<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for H.J.Res.67 Supporting a base Defense Budget that at the very minimum matches 4 percent of gross domestic product.</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-hj67/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-hj67/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-12-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/47670</id>
  <entry>
    <title>CQ Politics | New Study Calculates the Costs of the War on Terror</title>
    <link href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=hsnews-000002997992" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-16:/commentary/3788702</id>
    <updated>2008-12-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Top Stories from CQ </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
C., introduced a joint resolution ( H J Res 67 , S J Res 26 ) that would require a minimal defense budget equal to 4 percent of GDP. The report drew on analyses of the Defense Department, Congressional Research Service, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=hsnews-000002997992&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CQ Politics | New Study Calculates the Costs of the War on Terror</title>
    <link href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/hsnews-000002997992" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-16:/commentary/3710851</id>
    <updated>2008-12-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Top Stories from CQ </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
C., introduced a joint resolution ( H J Res 67 , S J Res 26 ) that would require a minimal defense budget equal to 4 percent of GDP. The report drew on analyses of the Defense Department, Congressional Research Service, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cqpolitics.com/hsnews-000002997992&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Balancing strategy and budgets</title>
    <link href="http://www.heritage.org/press/commentary/ed101408.cfm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-02:/commentary/3363478</id>
    <updated>2008-11-02T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Heritage Foundation Papers: Commentary </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A joint resolution (H.J. Res. 67 and S.J. Res. 26) introduced last year by Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., and Sen. Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C., seeks to fund America's military at roughly today's levels. Rep. Jim Saxton, R-N. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heritage.org/press/commentary/ed101408.cfm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Liddy's Money Part Two: The Neocon War Machine | BlueNC</title>
    <link href="http://www.bluenc.com/liddys-money-part-two:-the-neocon-war-machine" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-14:/commentary/3830101</id>
    <updated>2008-08-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BlueNC </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
26, HJ Res. 67) in December 2007 stating that the United States should &quot;commit a minimum of four percent of the nation's gross domestic product to the base defense budget.&quot; By mid-April 2008, five Republican senators, 23 Republican ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluenc.com/liddys-money-part-two:-the-neocon-war-machine&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation:</title>
    <link href="http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/securityspending/articles/tying_spending_to_gdp_bad_policy/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-14:/commentary/3363481</id>
    <updated>2008-04-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
26, HJ Res. 67) in December 2007 stating that the United States should &quot;commit a minimum of four percent of the nation's gross domestic product to the base defense budget.&quot; By mid-April 2008, five Republican senators, 23 Republican ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/securityspending/articles/tying_spending_to_gdp_bad_policy/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The FY 2009 Defense Budget Request: The Growing Gap in Defense ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.heritage.org/research/nationalsecurity/bg2110.cfm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-26:/commentary/3363479</id>
    <updated>2008-02-26T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Heritage Foundation Papers: Commentary </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
25 and H.J. Res. 67) that would make such a commitment. This commitment would require Congress to add roughly $59 billion in budget authority to the core defense budget in FY 2009 and a total of $532 billion over five years from FY 2009 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heritage.org/research/nationalsecurity/bg2110.cfm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Defense Allies Push GDP-Tied Funds | Young Professionals in ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.ypfp.org/defense_allies_push_gdp_tied_funds" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-15:/commentary/3392434</id>
    <updated>2008-02-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Young Professionals in Foreign Policy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
C., introduced a joint resolution (H J Res 67, S J Res 26) that would require the defense base budget to equal 4 percent of GDP, at a minimum. Democrats and budget experts criticize the idea as fiscally irresponsible and out of line ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ypfp.org/defense_allies_push_gdp_tied_funds&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy: Defence and GDP ratios</title>
    <link href="http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2008/02/defence-and-gdp-ratios.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-13:/commentary/3363480</id>
    <updated>2008-02-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adam Smith's Lost Legacy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Congressional Quarterly reports that sponsors of the resolution (H J Res 67) point out that the percentage GDP spent on defense today is low compared to other eras. Not including supplemental funding for Iraq and Afghanistan, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://adamsmithslostlegacy.com/2008/02/defence-and-gdp-ratios.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The First Duty of Government</title>
    <link href="http://blog.heritage.org/2008/02/13/the-first-duty-of-government/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-13:/commentary/3135826</id>
    <updated>2008-02-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Foundry (Blog) </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Congressional Quarterly reports that sponsors of the resolution (HJ Res 67) point out that the percentage GDP spent on defense today is low compared to other eras. Not including supplemental funding for Iraq and Afghanistan, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.heritage.org/2008/02/13/the-first-duty-of-government/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>the first duty of government</title>
    <link href="http://theheritagefoundry.org/2008/02/13/the-first-duty-of-government/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-13:/commentary/5782176</id>
    <updated>2008-02-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Foundry </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
writing in human events, w. thomas smith, jr. reminds us of adam smith&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s first duty of government: &#226;&#8364;&#339;protecting the society from the violence and invasion of other independent societies.&#226;&#8364;* to that end republican lawmakers are pushing a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://theheritagefoundry.org/2008/02/13/the-first-duty-of-government/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: HJRes. 67: Supporting a base Defense ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hj110-67" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-05:/commentary/1386495</id>
    <updated>2007-12-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by govtrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Rep. Trent Franks [R-AZ] introduced HJRes. 67: Supporting a base Defense Budget that at the very minimum matches 4 percent of gross domestic product. [This event matched these trackers: Active Legislation ]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hj110-67&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
