<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for H.R.5994 Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h5994/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h5994/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-07-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/50604</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Robert McChesney&amp;#39;s The Political Economy of Media (Part II) - by ...</title>
    <link href="http://kurtrudder.blogspot.com/2008/07/robert-mcchesneys-political-economy-of_04.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-03:/commentary/2448051</id>
    <updated>2008-07-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Don&amp;#39;t believe the lies, critically analyze! </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On May 8, the Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (HR 5994) was introduced. It requires that ISPs operate and interconnect with other network providers in a nondiscriminatory way. It applies to content, applications and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://kurtrudder.blogspot.com/2008/07/robert-mcchesneys-political-economy-of_04.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Robert McChesney&amp;#39;s The Political Economy of Media - Part II</title>
    <link href="http://www.phillyimc.org/en/node/70461" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2397504</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Philadelphia Independent Media Center -... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On May 8, the Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (HR 5994) was introduced. It requires that ISPs operate and interconnect with other network providers in a nondiscriminatory way. It applies to content, applications and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.phillyimc.org/en/node/70461"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title></title>
    <link href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/law_librarian_blog/2008/06/tracking-net-ne.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-10:/commentary/2340588</id>
    <updated>2008-06-10T07:52:01Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Law Librarian Blog</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Tracking Net Neutrality Bills in Congress  The Congress Gossip Blog (OpenCongress) ... , or destination on the Internet. &lt;strong class="keyword"&gt;H.R.5994&lt;/strong&gt;, The Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008  RSS feed&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/law_librarian_blog/2008/06/tracking-net-ne.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Piracy Tax: Why Stop with Music? Reihan Salam has an article ...</title>
    <link href="http://privacy-live.blogspot.com/2008/06/piracy-tax-why-stop-with-music-reihan.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-04:/commentary/2317962</id>
    <updated>2008-06-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>privacy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In the Judiciary Committee, Representatives John Conyers (D-MI) and Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) introduced HR 5994, the &#226;&#8364;&#339;Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008&#226;&#8364;&#157; (pdf). It authorizes the Department of Justice, under antitrust law, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://privacy-live.blogspot.com/2008/06/piracy-tax-why-stop-with-music-reihan.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Three Bills to Save the Net</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/articles/view/516-Three-Bills-to-Save-the-Net" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-03:/commentary/2269370</id>
    <updated>2008-06-03T17:27:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OpenCongress</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The net neutrality debate blew up and then fizzled out in the last Congress, but it&#8217;s back, in three forms, and one of them will probably get a vote before the current session ends.  Net neutrality is a principle that seeks to keep the internet free and&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opencongress.org/articles/view/516-Three-Bills-to-Save-the-Net"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Three Bills to Save the Net</title>
    <link href="http://www.buzzflash.net/story.php?id=54217" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-03:/commentary/2265864</id>
    <updated>2008-06-03T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BuzzFlash.net: all </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
There are three bills, representing three separate ways of getting net neutrality protections enacted, currently waiting in Congress. S.215 &#226;&#8364;&#8220; Internet Freedom Preservation Act, HR 5353 &#226;&#8364;&#8220; Internet Freedom Preservation Act, and HR5994 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.buzzflash.net/story.php?id=54217"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>LEGISLATION PROPOSED TO CURTAIL &#226;&#8364;&#339;ANTICOMPETITIVE&#226;&#8364;&#157; ISP PRACTICES</title>
    <link href="http://wombledistributionlaw.blogspot.com/2008/05/legislation-proposed-to-curtail.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-28:/commentary/2249440</id>
    <updated>2008-05-28T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Antitrust and Distribution Law Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Two days after the hearing, on May 8, 2008, a similar bill, titled he &#226;&#8364;&#339;Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008&#226;&#8364;&#157; (HR 5994) was introduced to the US House of Representatives. This bill is intended to &#226;&#8364;&#339;amend the Clayton Act with ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://wombledistributionlaw.blogspot.com/2008/05/legislation-proposed-to-curtail.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Judiciary Committee Unveils Net Neutrality Bill House ...</title>
    <link href="http://internet-line.blogspot.com/2008/05/house-judiciary-committee-unveils-net.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-25:/commentary/2340587</id>
    <updated>2008-05-25T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>internet </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
House Judiciary Committee Unveils Net Neutrality Bill House Judiciary Committee chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Rep. Zoe Lofgren (R-Ca) have introduced the &amp;quot;Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (HR 5994),&amp;quot; an antitrust ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://internet-line.blogspot.com/2008/05/house-judiciary-committee-unveils-net.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Skype, M2Z, and termination fees</title>
    <link href="http://scrawford.net/blog/skype-m2z-and-termination-fees/1176/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-23:/commentary/2233349</id>
    <updated>2008-05-23T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Susan Crawford blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The current proposed bill, HR 5994, would allow for discrimination (as long as the discrimination was equal) by network operators, and is subject to substantial exceptions (including permitting measures by network operators that are ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://scrawford.net/blog/skype-m2z-and-termination-fees/1176/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR5994 Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h5994/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-22:/commentary/2227019</id>
    <updated>2008-05-22T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Open Congress : Top 20 Bills Most Written... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
To amend the Clayton Act with respect to competitive and nondiscriminatory access to the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h5994/show"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR 5994</title>
    <link href="http://blog.godshell.com/blog/index.php?/archives/145-H.R.-5994.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-16:/commentary/2317961</id>
    <updated>2008-05-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Technological Musings </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 5994, known as the &amp;quot;Internet Freedom and Non-Discrimination Act of 2008,&amp;quot; is the latest attempt by the US Congress to get a handle on Internet access. In short, this is another play in the Net Neutrality battle. I&amp;#39;m no lawyer, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.godshell.com/blog/index.php?/archives/145-H.R.-5994.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Comment on The Web&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Wannabe Gatekeepers: Comcast, Now Cox by ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/05/15/the-internets-wannabe-gatekeepers-comcast-now-cox/#comment-114500" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-16:/commentary/2208304</id>
    <updated>2008-05-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Comments for Save the Internet Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Both the Markey bill (HR 5353) and the Conyers bill (HR 5994) are harmful to Internet freedom and anti-consumer. And so are the efforts of the so-called &#226;&#8364;&#339;network neutrality&#226;&#8364;&#157; crusaders, who in fact are lobbying on behalf of corporations ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/05/15/the-internets-wannabe-gatekeepers-comcast-now-cox/#comment-114500"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Legislation and Debate on Net Neutrality</title>
    <link href="http://bobbie-mouse.livejournal.com/1346725.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-15:/commentary/2223024</id>
    <updated>2008-05-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Born in the USA - Citizen of The World </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
May 8, House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-Michigan) and Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-California) introduced the &amp;quot;Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008&amp;quot; (HR 5994) which seeks to prevent anti-competitive and discriminatory ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://bobbie-mouse.livejournal.com/1346725.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Legislation and Debate on Net Neutrality Christopher Kuttruff ...</title>
    <link href="http://communitybridge.blogspot.com/2008/05/new-legislation-and-debate-on-net.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-15:/commentary/2223023</id>
    <updated>2008-05-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Community Bridge Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
New Legislation and Debate on Net Neutrality Christopher Kuttruff, of Truthout: &amp;quot;Last week, lawmakers proposed legislation on network neutrality that would open up the possibility for antitrust lawsuits against companies that violate ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://communitybridge.blogspot.com/2008/05/new-legislation-and-debate-on-net.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Legislation and Debate on Net Neutrality</title>
    <link href="http://xmlwatcher.com/news/index.php?blog=3&amp;amp;title=new_legislation_and_debate_on_net_neutra&amp;amp;more=1&amp;amp;c=1&amp;amp;tb=1&amp;amp;pb=1" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-15:/commentary/2216143</id>
    <updated>2008-05-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>US news Top Stories </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Zoe Lofgren (D-California) introduced the &#226;&#8364;&#732;Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008&#226;&#8364;&#178; (HR 5994) which seeks to prevent anti-competitive and discriminatory activity by broadband Internet service providers.&#226;&#8364;&#157; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://xmlwatcher.com/news/index.php?blog=3&amp;title=new_legislation_and_debate_on_net_neutra&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Legislation and Debate on Net Neutrality</title>
    <link href="http://thewhiterabbitnews.blogspot.com/2008/05/new-legislation-and-debate-on-net.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-15:/commentary/2216142</id>
    <updated>2008-05-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The White Rabbit News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Zoe Lofgren (D-California) introduced the &amp;quot;Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008&amp;quot; (HR 5994) which seeks to prevent anti-competitive and discriminatory activity by broadband Internet service providers. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://thewhiterabbitnews.blogspot.com/2008/05/new-legislation-and-debate-on-net.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Legislation and Debate on Net Neutrality</title>
    <link href="http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/4928690/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-15:/commentary/2208306</id>
    <updated>2008-05-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>World-News (Independent Media Source) </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Zoe Lofgren (D-California) introduced the &amp;#39;Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008&amp;#39; (HR 5994) which seeks to prevent anti-competitive and discriminatory activity by broadband Internet service providers.&amp;quot; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://freepage.twoday.net/stories/4928690/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Legislation and Debate on Net Neutrality</title>
    <link href="http://digg.com/politics/New_Legislation_and_Debate_on_Net_Neutrality" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-15:/commentary/2204742</id>
    <updated>2008-05-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Digg / upcoming </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Zoe Lofgren (D-California) introduced the &amp;quot;Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008&amp;quot; (HR 5994) which seeks to prevent anti-competitive and discriminatory activity by broadband Internet service providers. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://digg.com/politics/New_Legislation_and_Debate_on_Net_Neutrality"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USA: Net neutrality law-Online Media Daily</title>
    <link href="http://facthai.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/usa-net-neutrality-law-online-media-daily/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-14:/commentary/2208305</id>
    <updated>2008-05-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FACT - Freedom Against Censorship Thailand </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... to impair, to discriminate against, or to interfere with the ability of any person to use a broadband network service,&#226;&#8364;&#157; states the proposed measure, The Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (HR 5994)&#226;&#8364;&#166; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://facthai.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/usa-net-neutrality-law-online-media-daily/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The key language in HR</title>
    <link href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1567#comment-1090" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-13:/commentary/2198525</id>
    <updated>2008-05-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Public Knowledge - Comments </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In the case of HR 5994 as written, a version of &#226;&#8364;&#339;neutral&#226;&#8364;&#157; bundling has resulted that could inadvertently undermine much of the existing net neutrality that exists today. Language needs to be added that anticipates fast lanes with large ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1567#comment-1090"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lofgren has introduced Net Neutrality bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/105089" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-12:/commentary/2210633</id>
    <updated>2008-05-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NANOG | users </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:HR5994: Overall, I think it&amp;#39;s actually pretty good. Paragraph 28(a)(2) and especially when combined wit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/105089"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Conyers/Lofgren submit HR 5994</title>
    <link href="http://pghbloggers.org/node/196772" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-12:/commentary/2198526</id>
    <updated>2008-05-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>pittsburgh bloggers - All Blog Headlines </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
pNot a bad draft, but see 28(a)(2) when combined with 28(d)(2) for potentially interesting unintended consequences. The use of &amp;quot;broadband&amp;quot; in this context is not how the term is used by network operators, designers and protocol ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://pghbloggers.org/node/196772"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Comment on Internet Bill a Blow to the Gatekeepers by House ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-112800" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-12:/commentary/2195615</id>
    <updated>2008-05-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Comments for Save the Internet Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
in its regulatory language and also includes a provision that would require the FCC to hold nation-wide hearings to discuss Internet governance. This democratized approach has induced the RIAA and the MPAA to [&#226;&#8364;&#166;]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2008/02/12/internet-bill-would-bar-discrimination-engage-the-public-on-better-policy/#comment-112800"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: Conyers and Lofgren have introduced Net Neutrality bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/105094" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-12:/commentary/2195613</id>
    <updated>2008-05-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NANOG | users </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Owen DeLong wrote: &amp;gt; http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:HR5994: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Overall, I think it&amp;#39;s actually pretty good. Paragraph 28(a)(2) and &amp;gt; e.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/105094"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lawmakers Eye Net Neutrality As Anti-Trust Issue</title>
    <link href="http://mootblogger.com/2008/05/lawmakers-eye-net-neutrality-as-anti.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-11:/commentary/2195614</id>
    <updated>2008-05-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Internet Herald </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
John Conyers, who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, has introduced legislation that addresses the issue by labeling it an antitrust matter. Conyers&amp;#39; HR 5994 would ban discriminatory network management... To read the full article, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://mootblogger.com/2008/05/lawmakers-eye-net-neutrality-as-anti.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Net Neutrality Bill Prohibits Blocking, Degrading</title>
    <link href="http://66.84.23.86/new-net-neutrality-bill-prohibits-blocking-degrading" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-09:/commentary/2227020</id>
    <updated>2008-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>American Buddhist Net - Buddhist News &amp;amp; Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
by Wendy Davis, Friday, May 9, 2008 6:45 AM ET. Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) introduced a net neutrality bill Wednesday that would prohibit Internet service providers from blocking or degrading access to any &amp;quot;lawful content.&amp;quot; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://66.84.23.86/new-net-neutrality-bill-prohibits-blocking-degrading"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New bill ties net neutrality to antitrust law</title>
    <link href="http://www.alfonsofuggetta.org/?p=2904" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-09:/commentary/2208307</id>
    <updated>2008-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>alfonsofuggetta.org </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill, the Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, will enter the record as HR 5994. The text does not differ significantly from a previous attempt that went by the same name in 2006. The bill is intended to &amp;quot;promote ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.alfonsofuggetta.org/?p=2904"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New bill ties net neutrality to antitrust law</title>
    <link href="http://www.shinyplastic.com/snips/archives/05-09-2008--new-bill-ties-net-neutrality-to-antitrust-law.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-09:/commentary/2204743</id>
    <updated>2008-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>snips </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill, the Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, will enter the record as HR 5994. The text does not differ significantly from a previous attempt that went by the same name in 2006. The bill is intended to &amp;quot;promote ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.shinyplastic.com/snips/archives/05-09-2008--new-bill-ties-net-neutrality-to-antitrust-law.php"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>List of Selected US Federal Documents from Gallerywatch.com</title>
    <link href="http://www.bloglines.com/blog/PLL?id=9163" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-09:/commentary/2181309</id>
    <updated>2008-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
05/08/2008, Legislative Text of the Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act, HR 5994 (PDF 37.1 KB) Text of the Bill as Introduced by House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers on May 8, 2008. 05/08/2008, Legislative Text of the Medicare ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bloglines.com/blog/PLL?id=9163"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ArsTechnica: New bill ties net neutrality to antitrust law</title>
    <link href="http://codehound.goldsteinmedia.com/2008/05/09/arstechnica-new-bill-ties-net-neutrality-to-antitrust-law/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-09:/commentary/2181310</id>
    <updated>2008-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>-- Code Hound -- </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill, the Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, will enter the record as HR 5994. The text does not differ significantly from a previous attempt that went by the same name in 2006. The bill is intended to &#226;&#8364;&#339;promote ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://codehound.goldsteinmedia.com/2008/05/09/arstechnica-new-bill-ties-net-neutrality-to-antitrust-law/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Net Neutrality Bill Prohibits Blocking, Degrading</title>
    <link href="http://americanbuddhist.net/new-net-neutrality-bill-prohibits-blocking-degrading" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-09:/commentary/2181311</id>
    <updated>2008-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>American Buddhist Net - Buddhist News &amp;amp; Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... to impair, to discriminate against, or to interfere with the ability of any person to use a broadband network service,&amp;quot; states the proposed measure, The Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (HR 5994). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://americanbuddhist.net/new-net-neutrality-bill-prohibits-blocking-degrading"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Conyers and Lofgren Introduce Net Neutrality Legislation to ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48747128_conyers-and-lofgren-introduce-net-neutrality-legis" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-09:/commentary/2181312</id>
    <updated>2008-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>All American Patriots - Dispatches from... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) introduced HR 5994, the &amp;quot;Internet Freedom and Nondiscrimination Act of 2008,&amp;quot; to establish an antitrust remedy for anticompetitive and discriminatory practices by broadband service providers. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48747128_conyers-and-lofgren-introduce-net-neutrality-legis"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: HR 5994: To amend the Clayton Act with ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-5994" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-07:/commentary/2181308</id>
    <updated>2008-05-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by govtrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Rep. John Conyers [D-MI] introduced HR 5994: To amend the Clayton Act with respect to competitive and nondiscriminatory access to the Internet. [This event matched these trackers: Active Legislation ]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-5994"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR 5994, To amend the Clayton Act with respect to competitive and ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5994.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-07:/commentary/2188722</id>
    <updated>2008-05-07T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>washingtonwatch.com - Welcome to washingtonwatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 5994 would amend the Clayton Act with respect to competitive and nondiscriminatory access to the Internet.... Vote on This Bill: For | Against.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_5994.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
