<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for H.Res.727 Providing for a moratorium on the consideration of any bill or joint resolution, or amendment thereto or conference report thereon, that contains any congressional earmark until a bipartisan panel is established to provide oversight over the congressional earmarking process and that panel reports its recommendations to the House.</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-hr727/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-hr727/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2011-02-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/46666</id>
  <entry>
    <title>S.348: Judicial Transparency and Ethics Enhancement Act of 2011 ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s348/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-02-14:/commentary/10844635</id>
    <updated>2011-02-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The House bill (H.R. 727) would cover only the federal and appellate courts while the Senate bill (S. 348) would allow the inspector general to also conduct oversight of the Supreme Court. ... Source: Denise M. Champagne ... OpenCongress is a free and open&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s348/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H.R.727: Judicial Transparency and Ethics Enhancement Act of 2011 ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h727/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-02-14:/commentary/10844634</id>
    <updated>2011-02-14T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The House bill (H.R. 727) would cover only the federal and appellate courts while the Senate bill (S. 348) would allow the inspector general to also conduct oversight of the Supreme Court. ... Source: Denise M. Champagne ... OpenCongress is a free and open&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h727/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Politique Domestique Am&#195;&#169;ricaine</title>
    <link href="http://whereistand.com/fr/JohnShadegg/40428" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2147795</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>John Shadegg </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Congress should place a moratorium on earmarks. Cosponser of H.Res.727, Which would provide a Moratorium on Earmarks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://whereistand.com/fr/JohnShadegg/40428&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pol&#195;&#173;tica Dom&#195;&#169;stica Norte-Americana.</title>
    <link href="http://whereistand.com/pt/JohnShadegg/40428" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2118801</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>John Shadegg </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Congress should place a moratorium on earmarks. Cosponser of H.Res.727, Which would provide a Moratorium on Earmarks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://whereistand.com/pt/JohnShadegg/40428&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress should place a moratorium on earmarks. (US Domestic Policy)</title>
    <link href="http://whereistand.com/JerryMoran/40428" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-08:/commentary/2673800</id>
    <updated>2008-04-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Jerry Moran - whereIstand.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Cosponser of H.Res.727, Which would provide a Moratorium on Earmarks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://whereistand.com/JerryMoran/40428&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Domestic Policy</title>
    <link href="http://whereistand.com/JohnShadegg/40428" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-08:/commentary/2040884</id>
    <updated>2008-04-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>John Shadegg </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Congress should place a moratorium on earmarks. Cosponser of H.Res.727, Which would provide a Moratorium on Earmarks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://whereistand.com/JohnShadegg/40428&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H. Res. 727: Providing for a moratorium on the consideration of ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hr110-727" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-09:/commentary/3396753</id>
    <updated>2007-10-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Active Legislation -- Tracked by GovTrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A bill in the US Congress: Providing for a moratorium on the consideration of any bill or joint resolution, or amendment thereto or conference report thereon, that contains any congressional earmark until a bipartisan panel is ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hr110-727&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

