The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.6518 - Justice Integrity Act of 2008
To increase public confidence in the justice system and address any unwarranted racial and ethnic disparities in the criminal process.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 6518 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
110th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. R. 6518CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To increase public confidence in the justice system and address any unwarranted racial and ethnic disparities in the criminal process.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
July 16, 2008CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Mr. COHEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To increase public confidence in the justice system and address any unwarranted racial and ethnic disparities in the criminal process.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Justice Integrity Act of 2008’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds that--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) the pursuit of justice requires the fair application of the law;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) racial and ethnic disparities in the criminal process have contributed to a growing perception of bias in the criminal justice system;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) there are a variety of possible causes of disparities in criminal justice statistics among racial and ethnic groups and these causes may differ throughout the United States, including factors such as--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) varying levels of criminal activity among racial and ethnic groups and legitimate law enforcement response to that criminal activity; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) racial discrimination, ethnic and cultural insensitivity, or unconscious bias;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) the Nation would benefit from an understanding of all factors causing a disparate impact on the criminal justice system; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(5) programs that promote fairness will increase public confidence in the criminal justice system, increase public safety, and further the pursuit of justice.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 3. PILOT PROGRAM.
(a) In General- Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall establish a pilot program in 10 United States districts in order to promote fairness, and the perception of fairness, in the Federal criminal justice system, and to determine whether legislation is required.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Program Requirements-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) U.S. ATTORNEYS- The Attorney General shall designate, in accordance with paragraph (3), 10 United States Attorneys who shall each implement a plan in accordance with section 4, beginning not later than 1 month after those United States Attorneys are designated by the Attorney General.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) PURPOSE- The purposes of the plans required by this section are--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) to gather racial and ethnic data on investigations and prosecutions in the United States districts and the causes of disparities, if any;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) to determine the extent to which the communities’ perception of bias has affected confidence in the Federal criminal justice system;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) to analyze whether measures may be taken to reduce unwarranted disparities, if any, and increase confidence in the criminal justice system; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) to make recommendations, to the extent possible, to ensure that law enforcement priorities and initiatives, charging and plea bargaining decisions, sentencing recommendations, and other steps within the criminal process are not influenced by racial and ethnic stereotyping or bias, and do not produce unwarranted disparities from otherwise neutral laws or policies.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) CRITERIA FOR SELECTION-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) IN GENERAL- The 10 pilot districts referred to in subsection (a) shall include districts of varying compositions with respect to size, case load, geography, and racial and ethnic composition.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) METROPOLITAN AREAS- At least 3 of the United States Attorneys designated by the Attorney General shall be in Federal districts encompassing metropolitan areas.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 4. PLAN AND REPORT.
(a) In General-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) UNITED STATES ATTORNEY- Each United States Attorney shall, in consultation with an advisory group appointed in accordance with paragraph (2), develop and implement a plan in accordance with subsections (b) and (c).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) ADVISORY GROUP-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) APPOINTMENT- Not later than 90 days after designation by the Attorney General, the United States Attorney in each of the 10 pilot districts selected pursuant to section 3 shall appoint an advisory group, after consultation with the chief judge of the district and criminal justice professionals within the district.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) MEMBERSHIP- The advisory group of a United States Attorney shall include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) 1 or more senior social scientists with expertise in research methods or statistics; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) individuals and entities who play important roles in the criminal justice process and have broad-based community representation such as--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(I) Federal and State prosecutors;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(II) Federal and State defenders, if applicable in the district, and private defense counsel;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(III) Federal and State judges;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(IV) Federal and State law enforcement officials and union representatives;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(V) parole and probation officers;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(VI) correctional officers;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(VII) victim’s rights representatives;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(VIII) civil rights organizations;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(IX) business and professional representatives; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(X) faith-based organizations who do criminal justice work.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) TERM LIMIT- Subject to subparagraph (D), a member of the advisory group shall not serve longer than 5 years.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) PERMANENT MEMBERS- Notwithstanding subparagraph (C), the following shall be permanent members of the advisory group for that district:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) The chief judge for the judicial district.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) The Federal defender for the judicial district.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) The United States Attorney for the judicial district.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) REPORTER- The United States Attorney may designate a reporter for each advisory group, who may be compensated in accordance with guidelines established by the Executive Office of the United States Attorneys.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(F) INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS- The members of an advisory group of a United States Attorney and any person designated as a reporter for such group--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) shall be considered independent contractors of the United States Attorney’s Office when in the performance of official duties of the advisory group; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) may not, solely by reason of service on or for the advisory group, be prohibited from practicing law before any court.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Development and Implementation of a Plan and Report-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) ADVISORY GROUP REPORT- The advisory group appointed under subsection (a)(2) shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A)(i) systematically collect and analyze quantitative data on the race and ethnicity of the defendant and victim at each stage of prosecution, including case intake, bail requests, declinations, selection of charges, diversion from prosecution or incarceration, plea offers, sentencing recommendations, fast-track sentencing, and use of alternative sanctions; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) at a minimum, collect aggregate data capable of individualization and tracking through the system so that any cumulative racial or ethnic disadvantage can be analyzed;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) seek to determine the causes of racial and ethnic disparities in a district, and whether these disparities are substantially explained by sound law enforcement policies or if they are at least partially attributable to discrimination, insensitivity, or unconscious bias;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) examine the extent to which racial and ethnic disparities are attributable to--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) law enforcement priorities, prosecutorial priorities, the substantive provisions of legislation enacted by Congress; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) the penalty schemes enacted by Congress or implemented by the United States Sentencing Commission;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(D) examine data including--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) the racial and ethnic demographics of the United States Attorney’s district;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) defendants charged in all categories of offense by race and ethnicity, and, where applicable, the race and ethnicity of any identified victim;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) substantial assistance motions, whether at sentencing or post-conviction, by race and ethnicity;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iv) charging policies, including decisions as to who should be charged in Federal rather than State court when either forum is available, and whether these policies tend to result in racial or ethnic disparities among defendants charged in Federal court, including whether relative disparities exist between State and Federal defendants charged with similar offenses;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(v) the racial and ethnic composition of the Federal prosecutors in the district; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(vi) the extent to which training in the exercise of discretion, including cultural competency, is provided prosecutors;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(E) consult with an educational or independent research group, if necessary, to conduct work under this subsection; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(F) submit to the United States Attorney by the end of the second year after their initial appointment a report and proposed plan, which shall be made available to the public and which shall include--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(i) factual findings and conclusions on racial and ethnic disparities, if any, and the State of public confidence in the criminal process;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(ii) recommended measures, rules, and programs for reducing unjustified disparities, if any, and increasing public confidence; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(iii) an explanation of the manner in which the recommended plan complies with this paragraph.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) ADOPTION OF PLAN- Not later than 60 days after receiving and considering the advisory group’s report and proposed plan under paragraph (1), the United States Attorney appointed under section 3 shall adopt and implement a plan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(3) COPY OF REPORT- The United States Attorney shall transmit a copy of the plan and report adopted and implemented, in accordance with this subsection, together with the report and plan recommended by the advisory group, to the Attorney General. The United States Attorney shall include with the plan an explanation of any recommendation of the advisory group that is not included in the plan.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(4) CONGRESS- The Attorney General shall transmit to the United States Attorney’s in every Federal district and to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives copies of any plan and accompanying report submitted by a pilot district.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Periodic United States Attorney Assessment- After adopting and implementing a plan under subsection (b), each United States Attorney in a pilot district shall annually evaluate the efficacy of the plan. In performing such assessment, the United States Attorney shall consult with the advisory group appointed in accordance with subsection (a)(2). Each assessment shall be submitted to the Executive Office for United States Attorneys for review in accordance with subsection (d).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(d) Information on the Pilot Program-CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(1) REPORT AND MODEL PLAN- Not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) prepare a comprehensive report on all plans received pursuant to this section;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) based on all the plans received pursuant to this section the Attorney General shall also develop one or more model plans; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(C) transmit copies of the report and model plan or plans to the Committees on the Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(2) CONTINUED OVERSIGHT- The Attorney General shall, on a continuing basis--CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(A) study ways to reduce unwarranted racial and ethnic disparate impact in the Federal criminal system; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(B) make recommendations to all United States Attorneys on ways to improve the system.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There are authorized to be appropriated $3,000,000 for use, at the discretion of the Attorney General, by the United States Attorneys’ advisory groups in the development and implementation of plans under this Act.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
OC Blog Articles Related To This Bill
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- The Color (and Gender) of Congress Feb 01, 2011
- Compare Votes Head-to-Head in Advance of Tonight's SoTU Jan 25, 2011
- ACORN Suing Federal Government Over Vote in House Nov 12, 2009
- Top Financial Services Committee Members Rely Heavily On Finance Campaign Contributions Oct 13, 2009
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.6518 as Introduced in House Justice Integrity Act of 2008



