The easiest way to email your members of Congress
Donate NowH.R.6610 - To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence to address the waiver of the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine.

Loading Bill Text
Rollover any line of text to comment and/or link to it.
HR 6610 IHCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
110th CONGRESSCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
2d SessionCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
H. R. 6610CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence to address the waiver of the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
July 24, 2008CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the JudiciaryCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
A BILLCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence to address the waiver of the attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
SECTION 1. ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT; LIMITATIONS ON WAIVER.
(a) In General- Article V of the Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by adding at the end the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘Rule 502. Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product; Limitations on Waiver
‘The following provisions apply, in the circumstances set out, to disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(a) Disclosure Made in a Federal Proceeding or to a Federal Office or Agency; Scope of a Waiver- When the disclosure is made in a Federal proceeding or to a Federal office or agency and waives the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection, the waiver extends to an undisclosed communication or information in a Federal or State proceeding only if:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) the waiver is intentional;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) the disclosed and undisclosed communications or information concern the same subject matter; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) they ought in fairness to be considered together.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(b) Inadvertent Disclosure- When made in a Federal proceeding or to a Federal office or agency, the disclosure does not operate as a waiver in a Federal or State proceeding if:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) the disclosure is inadvertent;CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) the holder of the privilege or protection took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(3) the holder promptly took reasonable steps to rectify the error, including (if applicable) following Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(c) Disclosure Made in a State Proceeding- When the disclosure is made in a State proceeding and is not the subject of a State-court order concerning waiver, the disclosure does not operate as a waiver in a Federal proceeding if the disclosure:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) would not be a waiver under this rule if it had been made in a Federal proceeding; orCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) is not a waiver under the law of the State where the disclosure occurred.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(d) Controlling Effect of a Court Order- A Federal court may order that the privilege or protection is not waived by disclosure connected with the litigation pending before the court--in which event the disclosure is also not a waiver in any other Federal or State proceeding.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(e) Controlling Effect of a Party Agreement- An agreement on the effect of disclosure in a Federal proceeding is binding only on the parties to the agreement, unless it is incorporated into a court order.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(f) Controlling Effect of This Rule- Notwithstanding Rules 101 and 1101, this rule applies to State proceedings and to Federal court-annexed and Federal court-mandated arbitration proceedings, in the circumstances set out in the rule. And notwithstanding Rule 501, this rule applies even if State law provides the rule of decision.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(g) Definitions- In this rule:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(1) ‘attorney-client privilege’ means the protection that applicable law provides for confidential attorney-client communications; andCommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘(2) ‘work-product protection’ means the protection that applicable law provides for tangible material (or its intangible equivalent) prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(b) Technical and Conforming Changes- The table of contents for the Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by inserting after the item relating to rule 501 the following:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
‘502. Attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine; limitations on waiver.’.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
(c) Effective Date- The amendments made by this Act shall apply in all proceedings commenced after the date of enactment of this Act and, insofar as is just and practicable, in all proceedings pending on such date of enactment.CommentsClose CommentsPermalink
Vote on This Bill
-
Share This Bill
More Share via Email
Recent OC Blog Articles
- Yes, let's stride towards an open VCS for legislation (or, GitHub for laws on OC) May 23, 2012
- Contact Congress Today to #FreeTHOMAS May 17, 2012
- Yochai Benkler: Blueprint for Democratic Participation May 10, 2012
- New NDAA Would Give the Military Clandestine Cyberwar Powers May 08, 2012
- The Week Ahead in Congress May 07, 2012

U.S. Congress - Text of H.R.6610 as Introduced in House To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence to address the waiver of the attorney-client pri...



