as independent contractors. The bill removes the current safe harbor provision in the US Tax Code that allows employers to avoid paying ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://washlaborwire.com/2008/05/01/taxpayer-responsibility-accountability-and-consistency-act-of-2008-hr-5804/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WashingtonWatch.com - H.R. 5804, The Taxpayer Responsibility ...</title>
    <link href="http://washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5804.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-28:/commentary/3358600</id>
    <updated>2008-04-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Subject Group: Welfare </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
US Congress: HR 5804, The Taxpayer Responsibility, Accountability, and Consistency Act of 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5804.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BCTD Slams Misclassification &#226;&#8364;&#732;Scam&#226;&#8364;&#8482;</title>
    <link href="http://daytonaflcio.org/?p=308" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-18:/commentary/2201597</id>
    <updated>2008-04-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Dayton Miami Valley AFL-CIO </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The legislation (HR 5804) would put a halt to what the BCTD calls a &#226;&#8364;&#339;scam of unprecedented magnitude&#226;&#8364;&#157;&#226;&#8364;&#8221;by eliminating the provision in the tax code that allows employers to escape paying employment taxes when they misclassify workers as ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://daytonaflcio.org/?p=308"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BCTD Slams Misclassification &#226;&#8364;&#732;Scam&#226;&#8364;&#8482;</title>
    <link href="http://blog.aflcio.org/2008/04/17/bctd-slams-misclassification-scam/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-17:/commentary/2072007</id>
    <updated>2008-04-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>AFL-CIO Weblog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The legislation (HR 5804) would put a halt to what the BCTD calls a &#226;&#8364;&#339;scam of unprecedented magnitude&#226;&#8364;&#157;&#226;&#8364;&#8221;by eliminating the provision in the tax code that allows employers to escape paying employment taxes when they misclassify workers as ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.aflcio.org/2008/04/17/bctd-slams-misclassification-scam/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Teamsters Praise Bill to Close Loophole for Tax Cheats</title>
    <link href="http://mcmillion-hirtensteiner.com/labor-news/2008/04/teamsters-praise-bill-to-close-loophole.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-17:/commentary/2072008</id>
    <updated>2008-04-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>mcmillion &amp;amp; Hirtensteiner, LLP - Labor News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill, HR 5804, is sponsored by Reps. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., John Tierney, D-Mass., and Richard Neal, D-Mass. The bill removes the loophole that allows businesses to bypass the Internal Revenue Service&amp;#39;s test of whether a worker is ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://mcmillion-hirtensteiner.com/labor-news/2008/04/teamsters-praise-bill-to-close-loophole.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BCTD Slams Misclassification &#226;&#8364;&#732;Scam&#226;&#8364;&#8482;</title>
    <link href="http://www.4ibew.com/2008/04/17/bctd-slams-misclassification-%E2%80%98scam%E2%80%99/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-17:/commentary/2086036</id>
    <updated>2008-04-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Labor Union Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The legislation (HR 5804) would put a halt to what the BCTD calls a &#226;&#8364;&#339;scam of unprecedented magnitude&#226;&#8364;&#157;&#226;&#8364;&#8221;by eliminating the provision in the tax code that allows employers to escape paying employment taxes when they misclassify workers as ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.4ibew.com/2008/04/17/bctd-slams-misclassification-%E2%80%98scam%E2%80%99/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>bill action: introduced: hr 5804: to amend the internal revenue ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-5804" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-14:/commentary/3133396</id>
    <updated>2008-04-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by govtrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
james mcdermott [d-wa] introduced hr 5804: to amend the internal revenue code of 1986 to modify the rules relating to the treatment of individuals as independent contractors or employees, and for other purposes. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-5804"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR 5804, To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5804.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-14:/commentary/2072006</id>
    <updated>2008-04-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Welcome to WashingtonWatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 5804 would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rules relating to the treatment of individuals as independent contractors or employees.... Vote on This Bill: For | Against.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5804.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
