Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2761) to extend the Terrorism Insurance Program of the Department of the Treasury, and for other purposes.
Other Bill Titles (1 more)9/19/2007--Passed House without amendment. Sets forth the rule for consideration of H.R. 2761 (Terrorism Risk Insurance Revision and Extension Act of 2007). See Full Bill Text
Sponsor
Committees
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Bill Status
| Introduced | ![]() | Voted on by House |
| September 18, 2007 | September 19, 2007 |
Latest Vote
| September 19, 2007Roll call number 880 in the House | |||
| Question: On Agreeing to the Resolution: H RES 660 Providing for the consideration of H.R. 2761, Terrorism Risk Insurance Revision and Extension Act | |||
| Required percentage of 'Aye' votes: 1/2 (50%) | Percentage of 'aye' votes: 51% | Result: Passed | |
In the News
We are not currently finding any news articles on this topic using our daily automated search of Google News. However, if you know of a relevant news article to display here, OpenCongress site editors have the ability to add it manually. Simply e-mail us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: We'll post relevant links as quickly as possible. Also, if this topic is important to you, you could write a letter to the editor -- if a news article refers this specific topic by name, a link to that news article is likely to appear here soon.
Blog Coverage
September 19, 2007 Rollcall 879: H RES 660 - On Ordering the Previous Question
Providing for the consideration of HR 2761, Terrorism Risk Insurance Revision and Extension Act.
September 19, 2007 Rollcall 880: H RES 660 - On Agreeing to the Resolution
Providing for the consideration of HR 2761, Terrorism Risk Insurance Revision and Extension Act.
September 19, 2007 Congress 110, House vote: Vote 879: H RES 660
Bill: H RES 660 Vote description: Providing for the Consideration of HR 2761, Terrorism Risk Insurance Revision and Extension Act Result: Passed, 224-197, with 11 not voting. Ron Paul voted No.
Source: Ron Paul for President








Rating Filter: 5
(Close help)
Comments
(Close help)
No Comments
Add A Comment