<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for H.J.Res.64 Clarifying that the use of force against Iran is not authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, any resolution previously adopted, or any other provision of law.</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-hj64/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-hj64/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2011-05-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/47426</id>
  <entry>
    <title>H.J.Res.64: Expressing support for designation of ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-hj64/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-12:/commentary/10921365</id>
    <updated>2011-05-12T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Sheila Jackson-Lee of Texas, for example, proved to America that she&amp;#39;s focused like a laser beam when she introduced bill HJ Res. 64 on Friday afternoon. What exactly is HJ Res 64? It&amp;#39;s a resolution to express support . ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-hj64/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H.J.Res.64: Making further continuing appropriations for fiscal ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-hj64/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-12-14:/commentary/10792516</id>
    <updated>2009-12-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
During the 111th Congress, President Barack H. Obama has vetoed two bills, H.J.Res. 64, an FY2010 appropriations measure, and H.R. 3808, the Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act of 2010. ... Top-Rated Comments. &#8220;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebO&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-hj64/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BikePortland.org &#194;&#187; Blog Archive &#194;&#187; Politico: Blumenauer, Oberstar ...</title>
    <link href="http://bikeportland.org/2008/10/31/politico-blumenauer-oberstar-on-short-list-for-transportation-secretary/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-30:/commentary/3394312</id>
    <updated>2008-10-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BikePortland.org &#187; Front Page </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Earl has never apologized for his vote in favor of H.J. Res. 64, &quot;Authorization for Use of Military Force&quot;, which gave Bush authority to single-handedly conduct war against unspecified nations, organizations, or persons for an ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bikeportland.org/2008/10/31/politico-blumenauer-oberstar-on-short-list-for-transportation-secretary/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BJ Lawson vs. David Price -- NC 4th</title>
    <link href="http://kenmorefield.blogspot.com/2008/10/b-j-lawson-vs-david-price-nc-4th.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-18:/commentary/3051157</id>
    <updated>2008-10-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>All Things Ken </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I actually agree with Lawson's larger point that the more damning vote was probably HJ Res 64, which authorized the president to &quot;attack&quot; any nation &quot;believed&quot; to be involved in 9/11. This isn't quite the same as voting for war,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://kenmorefield.blogspot.com/2008/10/b-j-lawson-vs-david-price-nc-4th.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lowered Expectations</title>
    <link href="http://welcomebacktopottersville.blogspot.com/2008/08/lowered-expectations.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-10:/commentary/2728397</id>
    <updated>2008-08-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Welcome Back to Pottersville </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(HJRes. 64, RC Vote #342, 9/14/01; HJRes. 114, RC Vote #455, 10/10/02).&#226;&#8364;* All of which being votes that, no doubt, will pay dividends as soon as we find those darned elusive Hussein/al Qaeda connections, weapons of mass destruction and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://welcomebacktopottersville.blogspot.com/2008/08/lowered-expectations.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lowered Expectations</title>
    <link href="http://brilliantatbreakfast.blogspot.com/2008/08/lowered-expectations.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-10:/commentary/2657006</id>
    <updated>2008-08-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Brilliant at Breakfast </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(HJRes. 64, RC Vote #342, 9/14/01; HJRes. 114, RC Vote #455, 10/10/02).&#226;&#8364;* All of which being votes that, no doubt, will pay dividends as soon as we find those darned elusive Hussein/al Qaeda connections, weapons of mass destruction and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://brilliantatbreakfast.blogspot.com/2008/08/lowered-expectations.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BlueOregon: Eugene Mayor Kitty Piercy Co-sponsors Mayors ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.blueoregon.com/2008/06/eugene-mayor-ki.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-18:/commentary/3394314</id>
    <updated>2008-06-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BlueOregon </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Furthermore, the problem with calling &quot;...on Congress to prohibit the use of military force against Iran without explicit Congressional authorization&quot; is that Congress has been a rubber stamp for Bush hegemony, including H.J. Res. 64 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blueoregon.com/2008/06/eugene-mayor-ki.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Iran Questions</title>
    <link href="http://obama08.livejournal.com/86583.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-12:/commentary/2046285</id>
    <updated>2008-04-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Barack Obama in 08 </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I also know that Obama has taken a piece of legislation HJRES.64 that originated in the House and submitted it (without any cosponsors) to the senate: SJRES.23 Title: A joint resolution clarifying that the use of force against Iran is ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://obama08.livejournal.com/86583.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>TIMELINE OF TERRORIST ACTS</title>
    <link href="http://ohhowsoonweforget.blogspot.com/2008/03/timeline-of-terrorist-acts.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-04:/commentary/1741556</id>
    <updated>2008-03-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OH HOW SO WE FORGET </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
23 / HJ Res. 64 -- &amp;quot;Joint Resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.&amp;quot; 9/20/01 - President Bush, during televised address to a joint ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ohhowsoonweforget.blogspot.com/2008/03/timeline-of-terrorist-acts.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>what has obama done...</title>
    <link href="http://grimwomyn.blogspot.com/2008/03/what-has-obama-done.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-28:/commentary/3138266</id>
    <updated>2008-02-28T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Red Statement </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
related bills: hjres.64 latest major action: 11/1/2007 referred to senate committee. status: read twice and referred to the committee on foreign relations. (since i linked them, maybe you could drop a line about how they should hurry ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://grimwomyn.blogspot.com/2008/03/what-has-obama-done.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BARBARA LEE, TRIBALISM and the EVOLUTION of the WIDE WORLD of SPORTS</title>
    <link href="http://www.petemccormack.com/blog/?p=440" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-01:/commentary/1559551</id>
    <updated>2008-02-01T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Pete McCormack&amp;#39;s Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
One person&#226;&#8364;&#8221;one person&#226;&#8364;&#8221;Representative Barbara Lee, a Democrat from California, voted against a resolution (HJ Resolution 64) authorizing the president to use (HJ Res 64):. &#226;&#8364;&#339;&#226;&#8364;&#166;all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.petemccormack.com/blog/?p=440&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>no, i'm not done supporting ron paul</title>
    <link href="http://blog.madpuppy.com/2008/01/31/no-im-not-done-supporting-ron-paul.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-30:/commentary/3138265</id>
    <updated>2008-01-30T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mad Puppy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
paul voted for us forces going in afghanistan in 2001 to hunt down bin laden (hj res 64), but against nation building in afghanistan (hr 3994, may 2002). &quot;i supported going after al qaida into afghanistan &#226;&#8364;&#8220; but, lo &amp; behold, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.madpuppy.com/2008/01/31/no-im-not-done-supporting-ron-paul.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Presidential Primary - How are you going to vote?</title>
    <link href="http://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?t=31011" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-21:/commentary/1550351</id>
    <updated>2008-01-21T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>waccobb - waccotalk </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HJ Res 64: To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States. Clearly, this authorization was abused. Here is an almost prophetic speech to Congress by ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?t=31011&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation: Congress and Iran ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/iran/articles/iran_2007_review_2008_outlook/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-03:/commentary/3394315</id>
    <updated>2008-01-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Representative Neil Abercrombie (D-HI) introduced the House companion legislation, H.J.Res. 64. It was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and currently has 16 co-sponsors. Neither resolution is likely to come up for a vote in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/iran/articles/iran_2007_review_2008_outlook/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Primarily Paul &#194;&#187; Questions the media won&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t ask about Ron Paul</title>
    <link href="http://www.primarilypaul.com/2008/01/01/questions-the-media-wont-ask-about-ron-paul/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-31:/commentary/3394313</id>
    <updated>2007-12-31T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Primarily Paul </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Unless you are identifying another bill than H. J. RES. 64, then I cannot answer your question. However, this bill allowed for the military action upon Afghanistan as the Taliban was actively harboring Al Quaeda. 2. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.primarilypaul.com/2008/01/01/questions-the-media-wont-ask-about-ron-paul/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>local stuffs</title>
    <link href="http://greenwom.blogspot.com/2007/12/local-stuffs_21.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-20:/commentary/1390374</id>
    <updated>2007-12-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>local stuffs list </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Authorization does not authorize military action against Iran, and that any actions against Iran would require specific Congressional authorization. [HJ Res. 64, introduced on 11/14/2007, referred to House Committee on Foreign Affairs] ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://greenwom.blogspot.com/2007/12/local-stuffs_21.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ron Paul -1/24/02- Case for Defending America</title>
    <link href="http://unbearable-stench.blogspot.com/2007/12/ron-paul-12402-case-for-defending.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-10:/commentary/1384078</id>
    <updated>2007-12-10T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Closet </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HJ RES 64 gives the President authority to pursue only those guilty of the attack on us- not every terrorist in the entire world. Let there be no doubt: for every terrorist identified, others will see only a freedom fighter. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://unbearable-stench.blogspot.com/2007/12/ron-paul-12402-case-for-defending.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H. J. Res. 64: Clarifying that the use of force against Iran is ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hj110-64" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-13:/commentary/3394311</id>
    <updated>2007-11-13T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by GovTrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the US Congress: Clarifying that the use of force against Iran is not authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, any resolution previously adopted, or any other provision of law.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hj110-64&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Introduced: HJRes.64 Clarifying that the use of force against ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-hj64/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-12:/commentary/1366783</id>
    <updated>2007-11-12T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Open Congress : Major Bill Actions in Armed forces </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Clarifying that the use of force against Iran is not authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, any resolution previously adopted, or any other provision of law.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-hj64/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HJ Res. 64, Clarifying that the use of force against Iran is not ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HJ_64.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-12:/commentary/1350120</id>
    <updated>2007-11-12T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>washingtonwatch.com - Welcome to washingtonwatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HJ Res. 64 would clarify that the use of force against Iran is not authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, any resolution previously adopted, or any other provision of law. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_HJ_64.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

