<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for H.R.6381 Medical Device Safety Act of 2008</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2009-01-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/51353</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Saundersblog.com - Medical Device Preemption Gets a Second Look</title>
    <link href="http://www.saundersblog.com/2009/01/medical_device_preemption_gets.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-01-04:/commentary/3911186</id>
    <updated>2009-01-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Saundersblog.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Medical Device Safety Act of 2008, H.R. 6381-S.3398-is a proposed amendment to the Medical Device Amendment to the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act. The proposed bill reads as such,. SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saundersblog.com/2009/01/medical_device_preemption_gets.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What was the most significant headline in the medical device ...</title>
    <link href="http://itecsinsider.com/?p=1211" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-28:/commentary/3865508</id>
    <updated>2008-12-28T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ITECS Insider </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Frank Pallone and Henry Waxman introduced The Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 - HR 6381. In late July, Senators Leahy and Kennedy introduced similar legislation. Given the results of November&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s elections, many predict that Democrats ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://itecsinsider.com/?p=1211&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>GoozNews: Do FDA Regs Preempt Lawsuits?</title>
    <link href="http://www.gooznews.com/archives/001267.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-09:/commentary/3637339</id>
    <updated>2008-12-09T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>GoozNews </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
5 Medical Device Safety Act of 2008, H.R. 6381, 110 th Congress, 2d Sess. (2008) (Source: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c110:1:./temp/~c1104NyGvO::). 6 While I do not necessarily agree that state tort litigation, or the threat ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gooznews.com/archives/001267.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PointofLaw.com | PointOfLaw Forum: Trial lawyer lobbying: Let the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/11/trial-lawyer-lo.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-25:/commentary/3483083</id>
    <updated>2008-11-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PointOfLaw Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 6381/S. 3398 (Medical Device Safety Act); to amend the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act to clarify the scope of federal preemption of state law with regard to medical devices. &#226;&#8364;&#162; Congressional lobbying in response to proposed FDA rule ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/11/trial-lawyer-lo.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Essay 3</title>
    <link href="http://bobohaffa.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/essay-3/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-19:/commentary/3450645</id>
    <updated>2008-11-19T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bobohaffa&amp;#39;s Weblog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&#226;&#8364;&#339;HR 6381: Medical Device Safety Act of 2008.&#226;&#8364;* 26 jun 2008. 21 oct 2008 &lt;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-6381&gt;. Davidoff, Frank (2006,march). Sex, Politics, and Morality at the FDA: Reflections on the Plan B ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bobohaffa.wordpress.com/2008/11/21/essay-3/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Could Obama end FDA preemption by executive order?</title>
    <link href="http://blog.prescriptionaccess.org/?p=395" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-12:/commentary/3304214</id>
    <updated>2008-11-12T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Prescription Access Litigation (PAL) Project </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... about unsafe medical devices are preempted, and more than 80 members of Congress and Senators are trying to restore patients&#226;&#8364;&#8482; rights to sue device companies in such cases with the Medical Device Safety Act. (HR6381 and S.3398). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.prescriptionaccess.org/?p=395&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Commentary - Federal Preemption &amp; Complete Immunity for Negligent ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.injuryboard.com/national-news/commentary-federal-preemption-complete-immunity-for-negligent-corporations.aspx?googleid=249598" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-16:/commentary/3597338</id>
    <updated>2008-10-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>InjuryBoard National News Desk </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Together with support from legislators on both sides of the aisle, these groups have worked to urge the passage of H.R. 6381, the Medical Device Safety Act of 2008, which will enable Congress to restore the powers of the civil justice ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.injuryboard.com/national-news/commentary-federal-preemption-complete-immunity-for-negligent-corporations.aspx?googleid=249598&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Commentary - Federal Preemption &amp; Complete Immunity for Negligent ...</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.injuryboard.com/~r/IBnationalnews/~3/424098008/commentary-federal-preemption-complete-immunity-for-negligent-corporations.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-16:/commentary/3125997</id>
    <updated>2008-10-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>InjuryBoard National News Desk </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Together with support from legislators on both sides of the aisle, these groups have worked to urge the passage of HR 6381, the Medical Device Safety Act of 2008, which will enable Congress to restore the powers of the civil justice ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.injuryboard.com/~r/IBnationalnews/~3/424098008/commentary-federal-preemption-complete-immunity-for-negligent-corporations.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Federal Pre-emption Means No Remedy for Injured Consumer</title>
    <link href="http://www.reinerinjurylaw.com/blog/?p=241" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-17:/commentary/2857954</id>
    <updated>2008-09-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>www.reinerinjurylaw.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Since the Riegel decision, Congress has proposed the Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 (HR 6381) to overturn the Riegel v. Medtronic decision. In opposition to pre-emption in the upcoming Levine case, nine current and former editors of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reinerinjurylaw.com/blog/?p=241&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Britney, Palin, Paris, and Pre-emption (Part One)</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.injuryboard.com/~r/IBnationalnews/~3/389950225/britney-paris-palin-and-pre-emption-part-one.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-10:/commentary/2828405</id>
    <updated>2008-09-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>injuryboard National News Desk </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Since the Medtronic case, the Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 (HR 6381) has been proposed to overrule the February decision in Riegel v Medtronic. The legislation would restore the traditional state common-law remedies for injuries ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.injuryboard.com/~r/IBnationalnews/~3/389950225/britney-paris-palin-and-pre-emption-part-one.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Preemption....why it's a HUGE problem! Petition first post ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.paxilprogress.org/forums/showthread.php?t=37705" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-23:/commentary/3837426</id>
    <updated>2008-08-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>paxilprogress </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) which would essentially correspond to HR 6381, the Medical Device Safety Act of 2008, introduced on June 26, 2008 by Congressmen Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Frank Pallone (D-N.J.). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paxilprogress.org/forums/showthread.php?t=37705&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Jackpot Justice, Undermining Good Health and Good Sense</title>
    <link href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2008/08/19/jackpot-justice-undermining-good-health-and-good-sense/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-18:/commentary/2695407</id>
    <updated>2008-08-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Shopfloor </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(For example, this medical device legislation, HR6381.) As Frank concludes: &#226;&#8364;&#339;As even Clinton appointee Justice Stephen Breyer pointed out in a February 8-1 Supreme Court decision about medical devices, if we are to have meaningful ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shopfloor.org/2008/08/19/jackpot-justice-undermining-good-health-and-good-sense/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>democrats opposing supreme court decision in favor of pre-emption ...</title>
    <link href="http://03530.com/2008/08/17/democrats-opposing-supreme-court-decision-in-favor-of-pre-emption-pandering-to-tort-lawyers-wall-street-journal-editorial-says.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-16:/commentary/3346129</id>
    <updated>2008-08-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Medical,Health News and Articles </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... &#226;&#8364;&#339;makes sense for many reasons&#226;&#8364;* but has &#226;&#8364;&#339;nonetheless sent up yowls&#226;&#8364;* from democratic members of congress who have proposed the medical device safety act (s 3398, hr 6381) to overturn the ruling, a wall street journal editorial states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://03530.com/2008/08/17/democrats-opposing-supreme-court-decision-in-favor-of-pre-emption-pandering-to-tort-lawyers-wall-street-journal-editorial-says.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senators Introduce Their Version of Anti-Preemption Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.fdanews.com/newsletter/article?articleId=109358&amp;amp;issueId=11851" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-16:/commentary/3346115</id>
    <updated>2008-08-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>International Medical Device Regulatory Monitor </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) introduced the companion bill to H.R. 6381, which has 62 co-sponsors in the House, last month. Introduced in the House in June by Reps. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) and Henry Waxman (D-Calif. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fdanews.com/newsletter/article?articleId=109358&amp;amp;issueId=11851&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>senators introduce their version of anti-preemption bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.mpo-mag.com/news/2008/08/15/senators_introduce_their_version_of_anti-preemption_bill" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-14:/commentary/3125999</id>
    <updated>2008-08-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Medical Product Outsourcing Breaking News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
and patrick leahy (d-vt.) introduced the companion bill to hr 6381, which has 62 co-sponsors in the house, last month. introduced in the house in june by reps. frank pallone (d-nj) and henry waxman (d-calif.), the bill seeks to reverse ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mpo-mag.com/news/2008/08/15/senators_introduce_their_version_of_anti-preemption_bill&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>democrats opposing supreme court decision in favor of pre-emption ...</title>
    <link href="http://03530.com/2008/08/14/democrats-opposing-supreme-court-decision-in-favor-of-pre-emption-pandering-to-tort-lawyers-editorial-says.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-12:/commentary/3469124</id>
    <updated>2008-08-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Medical,Health News and Articles </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... &#226;&#8364;&#339;makes sense for many reasons&#226;&#8364;* but has &#226;&#8364;&#339;nonetheless sent up yowls&#226;&#8364;* from democratic members of congress who have proposed the medical device safety act (s 3398, hr 6381) to overturn the ruling, a wall street journal editorial states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://03530.com/2008/08/14/democrats-opposing-supreme-court-decision-in-favor-of-pre-emption-pandering-to-tort-lawyers-editorial-says.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>preemption, the congressional maneuvers</title>
    <link href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/08/preemption-the.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-12:/commentary/3125998</id>
    <updated>2008-08-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>pointoflaw Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
frank pallone (d-nj) as hr 6381, and in the senate by an absent sen. kennedy (d-ma) as s. 3398. you could almost hear the american association for justice shouting &quot;bingo!&quot; more on medtronic and preemption here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/08/preemption-the.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report - Wednesday, August 13, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://womenatnight.blogspot.com/2008/08/kaiser-daily-health-policy-report_13.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-12:/commentary/2725322</id>
    <updated>2008-08-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>women at night dress???? </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Medical Device Safety Act (S 3398, HR 6381) to overturn the ruling, a Wall Street Journal editorial states. The pre-emption principle avoids &quot;creating a sort of double-jeopardy for companies -- first having to run the FDA approval maze, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://womenatnight.blogspot.com/2008/08/kaiser-daily-health-policy-report_13.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Democrats opposing Supreme Court decision in favor of pre-emption ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.news-medical.net/?id=40707" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-12:/commentary/2666196</id>
    <updated>2008-08-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Medical News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... &amp;quot;makes sense for many reasons&amp;quot; but has &amp;quot;nonetheless sent up yowls&amp;quot; from Democratic members of Congress who have proposed the Medical Device Safety Act (S 3398, HR 6381) to overturn the ruling, a Wall Street Journal editorial states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news-medical.net/?id=40707&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senators Kennedy And Leahy Introduce Legislation To Protect ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.drug-injury.com/druginjurycom/2008/08/senators-kennedy-and-leahy-introduce-legislation-to-protect-patients-from-dangerous-and-defective-devices.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-11:/commentary/3125996</id>
    <updated>2008-08-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Drug Injury Watch </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
August 2008 Senate Counterpart of HR 6381, Medical Device Safety Act 2008, Which Was Sponsored By Congressmen Waxman And Pallone. (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com). In a June 27, 2008 article, &quot;Newly Introduced Legislation ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drug-injury.com/druginjurycom/2008/08/senators-kennedy-and-leahy-introduce-legislation-to-protect-patients-from-dangerous-and-defective-devices.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tom Lamb posted a blog entry</title>
    <link href="http://www.mybloglog.com/buzz/members/druginjurywatch/newwith/me/?eid=1218572339_17_95758711" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-11:/commentary/2734553</id>
    <updated>2008-08-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>MyBlogLog - Tom Lamb : New with me </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Kennedy And Leahy Introduce Legislation To Protect Patients From Dangerous And Defective Devices August 2008 Senate Counterpart of HR 6381, Medical Device Safety Act 2008, Which Was Sponsored By Congressmen Waxman And. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mybloglog.com/buzz/members/druginjurywatch/newwith/me/?eid=1218572339_17_95758711&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tom Lamb posted a blog entry</title>
    <link href="http://www.mybloglog.com/buzz/members/druginjurywatch/newwith/me/?eid=1218572339_17_92846201" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-11:/commentary/2671934</id>
    <updated>2008-08-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>MyBlogLog - Tom Lamb : New with me </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Kennedy And Leahy Introduce Legislation To Protect Patients From Dangerous And Defective Devices August 2008 Senate Counterpart of HR 6381, Medical Device Safety Act 2008, Which Was Sponsored By Congressmen Waxman And. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mybloglog.com/buzz/members/druginjurywatch/newwith/me/?eid=1218572339_17_92846201&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Drug Injury Watch: Senators Kennedy And Leahy Introduce ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.worldpharmanews.net/Blogs/Drug_Injury_Watch_Senators_Kennedy_And_Leahy_Introduce_Legislation_To_Protect_Patients_From_Dangerous_And_Defective_Devices/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-11:/commentary/2661170</id>
    <updated>2008-08-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>World Pharma News / Published News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
August 2008 Counterpart of HR 6381, Medical Device Safety Act 2008, Which Was Sponsored By Congressmen Waxman And Pallone 2 Vote(s)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldpharmanews.net/Blogs/Drug_Injury_Watch_Senators_Kennedy_And_Leahy_Introduce_Legislation_To_Protect_Patients_From_Dangerous_And_Defective_Devices/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress Must Restore Rights Of Patients</title>
    <link href="http://www.jlbreport.com/2008/08/07/congress-must-restore-rights-of-patients/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-06:/commentary/2637066</id>
    <updated>2008-08-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Jere Beasley Report </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Henry Waxman and Frank Pallone sponsored the bill (HR 6381) introduced in the US House of Representatives. Senators Ted Kennedy and Patrick Leahy are handling a similar bill in the Senate. The legislation would restore Congress&#226;&#8364;&#8482; intent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jlbreport.com/2008/08/07/congress-must-restore-rights-of-patients/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress Must Restore Rights to Patients</title>
    <link href="http://www.jlbreport.com/2008/08/06/congress-must-restore-rights-to-patients/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-05:/commentary/2839700</id>
    <updated>2008-08-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Jere Beasley Report </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Henry Waxman and Frank Pallone sponsored the bill (HR 6381) introduced in the US House of Representatives. Senators Ted Kennedy and Patrick Leahy are handling a similar bill in the Senate. The legislation would restore Congress&#226;&#8364;&#8482; intent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jlbreport.com/2008/08/06/congress-must-restore-rights-to-patients/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Putting the boot to preemption</title>
    <link href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/08/putting-the-boo.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-03:/commentary/2610488</id>
    <updated>2008-08-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>pointoflaw Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill is companion to HR 6381, and another attack on the principle of federal premption. The Kennedy news release and bill summary and Sen. Harkin&amp;#39;s statement (scroll down from here) both chastise medical device manufacturers for ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/08/putting-the-boo.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Zyprexa Reps Told Not To Raise Diabetes Concern // Pharmalot</title>
    <link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/07/zyprexa-reps-told-not-to-address-diabetes-concern/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-30:/commentary/3802061</id>
    <updated>2008-07-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pharmalot </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Bush will veto the Waxman/Pallone Medical Device Safety Act of 2008, H.R. 6381. And the same will be true of the Kennedy/Leahy companion bill designed to protect consumers of pharmaceutical drugs. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/07/zyprexa-reps-told-not-to-address-diabetes-concern/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Is Preemption Good For Patients?</title>
    <link href="http://biotech.about.com/b/2008/07/22/is-preemption-good-for-patients.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-21:/commentary/3346117</id>
    <updated>2008-07-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>About.com Biotech / Biomedical: Most Popular... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... believe it will offer added protection to the consumer (patients), but Congress is opposed and will try to curb the Supreme Court's decision to uphold preemption (if it does) by introducing the Medical Device Safety Act (H.R. 6381). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://biotech.about.com/b/2008/07/22/is-preemption-good-for-patients.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Preemption: The legislative undermining under way</title>
    <link href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/07/preemption.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-08:/commentary/3191644</id>
    <updated>2008-07-08T10:12:13Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>&#28496;&#28265;&#28532;&#19558;&#30561;&#25390;&#28015;&#31776;&#18720;&#26222;&#29295;&#24941;&#26996;&#28271;&#24864;&#25710;&#28448;&#26992;&#26990;&#28271;&#28448;&#8302;&#26740;&#8293;&#11861;&#11859;&#27680;&#29801;&#26473;&#29793;&#28521;&#8302;&#31091;&#29811;&#28005;</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The attacks against federal preemption,  a recurring topic of discussion around here, are stepping up in Congress.  On June 26 Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) introduced &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;H.R.6381&lt;/strong&gt;, the Medical Device &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/07/preemption.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Carter Wood at Point of Law misunderstands the legislative process</title>
    <link href="http://www.tortdeform.com/archives/2008/07/carter_wood_at_point_of_law_mi.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-07:/commentary/3126000</id>
    <updated>2008-07-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tortdeform </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Henry Waxman (D-CA) introduced HR6381, the Medical Device Safety Act. Being sold as overturning the Supreme Court's decision in Riegel v. Medtronic, it simply amends the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act with a clause: &quot;Nothing in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tortdeform.com/archives/2008/07/carter_wood_at_point_of_law_mi.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>overruling the united states supreme court</title>
    <link href="http://www.consumerrightswatch.com/2008/07/overruling-united-states-supreme-court.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-03:/commentary/3126003</id>
    <updated>2008-07-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Consumer Rights Watch </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
public citizen has an excellent post (click here) about hr 6381, the medical device safety act of 2008. it is a bill introduced in the us house of representatives by reps. henry waxman (d-calif.) and frank pallone (dn. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consumerrightswatch.com/2008/07/overruling-united-states-supreme-court.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Attorney At Law &#194;&#187; Blog Archive &#194;&#187; Congress Seeks to Side Step ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.attorneyatlaw.com/2008/07/congress-seeks-to-side-step-supreme-court-and-restore-right-to-sue-medical-device-makers-for-damages/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-02:/commentary/3346128</id>
    <updated>2008-07-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Attorney At Law </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 (H.R. 6381) would reverse &#226;&#8364;&#339;an unfortunate Supreme Court decision that denied victims any legal recourse and gave medical device makers blanket immunity for the life of a product,&#226;&#8364;* one the bill&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.attorneyatlaw.com/2008/07/congress-seeks-to-side-step-supreme-court-and-restore-right-to-sue-medical-device-makers-for-damages/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Should Doctors Worry About Preemption? // Pharmalot</title>
    <link href="http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/07/should-doctors-worry-about-preemption/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-02:/commentary/3346124</id>
    <updated>2008-07-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pharmalot </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
J.) along with 62 bipartisan supporters introduced HR 6381, the Medical Device Safety Act of 2008. This bill, if enacted into law, would reverse the U.S. Supreme Court&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Riegel ruling in favor of Medtronic and restore the legal rights ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pharmalot.com/2008/07/should-doctors-worry-about-preemption/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strike Two?</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1348225&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-01:/commentary/2491095</id>
    <updated>2008-07-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Fluor Daniel Services Corporation - Justia... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
We just got an email from a legal service (BNA, for you lawyers, but which one really doesn&amp;#39;t matter much) reporting on HR 6381, introduced on June 26, &amp;quot;that would reverse the effects of a recent Supreme Court decision [Riegel] on ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1348225&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strike Two?</title>
    <link href="http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/2008/07/strike-two.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-01:/commentary/2428777</id>
    <updated>2008-07-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Drug and Device Law </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
We just got an email from a legal service (BNA, for you lawyers, but which one really doesn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t matter much) reporting on HR 6381, introduced on June 26, &#226;&#8364;&#339;that would reverse the effects of a recent Supreme Court decision [Riegel] on ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/2008/07/strike-two.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>OpenCongress - U.S. Congress - H.R.6381 Medical Device Safety Act ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/3802060</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Open Congress : Major Bill Actions in Medical... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR6381 Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 on OpenCongress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>riegel v. medtronic: congress to the rescue?</title>
    <link href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/2008/06/riegel_v_medtronic_congress_to.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/3126002</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Maryland Injury Lawyer Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
yesterday, california congressmen henry waxman and new jersey congressman frank pallone, along with 62 bipartisan supporters, introduced hr 6381, the medical device safety act. this bill would effectively undo the wrong the riegel does ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/2008/06/riegel_v_medtronic_congress_to.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>riegel v. medtronic: congress to the rescue?</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1343621&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-29:/commentary/3126001</id>
    <updated>2008-06-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Recent Posts - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... did not intend to preclude medical device tort claims. yesterday, california congressmen henry waxman and new jersey congressman frank pallone, along with 62 bipartisan supporters, introduced hr 6381, the medical device safety act....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1343621&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WashingtonWatch.com - H.R. 6381, The Medical Device Safety Act of 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/200511632.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/3387319</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Comments for HR 6562,... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
US Congress: HR 6381, The Medical Device Safety Act of 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/200511632.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Newly Introduced Legislation Would Protect Legal Rights of ...</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1342403&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2839701</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Settlement Support Center, LLC - Justia... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
along with 62 bipartisan supporters introduced HR 6381, the Medical Device Safety Act of 2008. We previewed this new Congressional bill regarding preemption in ... devices approved by the FDA. At that May 2008 Congressional hearing ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1342403&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Newly Introduced Legislation Would Protect Legal Rights of ...</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1340009&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2551831</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Settlement Support Center, LLC - Justia... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
J.) along with 62 bipartisan supporters introduced HR 6381, the Medical Device Safety Act of 2008. We previewed this new Congressional bill regarding preemption in ... devices approved by the FDA. At that May 2008 Congressional hearing ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1340009&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Newly Introduced Legislation Would Protect Legal Rights of ...</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1343577&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-26:/commentary/2486436</id>
    <updated>2008-06-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Settlement Support Center, LLC - Justia... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
26, 2008 Congressmen Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Frank Pallone (DN.J.) along with 62 bipartisan supporters introduced HR 6381, the Medical Device Safety Act of 2008. We previewed this new Congressional bill regarding preemption in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1343577&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>bill would overrule high court&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s anti-consumer decision</title>
    <link href="http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/bill-would-overrule-high-courts-anti-consumer-decision/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-25:/commentary/3373752</id>
    <updated>2008-06-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>citizenvox.org </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
public citizen says it is critical for congress to pass this legislation, dubbed the medical device safety act of 2008 (hr 6381). a similar bill is expected to be filed shortly in the senate. here&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s what allison zieve, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/bill-would-overrule-high-courts-anti-consumer-decision/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>bill would overturn high court&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s anti-consumer ruling</title>
    <link href="http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/bill-would-overturn-high-courts-anti-consumer-ruling/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-25:/commentary/3126004</id>
    <updated>2008-06-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>citizenvox.org </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
public citizen says it is critical for congress to pass this legislation, dubbed the medical device safety act of 2008 (hr 6381). a similar bill is expected to be filed shortly in the senate. here&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s what allison zieve, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/bill-would-overturn-high-courts-anti-consumer-ruling/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H.R.6381: Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 - U.S. ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fjt5T_h4poixAvvJ0KEE&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrX2b9dygmaOBSN-guxyeSK79pIw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-25:/commentary/14038810</id>
    <updated>2008-06-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
All Bill Titles. Official: To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to liability under State and local requirements respecting devices. as introduced. Short: Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 as introduced. Overview .... Or, if   you &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=fjt5T_h4poixAvvJ0KEE&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHrX2b9dygmaOBSN-guxyeSK79pIw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H.R.6381: Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 - U.S. ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5ZJ4T_PgDIi3sQKTo8yhBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRpJXKTk0GiYNcprxycl6JAdJlhQ" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-25:/commentary/14018787</id>
    <updated>2008-06-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
All Bill Titles. Official: To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to liability under State and local requirements respecting devices. as introduced. Short: Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 as introduced. Overview .... Or, if   you &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=5ZJ4T_PgDIi3sQKTo8yhBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFRpJXKTk0GiYNcprxycl6JAdJlhQ&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H.R.6381: Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 - U.S. ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wep3T5KWG9GAsgLUta2iBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHs8H7DJ0kfKOL9N_z61f-EX5F3cA" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-25:/commentary/14001868</id>
    <updated>2008-06-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
All Bill Titles. Official: To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to liability under State and local requirements respecting devices. as introduced. Short: Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 as introduced. Overview .... Or, if   you &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=wep3T5KWG9GAsgLUta2iBA&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHs8H7DJ0kfKOL9N_z61f-EX5F3cA&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H.R.6381: Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 - U.S. ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nUF3T-T6A4662gXZ45C4Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvyUWh4b0X1QWS0NtfDRLpSGvI1g" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-25:/commentary/13981704</id>
    <updated>2008-06-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
All Bill Titles. Official: To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to liability under State and local requirements respecting devices. as introduced. Short: Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 as introduced. Overview .... Or, if   you &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=nUF3T-T6A4662gXZ45C4Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFvyUWh4b0X1QWS0NtfDRLpSGvI1g&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H.R.6381: Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 - U.S. ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vJh2T_fKMOGM2gXEt4C2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHH0KMgwf3Hnfunc5fyybbXA_r9nw" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-25:/commentary/13964330</id>
    <updated>2008-06-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
All Bill Titles. Official: To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to liability under State and local requirements respecting devices. as introduced. Short: Medical Device Safety Act of 2008 as introduced. Overview .... Or, if   you &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/url?q=http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-h6381/show&amp;amp;sa=U&amp;amp;ei=vJh2T_fKMOGM2gXEt4C2Bg&amp;amp;ved=0CCUQmAEwAA&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHH0KMgwf3Hnfunc5fyybbXA_r9nw&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: HR 6381: To amend the Federal Food, Drug ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-6381" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/3125995</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by GovTrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Rep. Frank Pallone [D-NJ] introduced HR 6381: To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to liability under State and local requirements respecting devices. [This event matched these trackers: Active Legislation ]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-6381&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HR 6381, To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6381.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/2417397</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Welcome to WashingtonWatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 6381 would amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to liability under State and local requirements respecting devices.... Vote on This Bill: For | Against.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HR_6381.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

