<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for H.Res.63 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to ensure that Members have a reasonable amount of time to read legislation that will be voted upon.</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-hr63/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-hr63/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-07-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/40046</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Surprise: House Vote to Tap the SPR</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/articles/view/569-Surprise-House-Vote-to-Tap-the-SPR" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-24:/commentary/2548583</id>
    <updated>2008-07-24T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Open Congress : Congress Gossip Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This reminds me: why hasn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t this bill been passed yet?:. H.Res.63 &#226;&#8364;&#8220; Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to ensure that Members have a reasonable amount of time to read legislation that will be voted upon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.opencongress.org/articles/view/569-Surprise-House-Vote-to-Tap-the-SPR"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sunlight Rule</title>
    <link href="http://www.peoplesrepublicofcork.com/forums/showthread.php?t=120942" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-18:/commentary/1488385</id>
    <updated>2007-12-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Peoples Republic Of Cork Forums </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(H.RES 63) This proposed rule stipulates that no piece of legislation can be brought before the House of Representatives for a vote unless it has been available to members and staff to read for at least ten days. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.peoplesrepublicofcork.com/forums/showthread.php?t=120942"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Thought of the Day: The Sunlight Rule</title>
    <link href="http://andrearice.livejournal.com/53696.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-15:/commentary/1233967</id>
    <updated>2007-10-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Woman With a Pen </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(H.RES 63) This proposed rule stipulates that no piece of legislation can be brought before the House of Representatives for a vote unless it has been available to members and staff to read for at least ten days. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://andrearice.livejournal.com/53696.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rep. Ron Paul and The Sunlight Rule; Read the bills with which you ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.redpills.org/?p=358" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-20:/commentary/1136290</id>
    <updated>2007-09-20T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Red Pills </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Today I found out that Ron Paul&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s weekly telephone message for this week discusses H. Res. 63! Dr. Ron Paul is calling it &#226;&#8364;&#339;The Sunlight Rule&#226;&#8364;&#157;, which is a very apt name for the legislation. Rep. Ron Paul states: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.redpills.org/?p=358"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rep. Ron Paul and The Sunlight Rule; Read the bills with which you ...</title>
    <link href="http://ronpaul.rockerreport.com/rep_ron_paul_and_sunlight_rule_read_bills_which_you_bind_us" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-20:/commentary/1198327</id>
    <updated>2007-09-20T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>admin&amp;#39;s blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I love it when great minds think alike, particularly when one of those minds is Dr. Ron Paul&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s and the other is mine. Ok, ok, so I just happened to discuss H. Res. 63 in a redpills.org post back on 9/12. Just let me delude myself a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://ronpaul.rockerreport.com/rep_ron_paul_and_sunlight_rule_read_bills_which_you_bind_us"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Sunlight Rule</title>
    <link href="http://lookinferlearnin.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/the-sunlight-rule/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-17:/commentary/2224613</id>
    <updated>2007-09-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lookin&amp;#39; Fer Learnin&amp;#39; </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(H.RES 63) This proposed rule stipulates that no piece of legislation can be brought before the House of Representatives for a vote unless it has been available to members and staff to read for at least ten days. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://lookinferlearnin.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/the-sunlight-rule/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sunlight is the Best Disinfectant</title>
    <link href="http://delawarecurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2007/09/sunlight-is-best-disinfectant.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-17:/commentary/2220937</id>
    <updated>2007-09-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Delaware Curmudgeon </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Ron Paul&amp;#39;s, weekly column: Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis famously said &#226;&#8364;&#339;Sunlight is the best disinfectant.&#226;&#8364;&#157; Indeed some of the most malignant growth of our government has been nurtured under a cover of darkness. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://delawarecurmudgeon.blogspot.com/2007/09/sunlight-is-best-disinfectant.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Sunlight Rule</title>
    <link href="http://voteyourconscience.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/the-sunlight-rule/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-17:/commentary/2212144</id>
    <updated>2007-09-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Vote Your Conscience </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(H.RES 63) This proposed rule stipulates that no piece of legislation can be brought before the House of Representatives for a vote unless it has been available to members and staff to read for at least ten days. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://voteyourconscience.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/the-sunlight-rule/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Texas Straight Talk</title>
    <link href="http://stanky.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/texas-straight-talk/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-17:/commentary/1125788</id>
    <updated>2007-09-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>stanky </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(H.RES 63) This proposed rule stipulates that no piece of legislation can be brought before the House of Representatives for a vote unless it has been available to members and staff to read for at least ten days. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://stanky.wordpress.com/2007/09/17/texas-straight-talk/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ron Paul Introduces Measure in the House to Empower Citizens ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2007/09/ron-paul-introduces-measure-in-the-house-to-empowe.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-17:/commentary/1231082</id>
    <updated>2007-09-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>News :: News and Policy.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(H.RES 63) This proposed rule stipulates that no piece of legislation can be brought before the House of Representatives for a vote unless it has been available to members and staff to read for at least ten days. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.newsandpolicy.com/news/2007/09/ron-paul-introduces-measure-in-the-house-to-empowe.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Ron Paul Record: Require US Representatives to actually read ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.redpills.org/?p=343" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-12:/commentary/1110312</id>
    <updated>2007-09-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Red Pills </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
One remedy to the situation is H. Res. 63, of which Ron Paul is the sponsor. The bill is entitled, &#226;&#8364;&#339;Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to ensure that Members have a reasonable amount of time to read legislation that will ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.redpills.org/?p=343"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>JUST A LIST&#8211; WHO&#8217;S BEEN NAUGHTY? WHO&#8217;S BEEN NICE? LET&#8217;S REMEMBER ...</title>
    <link href="http://lo7f.ddneo.com/JUST-A-LIST-WHOS-BEEN-NAUGHTY-WHOS-BEEN-NICE-LETS-REMEMBER-OR-AT-LEAST-ARCHIVE/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-03-22:/commentary/970675</id>
    <updated>2007-03-22T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>loan </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This week the House of Representatives passed H.RES.63, a resolution disapproving of &#8220;the decision of the President announced on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://lo7f.ddneo.com/JUST-A-LIST-WHOS-BEEN-NAUGHTY-WHOS-BEEN-NICE-LETS-REMEMBER-OR-AT-LEAST-ARCHIVE/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>JUST A LIST&#8211; WHO&#8217;S BEEN NAUGHTY? WHO&#8217;S BEEN NICE? LET&#8217;S REMEMBER ...</title>
    <link href="http://lo4h.ddneo.com/JUST-A-LIST-WHOS-BEEN-NAUGHTY-WHOS-BEEN-NICE-LETS-REMEMBER-OR-AT-LEAST-ARCHIVE/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-03-20:/commentary/901163</id>
    <updated>2007-03-20T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>loan </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This week the House of Representatives passed H.RES.63, a resolution disapproving of &#8220;the decision of the President announced on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://lo4h.ddneo.com/JUST-A-LIST-WHOS-BEEN-NAUGHTY-WHOS-BEEN-NICE-LETS-REMEMBER-OR-AT-LEAST-ARCHIVE/"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>JUST A LIST-- WHO&amp;#39;S BEEN NAUGHTY? WHO&amp;#39;S BEEN NICE? LET&amp;#39;S REMEMBER ...</title>
    <link href="http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2007/03/just-list-whos-been-naughty-whos-been.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-03-18:/commentary/831327</id>
    <updated>2007-03-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DownWithTyranny! </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This week the House of Representatives passed H.RES.63, a resolution disapproving of &amp;quot;the decision of the President announced on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2007/03/just-list-whos-been-naughty-whos-been.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>JUST A LIST-- WHO&amp;#39;S BEEN NAUGHTY? WHO&amp;#39;S BEEN NICE? LET&amp;#39;S REMEMBER ...</title>
    <link href="http://leftword.blogdig.net/archives/articles/March2007/18/JUST_A_LIST___WHO_S_BEEN_NAUGHTY__WHO_S_BEEN_NICE__LET_S_REMEMBER__OR__AT_LEAST__ARCHIVE_.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-03-18:/commentary/897690</id>
    <updated>2007-03-18T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>LeftWord: The Best Liberal Blog Posts </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This week the House of Representatives passed H.RES.63, a resolution disapproving of &amp;quot;the decision of the President announced on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://leftword.blogdig.net/archives/articles/March2007/18/JUST_A_LIST___WHO_S_BEEN_NAUGHTY__WHO_S_BEEN_NICE__LET_S_REMEMBER__OR__AT_LEAST__ARCHIVE_.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Morons in the News: Iraq War Debate: The Conclusion</title>
    <link href="http://web.morons.org/article.jsp?id=7398" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-17:/commentary/294842</id>
    <updated>2007-02-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>morons.org headlines </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Well yesterday the House voted 246-142 to pass H. Res 63, the non-binding resolution disapproving of Bush&amp;#39;s escalation. 17 Republicans joined all but 4 Democrats in voting for it. Two of the Democrats did not vote, but the two that ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://web.morons.org/article.jsp?id=7398"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Correct The Record: Defunding The Vietnam War</title>
    <link href="http://www.partisanblast.com/2007/jteague/correct-the-record-defunding-the-vietnam-war/12152.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-17:/commentary/294843</id>
    <updated>2007-02-17T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Partisan Blast </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I watched as much of the House debates on the non-binding Resolution (H. Res 63) as I could. I watched the full Senate debate on proceeding with debate of the same resolution today. I was not as much interested in party talking points ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.partisanblast.com/2007/jteague/correct-the-record-defunding-the-vietnam-war/12152.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Grijalva Remarks on Iraq Resolution</title>
    <link href="http://www.espressostraight.com/2007/02/grijalva_remark.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-16:/commentary/955136</id>
    <updated>2007-02-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Espresso Straight </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;quot;This resolution is one step in what I hope is a rapid process by Congress to bring the debacle in Iraq to an end. &amp;quot;I urge my colleagues to support H Res 63, and also to support HR 508 - The Bring Our Troops Home and Iraq Sovereignty ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.espressostraight.com/2007/02/grijalva_remark.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Iraq Survey</title>
    <link href="http://house-election-call-985-320-6006.blogspot.com/2007/02/iraq-survey.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-02-14:/commentary/259464</id>
    <updated>2007-02-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <content type="html">
This week, the House of Representatives is debating H.Res.63, a resolution disapproving the President&amp;#39;s decision to deploy more than 20000 additional US combat troops to Iraq. Last year, I sent out a video of my remarks on the House ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://house-election-call-985-320-6006.blogspot.com/2007/02/iraq-survey.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Rules: Proposed Amendments</title>
    <link href="http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/01/house-rules-proposed-amendments.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-13:/commentary/294841</id>
    <updated>2007-01-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Deeper Inside the Mountain </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.Res. 63 - Rep. Ronald Paul [R-TX] Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to ensure that Members have a reasonable amount of time to read legislation that will be voted upon. Of course, Rep. John Spratt [D-SC] introduced a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/01/house-rules-proposed-amendments.html"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>to ensure that Members have a reasonable amount of time to read ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=232987" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-13:/commentary/294844</id>
    <updated>2007-01-13T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sean Hannity Discussion </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.RES.63 : Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to ensure that Members have a reasonable amount of time to read legislation that will be voted upon. Sponsor: Rep Paul, Ron [TX-14] (introduced 1/12/2007) Cosponsors (1) ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=232987"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: H.Res. 63: Amending the Rules of the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hr110-63" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-01-11:/commentary/294840</id>
    <updated>2007-01-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Monitored by govtrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Ronald Paul [R-TX] introduced H.Res. 63: Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to ensure that Members have a reasonable amount of time to read legislation that will be voted upon.. [This event matched these monitors: Active ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hr110-63"&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>
