Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the practice of the Department of Defense to continue to use stop-loss orders to retain members of the Armed Forces who have completed their contractual obligations runs contrary to the stated policy of the United States to utilize an all-volunteer force.
Other Bill Titles (1 more) 5/6/2008--Introduced.
Declares that the Secretary of Defense should immediately:
(1) submit to Congress a plan to minimize the use of stop-loss orders that prevent Armed Forces members who have completed their contractual obligations from voluntarily separating from the Ar... moreSee Full Bill Text
Committees
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Bill Status
| Introduced | ![]() | Voted on by House |
| May 06, 2008 |
In the News
We are not currently finding any news articles on this topic using our daily automated search of Google News. However, if you know of a relevant news article to display here, OpenCongress site editors have the ability to add it manually. Simply e-mail us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: We'll post relevant links as quickly as possible. Also, if this topic is important to you, you could write a letter to the editor -- if a news article refers this specific topic by name, a link to that news article is likely to appear here soon.
Blog Coverage
May 27, 2008 Rep. Sutton Taking Lead in Stopping "Stop-Loss"
When passed, H. Res. 1177 will go far toward providing genuine support to our men and women patriotically answering America's call to duty. As Rep. Sutton states, âThe Army's use of 'stop-loss' orders undermines the voluntary nature of
Source: Community Blogs at ProgressOhio
May 05, 2008 Bill Action: Introduced: H.Res. 1177: Expressing the sense of the ...
Betty Sutton [D-OH] introduced H.Res. 1177: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the practice of the Department of Defense to continue to use stop-loss orders to retain members of the Armed Forces who have completed ...










Rating Filter: 5
Comments
No Comments
Add A Comment