<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : Blog Articles for S.1145 Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1145/atom_blogs" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1145/blogs" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2011-06-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/blog/42984</id>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1145: Civilian Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1145/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-06-05:/commentary/11015461</id>
    <updated>2011-06-05T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1145 - Civilian Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (CEJA) of 2011. A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify and expand Federal criminal jurisdiction over Federal contractors and employees outside the ... - &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1145/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>H.R.2007: Autism Spectrum Disorders Services Act of ... - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h2007/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2011-05-25:/commentary/11031224</id>
    <updated>2011-05-25T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1145: Civilian Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act ... - OpenCongress. A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify and expand Federal criminal jurisdiction over Federal contractors and employees outside the United States, and for other purpose&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h2007/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congressional oversight - U.S. Congress - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/issues/show/4793_congressional_oversight" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2010-10-30:/commentary/11031225</id>
    <updated>2010-10-30T01:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1145 - Civilian Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (CEJA) of 2011. A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify and expand Federal criminal jurisdiction over Federal contractors and employees outsi. ... OpenCongress syndication panels allow yo&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/issues/show/4793_congressional_oversight&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1145: Webcaster Settlement Act of 2009 - U.S. Congress ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1145/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-05-19:/commentary/10498030</id>
    <updated>2009-05-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Or, if you know of a news article about this bill to display here, email us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: Our editorial team will post relevant links as quickly as possible. ... S. 1145: Patent Reform Act &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1145/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WATER Act of 2009 - OpenCongress</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1908/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-03-31:/commentary/10498031</id>
    <updated>2009-03-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>opencongress.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In the Senate, Leahy and Hatch introduced S. 1145, while in the House Representatives Howard Berman (D-California) and Lamar Smith (R-Texas) introduced H.R. 1908. On May 16th, a House subcommittee approved the bill for ... - &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1908/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Alaska Pride: YouTube Video: Rev. Ted Pike Warns Us Of The Return ...</title>
    <link href="http://alaskapride.blogspot.com/2009/01/youtube-video-rev-ted-pike-warns-us-of.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-01-06:/commentary/3926154</id>
    <updated>2009-01-06T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Alaska Pride </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Pike reproduces the text of the Local Law Enforcement Act of 2005 [S.1145], with his own comments interspersed throughout. In this other post, Rev. Pike explains the problem. This hate crimes bill has been narrowly defeated five times ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://alaskapride.blogspot.com/2009/01/youtube-video-rev-ted-pike-warns-us-of.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Docs: Top Stories of 2008: #5 to #1</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/01/top-stories-of-2008-5-to-1.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2009-01-05:/commentary/3915559</id>
    <updated>2009-01-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The year started out with the release of a draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee's report on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145), saw a better-late-than-never movement by biotech and pharma companies and organizations against ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/01/top-stories-of-2008-5-to-1.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>jagtvej69: Quinn bebrejder Coalition for Patent Fairness for ...</title>
    <link href="http://jagtvej69.blogspot.com/2008/12/quinn-bebrejder-coalition-for-patent.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-29:/commentary/3867901</id>
    <updated>2008-12-29T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>jagtvej69 </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
P&#195;&#165; tidspunktet for d&#195;&#184;d S. 1145, var der allerede bekymring over &#195;&#184;konomien. [ &quot;Dette er ikke en risiko for, at senatet b&#195;&#184;r tage p&#195;&#165; et tidspunkt, hvor vi er n&#195;&#184;dt til at g&#195;&#184;re alt, hvad vi kan for at st&#195;&#184;tte innovative og v&#195;&#166;kstor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://jagtvej69.blogspot.com/2008/12/quinn-bebrejder-coalition-for-patent.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IPBiz: Quinn blames Coalition for Patent Fairness for absence of ...</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/12/quinn-blames-coalition-for-patent.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-28:/commentary/3926153</id>
    <updated>2008-12-28T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
At the time of the death of S. 1145, there was already concern about the economy. [&quot;This is not a risk that the Senate should take at a time when we need to do all we can to support innovative, growth-oriented American industries and a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/12/quinn-blames-coalition-for-patent.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IPBiz: TechDirt on patent reform on Dec. 15</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/12/techdirt-on-patent-reform-on-dec-15.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-12-14:/commentary/3766019</id>
    <updated>2008-12-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[text: It needed to also pass a Senate vote so S. 1145: Patent Reform Act of 2007 was drafted and it quickly passed through the Senate sub committee process and was recommended for a Senate vote. That&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s where the Republicans struck back ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/12/techdirt-on-patent-reform-on-dec-15.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Risk &amp; Insurance Online - Story</title>
    <link href="http://www.riskandinsurance.com/story.jsp?storyId=150842882&amp;amp;topic=Main" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-25:/commentary/3474609</id>
    <updated>2008-11-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Risk and Insurance Online -- ALL </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Department of Insurance, he said, has been heavily involved in improving the performance of the State Compensation Insurance Fund, from a top-down review to supporting legislation -- S. 1145 -- by Sen. Mike Machado, D-Linden, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.riskandinsurance.com/story.jsp?storyId=150842882&amp;amp;topic=Main&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PointofLaw.com | PointOfLaw Forum: Trial lawyer lobbying: Let the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/11/trial-lawyer-lo.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-25:/commentary/3474608</id>
    <updated>2008-11-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PointOfLaw Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
H.R. 1908/S. 1145/S. 3600 (Patent Reform Act; specific interest in provisions relating to venue for patent cases, and damages.) Consumer Issues/Safety/Products. &#226;&#8364;&#162; H.R. 3010/S. 1782 (Arbitration Fairness Act; to prohibit mandatory ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/11/trial-lawyer-lo.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Examples of Violence Against The Poor On The Main Streets Around ...</title>
    <link href="http://sfhomelessyahoogroup.blogspot.com/2008/11/examples-of-violence-against-poor-on.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-11-06:/commentary/3246010</id>
    <updated>2008-11-06T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sfhomeless Yahoo! Group Blogger </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The most recent piece of legislation, Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2005 was introduced in the US House (HR2662), and (S.1145) in the US Senate in the 109th Congress. This legislation &quot;authorizes the Attorney ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sfhomelessyahoogroup.blogspot.com/2008/11/examples-of-violence-against-poor-on.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>eBay v. MercExchange - from an infringer&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s perspective</title>
    <link href="http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/ebay-v-mercexchange-from-an-infringers-perspective/558/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-27:/commentary/3454727</id>
    <updated>2008-10-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Promote the Progress sitewide RSS </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The curious case of the new rules timeline &#183; Our pro-patent neighbors to the North deliver a victory for big Pharma &#183; Current PTO administration will not make proposed IDS and Markush rules final &#183; Congressional Budget Office - S.1145 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/ebay-v-mercexchange-from-an-infringers-perspective/558/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>and there was much rejoicing&#226;&#8364;&#166;.</title>
    <link href="http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/and-there-was-much-rejoicing/635/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-26:/commentary/3513832</id>
    <updated>2008-10-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The United States blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The curious case of the new rules timeline &#183; Our pro-patent neighbors to the North deliver a victory for big Pharma &#183; Current PTO administration will not make proposed IDS and Markush rules final &#183; Congressional Budget Office - S.1145 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/and-there-was-much-rejoicing/635/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Halloween 2007 - RIP 35 U.S.C. s.120</title>
    <link href="http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/halloween-2007-rip-35-usc-s120/634/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-26:/commentary/3363441</id>
    <updated>2008-10-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The United States blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Our pro-patent neighbors to the North deliver a victory for big Pharma &#183; Current PTO administration will not make proposed IDS and Markush rules final &#183; Congressional Budget Office - S.1145 would increase budget deficits by $1.4 billion ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/halloween-2007-rip-35-usc-s120/634/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congressional Budget Office - S.1145 would increase budget ...</title>
    <link href="http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/congressional-budget-office-s1145-would-increase-budget-deficits-by-14-billion-from-2009-to-2018/658/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-26:/commentary/3283036</id>
    <updated>2008-10-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Promote the Progress </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Congressional Budget Office released its analysis of the budgetary impact S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. The Office estimates that enacting the bill as reported by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary would increase direct ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/congressional-budget-office-s1145-would-increase-budget-deficits-by-14-billion-from-2009-to-2018/658/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Comprehensive Patent Reform Legislation: The Road Ahead in the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.martindale.com/consumer-products/article_King-Spalding-LLP_534408.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-23:/commentary/3096128</id>
    <updated>2008-10-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Banking &amp;amp; Financial services Articles... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Although the House of Representatives passed its version of the Patent Reform Act (HR 1908) in September 2007, the Senate Judiciary Committee-reported version of the bill (S. 1145) failed to come...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.martindale.com/consumer-products/article_King-Spalding-LLP_534408.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The American Spectator : Yes to the Patent Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.spectator.org/archives/2007/12/03/yes-to-the-patent-reform-act" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-21:/commentary/3363443</id>
    <updated>2008-10-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>AmSpec Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
When the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) soon reaches the Senate floor, Congress will be presented with a significant opportunity to affirm the goals the Framers envisioned for the patent system. Those goals -- to spur innovation by ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spectator.org/archives/2007/12/03/yes-to-the-patent-reform-act&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Law Year in Review - Preparing presentation for DunesCLE in ...</title>
    <link href="http://bipo.us/patent-law-year-in-review-2008-preparing-presentation-for-dunescle-in-las-vegas/2008/10/21/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-20:/commentary/3061094</id>
    <updated>2008-10-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BIPO </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Reform Act of 2007 &#226;&#8364;&#8220; S.1145 (&#226;&#8364;&#339;The Leahy-Hatch bill&#226;&#8364;*). - Patent Reform Act of 2008 - &#226;&#8364;&#339;The Kyl bill&#226;&#8364;* (Pharma gets its say in the waning days of the 110th Congress). 2. Update on Administrative reforms. - Cooper v. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bipo.us/patent-law-year-in-review-2008-preparing-presentation-for-dunescle-in-las-vegas/2008/10/21/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit</title>
    <link href="http://intellectualventures.com/docs/IV-GE-Dolby-Amicus-Brief-in-GSK-v-Dudas.pdf" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-14:/commentary/3363449</id>
    <updated>2008-10-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Ventures News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(2008)); see also Patent Reform Act of 2007, S. 1145, 110th Cong. &#194;&#167; 2 (2008). (from Senator Leahy); Patent Reform Act of 2007, H.R. 1908, 110th Cong. &#194;&#167; 1. (2007) (from Representative Berman). It is, accordingly, possible that Congress ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://intellectualventures.com/docs/IV-GE-Dolby-Amicus-Brief-in-GSK-v-Dudas.pdf&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Six questions that the Presidential candidates must answer</title>
    <link href="http://kevincolby.com/2008/10/15/six-questions-that-the-presidential-candidates-must-answer/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-14:/commentary/3026285</id>
    <updated>2008-10-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kevin Colby: Libertarian Political News... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
6. Patents and American Jobs &#226;&#8364;&#8220; Without patent protection, American companies won&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t innovate or invent. How will you vote on patent protection legislation, now before congress as Senate Bill S. 1145? Read the whole article. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://kevincolby.com/2008/10/15/six-questions-that-the-presidential-candidates-must-answer/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The American Spectator : Yes to the Patent Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://spectator.org/archives/2007/12/03/yes-to-the-patent-reform-act" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-13:/commentary/3474610</id>
    <updated>2008-10-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>AmSpec Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
When the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) soon reaches the Senate floor, Congress will be presented with a significant opportunity to affirm the goals the Framers envisioned for the patent system. Those goals -- to spur innovation by ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://spectator.org/archives/2007/12/03/yes-to-the-patent-reform-act&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&#231;&#177;&#179;&#229;&#8250;&#189; &#231;&#8240;&#185;&#232;&#168;&#177;&#230;&#179;&#8226;&#230;&#8221;&#185;&#230;&#173;&#163;&#230;&#161;&#710;S.3600</title>
    <link href="http://ip-info.blogspot.com/2008/08/blog-post_14.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-11:/commentary/3010512</id>
    <updated>2008-10-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>&#30693;&#36001;&#24773;&#22577;&#23460; </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This bill is based on, but makes a number of changes to, S. 1145, a patent reform bill that was reported out of the Judiciary Committee in 2007 but that was never considered by the full Senate...(&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ip-info.blogspot.com/2008/08/blog-post_14.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>2009 Show Down: Democrat Software Patent Reform versus the ...</title>
    <link href="http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/infosphere/2009-show-down-democrat-software-patent-reform-versus-the-republican-biotech-patent-reform-27662" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-10-09:/commentary/3363445</id>
    <updated>2008-10-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Network &amp; Infrastructure Blogs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It needed to also pass a Senate vote so S. 1145: Patent Reform Act of 2007 was drafted and it quickly passed through the Senate sub committee process and was recommended for a Senate vote. That&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s where the Republicans struck back, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/infosphere/2009-show-down-democrat-software-patent-reform-versus-the-republican-biotech-patent-reform-27662&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Update on the US Patent Reform : Internet Business Law</title>
    <link href="http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?id=1883&amp;amp;s=latestnews" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-27:/commentary/3363438</id>
    <updated>2008-09-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IBLS INTERNET LAW - NEWS PORTAL </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&quot;I write to you to raise my concern regarding and express my opposition to, S.1145, the &quot;Patent Reform Act of 2007.&quot; Despite bipartisan opposition, the House passed a corresponding bill on September 7, and I understand that S.1145 may ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?id=1883&amp;amp;s=latestnews&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Links for September 26th</title>
    <link href="http://purveyorofiniquities.com/2008/09/26/links-for-september-26th/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-25:/commentary/2928620</id>
    <updated>2008-09-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Purveyor of Iniquities </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
For now, some of the similarities and differences will be discussed with a view towards identifying where the bill represents improvements over S. 1145, and a few areas where it does not. (patents ); Supreme Court Memo - A Second ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://purveyorofiniquities.com/2008/09/26/links-for-september-26th/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Biotechnology Industry Organization says Kyl legislation advances ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.news-medical.net/?id=41685" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-24:/commentary/3821142</id>
    <updated>2008-09-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Medical News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... although the post-grant review provisions in the Kyl legislation would provide a second window to administratively challenge a patent, the circumstances allowing such a challenge are considerably more narrow than those in S. 1145, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news-medical.net/?id=41685&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senator Kyl Introduces Patent Reform | IPWatchdog.com</title>
    <link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/09/25/senator-kyl-introduces-patent-reform/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-24:/commentary/3392415</id>
    <updated>2008-09-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... although the post-grant review provisions in the Kyl legislation would provide a second window to administratively challenge a patent, the circumstances allowing such a challenge are considerably more narrow than those in S. 1145, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/09/25/senator-kyl-introduces-patent-reform/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO | BIO Says Kyl Legislation Advances Patent Reform Debate</title>
    <link href="http://www.bio.org/news/pressreleases/newsitem.asp?id=2008_0925_01" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-24:/commentary/3363446</id>
    <updated>2008-09-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BIO Press Releases </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... although the post-grant review provisions in the Kyl legislation would provide a second window to administratively challenge a patent, the circumstances allowing such a challenge are considerably more narrow than those in S. 1145, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bio.org/news/pressreleases/newsitem.asp?id=2008_0925_01&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senator Kyl&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Patent Reform Bill Introduced Today</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/09/senator-kyls-pa.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-24:/commentary/2893994</id>
    <updated>2008-09-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Not this time: Senator Jon Kyl (R-AR and Minority Whip; at right) today introduced a patent reform bill that differs dramatically in some ways (but is strikingly similar in others) from S. 1145 introduced last session by Senators Leahy ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/09/senator-kyls-pa.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Practising Law Institute - Patent Practice Center - Not So Fast ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp?view=plink&amp;amp;id=349" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-23:/commentary/3513831</id>
    <updated>2008-09-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PLI Patent Practice Center RSS feed </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... the circumstances allowing such a challenge are considerably more narrow than those in S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act. The broad new administrative challenge system in S. 1145 would create patent uncertainty and reduce investment ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp?view=plink&amp;amp;id=349&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>110th Congress Committee Reports</title>
    <link href="http://judiciary.senate.gov/resources/reports/110reports.cfm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-10:/commentary/3363444</id>
    <updated>2008-09-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Senate Judiciary Committee Reports - 110th... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... S.1845 - The Security From Political Interference in Justice Act of 2007 (Senate Report 110-203, October 23, 2007); S.1638 - Federal Judicial Salary Restoration Act of 2008 (Senate Report 110-277, April 1, 2008); S.1145 - The Patent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://judiciary.senate.gov/resources/reports/110reports.cfm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How Patent Law Changes Could Hurt Small Inventors</title>
    <link href="http://www.divinecaroline.com/article/22354/55375" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-09-07:/commentary/3363451</id>
    <updated>2008-09-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DivineCaroline Neighborhood &amp; World </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
There are two very similar bills currently in process&#226;&#8364;&#8221;one in the House (H.R. 1908) and one in the Senate Bill (S. 1145). In May, the Senate removed their bill from consideration from this session (although it could easily reemerge). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.divinecaroline.com/article/22354/55375&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Consumer Goods &amp; Retail Industry Litigation Blog: Diaper Suit ...</title>
    <link href="http://cpg-retail-litigation.kotchen.com/2007/12/dirty-diapers-arquest-files-suit.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-29:/commentary/3363453</id>
    <updated>2008-08-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Consumer Goods &amp; Retail Industry Litigation Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
For those interested in patent law, it's worth noting that Congress is currently considering the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (H.R. 1908, S. 1145). The House passed it as H.R. 1908, and the Senate may soon consider S. 1145. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cpg-retail-litigation.kotchen.com/2007/12/dirty-diapers-arquest-files-suit.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NYT quote: &#226;&#8364;&#339;Barack Obama makes me nervous&#226;&#8364;*</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/08/nyt-quote-barack-obama-makes-me-nervous.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-20:/commentary/2700563</id>
    <updated>2008-08-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Timko nervous. The old jobs in Pennsylvania steel mills are gone, and the &amp;quot;would be&amp;quot; new jobs are going to India under Obama&amp;#39;s policies. Mr. Timko need only ask the labor unions where they stood on S.1145.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/08/nyt-quote-barack-obama-makes-me-nervous.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gauge as regards&amp;gt;200 writes Leahy with regard to needed changes ...</title>
    <link href="http://lqlisabelcharlene.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/gauge-as-regards200-writes-leahy-with-regard-to-needed-changes-into-s1145-20/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-15:/commentary/2682596</id>
    <updated>2008-08-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lqlisabelcharlene&amp;#39;s Weblog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Croaker Devices Manufacturers Federation(MDMA) simultaneous once again 200 rare organizations for halfpenny post concerns pro The OK Accommodation Act as foil in relation with 2007, S.1145 and HR 1908. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lqlisabelcharlene.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/gauge-as-regards200-writes-leahy-with-regard-to-needed-changes-into-s1145-20/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>patent invention</title>
    <link href="http://clipinclipon.com/2008/08/15/patent-invention/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-14:/commentary/2726413</id>
    <updated>2008-08-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CLIP IN CLIP ON </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Docs: Amendments to S. 1145 Biotech &amp; Pharma Patent Law &amp; News Blog &#226;&#8364;&#166; (i) Action for Claim to Patent on Derived Invention &#226;&#8364;&#8221; Section 135(a) of title 35, &#226;&#8364;&#166; http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/03/amendments-to-s.html ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://clipinclipon.com/2008/08/15/patent-invention/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How Patent Law Changes Could Hurt Small Inventors</title>
    <link href="http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=182967200" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-11:/commentary/2661501</id>
    <updated>2008-08-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Inbox Robot: Legislation News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
patent law. While certain elements of the legislation will bring the US patent system in ... to know: There are two very similar bills currently in process--one in the House (HR ... House (HR 1908) and one in the Senate Bill (S. 1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inboxrobot.com/news.php?fid=182967200&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How Patent Law Changes Could Hurt Small Inventors - Patent Laws ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.entrepreneur.com/startingabusiness/inventing/inventionscolumnisttamaramonosoff/article196328.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-08-07:/commentary/3392422</id>
    <updated>2008-08-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Entrepreneur.com: Latest Articles </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
There are two very similar bills currently in process--one in the House (H.R. 1908) and one in the Senate Bill (S. 1145). In May, the Senate removed their bill from consideration from this session (although it could easily reemerge). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.entrepreneur.com/startingabusiness/inventing/inventionscolumnisttamaramonosoff/article196328.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>_: USPTO Director Press Release</title>
    <link href="http://blog.gapatents.com/2008/07/uspto-director-press-release.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-25:/commentary/3614035</id>
    <updated>2008-07-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>_ </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The article goes on to cite Mr. Dudas&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s active role in &#226;&#8364;&#339;promoting the administrations&#226;&#8364;&#8482; applicant quality submissions (AQS) provision to the US Patent Reform Act, Senate bill S.1145.&#226;&#8364;* In the interview, Mr. Dudas told the magazine that ..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.gapatents.com/2008/07/uspto-director-press-release.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Douglas Schoen on patent reform</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/07/douglas-schoen-on-patent-reform.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-19:/commentary/2521704</id>
    <updated>2008-07-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ipbiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Although Schoen writes on 17 July 2008: [patent reform] &amp;quot;is currently under consideration in the Senate, &amp;quot; IPBiz notes that realistically S.1145 is more than 90 miles away and won&amp;#39;t be of concern during this session. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/07/douglas-schoen-on-patent-reform.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AGIPNEWS6085 USPTO Director Among Managing Intellectual Property ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.ag-ip-news.com/getArticle.asp?Art_ID=6085&amp;amp;lang=en" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-14:/commentary/3363452</id>
    <updated>2008-07-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ag-IP-news Agency - Latest IP Headlines </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The article goes on to cite Dudas&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s active role in &#226;&#8364;&#339;promoting the administrations&#226;&#8364;&#8482; applicant quality submissions (AQS) provision to the US Patent Reform Act, Senate bill S.1145.&#226;&#8364;* In the interview, Dudas told the magazine that the search&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ag-ip-news.com/getArticle.asp?Art_ID=6085&amp;amp;lang=en&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Carpet-bombing by patent trolls?</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/07/carpet-bombing-by-patent-trolls.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-13:/commentary/2491579</id>
    <updated>2008-07-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ipbiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;quot;Now that the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has been pulled from the Senate floor schedule, it looks like business as usual for patent litigants, as a holder of touch screen patents has launched a carpet-bombing assault. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/07/carpet-bombing-by-patent-trolls.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent confusion at eWeek?</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/07/patent-confusion-at-eweek.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-06:/commentary/2448222</id>
    <updated>2008-07-06T08:22:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In Tech Titans Form Patent Trust about Allied Security Trust, ...  Roy Mark of eWeek portrays a misleading idea that the trust was formed in response to the failure of patent reform (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;) in the Senate --   With efforts &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/07/patent-confusion-at-eweek.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EagleForum.org: ALERT: Patent Reform Cheats Inventors!</title>
    <link href="http://www.eagleforum.org/blog/2008/02/alert-patent-reform-cheats-inventors.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-05:/commentary/3531485</id>
    <updated>2008-07-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>EagleForum.org </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Eagle Forum has been following the developments regarding the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145), sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT). This dangerous legislation could come up in the Senate for a vote in the next week when Congress returns ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eagleforum.org/blog/2008/02/alert-patent-reform-cheats-inventors.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Touch-Screen Lawsuit Hits Toshiba, Apple, HTC and Many Others</title>
    <link href="http://pda-rss.livejournal.com/5392329.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-02:/commentary/2475099</id>
    <updated>2008-07-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PDA RSS News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;quot;Now that the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has been pulled from the Senate floor schedule, it looks like business as usual for patent litigants, as a holder of touch screen patents has launched a carpet-bombing assault. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://pda-rss.livejournal.com/5392329.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Touch-Screen Lawsuit Hits Toshiba, Apple, HTC and Many Others</title>
    <link href="http://www.mb-box.ro/2008/07/03/touch-screen-lawsuit-hits-toshiba-apple-htc-and-many-others/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-07-02:/commentary/2433700</id>
    <updated>2008-07-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>mb&amp;#39;s videoblog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;quot;Now that the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has been pulled from the Senate floor schedule, it looks like business as usual for patent litigants, as a holder of touch screen patents has launched a carpet-bombing assault. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mb-box.ro/2008/07/03/touch-screen-lawsuit-hits-toshiba-apple-htc-and-many-others/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PATENT EXAMINATION BY THE BRAIN DEAD FOR THE BRAIN DEAD</title>
    <link href="http://www.inventorsblog.org/2008/07/patent-examination-by-brain-dead-for.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-30:/commentary/2423881</id>
    <updated>2008-06-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>INVENTORS BLOG </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In fact this is EVEN WORSE than the madness of Senate Bill S.1145 which proposes to mandate the publication of all US Patent applications &#226;&#8364;&#8220; only 18 months after the application is filed &#226;&#8364;&#8220; despite the usual 33 month (or more) gestation ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inventorsblog.org/2008/07/patent-examination-by-brain-dead-for.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wegner on Bessen/Meurer in LA Times</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/wegner-on-bessenmeurer-in-la-times.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-30:/commentary/2418102</id>
    <updated>2008-06-30T07:32:24Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Harold Wegner's piece on Bessen/Meurer that appeared in the Financial Times was reproduced in the Los Angeles Times ... ;M destroys his credibility.  IPBiz already stuck a fork in &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;. Do we need another fork?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/wegner-on-bessenmeurer-in-la-times.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Passes Patent Term Extension Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/06/house-passes-pa.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-27:/commentary/2399771</id>
    <updated>2008-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Since that time, there have been efforts to remedy this deficiency by legislation (including HR 5120; S. 1785; and provisions of S. 1145, the patent &amp;quot;reform&amp;quot; act; as well as an earlier &amp;quot;stand alone&amp;quot; version of the bill introduced as HR &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/06/house-passes-pa.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Touch-screen lawsuits hit Apple, HTC, Dell, Toshiba, others - Beta ...</title>
    <link href="http://consumer-electronics-show-2008--video.hightech-review.com/107064/touch-screen-lawsuits-hit/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/2390868</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Consumer Electronics Show 2008: Video </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Now that the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has been pulled from the Senate floor schedule, it looks like business as usual for patent litigants, as a holder of.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://consumer-electronics-show-2008--video.hightech-review.com/107064/touch-screen-lawsuits-hit/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Touch-screen lawsuits hit Apple, HTC, Dell, Toshiba, others</title>
    <link href="http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/copyright-trademark-patent/13479-touch-screen-lawsuits-hit-apple-htc-dell-toshiba-others.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/2390867</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WORLD Law Direct Forums </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Now that the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has been pulled from the Senate floor schedule, it looks like business as usual for patent litigants, as a holder of touch screen patents has launched a carpet-bombing assault. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/copyright-trademark-patent/13479-touch-screen-lawsuits-hit-apple-htc-dell-toshiba-others.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Touch-screen lawsuits hit Apple, HTC, Dell, Toshiba, others</title>
    <link href="http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/law-news/13479-touch-screen-lawsuits-hit-apple-htc-dell-toshiba-others.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/2386584</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WORLD Law Direct Forums </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Now that the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has been pulled from the Senate floor schedule, it looks like business as usual for patent litigants, as a holder of touch screen patents has launched a carpet-bombing assault. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/law-news/13479-touch-screen-lawsuits-hit-apple-htc-dell-toshiba-others.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Going Once . . . Twice . . . Sold &#226;&#8364;&#8220; One PTE to the Company from ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.fdalawblog.net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/2008/06/going-once-twic.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-24:/commentary/2386583</id>
    <updated>2008-06-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FDA Law Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As we previously reported, a similar provision was added to the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145) by Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) in August 2007; however, efforts to get that bill passed have stalled. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fdalawblog.net/fda_law_blog_hyman_phelps/2008/06/going-once-twic.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lemley astonished that apportionment was controversial</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1333405&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-23:/commentary/2672672</id>
    <updated>2008-06-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Settlement Support Center, LLC - Justia... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(S.1145) died over damages apportionment. Here&amp;#39;s what Mark Lemley said: &amp;quot;I have to say I&amp;#39;m frankly astonished that apportionment has been this controversial,&amp;quot; said Mark A. Lemley, an intellectual-property scholar at Stanford who has ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1333405&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Touch-screen lawsuits hit Apple, HTC, Dell, Toshiba, others</title>
    <link href="http://www.techmacro.com/tech-news/betanews/touch-screen-lawsuits-hit-apple-htc-dell-toshiba-others/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-23:/commentary/2475100</id>
    <updated>2008-06-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>techmacro </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[BetaNews] &#226;&#8364;&#8221; Now that the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has been pulled from the Senate floor schedule, it looks like business as usual for patent litigants, as a holder of touch screen patents has launched a carpet-bombing assault.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techmacro.com/tech-news/betanews/touch-screen-lawsuits-hit-apple-htc-dell-toshiba-others/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Touch-screen lawsuits hit Apple, HTC, Dell, Toshiba, others</title>
    <link href="http://rbytes.org/?p=8817" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-23:/commentary/2448221</id>
    <updated>2008-06-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>rbytes.org software news </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Now that the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has been pulled from the Senate floor schedule, it looks like business as usual for patent litigants, as a holder of touch screen patents has launched a carpet-bombing assault. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rbytes.org/?p=8817&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Links: Open Source Week in Review | Socialized Software</title>
    <link href="http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/06/22/links-open-source-week-in-review/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-21:/commentary/3392419</id>
    <updated>2008-06-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Socialized Software </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Given the failure of pending patent reform legislation (S. 1145) to make it out of committee in the U.S. Senate this spring, it is unlikely that we will see any form of comprehensive patent reform legislation this year. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://socializedsoftware.com/2008/06/22/links-open-source-week-in-review/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Where Now With Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://walkingwithelephants.blogspot.com/2008/06/where-now-with-patent-reform.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-19:/commentary/2369138</id>
    <updated>2008-06-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Walking With Elephants </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Given the failure of pending patent reform legislation (S. 1145) to make it out of committee in the US Senate this spring, it is unlikely that we will see any form of comprehensive patent reform legislation this year. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://walkingwithelephants.blogspot.com/2008/06/where-now-with-patent-reform.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Biotechnology&amp;#39;s Unsettled Forecast</title>
    <link href="http://idealaw.blogspot.com/2008/06/biotechnologys-unsettled-forecast.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-19:/commentary/2351019</id>
    <updated>2008-06-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IdeaLaw </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate, by contrast, let its counterpart bill, S. 1145, die. Though aligned on many policy issues over the years, the high technology and biotechnology industries strongly disagree about Congress&amp;#39; patent reform bills. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://idealaw.blogspot.com/2008/06/biotechnologys-unsettled-forecast.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What might have been in patent reform?</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/what-might-have-been-in-patent-reform.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-14:/commentary/2341584</id>
    <updated>2008-06-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ipbiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It should seize this opportunity to modify patents to improve the health of millions suffering from neglected diseases. IPBiz notes that S.1145 and patent reform are gone for 2008. The particular issues in the above post were not on the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/what-might-have-been-in-patent-reform.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Patent Reform: Court Blocks New Patent Rules | Xconomy</title>
    <link href="http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/04/03/no-patent-reform-court-blocks-new-patent-rules/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-13:/commentary/3392418</id>
    <updated>2008-06-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Xconomy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Deform legislation (S. 1145 and HR 1908) was dealt a mortal blow in early March as a result of organized labor&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s opposition to the bill. The Coalition for Patent fairness &amp; PIRACY (CPF or &#226;&#8364;&#339;C-poof&#226;&#8364;*) and their high-priced lobbyists &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xconomy.com/boston/2008/04/03/no-patent-reform-court-blocks-new-patent-rules/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Hollywood inventor protests the patent bill</title>
    <link href="http://legal-questions.org/2008/06/13/a-hollywood-inventor-protests-the-patent-bill/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-12:/commentary/2341585</id>
    <updated>2008-06-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Legal Questions </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... that would favor inventors who were the &#226;&#8364;&#339;first to file&#226;&#8364;* for patent protection above those who came up with ideas first. (For background on S. 1145 in the Senate and HR 1908 in the House, see &#226;&#8364;&#339;Will Congress slam small inventors?&#226;&#8364;* ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legal-questions.org/2008/06/13/a-hollywood-inventor-protests-the-patent-bill/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Coalition for Patent Fairness member HP settles with Acer</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/coalition-for-patent-fairness-member-hp_09.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-09:/commentary/2303033</id>
    <updated>2008-06-09T07:24:42Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In March 2007, HP sued Acer for patent infringement, planning to keep the Taiwan firm from selling some products in the United States ...  to &quot;do as I say, not as I do&quot; proposition. Congressman Berman and Senator Leahy (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/stro&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/coalition-for-patent-fairness-member-hp_09.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>TPMMuckraker | Talking Points Memo | Gonzales Gets a Job</title>
    <link href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/gonzales_gets_a_job.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-05:/commentary/3392425</id>
    <updated>2008-06-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TPMMuckraker </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The law being referred to is S. 1145: The Patent Reform Act Of 2007, and in a Senate report Published January 24, 2008: Senate Report 110-259 (GPO PDF), there is a reasonable argument against the validity of the patent (pp 33,34). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/gonzales_gets_a_job.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Domain Forwarding - Research and Markets: Discover the Major IP ...</title>
    <link href="http://eonestore.com/2631/domain-forwarding-research-and-markets-discover-the-major-ip-technologies-used-in-voip-pr-inside/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-04:/commentary/2318666</id>
    <updated>2008-06-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Internet Business Learning To Wealth </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The progress Congress was making on the Patent Reform Act ( S. 1145 ) has stalled and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has pulled the bill from the floor schedule. The lack of progress is disappointing. Despite its flaws, the proposed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://eonestore.com/2631/domain-forwarding-research-and-markets-discover-the-major-ip-technologies-used-in-voip-pr-inside/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mea Culpa on Ning - BusinessWeek (Domain Registration News)</title>
    <link href="http://www.your-news-blog.com/yahoo-domain-registration/?p=1055" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-06-02:/commentary/2303032</id>
    <updated>2008-06-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>yahoo domain registration </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The progress Congress was making on the Patent Reform Act ( S. 1145 ) has stalled and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has pulled the bill from the floor schedule. The lack of progress is disappointing. Despite its flaws, the proposed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.your-news-blog.com/yahoo-domain-registration/?p=1055&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Update: Clinton &amp;amp; Carlos Gutierrez Opine on Patent Reform.</title>
    <link href="http://greatdomainname.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/clinton-carlos-gutierrez-opine-on-patent-reform/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-30:/commentary/2271217</id>
    <updated>2008-05-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Great Domain Name - An Invention and Intellectu... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... statistics or political employees padding their resumes for the next government job or K Street consultancy, to contact their Senator and tell them the &#226;&#8364;&#339;compromise&#226;&#8364;* offered by the Secretary is merely the &#226;&#8364;&#339;worst of&#226;&#8364;* S. 1145. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://greatdomainname.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/clinton-carlos-gutierrez-opine-on-patent-reform/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Deeplinks Blogs related to Patents - Electronic Frontier ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.your-news-blog.com/yahoo-domain-registration/?p=1040" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-27:/commentary/2271222</id>
    <updated>2008-05-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>yahoo domain registration </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The progress Congress was making on the Patent Reform Act ( S. 1145 ) has stalled and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has pulled the bill from the floor schedule. The lack of progress is disappointing. Despite its flaws, the proposed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.your-news-blog.com/yahoo-domain-registration/?p=1040&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>La Administraci&#195;&#179;n Bush intensifica esfuerzos por lograr la ...</title>
    <link href="http://lawbites.com/la-administracion-bush-intensifica-esfuerzos-por-lograr-la-aprobacion-del-proyecto-de-ley-sobre-reforma-del-regimen-de-patentes-este-ano/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-18:/commentary/2318670</id>
    <updated>2008-05-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Law Bites </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Tapped to Represent &amp;quot;Orphans&amp;quot; at SCOTUS; No Sanctions Warranted for Failure to Produce &amp;quot;Smoking Gun&amp;quot; Email, Where Email System Did Not Retain Any Sent Emails; Judge Michel Doesn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t Think Much of Senate Bill S. 1145, Either.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lawbites.com/la-administracion-bush-intensifica-esfuerzos-por-lograr-la-aprobacion-del-proyecto-de-ley-sobre-reforma-del-regimen-de-patentes-este-ano/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Remember: S.1145 is off the calendar.</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/05/remember-s1145-is-off-calendar.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-08:/commentary/2183410</id>
    <updated>2008-05-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Newsflash to Laura Newpoff: of your text: There&amp;#39;s also a looming Patent Reform Act in the US Senate that, if passed, will drastically change the IP law landscape, the Senate already took S.1145 off the calendar. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/05/remember-s1145-is-off-calendar.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Patent Reform Bill: RIP?</title>
    <link href="http://lawbites.com/senate-patent-reform-bill-rip/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-05:/commentary/2165768</id>
    <updated>2008-05-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Law Bites </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Docs: By Donald Zuhn &#226;&#8364;&#8221; Earlier today, the technology website Ars Technica posted a report that the Senate patent reform bill (S. 1145) &#226;&#8364;&#339;has been taken off the [Senate] schedule.&#226;&#8364;* Because Ars Technica did not provide any ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lawbites.com/senate-patent-reform-bill-rip/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>san mateo fairgrounds</title>
    <link href="http://www.creditcardsknowledge.com/credit/popular-blogs/22008/san-mateo-fairgrounds.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-02:/commentary/2189147</id>
    <updated>2008-05-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Credit Cards knowledge </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The progress Congress was making on the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has stalled and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has pulled the bill from the &#226;&#8364;&#166; Witches in the Legacy - http://carpememe.com/witchesinthelegacy ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.creditcardsknowledge.com/credit/popular-blogs/22008/san-mateo-fairgrounds.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>san mateo fairgrounds</title>
    <link href="http://appleiphonenews.cn/san-mateo-fairgrounds/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-02:/commentary/2162002</id>
    <updated>2008-05-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lasts information </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The progress Congress was making on the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has stalled and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has pulled the bill from the &#226;&#8364;&#166; Witches in the Legacy - http://carpememe.com/witchesinthelegacy. He loves me ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://appleiphonenews.cn/san-mateo-fairgrounds/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Act Stalls in the Senate</title>
    <link href="http://digg.com/politics/Patent_Reform_Act_Stalls_in_the_Senate" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-02:/commentary/2150883</id>
    <updated>2008-05-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Digg / upcoming </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The progress Congress was making on the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has stalled and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has pulled the bill from the floor schedule.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/politics/Patent_Reform_Act_Stalls_in_the_Senate&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>san mateo fairgrounds</title>
    <link href="http://www.botian.org/hottags/2008-05-03/san-mateo-fairgrounds/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-02:/commentary/2150882</id>
    <updated>2008-05-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Hottags </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The progress Congress was making on the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has stalled and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has pulled the bill from the &#226;&#8364;&#166; Witches in the Legacy - http://carpememe.com/witchesinthelegacy. He loves me ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.botian.org/hottags/2008-05-03/san-mateo-fairgrounds/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>San mateo county fairgrounds</title>
    <link href="http://carpememe.com/witchesinthelegacy/2008/05/02/san-mateo-county-fairgrounds/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-01:/commentary/2147478</id>
    <updated>2008-05-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Witches in the Legacy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1145 would also have clearly defined situations in which defendants would be liable for willful infringement, which can result in treble damages for the losing party. Until the recent Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decision in In ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://carpememe.com/witchesinthelegacy/2008/05/02/san-mateo-county-fairgrounds/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NASSCOM Assessment of Competence &#226;&#8364;&#8220;Ticket to an Indian BPO Career</title>
    <link href="http://legal.services.rvsglobal.com/blogs/Website-Developement/8250/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-29:/commentary/2165769</id>
    <updated>2008-04-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Website Developement </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Posted to United States Jon Dudas held a Q&amp;amp;A with the media this morning to discuss the recently-issued Bush administration letter of opposition (.pdf) regarding the Senate version of The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legal.services.rvsglobal.com/blogs/Website-Developement/8250/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Senate Could Vote on Patents Soon!</title>
    <link href="http://stiffrightalerts.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/the-senate-could-vote-on-patents-soon/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-28:/commentary/2130870</id>
    <updated>2008-04-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Stiff Right Alerts </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Rumors are now circulating that the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145), sponsored by Senator Pat Leahy (D-VT), could be brought to the Senate floor at any time. Although we have no way of knowing exactly when that will be, Senators still need ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://stiffrightalerts.wordpress.com/2008/04/29/the-senate-could-vote-on-patents-soon/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tell your Senator to vote NO on S. 1145</title>
    <link href="http://normanhooben.blogspot.com/2008/04/tell-your-senator-to-vote-no-on-s-1145.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-28:/commentary/2130869</id>
    <updated>2008-04-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>. </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Report Abusive PostAs I read the last two posts by &amp;quot;Doc&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Jingo&amp;quot; -- it appears tat there is basic concensus that the proposed S.1145 is Baaaad. It IS BAD. And while the Double-Speak Patent FAIRNESS folks are attempting to HARMonize &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://normanhooben.blogspot.com/2008/04/tell-your-senator-to-vote-no-on-s-1145.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IP News &amp;amp; Presentations</title>
    <link href="http://www.chicagoiplitigation.com/2008/04/articles/legal-news/ip-news-presentations/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-21:/commentary/2100328</id>
    <updated>2008-04-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Chicago IP Litigation Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Wall Street Journal reported last Friday that the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) will likely not reach the Senate floor -- click here for the story. It was widely reported throughout the first quarter that the bill was expected to be ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagoiplitigation.com/2008/04/articles/legal-news/ip-news-presentations/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No End to Fee Diversion?</title>
    <link href="http://lawbites.com/no-end-to-fee-diversion/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-21:/commentary/2100327</id>
    <updated>2008-04-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Law Bites </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Docs: By Donald Zuhn &#226;&#8364;&#8221; On April 1st, we reported on a press release issued by the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) concerning a report from the Coalition for Patent Fairness that the Senate patent reform bill (S. 1145) ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lawbites.com/no-end-to-fee-diversion/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Press Release: CPA further strengthens European Legal Services Unit</title>
    <link href="http://legal.services.rvsglobal.com/blogs/Legal-BPO/8032/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-20:/commentary/2672676</id>
    <updated>2008-04-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Legal BPO </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Posted to United States Jon Dudas held a Q&amp;amp;A with the media this morning to discuss the recently-issued Bush administration letter of opposition (.pdf) regarding the Senate version of The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legal.services.rvsglobal.com/blogs/Legal-BPO/8032/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform on Wobbly Legs in Senate</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1221928&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-19:/commentary/2107022</id>
    <updated>2008-04-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On Friday, the Wall Street Journal ran an article claiming that S. 1145 has hit an &amp;quot;impasse&amp;quot; at the Senate, and quoted Pennsylvania&amp;#39;s Sen. Arlen Specter as saying &amp;quot;I think we need more time to get it right.&amp;quot; More telling however, wa&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1221928&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform on Wobbly Legs in Senate</title>
    <link href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/04/patent-reform-on-wobbly-legs-in-senate.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-19:/commentary/2081877</id>
    <updated>2008-04-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Peter Zura&amp;#39;s 271 Patent Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On Friday, the Wall Street Journal ran an article claiming that S. 1145 has hit an &amp;quot;impasse&amp;quot; at the Senate, and quoted Pennsylvania&amp;#39;s Sen. Arlen Specter as saying &amp;quot;I think we need more time to get it right.&amp;quot; More telling however, wa&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/04/patent-reform-on-wobbly-legs-in-senate.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Abandoning His Post</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/abandoning_his_post.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-17:/commentary/2126426</id>
    <updated>2008-04-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In a signal of defeat for the bill, S. 1145, Whealan, who has been on leave from the PTO, is abandoning his temporary post with the Senate May 1. Self-absorbed, Leahy has called his efforts a waste of &amp;quot;thousands of hours.&amp;quot; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/abandoning_his_post.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Stalled in Senate</title>
    <link href="http://www.lawsciencetech.com/?p=41" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-17:/commentary/2072469</id>
    <updated>2008-04-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Law </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Arlen Specter indicated that pending Patent Reform legislation (S. 1145) may be held up by the Republican caucus due to some political maneuvering to ensure leverage in the confirmation of certain federal judges. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawsciencetech.com/?p=41&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wall Street Journal on meltdown of S.1145 on patent reform</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/wall-street-journal-on-meltdown-of.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-17:/commentary/2072468</id>
    <updated>2008-04-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Greg Hitt wrote: Negotiations among key senators have reached an impasse, forcing Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, to give up plans to bring the bill to the Senate floor this week. It isn&amp;#39;t clear when, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/wall-street-journal-on-meltdown-of.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Over the Cliff on Senate S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://www.inventorsblog.org/2008/04/over-cliff-on-senate-s1145.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-17:/commentary/2072310</id>
    <updated>2008-04-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>INVENTORS BLOG </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Click for Larger Image Vote No on S.1145. InventorsBlog.org.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inventorsblog.org/2008/04/over-cliff-on-senate-s1145.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1145: &amp;quot;Not dead, but on ice&amp;quot;</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1218552&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-16:/commentary/2070135</id>
    <updated>2008-04-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia BlawgSearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The report (by Diane Bartz and Tom Ferraro) suggested the opposition to S.1145 was partisan (&amp;quot;opposition mostly from Republicans&amp;quot;). The only hint of a jobs issue came in page 3 of the report: &amp;quot;Most proposed changes would have been ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1218552&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1145: &amp;quot;Not dead, but on ice&amp;quot;</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/s1145-not-dead-but-on-ice.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-16:/commentary/2067055</id>
    <updated>2008-04-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Not mentioned by Bartz and Ferraro is the fact that US trade unions OPPOSE S.1145, and they have informed folks in Congress that they are making a list and checking it twice. This will result in opposition from Democrats. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/s1145-not-dead-but-on-ice.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>HONORABLE SENATORS Q&amp;amp;A</title>
    <link href="http://www.inventorsblog.org/2008/04/honorable-senators-q.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-16:/commentary/2066631</id>
    <updated>2008-04-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>INVENTORS BLOG </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
How can we KNOW S.1145 will perform for ALL NEEDED American technological requirements if we don&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t test it, test it, test it &#226;&#8364;&#8220; BEFORE WE LEAP INTO THE UNKNOWABLE CHASM of UNRECALLABLE legislation? Q. -- Where&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s the PROOF that this can ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inventorsblog.org/2008/04/honorable-senators-q.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Challenge to BPAI Appointments Moves to Supreme Court</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/04/challenge-to-bp.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-15:/commentary/2065772</id>
    <updated>2008-04-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Notes and Documents:. TranslogicPetition.pdf (150 KB); Duffy Article: John F. Duffy, Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?, 2007 Patently-O Patent LJ 21. Translogic&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Arguments On Rehearing; S.1145 includes a provision that ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/04/challenge-to-bp.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Another nugget from the US Patent &amp;amp; Trademark Office&amp;#39;s website</title>
    <link href="http://ipattorneyfirm.blogspot.com/2008/04/another-nugget-from-us-patent-trademark.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-15:/commentary/2065750</id>
    <updated>2008-04-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property &amp;amp; Business Law </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Gutierrez sent a letter to members of the US Senate to share the Administration&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s thoughts on key aspects of the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145), including the Applicant Quality Submissions (AQS) provision, which he cites as &amp;#39;the strongest ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipattorneyfirm.blogspot.com/2008/04/another-nugget-from-us-patent-trademark.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform once again dead in the water?</title>
    <link href="http://www.Filewrapper.com/index.cfm/2008/4/14/Patent-Reform-once-again-dead-in-the-water" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-14:/commentary/2058070</id>
    <updated>2008-04-14T13:17:15Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Filewrapper&#174;</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Reform once again dead in the water? Posted At : April 14, 2008 11:46 AM | Posted By : Blog Staff  Related Categories: Patents,Legislation     Negotiations on a compromise version of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/str&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.Filewrapper.com/index.cfm/2008/4/14/Patent-Reform-once-again-dead-in-the-water&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Editorial against the patent reform of S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/editorial-against-patent-reform-of.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-13:/commentary/2054342</id>
    <updated>2008-04-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ipbiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Note an editorial in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel titled &amp;gt;Protect innovation: Legislation being debated by the Senate would weaken the value of patents, which could be harmful to Wisconsin&amp;#39;s... which includes the text about S.1145: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/editorial-against-patent-reform-of.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Biotech Transfer Week: AAU&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Executive VP Weighs in on Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.biotechtransferweek.com/issues/2_14/btw_qa/146199-1.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-12:/commentary/3392421</id>
    <updated>2008-04-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Biotech Transfer Week Current Issue </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While the Senate Judiciary Committee continues to contemplate the bill, S. 1145, the White House, via the US Department of Commerce and the US Patent and Trademark Office, said last month in a letter to the SJC that while it agrees with ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biotechtransferweek.com/issues/2_14/btw_qa/146199-1.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Disappointed</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/disappointed.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-11:/commentary/2045756</id>
    <updated>2008-04-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patrick Leahy appears left holding a sack of shat - S. 1145, the Patent Putrefaction Act. Referring to the lobbyists who have bought him, Leahy lamented, &amp;quot;we have been working on these reforms for years.&amp;quot; Leahy called the thwarted bill ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/disappointed.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dudas: S1145 creates a false choice on innovation, but balance can ...</title>
    <link href="http://security.reliableis.com/blogs/Legal-BPO/4247/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2348275</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Legal BPO </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Posted to United States Jon Dudas held a Q&amp;amp;A with the media this morning to discuss the recently-issued Bush administration letter of opposition (.pdf) regarding the Senate version of The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://security.reliableis.com/blogs/Legal-BPO/4247/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Docs</title>
    <link href="http://antibody-technologies-biotechnology.blogspot.com/2008/04/patent-docs_11.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2051273</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Antibody Technologies </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... we reported on a statement issued by Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) President and CEO Jim Greenwood (at right) disputing a report from the Coalition for Patent Fairness that the Senate patent reform bill (S. 1145) would ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://antibody-technologies-biotechnology.blogspot.com/2008/04/patent-docs_11.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform 2008: it&amp;#39;s the economy, stupid</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1211892&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2042747</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Of the state of things with S.1145 on patent reform, IPBiz commenter Jason Taylor wrote: I personally think S.1145 was brought down by the unions&amp;#39; recognition that it would effect job creation and the subsequent fear by S.1145&amp;#39;s backing ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1211892&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform 2008: it&amp;#39;s the economy, stupid</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/patent-reform-2008-its-economy-stupid.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2040403</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ipbiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I personally think S.1145 was brought down by the unions&#226;&#8364;&#8482; recognition that it would effect job creation and the subsequent fear by S.1145&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s backing politicians that they might actually lose too many votes and be held especially ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/patent-reform-2008-its-economy-stupid.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO Commends Senator Specter for Patent Reform Stance</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/04/bio-commends-se.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2033053</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... we reported on a statement issued by Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) President and CEO Jim Greenwood (at right) disputing a report from the Coalition for Patent Fairness that the Senate patent reform bill (S. 1145) would ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/04/bio-commends-se.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform slip sliding away:  &quot;Arlen Specter has killed the patent bill&quot;</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/patent-reform-slip-sliding-away-arlen.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2032578</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T18:04:56Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In discussing a possible political link between judicial nominations and the patent reform bill, Keith Perine of CQ Staff writes: ...  to relent, or is it an accurate assessment of the future of &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;?  Perine also writes:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/patent-reform-slip-sliding-away-arlen.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Meaningful Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://tanforyou.com/2008/04/10/meaningful-patent-reform/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2026857</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T01:13:15Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Personal injury lawyers</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
  Today I was digging for some info on &#8216;relevance&#8217; and came across the following section:     . .  ...  forward. The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;) is the product of years of deliberation and study&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tanforyou.com/2008/04/10/meaningful-patent-reform/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cracks Forming in the Passage of Patent Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/04/cracks-forming-in-passage-of-patent.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-08:/commentary/2026845</id>
    <updated>2008-04-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Peter Zura&amp;#39;s 271 Patent Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Today the Congressional Quarterly (CQ) is reporting that Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) is pulling his support for S.1145, stating that he &amp;quot;cannot join&amp;quot; his colleagues &amp;quot;on some parts of the bill, citing apportionment of damages as a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/04/cracks-forming-in-passage-of-patent.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Commerce Secretary &amp;quot;Entirely Wrong&amp;quot; on Inequitable Conduct Reform</title>
    <link href="http://lawbites.com/commerce-secretary-entirely-wrong-on-inequitable-conduct-reform/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-08:/commentary/2023779</id>
    <updated>2008-04-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Law Bites </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Carlos Gutierrez to Senators Patrick Leahy and Arlen Specter, in which the Secretary reaffirmed the Bush Administration&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s support for the Applicant Quality Submission (AQS) provision of the Senate patent reform bill (S. 1145). In&#226;&#8364;&#166;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lawbites.com/commerce-secretary-entirely-wrong-on-inequitable-conduct-reform/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Commerce Secretary &amp;quot;Entirely Wrong&amp;quot; on Inequitable Conduct Reform</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1207952&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-07:/commentary/2033283</id>
    <updated>2008-04-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Carlos Gutierrez to Senators Patrick Leahy and Arlen Specter, in which the Secretary reaffirmed the Bush Administration&amp;#39;s support for the Applicant Quality Submission (AQS) provision of the Senate patent reform bill (S. 1145). In...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1207952&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IP&amp;amp;T e-Alert: To Patent Or Not To Patent? &#226;&#8364;&#8221; An Important Strategic ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.stinson.com/legalpublications/smhlupage.asp?key=719" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-07:/commentary/2022019</id>
    <updated>2008-04-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Reform was the focus of a recent CRS Report for Congress discussing the House and Senate bills (HR 1908 and S.1145) that attempt to respond to current concerns about the functioning of the US patent process. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stinson.com/legalpublications/smhlupage.asp?key=719&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Docs: Last Call to Voice Your Opposition to AQS Provision</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/04/print-sign-and.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-06:/commentary/3392427</id>
    <updated>2008-04-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In his letter to Senators Leahy and Specter, Secretary Gutierrez noted that the Administration &quot;strongly supports the AQS provision in the bill,&quot; calling it one of the &quot;key elements&quot; of S. 1145. We also reported yesterday on the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/04/print-sign-and.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Stupiderest Patent Reform Provisions</title>
    <link href="http://george-bush.blogthisandthat.info/?p=4508" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-06:/commentary/2044246</id>
    <updated>2008-04-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>George Bush </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
After months of meetings and redrafting work, the US Senate is said to be ready to make a move on the patent reform bill, S. 1145. Various senators are said to be working behind the scenes drafting amendments with some compromises being ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://george-bush.blogthisandthat.info/?p=4508&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Not Happening</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/not_happening.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-06:/commentary/2032576</id>
    <updated>2008-04-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act, languishes in a Senate cubbyhole, awaiting an airing on the floor. While its boosters croon its debut imminent, it may not even make it to the floor this session, as time runs short, and more important ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/not_happening.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Quality Submission</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/quality_submission.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-05:/commentary/2007779</id>
    <updated>2008-04-05T03:35:48Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
  Carlos Gutierrez, Secretary of Commerce, &quot;the voice of business in government,&quot; wrote a letter to the Senate, praising to the skies &quot; ...  before filing a patent application, as part of &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, the pending Senate patent b&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/quality_submission.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Commerce Department Renews Support for AQS&amp;#39;s in S. 1145</title>
    <link href="http://patent-help.inventionindustryhelponline.com/95994/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-04:/commentary/2026846</id>
    <updated>2008-04-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent help </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... subsidizing poor quality patent applications, which crowd out our most important innovations. Applicant quality standards are essential to improving and expediting the process by which new and innovative ideas become reality. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://patent-help.inventionindustryhelponline.com/95994/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What variant of S.1145 will Reid put before the Senate?</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/what-variant-of-s1145-will-reid-put.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-04:/commentary/2010356</id>
    <updated>2008-04-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ipbiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Michael Collins, in an article at KnoxvilleBiz titled Concerns build over patent bill, states that Tennessee&amp;#39;s two senators are undecided on the patent reform bill, S. 1145, in part because they do not know what the final form is: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/what-variant-of-s1145-will-reid-put.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Last Call to Voice Your Opposition to AQS Provision</title>
    <link href="http://lawbites.com/last-call-to-voice-your-opposition-to-aqs-provision/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-04:/commentary/2009345</id>
    <updated>2008-04-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Law Bites </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... on a letter sent by Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez to Senators Patrick Leahy and Arlen Specter, in which the Secretary reaffirmed the Bush Administration&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s support for Section 11 of the Senate patent reform bill (S. 1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lawbites.com/last-call-to-voice-your-opposition-to-aqs-provision/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Commerce Department Renews Support for AQS&amp;#39;s in S. 1145</title>
    <link href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/04/commerce-department-renews-support-for.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-02:/commentary/2003455</id>
    <updated>2008-04-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Peter Zura&amp;#39;s 271 Patent Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Carlos Gutierrez from the Department of Commerce sent a letter today to Arlen Specter, expressing &amp;quot;strong support&amp;quot; for a &amp;quot;key element&amp;quot; of S. 1145: Applicant Quality Submissions (AQS). The Administration strongly supports the AQS ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/04/commerce-department-renews-support-for.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Docs</title>
    <link href="http://antibody-technologies-biotechnology.blogspot.com/2008/04/patent-docs_02.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-01:/commentary/2003430</id>
    <updated>2008-04-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Antibody Technologies </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Kevin E. Noonan -- The Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) issued two press releases today, concerning the &amp;quot;patent reform&amp;quot; bill pending in the Senate (S. 1145) and District Court Judge Cacheris&amp;#39; decision in Tafas/GSK v. Dudas. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://antibody-technologies-biotechnology.blogspot.com/2008/04/patent-docs_02.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>*** USPTO Continuation Ruled Dead (For Now) ***</title>
    <link href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/04/uspto-continuation-ruled-dead-for-now.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-01:/commentary/2003461</id>
    <updated>2008-04-01T17:34:48Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Judge Cacheris from the ED Va. granted GSK&#8217;s and Tafas&#8217;s Motions for Summary Judgment finding that the PTO&#8217;s &quot;hard limit&quot; ...  of the rules and didn't stray further.  Expect the PTO to hit Congress hard on &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt; to g&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/04/uspto-continuation-ruled-dead-for-now.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Media &quot;Briefing&quot;</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/media_briefing.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-01:/commentary/1995702</id>
    <updated>2008-04-01T15:44:40Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Coalition for Patent Fairness hosted a media briefing conference call this morning to discuss the Patent Reform Act (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;) ...  with his appraisal of the situation, stating that the Patent Reform Act (&lt;strong class=&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/04/media_briefing.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ebert And</title>
    <link href="http://singlesinsteelecrossing-al.blogspot.com/2008/04/ebert-and.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-31:/commentary/2003431</id>
    <updated>2008-03-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Singles In Steelecrossing Al </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In an editorial in the Washington Post on 15 Feb 08, Senators Leahy and Hatch state: The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145) is the product of years of deliberation and study within Congress and by many esteemed agencies and institutions ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://singlesinsteelecrossing-al.blogspot.com/2008/04/ebert-and.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>On Tafas v. Dudas: selected excerpts</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/on-tafas-v-dudas-selected-excerpts.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-31:/commentary/1999917</id>
    <updated>2008-03-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ipbiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Wegner also writes --In other words, if S. 1145 is enacted in the manner hoped for by the PTO, then S. 1145 would legislatively overrule today&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Tafas v. Dudas victory by the patent bar.-- Hmmm, if wishes were horses, pigs would fly. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/on-tafas-v-dudas-selected-excerpts.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O): Tafas v. Dudas: PTO's Proposed ...</title>
    <link href="http://patentlyo.com/patent/2008/04/tafas-v-dudas-p.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-30:/commentary/3392423</id>
    <updated>2008-03-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I called both of my senators, asked for the person handling S.1145 (per aipla's suggestion), left very polite voice mails, and neither has called me back. I've never called a politician about anything in my life. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://patentlyo.com/patent/2008/04/tafas-v-dudas-p.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform&#226;&#8364;&#8220;Post Grant Review Promising?</title>
    <link href="http://marcusmartinezik.merchantcow.com/2008/04/01/patent-reform-post-grant-review-promising/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-30:/commentary/2019082</id>
    <updated>2008-03-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Martine Diary </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Leahy having introduced legislation supporting post-grant review (S. 1145). Earlier, Rep. Rick Boucher and Rep. Howard Berman had introduced the Patents Depend on Quality Act of 2006. This bill requires that patent applications be ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://marcusmartinezik.merchantcow.com/2008/04/01/patent-reform-post-grant-review-promising/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IPO Distributes &amp;quot;Urgent&amp;quot; Legislative Alert on Applicant Quality ...</title>
    <link href="http://lawbites.com/ipo-distributes-urgent-legislative-alert-on-applicant-quality-submissions/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-30:/commentary/1999918</id>
    <updated>2008-03-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Law Bites </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Owners Association (IPO), sent out an &#226;&#8364;&#339;Urgent IPO Legislative Alert&#226;&#8364;* to IPO members, urging them to contact their Senators to oppose the Applicant Quality Submission (AQS) provision of the Senate patent reform bill (S. 1145)&#226;&#8364;&#166;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lawbites.com/ipo-distributes-urgent-legislative-alert-on-applicant-quality-submissions/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Differeng Views on the Value of Pre-Filing Searches</title>
    <link href="http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/03/differeng-views-on-net-value-of-pre.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-30:/commentary/1995687</id>
    <updated>2008-03-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>I/P Updates </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On Friday, March 28, 2008, the IPO issued an urgent legislative alert to all US members urging them to contact their two Senators to express opposition to mandatory &#226;&#8364;&#339;applicant quality submissions&#226;&#8364;* in patent reform bill S. 1145: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/03/differeng-views-on-net-value-of-pre.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1145</title>
    <link href="http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=8981" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-29:/commentary/3363439</id>
    <updated>2008-03-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CBO's Latest 10 Documents </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1145. Patent Reform Act of 2007. As reported by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on January 24, 2008. SUMMARY. S. 1145 would amend various provisions of current law that regulate how the Patent and. Trademark Office (PTO) awards ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=8981&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IPO Urges Action Against Patent Reform Bill Provision</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/28/ipo-urges-action-against-patent-reform-bill-provision/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-28:/commentary/1922274</id>
    <updated>2008-03-28T16:55:18Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Intellectual Property Owners (IPO) has made a call to arms agains the patent reform legislation in the Senate (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;) ...  with their applications.  As it appears in &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, if enacted, AQ&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/28/ipo-urges-action-against-patent-reform-bill-provision/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Latest Amendments to S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://how-to-get-a-patent-for-an-idea.inventionindustryhelponline.com/70827/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-26:/commentary/2026847</id>
    <updated>2008-03-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>How to get a patent for an idea </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate has released the latest amendments to the Patent Reform Act in advance of Senate Floor Debate: Interlocutory appeals: limits interlocutory appeals of claim construction orders to those which the district court determines have ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://how-to-get-a-patent-for-an-idea.inventionindustryhelponline.com/70827/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Killing the Crap Shoot</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/03/killing_the_crap_shoot.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-24:/commentary/1975538</id>
    <updated>2008-03-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
No reform is more critical, nor glaring in its absence from Leahy S. 1145.&amp;quot; What this country needs is a dedicated patent trial circuit, preferably with shortcut arbitration capability.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/03/killing_the_crap_shoot.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dudas: S1145 creates a false choice on innovation, but balance can ...</title>
    <link href="http://legal.services.rvsglobal.com/blogs/Website-Developement/7217/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-23:/commentary/2189148</id>
    <updated>2008-03-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Website Developement </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Posted to United States Jon Dudas held a Q&amp;amp;A with the media this morning to discuss the recently-issued Bush administration letter of opposition (.pdf) regarding the Senate version of The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legal.services.rvsglobal.com/blogs/Website-Developement/7217/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>More On Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://ipthoughts.com/2008/03/20/more-on-patent-reform.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-19:/commentary/1777059</id>
    <updated>2008-03-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IP Thoughts </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... of filing applications (as much as three times based on the AIPLA Economic Survey) and substantially increase the likelihood of later inequitable conduct charges given the failure of S. 1145 to adequately constrain this defense.&amp;quot; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipthoughts.com/2008/03/20/more-on-patent-reform.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Docs</title>
    <link href="http://antibody-technologies-biotechnology.blogspot.com/2008/03/patent-docs_18.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-17:/commentary/1739182</id>
    <updated>2008-03-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Antibody Technologies </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Kevin E. Noonan -- Senator Leahy (at right), reportedly determined to bring S. 1145, the Senate&amp;#39;s patent &amp;quot;reform&amp;quot; bill to the Senate floor for a vote after the spring recess, on Friday released a number of proposed amendments to the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://antibody-technologies-biotechnology.blogspot.com/2008/03/patent-docs_18.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Amendments to S. 1145</title>
    <link href="http://lawbites.com/amendments-to-s-1145/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-17:/commentary/1738336</id>
    <updated>2008-03-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Law Bites </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Noonan &#226;&#8364;&#8221; Senator Leahy (at right), reportedly determined to bring S. 1145, the Senate&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s patent &#226;&#8364;&#339;reform&#226;&#8364;* bill to the Senate floor for a vote after the spring recess, on Friday released a number of proposed amendments to the bill. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lawbites.com/amendments-to-s-1145/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Here Boy</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/03/here_boy.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-16:/commentary/1936448</id>
    <updated>2008-03-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1145 eliminates inter partes reexamination (Sec. 5), substituting a terminal one-year open season. Patents are often not enforced in their first year; prior art may take years to surface; the rules of validity change through time (eg ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/03/here_boy.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Amendments to S. 1145</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/03/amendments-to-s.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-16:/commentary/1759258</id>
    <updated>2008-03-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Kevin E. Noonan -- Senator Leahy (at right), reportedly determined to bring S. 1145, the Senate&amp;#39;s patent &amp;quot;reform&amp;quot; bill to the Senate floor for a vote after the spring recess, on Friday released a number of proposed amendments to the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/03/amendments-to-s.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Patent Reform Moving Forward</title>
    <link href="http://www.marylandiplaw.com/2008/03/articles/patents/patent-reform-act/senate-patent-reform-moving-forward/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-16:/commentary/1905862</id>
    <updated>2008-03-16T10:08:20Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Maryland Intellectual Property Lawyer &amp; Attorney : Brian Wm. Higgins : Serving Baltimore, Columbia, Frederick</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Patent Reform Moving Forward   Posted on March 16, 2008 by Brian Wm. Higgins         On March 12, 2008, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) issued a press release outlining possible amendments to &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marylandiplaw.com/2008/03/articles/patents/patent-reform-act/senate-patent-reform-moving-forward/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NO WAY TO TEST S.1145 IT WILL DOOM THE US</title>
    <link href="http://u-s-p-t-o.wesimplifylife.com/38961/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-15:/commentary/1958175</id>
    <updated>2008-03-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>U spto </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While THEY (the Patent &#226;&#8364;&#339;reform&#226;&#8364;* promoters), can easily recall a faulty production run &#226;&#8364;&#8220; CONGRESS IS NOT SET UP TO DO THAT. Judge Paul R Michel &#226;&#8364;&#8220; Chief Judge of the US Court of appeals for the Federal Circuit, on Monday January 28, 2008,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://u-s-p-t-o.wesimplifylife.com/38961/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Bill Amendments</title>
    <link href="http://patent-royalties.inventionindustryhelponline.com/71796/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-15:/commentary/1936449</id>
    <updated>2008-03-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent royalties </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Thanks to Greg Aharonian&amp;#39;s Internet Patent News Service for circulating these links to amendments released in advance of the Senate floor debate on the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145): * &amp;quot;Best Mode&amp;quot; Elimination Amendment . ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://patent-royalties.inventionindustryhelponline.com/71796/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform 2007 - The debate is heating up</title>
    <link href="http://olivekfnphineas.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/patent-reform-2007-the-debate-is-heating-up/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-15:/commentary/1729490</id>
    <updated>2008-03-15T00:33:38Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name> Olivekfnphineas&#8217;s Weblog</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
  Called the most sweeping patent reform in fifty years, the bi-partisan Patent Reform Act of 2007 &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;amp;amp; H.R. 1908 was introduced on April 18, 2007.&#160; Generally speaking, those proposed reforms incCalled the most&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://olivekfnphineas.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/patent-reform-2007-the-debate-is-heating-up/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Links on the LawPundit Main Page : (2) (o,p) The Law Blogroll ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lawpundit.com/blog/2008/03/links-on-lawpundit-main-page-2-op-law.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-14:/commentary/1732639</id>
    <updated>2008-03-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>LawPundit </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Peter Zura&amp;#39;s 271 Patent Blog reported recently on the Latest Amendments to S.1145 writing, &amp;quot;The Senate has released the latest amendments to the Patent Reform Act in advance of Senate Floor Debate&amp;quot;. See there for a list of those ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawpundit.com/blog/2008/03/links-on-lawpundit-main-page-2-op-law.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>15 different amendments proposed to Senate version of Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
    <link href="http://www.Filewrapper.com/index.cfm/2008/3/14/15-different-amendments-proposed-to-Senate-version-of-Patent-Reform-Act-of-2007" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-14:/commentary/1729491</id>
    <updated>2008-03-14T19:44:15Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Filewrapper&#174;</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
15 different amendments proposed to Senate version of Patent Reform Act of 2007 Posted At : March 14, 2008 3:03 PM | Posted By : Blog Staff  Related Categories: Legislation,Patents     The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.Filewrapper.com/index.cfm/2008/3/14/15-different-amendments-proposed-to-Senate-version-of-Patent-Reform-Act-of-2007&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>More than 75% of Reexams Narrow or Kill the Claims</title>
    <link href="http://blog.patentassassins.com/?p=15" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-14:/commentary/1729492</id>
    <updated>2008-03-14T11:39:20Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Assassins Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
More than 75% of Reexams Narrow or Kill the Claims March 14th, 2008    This is a cross-post from the Deeplinks blog, ...  overlooked by the latest draft of &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, the Patent&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.patentassassins.com/?p=15&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congress attacks Mom&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Apple Pie at Jane Chastain : Politically Direct</title>
    <link href="http://janechastain.com/2007/09/06/congress-attacks-moms-apple-pie/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-13:/commentary/3600503</id>
    <updated>2008-03-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Jane Chastain : Politically Direct </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., who is the leader of a small bipartisan opposition, compared H.R. 1908 and S.1145, &#226;&#8364;&#339;The Patent Reform Act,&#226;&#8364;* to the so-called comprehensive immigration reform bill that went down to defeat earlier this summer ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://janechastain.com/2007/09/06/congress-attacks-moms-apple-pie/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>It&amp;#39;s Getting to Be Crunch Time for S. 1145</title>
    <link href="http://getting-a-patent.inventionindustryhelponline.com/71048/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-13:/commentary/1918641</id>
    <updated>2008-03-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Getting a patent </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Kevin E. Noonan -- The patent community got its biggest scare in quite a while late last year, when a rules package thought to be dead for almost a year was released on August 21, 2007 (see &amp;quot;New Continuation and Claims Rules . ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://getting-a-patent.inventionindustryhelponline.com/71048/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>[Conspiracy-Theory] -- Yippee!!!</title>
    <link href="http://insurance-list-tips.blogspot.com/2008/03/conspiracy-theory-yippee.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-13:/commentary/1779299</id>
    <updated>2008-03-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>INSURANCE TIPS AND TRIKS </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, which suggests replacing the current reexamination processes with an inadequate form of post-grant review and places undue restrictions on third party participation. This portion of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://insurance-list-tips.blogspot.com/2008/03/conspiracy-theory-yippee.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EFFector 21.09: EFF Applauds House Passage of Surveillance Bill ...</title>
    <link href="http://60-second-auto-quote.blogspot.com/2008/03/effector-2109-eff-applauds-house.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-13:/commentary/1729489</id>
    <updated>2008-03-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>60 Second Auto Quote </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, which suggests replacing the current reexamination processes with an inadequate form of post-grant review and places undue restrictions on third party participation. This portion of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://60-second-auto-quote.blogspot.com/2008/03/effector-2109-eff-applauds-house.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Bill Amendments</title>
    <link href="http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/03/patent-reform-bill-amendments.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-13:/commentary/1729488</id>
    <updated>2008-03-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>I/P Updates </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Act (S. 1145): * &amp;quot;Best Mode&amp;quot; Elimination Amendment &amp;lt;http://us.gallerywatch.com/docs/news/us/agdocs/multipage/senpatentamends031208/Amend_Best_Mode_to_House_language.pdf&amp;gt; * Ex Parte Reexamination Amendment ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/03/patent-reform-bill-amendments.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>It&amp;#39;s Getting to Be Crunch Time for S. 1145</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/03/its-getting-to.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-13:/commentary/1725887</id>
    <updated>2008-03-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Kevin E. Noonan -- The patent community got its biggest scare in quite a while late last year, when a rules package thought to be dead for almost a year was released on August 21, 2007 (see &amp;quot;New Continuation and Claims Rules ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/03/its-getting-to.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Amendments to S.1145 Prior to Floor Debate.</title>
    <link href="http://anticipatethis.wordpress.com/2008/03/14/amendments-to-s1145-prior-to-floor-debate/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-13:/commentary/1725886</id>
    <updated>2008-03-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Anticipate This!&#8482; | Patent and Trademark... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Per Zura&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s 271 blog today, regarding recently release amendments to the Patent Reform Act of 2007:. The Senate has released the latest amendments to the Patent Reform Act in advance of Senate Floor Debate: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://anticipatethis.wordpress.com/2008/03/14/amendments-to-s1145-prior-to-floor-debate/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reexamination Improves Patent Quality: A Look at the Latest USPTO Filing Data</title>
    <link href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/03/reexamination-improves-patent-quality-look-latest-uspto-filing-data" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-12:/commentary/1721977</id>
    <updated>2008-03-12T20:44:33Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Deeplinks | Electronic Frontier Foundation</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Coauthored by Policy Intern Raeanne Young  The latest statistics [PDF] ...  overlooked by the latest draft of &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, which is raising some serious&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/03/reexamination-improves-patent-quality-look-latest-uspto-filing-data&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Amendments to S.1145 Prior to Floor Debate.</title>
    <link href="http://akamu.tekk.org/uncategorized/amendments-to-s1145-prior-to-floor-debate/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-12:/commentary/2032574</id>
    <updated>2008-03-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>akamu&#180;s favorites </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Per Zura&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s 271 blog today, regarding recently release amendments to the Patent Reform Act of 2007: The Senate has released the latest amendments to the Patent Reform Act in advance of Senate Floor Debate: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://akamu.tekk.org/uncategorized/amendments-to-s1145-prior-to-floor-debate/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Latest Amendments to S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/03/latest-amendments-to-s1145.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-12:/commentary/1725885</id>
    <updated>2008-03-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Peter Zura&amp;#39;s 271 Patent Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate has released the latest amendments to the Patent Reform Act in advance of Senate Floor Debate: Interlocutory appeals: limits interlocutory appeals of claim construction orders to those which the district court determines have ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/03/latest-amendments-to-s1145.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Universities: key opponent to S.1145IPBiz</title>
    <link href="http://law.bg58.com/2008/03/universities-key-opponent-to-s1145ipbiz.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-11:/commentary/2003432</id>
    <updated>2008-03-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>LAW </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Although the IT vs. pharma divergence has been stressed in the debate on patent reform, another key loser if S.1145 is passed is academe, and universities have been making themselves heard. Further, unlike pharma (which is not uniformly ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://law.bg58.com/2008/03/universities-key-opponent-to-s1145ipbiz.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>test test</title>
    <link href="http://rapierwhit.blogspot.com/2008/03/test-test.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-10:/commentary/1718685</id>
    <updated>2008-03-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rapier Whit </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
That&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s why I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m fighting for Congress to pass the Patent Reform Act of 2007 ( S.1145 ), the product of years of deliberation and study within Congress and by many esteemed agencies and institutions. This legislation represents the first ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rapierwhit.blogspot.com/2008/03/test-test.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NO WAY TO TEST S.1145 IT WILL DOOM THE US</title>
    <link href="http://www.inventorsblog.org/2008/03/no-way-to-test-s1145-it-will-doom-us.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-10:/commentary/1718684</id>
    <updated>2008-03-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>INVENTORS BLOG </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This is where the so called &#226;&#8364;&#339;Fairness&#226;&#8364;* patent reform proponents depart and diverge from their own mandatory development practices and are attempting to short circuit safeguards to coerce Congress to pass the ill fated S.1145. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inventorsblog.org/2008/03/no-way-to-test-s1145-it-will-doom-us.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Entrepreneur.com: Sisters-in-law Turn Function Into Fashion Hit</title>
    <link href="http://blog.innovators-network.org/2008/03/entrepreneurcom.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-09:/commentary/1739181</id>
    <updated>2008-03-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Innovators Network </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
But that doesn&amp;#39;t mean you destroy the whole ecosystem to deal with parasites[.]&amp;quot; Dig into more details on how technology discoveries might be hurt by S. 1145 in Tech leader assesses state of innovation in valley.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.innovators-network.org/2008/03/entrepreneurcom.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Meaningful Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://iplawreport.blogspot.com/2008/03/meaningful-patent-reform.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-08:/commentary/1859673</id>
    <updated>2008-03-08T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IP Law Report </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145) is the product of years of deliberation and study within Congress and by many esteemed agencies and institutions, including dozens of hearings with the testimony of scores of witnesses, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://iplawreport.blogspot.com/2008/03/meaningful-patent-reform.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Universities:  key opponent to S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/03/universities-key-opponent-to-s1145.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-05:/commentary/1699363</id>
    <updated>2008-03-05T11:10:16Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
PatentHawk quotes a source:  One interesting aspect is the significant role that the universities have played because of their tech-transfer offices ...  the IT vs. pharma divergence has been stressed in the debate on patent reform, another key loser if &lt;s&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/03/universities-key-opponent-to-s1145.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Salt Lake City Tribune commentary blasts patent reform legislation</title>
    <link href="http://borisvwqhannah.stmhost.com/2008/03/05/salt-lake-city-tribune-commentary-blasts-patent-reform-legislation/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-04:/commentary/1697592</id>
    <updated>2008-03-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Hannah Boris Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[The S. 1145 bill might be here.] *** IPBiz notes a comment below suggesting that the Salt Lake City Tribune may have praised Senator Hatch (and the IT biggies) previously. Of strange events in patent reform, IPBiz notes that the USPTO ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://borisvwqhannah.stmhost.com/2008/03/05/salt-lake-city-tribune-commentary-blasts-patent-reform-legislation/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FTCuaNanotechnology23: NanoNews Custom 6/20/07</title>
    <link href="http://on-line-interest11.blogspot.com/2008/03/ftcuananotechnology23-nanonews-custom.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-03:/commentary/1759259</id>
    <updated>2008-03-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>online interest </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Devices Manufacturers Association (MDMA) June 19, 2007 The Medical Devices Manufacturers Association (MDMA) joined over 200 other organizations to express concerns with The Patent Reform Act of 2007, S.1145 and HR 1908. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://on-line-interest11.blogspot.com/2008/03/ftcuananotechnology23-nanonews-custom.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform in Congress</title>
    <link href="http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day04/archive/2008/03/04/patent-reform-in-congress.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-03:/commentary/1697593</id>
    <updated>2008-03-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Talking Justice </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Despite some in the media calling patent reform dead,[1] on January 24, 2008, the Senate placed S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, on the general calendar. The next few weeks will be critical to the legislation, which the House ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://communities.justicetalking.org/blogs/day04/archive/2008/03/04/patent-reform-in-congress.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Linux.com :: End Software Patents project comes out swinging</title>
    <link href="http://4sustainability.blogspot.com/2008/03/linuxcom-end-software-patents-project.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-01:/commentary/1721973</id>
    <updated>2008-03-01T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Scholarly Communication News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The report further suggests that, based on the tentative changes contained in The Patent Reform Act of 2008 (S.1145), a bill currently before Congress, reform is unlikely to improve the current situation. Although proposed changes such ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://4sustainability.blogspot.com/2008/03/linuxcom-end-software-patents-project.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Cheats Inventors! Property Rights In Danger!</title>
    <link href="http://arkansasgopwing.blogspot.com/2008/02/patent-reform-cheats-inventors-property.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-27:/commentary/1678661</id>
    <updated>2008-02-27T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ARRA News Service - Arkansas Republican... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Eagle Forum has been following the developments regarding the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145), sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT). This dangerous legislation could come up in the Senate for a vote. The House version (HR 1908) already ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://arkansasgopwing.blogspot.com/2008/02/patent-reform-cheats-inventors-property.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Open Question: Time to move garden spot?</title>
    <link href="http://property-services-solutions.blogspot.com/2008/02/open-question-time-to-move-garden-spot.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-26:/commentary/1936451</id>
    <updated>2008-02-26T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>property </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1145: Patent Reform Act of 2007&amp;amp;quot; by ME. Array. Open Question: How can I buy property with no money down? How can I genuinely buy property with no money down? Array. Open Question: Insurance on a commercial rental property? ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://property-services-solutions.blogspot.com/2008/02/open-question-time-to-move-garden-spot.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Gathering Patent Reform Storm</title>
    <link href="http://inventorsdigest.blogspot.com/2008/02/gathering-patent-reform-storm.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-26:/commentary/1672030</id>
    <updated>2008-02-26T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Innovation Watch </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
With each passing day, the debate over the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) intensifies. I&#226;&#8364;&#8482;m seeing more big-name players emerge to attack the Act, which as of this writing is still in the Senate. This week David Snivley, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://inventorsdigest.blogspot.com/2008/02/gathering-patent-reform-storm.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strong intellectual property protection</title>
    <link href="http://carloslagemann.blogspot.com/2008/02/strong-intellectual-property-protection.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-25:/commentary/1684071</id>
    <updated>2008-02-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Carlos Lagemann </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
That picture will change for the worse if the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145), now being considered by the Senate, is enacted in its present form. This bill, together with two recent patent-unfriendly Supreme Court rulings, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://carloslagemann.blogspot.com/2008/02/strong-intellectual-property-protection.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Judge Michel Doesn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t Think Much of Senate Bill S. 1145, Either</title>
    <link href="http://lawbites.com/judge-michel-doesnt-think-much-of-senate-bill-s-1145-either/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-25:/commentary/1670271</id>
    <updated>2008-02-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Law Bites </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Docs: By Kevin E. Noonan &#226;&#8364;&#8221; Judge Paul Michel (at right), Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, recently had the opportunity to speak to a meeting of the Association of Corporate Patent Counsel, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lawbites.com/judge-michel-doesnt-think-much-of-senate-bill-s-1145-either/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>There Is a Role for Congress in Patent Litigation Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.docuticker.com/?p=19512" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-25:/commentary/1670269</id>
    <updated>2008-02-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Docuticker </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
There Is a Role for Congress in Patent Litigation Reform Source: Liability Outlook (American Enterprise Institute) Despite some in the media calling patent reform dead,[1] on January 24, 2008, the Senate placed S. 1145, the Patent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.docuticker.com/?p=19512&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Throwing out America&amp;#39;s Future with the Bathwater- S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://www.inventorsblog.org/2008/02/throwing-out-americas-future-with.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-25:/commentary/1670268</id>
    <updated>2008-02-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>INVENTORS BLOG </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Vote out the Patent &amp;quot;Deform&amp;quot; Act- S.1145 from the Senate. Contact YOUR Senators and tell them to &amp;quot;Just Say NO!&amp;quot; We need American Innovation and Patents! Click for a larger image. InventorsBlog.org.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inventorsblog.org/2008/02/throwing-out-americas-future-with.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Are Patents Headed For Extinction?</title>
    <link href="http://berniemartin.blogspot.com/2008/02/are-patents-headed-for-extinction.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-25:/commentary/1668175</id>
    <updated>2008-02-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>bernie&amp;#39;s blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
That picture will change for the worse if the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145), now being considered by the Senate, is enacted in its present form. This bill, together with two recent patent-unfriendly Supreme Court rulings, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://berniemartin.blogspot.com/2008/02/are-patents-headed-for-extinction.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform undermining innovation?</title>
    <link href="http://www.addovere.com/2008/02/26/patent-reform-undermining-innovation/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-25:/commentary/1666518</id>
    <updated>2008-02-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Addo Vere </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Joe Kiani, CEO of Masimo, wrote an interesting article in Forbes on the potential effects of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145). He refers to the bill as &#226;&#8364;&#339;one of the worst assaults on intellectual property protection in the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.addovere.com/2008/02/26/patent-reform-undermining-innovation/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Guide to Current Patent Reform Legislation</title>
    <link href="http://intellectual-property-online.blogspot.com/2008/02/guide-to-current-patent-reform.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-24:/commentary/1670272</id>
    <updated>2008-02-24T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In the Senate, Leahy and Hatch introduced S. 1145, while in the House Representatives Howard Berman (D-California) and Lamar Smith (R-Texas) introduced HR 1908. On May 16th, a House subcommittee approved the bill for further review by ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://intellectual-property-online.blogspot.com/2008/02/guide-to-current-patent-reform.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ALERT: Patent Reform Cheats Inventors!</title>
    <link href="http://eagleforum.org/blog/2008/02/alert-patent-reform-cheats-inventors.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-24:/commentary/1670270</id>
    <updated>2008-02-24T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>eagleforum.org </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Tell Your Senator to vote NO on Patent &amp;quot;Reform&amp;quot; (S. 1145)!! Eagle Forum has been following the developments regarding the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145), sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT). This... [[ This is a content summary only. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://eagleforum.org/blog/2008/02/alert-patent-reform-cheats-inventors.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Cheats Inventors!</title>
    <link href="http://libertyletters.wordpress.com/2008/02/25/patent-reform-cheats-inventors/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-24:/commentary/1664118</id>
    <updated>2008-02-24T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Liberty Letters </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Eagle Forum has been following the developments regarding the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145), sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT). This dangerous legislation could come up in the Senate for a vote in the next week when Congress returns ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://libertyletters.wordpress.com/2008/02/25/patent-reform-cheats-inventors/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DRM, Net Neutrality, and Apple&amp;#39;s budget imbalance...</title>
    <link href="http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/02/drm-net-neutrality-and-apples.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-23:/commentary/1658485</id>
    <updated>2008-02-23T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Capitol Valley </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
HR 1908/S.1145, The Patent Reform Act of 2007; Section 115 of the US Copyright Act: Compulsory Licensing of EU Copyright Directive. That&amp;#39;s from their year-end 2007 Lobbying Disclosure Act report. They didn&amp;#39;t so much as make a single ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.capitolvalley.net/2008/02/drm-net-neutrality-and-apples.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Patent &amp;quot;Reform&amp;quot; Bill Worries Israelis</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/02/us-patent-refor.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-22:/commentary/1655477</id>
    <updated>2008-02-22T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Kevin E. Noonan -- A prominent Israeli commentator has added his voice to the growing chorus of objections to the patent &amp;quot;reform&amp;quot; bill under consideration by the Senate (S. 1145). In an opinion piece published by the Jerusalem Post ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/02/us-patent-refor.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dudas: S1145 creates a false choice on innovation, but balance can ...</title>
    <link href="http://legal.services.rvsglobal.com/blogs/Legal-BPO/6354/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-21:/commentary/1721975</id>
    <updated>2008-02-21T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Legal BPO </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Posted to United States Jon Dudas held a Q&amp;amp;A with the media this morning to discuss the recently-issued Bush administration letter of opposition (.pdf) regarding the Senate version of The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legal.services.rvsglobal.com/blogs/Legal-BPO/6354/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
    <link href="http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/02/the-patent-reform-act-of-2007.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-21:/commentary/1650694</id>
    <updated>2008-02-21T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PointOfLaw Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
My latest Liability Outlook is on the Patent Reform Act of 2007:Despite some in the media calling patent reform dead, on January 24, 2008, the Senate placed S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, on the general calendar. The...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/2008/02/the-patent-reform-act-of-2007.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
    <link href="http://www.overlawyered.com/2008/02/the_patent_reform_act_of_2007.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-21:/commentary/1650693</id>
    <updated>2008-02-21T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Overlawyered </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Despite some in the media calling patent reform dead, on January 24, 2008, the Senate placed S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, on the general calendar. The next few weeks will be critical to the legislation, which the House passed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.overlawyered.com/2008/02/the_patent_reform_act_of_2007.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Loaded Gun</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/02/loaded_gun.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-20:/commentary/1721974</id>
    <updated>2008-02-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
George Margolin of the Professional Inventors Alliance had a graphic response to last week&amp;#39;s editorial in the Washington Times by Senators Leahy, touting S. 1145, the Senate bill to deform the US patent system. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/02/loaded_gun.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Loaded Gun</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1115077&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-20:/commentary/1651990</id>
    <updated>2008-02-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
George Margolin of the Professional Inventors Alliance had a graphic response to last week&amp;#39;s editorial in the Washington Times by Senators Leahy, touting S. 1145, the Senate bill to deform the US patent system. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1115077&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Stardoll.com Epitomizes Web 2.0 Success</title>
    <link href="http://blog.innovators-network.org/2008/02/mark-evans-remo.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-20:/commentary/1647461</id>
    <updated>2008-02-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Innovators Network </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... an imaginary bit of current legislative legerdemain, it&amp;#39;s also the title of a recent article at The Washington Times that hopes to clear up some of the mystery surrounding the ins and outs of the Patent Reform Bill of 2007 (S.1145. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.innovators-network.org/2008/02/mark-evans-remo.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Judge Michel Doesn&amp;#39;t Think Much of Senate Bill S. 1145, Either</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/02/judge-michel-do.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-20:/commentary/1645155</id>
    <updated>2008-02-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Kevin E. Noonan -- Judge Paul Michel (at right), Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, recently had the opportunity to speak to a meeting of the Association of Corporate Patent Counsel, one of the preeminent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/02/judge-michel-do.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent (Reform) Pending?</title>
    <link href="http://mediligence.com/blog/2008/02/21/patent-reform/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-20:/commentary/1643722</id>
    <updated>2008-02-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>advanced medical technologies </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
But now, the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (HR 1908, S. 1145) is gaining momentum and may become reality. And that may change the ball game considerably. Some of the key elements of the legislation are below (drawn in part from Wikipedia): ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mediligence.com/blog/2008/02/21/patent-reform/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Judge Michel Doesn&amp;#39;t Think Much of Senate Bill S. 1145, Either</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1113433&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-20:/commentary/1642877</id>
    <updated>2008-02-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Recent Posts - Justia BlawgSearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Kevin E. Noonan -- Judge Paul Michel (at right), Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, recently had the opportunity to speak to a meeting of the Association of Corporate Patent Counsel, one of the preeminent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1113433&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senators Leahy, Hatch not getting the facts right on patent reform</title>
    <link href="http://picking-up-pecans.inventionindustryhelponline.com/48480/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-19:/commentary/1891882</id>
    <updated>2008-02-19T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Picking up pecans </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In an editorial in the Washington Post on 15 Feb 08, Senators Leahy and Hatch state: The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145) is the product of years of deliberation and study within Congress and by many esteemed agencies and institutions ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://picking-up-pecans.inventionindustryhelponline.com/48480/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Selected List of US Federal Documents from Gallerywatch.com</title>
    <link href="http://www.bloglines.com/blog/PLL?id=8019" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-19:/commentary/1642527</id>
    <updated>2008-02-19T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>New York Supreme Court Criminal Term Library </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
02/19/2008, CBO Cost Estimate for the Patent Reform Act of 2007, S. 1145 (PDF 39.9 KB) Cost Estimate for the Bill as Reported by the Senate Judiciary Committee on Jan. 24, 2008. 02/19/2008, CBO Cost Estimate for the Rio Puerco Watershed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloglines.com/blog/PLL?id=8019&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>United States: Patent Reform: What Does First-To-File Mean To Me ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=57298" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-19:/commentary/1639326</id>
    <updated>2008-02-19T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq.Com - feed of articles </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Committee on the Judiciary, has issued its draft report on the Patent Reform bill (S. 1145) , to amend the patent laws currently in Title 35 of the United States Code.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=57298&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Google &amp;amp; Microsoft Charged With Patent Infringement</title>
    <link href="http://www.pagetrafficblog.com/google-microsoft-charged-with-patent-infringement/4206/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-19:/commentary/1634700</id>
    <updated>2008-02-19T05:00:22Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PageTraffic Blog- Search engine information much before its official!</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 After being sued for defamation, it seems Google in now once again in for a lawsuit ...  in support of &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. Bitter or better, you tell me? Related&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pagetrafficblog.com/google-microsoft-charged-with-patent-infringement/4206/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Google &amp;amp; Microsoft Charged With Patent Infringement</title>
    <link href="http://seokeywordsnews.net/2008/02/19/google-microsoft-charged-with-patent-infringement/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-19:/commentary/1634699</id>
    <updated>2008-02-19T05:00:22Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SEO Keyword News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 After being sued for defamation, it seems Google in now once again in for a lawsuit ...  in support of &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. Bitter or better, you tell me? Related&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://seokeywordsnews.net/2008/02/19/google-microsoft-charged-with-patent-infringement/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PPC News, Google Adwords News on Blogs</title>
    <link href="http://ppc-news.blogspot.com/2008/02/ppc-news-google-adwords-news-on-blogs_19.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-18:/commentary/2011143</id>
    <updated>2008-02-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PPC News US, UK, Europe </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Certainly, it is no wonder then that Google and Microsoft are among the 150 corporate signatories of a letter sent to congressional leaders in January by the Coalition for Patent Fairness in support of S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ppc-news.blogspot.com/2008/02/ppc-news-google-adwords-news-on-blogs_19.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform is again before Washington legislators, as Congress ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/archives/patents-patent-reform-is-again-before-washington-legislators-as-congress-continued-to-fail-to-reach-a-consensus-on-the-legislation-in-2007.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-18:/commentary/1645154</id>
    <updated>2008-02-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In 2007, identical bills, HR 1908 and S. 1145, were introduced, with the expectation that refinements would be made during the legislative process. HR 1908, with amendments, was passed on September 7, 2007. But when the 110th Congress ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/archives/patents-patent-reform-is-again-before-washington-legislators-as-congress-continued-to-fail-to-reach-a-consensus-on-the-legislation-in-2007.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Leahy and Hatch push Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.redhatmagazine.com/~r/TruthHappens/~3/237759269/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-18:/commentary/1639452</id>
    <updated>2008-02-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Truth happens </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145) is the product of years of deliberation and study within Congress and by many esteemed agencies and institutions, including dozens of hearings with the testimony of scores of witnesses, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.redhatmagazine.com/~r/TruthHappens/~3/237759269/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Leahy and Hatch push Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
    <link href="http://truthhappens.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/19/leahy-and-hatch-push-patent-reform-act-of-2007/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-18:/commentary/1638030</id>
    <updated>2008-02-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Truth happens </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145) is the product of years of deliberation and study within Congress and by many esteemed agencies and institutions, including dozens of hearings with the testimony of scores of witnesses, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://truthhappens.redhatmagazine.com/2008/02/19/leahy-and-hatch-push-patent-reform-act-of-2007/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Google and Microsoft Charged With Patent Infringement</title>
    <link href="http://www.searchnewz.com/blog/talk/sn-6-20080219GoogleMicrosoftChargedWithPatentInfringement.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-18:/commentary/1635962</id>
    <updated>2008-02-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SearchNewz: Combined RSS Feed </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Certainly, it is no wonder then that Google and Microsoft are among the 150 corporate signatories of a letter sent to congressional leaders in January by the Coalition for Patent Fairness in support of S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchnewz.com/blog/talk/sn-6-20080219GoogleMicrosoftChargedWithPatentInfringement.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>insurance $ estimate Dec Congressional Budget Office - S.1145 would increase budget ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.insurableevents.com/insurance-estimate/insurance-estimate-dec-congressional-budget-office-s-1145-would-increase-budget-b" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-17:/commentary/1630616</id>
    <updated>2008-02-17T22:38:56Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>insurance estimate</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Office notes that this provision would not only have a direct impact on the generic drug industry (via lost revenue due to the extended patent term), but also that it would indirectly impact healthinsurance premiums and tax ... insurance estimate  ins&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insurableevents.com/insurance-estimate/insurance-estimate-dec-congressional-budget-office-s-1145-would-increase-budget-b&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The (Un)Intended Consequences of the Law</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/02/the-unintended.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-17:/commentary/1645135</id>
    <updated>2008-02-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Kevin E. Noonan -- In discussing the patent &amp;quot;reform&amp;quot; bill waiting to be brought to the floor for a vote in the Senate (S. 1145), various stakeholders have availed themselves of their right to petition the government for redress in ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/02/the-unintended.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Google, Microsoft Sued and Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.addovere.com/2008/02/18/google-microsoft-sued-and-patent-reform/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-17:/commentary/1633694</id>
    <updated>2008-02-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Addo Vere </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Google and Microsoft are among the more than 150 corporate signatories of a letter sent to congressional leaders in January by the Coalition for Patent Fairness in support of S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.addovere.com/2008/02/18/google-microsoft-sued-and-patent-reform/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Monday Shorts - Business Method Challenge at the CAFC</title>
    <link href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/02/monday-shorts-business-method-challenge.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-17:/commentary/1630615</id>
    <updated>2008-02-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Peter Zura&amp;#39;s 271 Patent Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
CBO Estimates Cost of Patent Reform: On February 15, the CBO estimated the costs of enacting S. 1145:. CBO estimates that enacting the bill would increase direct spending by $26.9 billion and revenues by $25.5 billion over the 2009-2018 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/02/monday-shorts-business-method-challenge.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congressional Budget Office - S.1145 would increase budget ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.lawnewsonline.net/2008/02/18/congressional-budget-office-s1145-would-increase-budget-deficits-by-14-billion-from-2009-to-2018/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-17:/commentary/1630103</id>
    <updated>2008-02-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Law News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Posted to The United States blogThe Congressional Budget Office released its analysis of the budgetary impact S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. The Office estimates that enacting the bill as Read full entry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawnewsonline.net/2008/02/18/congressional-budget-office-s1145-would-increase-budget-deficits-by-14-billion-from-2009-to-2018/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congressional Budget Office - S.1145 would increase budget &#8230;</title>
    <link href="http://universal-health.info/2008/02/17/congressional-budget-office-s1145-would-increase-budget/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-17:/commentary/1630054</id>
    <updated>2008-02-17T16:38:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Universal Health </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 clevelandjie wrote an interesting post today on Here&#8217;s a quick excerpt The Office notes that this provision would not only have a direct impact on the generic drug industry (via lost revenue due to the extended patent term), but also that it would indir&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://universal-health.info/2008/02/17/congressional-budget-office-s1145-would-increase-budget/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Good Old Bozos</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/02/old_white_bozos.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-17:/commentary/1630055</id>
    <updated>2008-02-17T16:36:43Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
  Senators Leahy and Hatch, in a Washington Times editorial, cry wolf about the need for patent reform, ...  sots and shills in reality, pose as academics.   The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;) is the product&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/02/old_white_bozos.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congressional Budget Office - S.1145 would increase budget ...</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1106213&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-16:/commentary/1630639</id>
    <updated>2008-02-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Posted to The United States blog The Congressional Budget Office released its analysis of the budgetary impact S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. The Office estimates that enacting the bill as reported by the Senate Committee on the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1106213&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Congressional Budget Office - S.1145 would increase budget ...</title>
    <link href="http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/congressional-budget-office-s1145-would-increase-budget-deficits-by-14-billion-from-2009-to-2018/651/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-16:/commentary/1630043</id>
    <updated>2008-02-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The United States blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Congressional Budget Office released its analysis of the budgetary impact S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. The Office estimates that enacting the bill as reported by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary would increase direct ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/congressional-budget-office-s1145-would-increase-budget-deficits-by-14-billion-from-2009-to-2018/651/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Losing Steam in Senate</title>
    <link href="http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/02/17/patent-reform-losing-steam-in-senate/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-16:/commentary/1628356</id>
    <updated>2008-02-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPWatchdog.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The IPO is reporting that momentum for patent reform has been lost in the Senate and that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will not bring S. 1145 to the floor for action until at least after the Senate returns from recess at the end of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2008/02/17/patent-reform-losing-steam-in-senate/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Russian Roulette S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://www.inventorsblog.org/2008/02/patent-russian-roulette-s1145.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-15:/commentary/1630053</id>
    <updated>2008-02-15T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>INVENTORS BLOG </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
InventorsBlog.org.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inventorsblog.org/2008/02/patent-russian-roulette-s1145.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Meaningful Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/02/meaningful-pate.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-15:/commentary/1620217</id>
    <updated>2008-02-15T07:19:34Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 By Senators Patrick Leahy and Orrin Hatch, Full editorial in the Washington Times 2/15/08   &#8220;. .  ...  forward.  The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;) is the product of years of deliberation and study&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/02/meaningful-pate.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senators Leahy, Hatch not getting the facts right on patent reform</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1103641&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-14:/commentary/1629175</id>
    <updated>2008-02-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In an editorial in the Washington Post on 15 Feb 08, Senators Leahy and Hatch state: The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145) is the product of years of deliberation and study within Congress and by many esteemed agencies and institutions ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1103641&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Meaningful Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1101316&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-14:/commentary/1624518</id>
    <updated>2008-02-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Meaningful patent reform is crucial to America&amp;#39;s ability to maintain its competitive edge in the world, and now - after years of careful spadework - Congress has the chance to move forward. The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145) is the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1101316&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Losing Steam in Senate</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1101764&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-14:/commentary/1624281</id>
    <updated>2008-02-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The IPO is reporting that momentum for patent reform has been lost in the Senate and that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will not bring S. 1145 to the floor for action until at least after the Senate returns from recess at the end of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1101764&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1145, Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
    <link href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc.cfm?index=8981&amp;amp;type=1" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-14:/commentary/1622569</id>
    <updated>2008-02-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Recent CBO Cost Estimates </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Cost estimate for the bill as reported by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on January 24, 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdoc.cfm?index=8981&amp;amp;type=1&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WashTimes: Meaningful Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2008/02/washtimes_meaningful_patent_re.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-14:/commentary/1622551</id>
    <updated>2008-02-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tech Daily Dose </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has committed to taking up S.1145 as early in the new year as possible, and we welcome the continued dialogue on how best to perfect it. Unfortunately, some would like to play political football with ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2008/02/washtimes_meaningful_patent_re.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Losing Steam in Senate</title>
    <link href="http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp?view=plink&amp;amp;id=271" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-14:/commentary/1621784</id>
    <updated>2008-02-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PLI Patent Practice Center RSS feed </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The IPO is reporting that momentum for patent reform has been lost in the Senate and that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will not bring S. 1145 to the floor for action until at least after the Senate returns from recess at the end of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp?view=plink&amp;amp;id=271&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Leahy and Hatch on Patent Reform Act of 2007 - we&#226;&#8364;&#8482;re making ...</title>
    <link href="http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/leahy-and-hatch-on-patent-reform-act-of-2007-were-making-progress-beacuse-no-one-is-entirely-happy/650/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-14:/commentary/1621299</id>
    <updated>2008-02-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Untitled </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Characterizing themselves as &#226;&#8364;&#339;close partners on intellectual property issues,&#226;&#8364;* the current and immediate past chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee pitched their case for passage of S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/leahy-and-hatch-on-patent-reform-act-of-2007-were-making-progress-beacuse-no-one-is-entirely-happy/650/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Administrations thoughts on The Patent Reform Act.</title>
    <link href="http://vanlawfirm.com/blog/?p=7" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-13:/commentary/1647462</id>
    <updated>2008-02-13T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Obvious Innovation (TM) </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Bush Administration shares its views on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145). Below is a link to the letter from Nathaniel F. Wienecke to Patrick J. Leahy, Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, and to all the members of the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://vanlawfirm.com/blog/?p=7&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Links on the LawPundit Main Page : (1) Useful Links at the Top</title>
    <link href="http://www.lawpundit.com/blog/2008/02/links-on-lawpundit-main-page-1-useful.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-12:/commentary/1643723</id>
    <updated>2008-02-12T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>lawpundit </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office - eg a recent posting about the Bush administration opposition to the Patent Reform Act of 2007, S. 1145 ) Vault (legal careers) WorldLaw (Law Library of the US Congress)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawpundit.com/blog/2008/02/links-on-lawpundit-main-page-1-useful.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO Report Indicts &amp;quot;Patent Reform&amp;quot; Proponents</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/02/bio-report-indi.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-12:/commentary/1621300</id>
    <updated>2008-02-12T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... this week released a report on the purported bases of current patent &amp;quot;reform&amp;quot; efforts that have culminated in passage of a bill in the House of Representatives (HR 1908) and consideration of another bill by the Senate (S. 1145)....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/02/bio-report-indi.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Blog: U.S. has strongest patent system in world..why ...</title>
    <link href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/04/us-has-strongest-patent-system-in-worldwhy-change-it.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-11:/commentary/3513833</id>
    <updated>2008-02-11T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Reform Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent examiners voice opposition to Patent Reform Act. Wednesday, February 13, 2008. U.S. has strongest patent system in world..why change it? Monday, February 04, 2008. 485 + Companies Against S.1145. Monday, February 04, 2008 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/04/us-has-strongest-patent-system-in-worldwhy-change-it.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>STRONG US PATENT SYSTEM CRITICAL TO CONTINUED MEDICAL INNOVATION</title>
    <link href="http://clug-unknown.blogspot.com/2008/02/strong-us-patent-system-critical-to.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-11:/commentary/1647463</id>
    <updated>2008-02-11T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Unknown </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The administration is right to oppose Section 4 of the &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Patent Reform Act of 2007 &amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;(S. 1145) which contains language that would reduce the incentive to innovate in a way that advantages one business model at the expense of others. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://clug-unknown.blogspot.com/2008/02/strong-us-patent-system-critical-to.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>To the Labor Unions, Applause on Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/to_the_labor_un.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-11:/commentary/1607826</id>
    <updated>2008-02-11T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>shopfloor.org: The Manufacturers Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Seth Borden of Labor Lawyers for Management alerts us to a great letter a group of labor unions sent to the US Senate last week stressing their opposition to S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. An excerpt:The American...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.nam.org/archives/2008/02/to_the_labor_un.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cable GC - patent reform is about loopholes, frivolous lawsuit ...</title>
    <link href="http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/cable-gc-patent-reform-is-about-loopholes-frivolous-lawsuit-and-american-jobs/647/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-11:/commentary/1604346</id>
    <updated>2008-02-11T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>United States </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... on introducing ground-breaking innovations and promoting American jobs.&#226;&#8364;* Odd that he didn&#226;&#8364;&#8482;t mention the letter of opposition to S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, that was recently signed by more than a dozen major labor unions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/cable-gc-patent-reform-is-about-loopholes-frivolous-lawsuit-and-american-jobs/647/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What Do You Think of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145)?</title>
    <link href="http://www.wikipatents.com/blog/?p=8" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-11:/commentary/1603984</id>
    <updated>2008-02-11T11:16:20Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WikiPatents Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
What Do You Think of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145)? February 11th, 2008    The Bush Administration notified the members of the Senate Thursday that the Administration strongly opposes the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wikipatents.com/blog/?p=8&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strong U.S. Patent System Critical To Continued Medical Innovation</title>
    <link href="http://www.bite.ws/2008/02/11/strong-us-patent-system-critical-to-continued-medical-innovation-2/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-11:/commentary/1603985</id>
    <updated>2008-02-11T08:54:14Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Bite - Dentistry And Medical News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Christopher White, general counsel for the Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed), issued the following statement regarding a recent letter from the Department of Commerce on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bite.ws/2008/02/11/strong-us-patent-system-critical-to-continued-medical-innovation-2/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senators Leahy, Hatch not getting the facts right on patent reform</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/02/senators-leahy-hatch-not-getting-facts.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-11:/commentary/1624519</id>
    <updated>2008-02-11T05:04:19Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In an editorial in the Washington Post on 15 Feb 08, Senators Leahy and Hatch state:  The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;) is the product of years of deliberation and study within Congress&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/02/senators-leahy-hatch-not-getting-facts.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform coming down to the wire</title>
    <link href="http://www.newdigitalcomputer.com/2008/02/11/patent-reform-coming-down-to-the-wire/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-10:/commentary/1654999</id>
    <updated>2008-02-10T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>New Digital Computer </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators McCain, Clinton and Obama may have to make some tough choices on S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act, which is supported by technology companies but opposed by the health care lobby. That&amp;#39;s because the Bush Administration has come ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newdigitalcomputer.com/2008/02/11/patent-reform-coming-down-to-the-wire/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strong US Patent System Critical To Continued Medical Innovation</title>
    <link href="http://health.showpharmacy.com/2008/02/strong-us-patent-system-critical-to-continued-medical-innovation/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-10:/commentary/1605247</id>
    <updated>2008-02-10T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Health pages </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The administration is right to oppose Section 4 of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) which contains language that would reduce the incentive to innovate in a way that advantages one business model at the expense of others. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://health.showpharmacy.com/2008/02/strong-us-patent-system-critical-to-continued-medical-innovation/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PATENT REFORM ACT OF 2007 MAKES STRANGE LABOR-MANAGEMENT BEDFELLOWS</title>
    <link href="http://union-free.blogspot.com/2008/02/patent-reform-act-of-2007-makes-strange.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-10:/commentary/1603983</id>
    <updated>2008-02-10T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Union-Free Employer </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Late last week, a number of labor unions sent a letter to members of the US Senate urging opposition to the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145). The letter expresses concern that the Act might undermine US competiveness. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://union-free.blogspot.com/2008/02/patent-reform-act-of-2007-makes-strange.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strong US Patent System Critical To Continued Medical Innovation</title>
    <link href="http://google-sina.com/2008/02/11/strong-us-patent-system-critical-to-continued-medical-innovation/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-10:/commentary/1603982</id>
    <updated>2008-02-10T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Medical Health Articles </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Christopher White, general counsel for the Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed), issued the following statement regarding a recent letter from the Department of Commerce on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145) : &#226;&#8364;&#339;AdvaMed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://google-sina.com/2008/02/11/strong-us-patent-system-critical-to-continued-medical-innovation/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USPTO management and workers AGREE: S.1145 on patent reform is flawed</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/02/uspto-management-and-workers-agree.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-09:/commentary/1600387</id>
    <updated>2008-02-09T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ipbiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Patent Office Professional Association (POPA) has joined several other major labor unions in opposition to the Patent Reform Act of 2007, S. 1145. According to a press release by POPA, the coalition of unions sent a letter to every ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/02/uspto-management-and-workers-agree.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O): Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 9</title>
    <link href="http://patentlyo.com/patent/2008/02/patently-o-bits.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-08:/commentary/3614034</id>
    <updated>2008-02-08T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Spector &amp; Brownback: The S.1145 &#226;&#8364;&#339;remains a work in progress;&#226;&#8364;* the damage apportionment language would create uncertainity and litigation &#226;&#8364;&#8221; especially determining an invention&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s &#226;&#8364;&#339;specific contribution over the prior art&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://patentlyo.com/patent/2008/02/patently-o-bits.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Alexander Poltorak: Check Your Facts</title>
    <link href="http://loudseek.info/2008/02/09/alexander-poltorak-check-your-facts/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-08:/commentary/1610467</id>
    <updated>2008-02-08T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>loudseek.info </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Just last week, over 150 companies and organizations sent a letter in support of patent reform to the Senate leadership, urging passage of S.1145. Those letter-signers included more than just the 5 high-tech &#226;&#8364;&#339;giants&#226;&#8364;* that Polotrak ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://loudseek.info/2008/02/09/alexander-poltorak-check-your-facts/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USPTO management and workers AGREE: S.1145 on patent reform is flawed</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1089651&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-08:/commentary/1603980</id>
    <updated>2008-02-08T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Of the union, ag-ip noted on 10 Feb: The Patent Office Professional Association (POPA) has joined several other major labor unions in opposition to the Patent Reform Act of 2007, S. 1145. According to a press release by POPA, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1089651&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>USPTO management and workers AGREE: S.1145 on patent reform is flawed</title>
    <link href="http://www.aqym.com/uspto-management-and-workers-agree-s1145-on-patent-reform-is-flawed" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-08:/commentary/1600388</id>
    <updated>2008-02-08T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Advertisement </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In addition, POPA has signed with over 485 other corporations, associations and unions in a full page advertisement that ran in the newspaper Roll Call when the S enate went back in session&#226;&#8364;&#166;. Original post by IPBiz.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aqym.com/uspto-management-and-workers-agree-s1145-on-patent-reform-is-flawed&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EFFector 21.04: Action Alert: Support Senate Patent Reform and the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=18339" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-08:/commentary/1597745</id>
    <updated>2008-02-08T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Privacy / Rights Project </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While not perfect, S. 1145 is an important step in the right direction. For years, EFF&amp;#39;s Patent Busting Project has been a successful and important front in the fight against harmful patents and patent abuse. While S. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluetack.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=18339&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Office Professionals Oppose Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.securinginnovation.com/2008/02/articles/patents/patent-office-professionals-oppose-bill/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-08:/commentary/1594229</id>
    <updated>2008-02-08T12:50:14Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>SECURING INNOVATION | The Business Blog of IP.com about Managing Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks, and Trade Secrets </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Office Professionals Oppose Bill   Posted on February 8, 2008 by  JC    U.S. patent examiners and 13 other unions want the U.S ...  has not changed in 32 years.   &quot;Now that &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt; is heading into the final stretch, m&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.securinginnovation.com/2008/02/articles/patents/patent-office-professionals-oppose-bill/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Administration Shares Views on Senate Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.sierralaw.com/site/?p=19" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-07:/commentary/1630640</id>
    <updated>2008-02-07T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Sierra Patent Group </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The letter states the Administration strongly opposes S. 1145 in its current form, but strongly supports passage of balanced patent modernization legislation. Any changes must be carefully considered and balanced to encourage all ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sierralaw.com/site/?p=19&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Internet Coverage of Patent Reform Increasing</title>
    <link href="http://www.marylandiplaw.com/2008/02/articles/patents/patent-reform-act/internet-coverage-of-patent-reform-increasing/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-07:/commentary/1594230</id>
    <updated>2008-02-07T05:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Maryland Intellectual Property Lawyer &amp; Attorney : Brian Wm. Higgins : Serving Baltimore, Columbia, Frederick</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Internet Coverage of Patent Reform Increasing   Posted on February 7, 2008 by Brian Wm. Higgins         A search of Google&#169; on February 4, 2008 ( ...  before the Senate votes on its current version of &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, the Patent Re&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marylandiplaw.com/2008/02/articles/patents/patent-reform-act/internet-coverage-of-patent-reform-increasing/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SFLC Sends Letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Regarding Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/feb/06/patent-letter/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-06:/commentary/1580768</id>
    <updated>2008-02-06T19:58:19Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>News and Activities - Software Freedom Law Center</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
SFLC Sends Letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Regarding Patent Reform Bill U.S ...  to reconsider the current state of &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, a bill which would eliminate the public's ability to request&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/feb/06/patent-letter/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Big bucks, big drugs and more</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1083824&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-06:/commentary/1614677</id>
    <updated>2008-02-06T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Interesting takes on the Electronic Frontier Foundation&amp;#39;s opposition to the post-grant review provisions of S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007: Senate Seeks Protection for Invalid Patents Patent Mafia&#195;&#162;&#226;&#8218;&#172;&#194;&#166;US Congress? 2. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1083824&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>White House Opposes Patent Reform Act&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Limit on Damage Calculations</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1085587&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-06:/commentary/1614550</id>
    <updated>2008-02-06T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Reform of the US Patent Act seems to be progressing toward reality as S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, moves out of committee and toward expected review by the US Senate later this month. However, this week President Bush&amp;#39;s ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1085587&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Letter from Unions Opposing Patent Reform Act of 2007.</title>
    <link href="http://anticipatethis.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/letter-from-unions-opposing-patent-reform-act-of-2007/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-06:/commentary/1594228</id>
    <updated>2008-02-06T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Anticipate This!&#8482; | Patent and Trademark... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Judge Cheng runs a non-profit organization dealing with intellectual property issues and has stated the following regarding S. 1145/HR 1908:. [I]n general the bill favors infringers and burdens patentees more. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://anticipatethis.wordpress.com/2008/02/07/letter-from-unions-opposing-patent-reform-act-of-2007/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Big bucks, big drugs and more</title>
    <link href="http://links.promotetheprogress.com/big-bucks-big-drugs-and-more/3/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-06:/commentary/1589598</id>
    <updated>2008-02-06T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Promote the Progress sitewide RSS </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Interesting takes on the Electronic Frontier Foundation&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s opposition to the post-grant review provisions of S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007:. Senate Seeks Protection for Invalid Patents. Patent Mafia&#226;&#8364;&#166;US Congress? ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://links.promotetheprogress.com/big-bucks-big-drugs-and-more/3/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>White House Opposes Patent Reform Act&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Limit on Damage Calculations</title>
    <link href="http://ipspotlight.com/2008/02/07/white-house-opposes-patent-reform-acts-limit-on-damage-calculations/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-06:/commentary/1589597</id>
    <updated>2008-02-06T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IP Spotlight </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Reform of the US Patent Act seems to be progressing toward reality as S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, moves out of committee and toward expected review by the US Senate later this month. However, this week President Bush&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipspotlight.com/2008/02/07/white-house-opposes-patent-reform-acts-limit-on-damage-calculations/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Support Senate Patent Reform and the EFF Patent Busting Project!</title>
    <link href="http://russabbott.blogspot.com/2008/02/support-senate-patent-reform-and-eff.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-06:/commentary/1580763</id>
    <updated>2008-02-06T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Blue Cat Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate is now deciding whether or not to take up S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. Among other things, the bill aims to reduce certain excessive patent infringement damages, allow third parties to file patent defeating ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://russabbott.blogspot.com/2008/02/support-senate-patent-reform-and-eff.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EFFector 21.04: Action Alert: Support Senate Patent Reform and the ...</title>
    <link href="http://lawers-spree.blogspot.com/2008/02/effector-2104-action-alert-support.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-05:/commentary/1617794</id>
    <updated>2008-02-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lawyers Spree </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While S. 1145 is generally a good and important piece of legislation, dangerous language cropped up in a draft committee report about the bill -- language that threatens the efforts of advocacy groups to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lawers-spree.blogspot.com/2008/02/effector-2104-action-alert-support.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EFFector 21.04: Action Alert: Support Senate Patent Reform and the ...</title>
    <link href="http://payday-monster.blogspot.com/2008/02/effector-2104-action-alert-support.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-05:/commentary/1604348</id>
    <updated>2008-02-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Payday Monster </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While S. 1145 is generally a good and important piece of legislation, dangerous language cropped up in a draft committee report about the bill -- language that threatens the efforts of advocacy groups to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://payday-monster.blogspot.com/2008/02/effector-2104-action-alert-support.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&amp;quot;Coalition for Patent Fairness&amp;quot; not playing fair with universities?</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/02/coalition-for-patent-fairness-not.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-05:/commentary/1604347</id>
    <updated>2008-02-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ipbiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Specifically, the Coalition circulated an article with the headline &#226;&#8364;&#339;University Concerns With S. 1145 Addressed by Bill as Reported by Committee&#226;&#8364;* and indicated that the major objections of higher education groups &#226;&#8364;&#339;have been ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/02/coalition-for-patent-fairness-not.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>United States: Patent Reform Efforts Revitalized With Release Of ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=56742" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-05:/commentary/1589599</id>
    <updated>2008-02-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq.Com - feed of articles on Intellectual... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Efforts to reform United States patent laws were revitalized on January 14, 2008, when the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary issued its draft report about the proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145), which urged the Senate to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=56742&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>News Fit to Quip Remember - no one is perfect - until they write ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.politicalfunnies.com/?p=525" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-05:/commentary/1580765</id>
    <updated>2008-02-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Untitled </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Leahy-Hatch Patent Reform Act Of 2007 (S.1145) before the USA Senate has Yongshun Cheng, deputy director of the Intellectual Property Division of the Beijing High People&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Court dancing with joy. He likes the bill because it&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politicalfunnies.com/?p=525&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>EFFector 21.04: Action Alert: Support Senate Patent Reform and the ...</title>
    <link href="http://60-second-auto-quote.blogspot.com/2008/02/effector-2104-action-alert-support.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-05:/commentary/1580764</id>
    <updated>2008-02-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>60 Second Auto Quote </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While S. 1145 is generally a good and important piece of legislation, dangerous language cropped up in a draft committee report about the bill -- language that threatens the efforts of advocacy groups to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://60-second-auto-quote.blogspot.com/2008/02/effector-2104-action-alert-support.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dirty pool in patent politics?</title>
    <link href="http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/dirty-pool-in-patent-politics/646/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-05:/commentary/1580762</id>
    <updated>2008-02-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>United States </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The rhetoric of late is at an all time high and seems to reflect the &#226;&#8364;&#339;false choice&#226;&#8364;* on innovation described by PTO Director Jon Dudas in his explanation of the Bush administration&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s letter of opposition to the Senate bill (S.1145, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/dirty-pool-in-patent-politics/646/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dudas: First quarter allowance rate at about 44%</title>
    <link href="http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/dudas-first-quarter-allowance-rate-at-about-44/644/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-05:/commentary/1575102</id>
    <updated>2008-02-05T13:48:41Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>United States </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Jon Dudas held a Q&amp;amp;amp;A with the media this morning to discuss the recently-issued Bush administration letter of opposition (.pdf) to the Senate version of The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;).  I was able to partic&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/dudas-first-quarter-allowance-rate-at-about-44/644/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Prospector: Patent Office on Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/02/patent_office_on_patent_reform.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-04:/commentary/3531486</id>
    <updated>2008-02-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Finally, the USPTO supports S. 1145's establishment of an effective, efficient post-grant patent review process as a lower-cost alternative than litigation for those who want to challenge a patent's validity. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/02/patent_office_on_patent_reform.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bush Administration Opposes S. 1145 on Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp?view=plink&amp;amp;id=261" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-04:/commentary/1603981</id>
    <updated>2008-02-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PLI Patent Practice Center RSS feed </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Last week I wrote that Robert Clarke, the Director of the Office of Legal Administration at the United States Patent Office, told those attending the Second Annual Patent Instituted sponsored by PLI that the Patent Office did not ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp?view=plink&amp;amp;id=261&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intellectual Property Management and Technology News - Feb. 05, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://healthlaw-zero.blogspot.com/2008/02/intellectual-property-management-and.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-04:/commentary/1575099</id>
    <updated>2008-02-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>HEALTH LAW </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Cybor De Novo Appellate Claim Construction (PDF) The paper analyzes Sec. 8(b) of Leahy, S. 1145, The Patent Reform Act of 2007, by providing the complete text of the relevant portions of the draft of the Committee Report. Harold Wegner ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://healthlaw-zero.blogspot.com/2008/02/intellectual-property-management-and.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dudas: S1145 creates a false choice on innovation, but balance can ...</title>
    <link href="http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/dudas-s1145-creates-a-false-choice-on-innovation-but-balance-can-be-struck/645/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-04:/commentary/1575098</id>
    <updated>2008-02-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>United States </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Jon Dudas held a Q&amp;amp;A with the media this morning to discuss the recently-issued Bush administration letter of opposition (.pdf) regarding the Senate version of The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145). Director Dudas characterized the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/dudas-s1145-creates-a-false-choice-on-innovation-but-balance-can-be-struck/645/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Act Teleconference Scheduled for Today</title>
    <link href="http://dailydoseofip.blogspot.com/2008/02/patent-reform-act-teleconference.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-04:/commentary/1575097</id>
    <updated>2008-02-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Daily Dose of IP </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This teleconference, highlighted by Jon Dudas, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO, will include a discussion on the Bush administration&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s position on S. 1145, noting that the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dailydoseofip.blogspot.com/2008/02/patent-reform-act-teleconference.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bush Administration Opposes S. 1145 on Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1079192&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-04:/commentary/1575096</id>
    <updated>2008-02-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia BlawgSearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Last week I wrote that Robert Clarke, the Director of the Office of Legal Administration at the United States Patent Office, told those attending the Second Annual Patent Instituted sponsored by PLI that the Patent Office did not ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1079192&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PubPat: Proposed Post-Grant Review Cuts-Out Public Interest</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/02/pubpat-proposed.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-04:/commentary/1569545</id>
    <updated>2008-02-04T16:13:20Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 [ Ravicher]There is a possibility that a passed Patent Reform statute would eliminate third-party-requested reexaminations ( ...   The Current Proposal Found in &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;: The proposed system of post-grant review would have t&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/02/pubpat-proposed.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Under Secretary of Commerce Dudas to Discuss Patent Reform Tomorrow</title>
    <link href="http://www.marylandiplaw.com/2008/02/articles/ip-news-and-trends/under-secretary-of-commerce-dudas-to-discuss-patent-reform-tomorrow/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-04:/commentary/1589600</id>
    <updated>2008-02-04T15:19:48Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Maryland Intellectual Property Lawyer &amp; Attorney : Brian Wm. Higgins : Serving Baltimore, Columbia, Frederick</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
      The following Notice concerning patent reform was posted on the USPTO website today. Clearly, the Bush Administration is concerned about a potential vote on the Senate's version of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marylandiplaw.com/2008/02/articles/ip-news-and-trends/under-secretary-of-commerce-dudas-to-discuss-patent-reform-tomorrow/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Administration views on S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/04/administration-views-on-s1145.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-04:/commentary/1569546</id>
    <updated>2008-02-04T08:31:04Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name> Patent Reform Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
To read the Administration's views on &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, click on the following link:   http://www.ogc.doc.gov/ogc/legreg/letters/110/S1145020408.pdf&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/04/administration-views-on-s1145.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>485 + Companies Against S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/04/485--companies-against-s1145.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-04:/commentary/1569547</id>
    <updated>2008-02-04T08:30:47Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name> Patent Reform Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
For a list of companies that do not support Patent Reform, click on the following link:   http://innovationalliance.net/files/08-047.FG-FirstDoNoHarm_r1[1].pdf&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://patentreformblog.com/2008/02/04/485--companies-against-s1145.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Baristas &#194;&#187; Bush Administration To Patent Office: Hey, Hold ...</title>
    <link href="http://patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/04/bush-administration-to-patent-office-hey-hold-up-there-mister-on-that-there-reasonable-royalty-rate/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-03:/commentary/3800986</id>
    <updated>2008-02-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patrick J. Leahy Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary, on the views of the current Administration on S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. The letter basically outlines the Administration&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s big beef with the bill, that is, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/04/bush-administration-to-patent-office-hey-hold-up-there-mister-on-that-there-reasonable-royalty-rate/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>I/P Updates: Bush Administration Views on Senate Patent Reform ...</title>
    <link href="http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/02/bush-administration-views-on-senate.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-03:/commentary/3392426</id>
    <updated>2008-02-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>I/P Updates </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Applicant Quality Submissions - &quot;[W]e appreciate S. 1145's inclusion of inequitable conduct reform language, but believe there is more to be done to ensure that patent applicants fully and fairly share relevant information with the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/02/bush-administration-views-on-senate.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Google Alert - reform</title>
    <link href="http://onlinelinks-freelinks.blogspot.com/2008/02/google-alert-reform_04.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-03:/commentary/1737244</id>
    <updated>2008-02-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Free Online Links </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
potential vote on the Senate&amp;#39;s version of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145), ... &amp;lt;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1077034&amp;amp;type=post&amp;gt; Recent Posts - Justia BlawgSearch.com &amp;lt;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/&amp;gt; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://onlinelinks-freelinks.blogspot.com/2008/02/google-alert-reform_04.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bush Administration letter hints at Reform Act veto</title>
    <link href="http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=f71bb97f-260b-401c-9900-1e755ee60182" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-03:/commentary/1575100</id>
    <updated>2008-02-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IAM Magazine - Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Consequently, we continue to oppose S. 1145 - in its entirety - unless Section 4 is significantly revised, as we believe the resulting harm to a reasonably well-functioning US intellectual property system...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iam-magazine.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=f71bb97f-260b-401c-9900-1e755ee60182&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dear Senate, Love George</title>
    <link href="http://www.addovere.com/2008/02/04/dear-senate-love-george/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-03:/commentary/1569544</id>
    <updated>2008-02-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Addo Vere </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Today, the Bush Administration weighed in on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) in a letter to the Senate. Summary. The Administration [conditionally] supports:. Applicant quality submissions provisions; Small entity exemption from ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.addovere.com/2008/02/04/dear-senate-love-george/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 9</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/02/patently-o-bits.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-03:/commentary/1569543</id>
    <updated>2008-02-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senators Spector &amp;amp; Brownback: The S.1145 &#226;&#8364;&#339;remains a work in progress;&#226;&#8364;* the damage apportionment language would create uncertainity and litigation &#226;&#8364;&#8221; especially determining an invention&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s &#226;&#8364;&#339;specific contribution over the prior art&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/02/patently-o-bits.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Letter: &#226;&#8364;&#732;Too balanced in unbalanced situation&amp;#39; (Printed Feb. 1, 2008)</title>
    <link href="http://blog.scarboroughleader.com/2008/02/01/letter-too-balanced-in-unbalanced-situation-printed-feb-1-2008.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-31:/commentary/1559435</id>
    <updated>2008-01-31T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Follow the Leader </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The HR 1908 bill, now in the US Senate as S.1145, is catastrophic for American innovation, since it narrows the definition of patent infringement; and so greatly softens the penalties so that it pays to infringe. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.scarboroughleader.com/2008/02/01/letter-too-balanced-in-unbalanced-situation-printed-feb-1-2008.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An unwitting dupe, duped again?</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/02/unwitting-dupe-duped-again.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-31:/commentary/1559434</id>
    <updated>2008-01-31T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The actual mechanism for &amp;quot;piracy&amp;quot; within the &amp;quot;second window of opposition&amp;quot; in S.1145 is in the form of a wearing down of smaller patentees. It&amp;#39;s a death by a 1000 cuts rather than a swift blow from a cutlass. On the subject of dupin&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/02/unwitting-dupe-duped-again.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Google Alert - reform</title>
    <link href="http://onlinelinks-freelinks.blogspot.com/2008/01/google-alert-reform_31.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-30:/commentary/1810798</id>
    <updated>2008-01-30T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Free Online Links </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Letters to Senators opposing patent reform By Lawrence B. Ebert(Lawrence B. Ebert) Relevant to an earlier post on IPBiz, maybe NJBiz (and others) should take note of the increasing opposition to patent reform (S.1145): ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://onlinelinks-freelinks.blogspot.com/2008/01/google-alert-reform_31.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Letters to Senators Oppose Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://digg.com/politics/Letters_to_Senators_Oppose_Patent_Reform" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-30:/commentary/1555272</id>
    <updated>2008-01-30T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Digg / World &amp;amp; Business / upcoming </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The rising tide has now become a flood of US universities, businesses, and individuals in opposition to the patent &amp;quot;reform&amp;quot; bill poised for a vote in the Senate (S. 1145).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/politics/Letters_to_Senators_Oppose_Patent_Reform&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Letters Keep Coming Over the Senate Transom</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/the-letters-kee.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-30:/commentary/1550185</id>
    <updated>2008-01-30T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Noonan -- The rising tide has now become a flood of US universities, businesses, and individuals in opposition to the patent &amp;quot;reform&amp;quot; bill poised for a vote in the Senate (S. 1145). And the mechanism for this opposition is the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/the-letters-kee.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/s1145.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-30:/commentary/1550187</id>
    <updated>2008-01-30T16:48:15Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name> Patent Reform Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Senate Leadership Reaffirms Commitment to Passing Patent Reform Legislation. Amid media commentary that patent reform legislation is dead, Senate leadership on December 18, 2007 reaffirmed their commitment to passing patent reform legislation in 2008. See &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/s1145.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Judiciary Committee's Report on S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/senate-judiciary-committees-report-on-s1145.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-30:/commentary/1550188</id>
    <updated>2008-01-30T16:28:51Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name> Patent Reform Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee's Report on &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt; can be found here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/senate-judiciary-committees-report-on-s1145.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform - Not Good for Americans</title>
    <link href="http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-30:/commentary/1550189</id>
    <updated>2008-01-30T14:01:48Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name> Patent Reform Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
  As you know, Congress has already passed HR1908. Now the bill (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;) is in front of the Senate, and they looked poised to pass it for Presidential review. It is important that as concerned&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://patentreformblog.com/2008/01/30/patent-reform.aspx&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1145/show" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-30:/commentary/1550190</id>
    <updated>2008-01-30T13:10:17Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>OpenCongress</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;   Patent Reform Act of 2007  introduced Apr. 18, 2007   13 posts     See more bills  Bills Most Covered in the News(Past Seven Days)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1145/show&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Draft Report on Senate Patent Reform Bill: Interlocutory Decisions ...</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1064361&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-29:/commentary/1544733</id>
    <updated>2008-01-29T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Untitled </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Mark Chael -- As we reported two weeks ago, a draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee&amp;#39;s report on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) has been circulated on the internet. The 106-page draft report contains sections on the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1064361&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform down to four sticking points?</title>
    <link href="http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/patent-reform-down-to-four-sticking-points/641/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-29:/commentary/1569548</id>
    <updated>2008-01-29T15:51:11Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>United States </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 According to Hewlett-Packard Co. General Counsel Mark Holston, the comprehensive approach to patent reform, which has now spanned several Congressional sessions and is currently styled as &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, is &#8220;down to four stickin&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://unitedstates.promotetheprogress.com/patent-reform-down-to-four-sticking-points/641/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Draft Report on Senate Patent Reform Bill: Interlocutory Decisions ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/draft-report--8.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-28:/commentary/1607799</id>
    <updated>2008-01-28T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Mark Chael -- As we reported two weeks ago, a draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee&amp;#39;s report on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) has been circulated on the internet. The 106-page draft report contains sections on the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/draft-report--8.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intellectual Property Management and Technology News - Jan 29, 2008</title>
    <link href="http://healthlaw-zero.blogspot.com/2008/01/intellectual-property-management-and_29.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-28:/commentary/1544734</id>
    <updated>2008-01-28T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>HEALTH LAW </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
8(b) of Leahy, S. 1145, The Patent Reform Act of 2007, by providing the complete text of the relevant portions of the draft of the Committee Report. Harold Wegner At The Razor&amp;#39;s Edge Prosecuting And Defending Against Patent Infringement ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://healthlaw-zero.blogspot.com/2008/01/intellectual-property-management-and_29.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Alexander Poltorak: Check Your Facts</title>
    <link href="http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/2008/01/alexander-poltorak-check-your-facts.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-28:/commentary/1535456</id>
    <updated>2008-01-28T00:01:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Troll Tracker</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Alexander Poltorak is CEO of General Patent Corp., an IP licensing shop I featured some time ago, nicknaming them &quot;Acacia of the East&quot; ( ...  of patent reform to the Senate leadership, urging passage of &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;. Those letter&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/2008/01/alexander-poltorak-check-your-facts.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FDALegislativeWatch: Senators Oppose Patent Reform Provisions; GSK ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/01/senators-oppose.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-27:/commentary/3392430</id>
    <updated>2008-01-27T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FDALegislativeWatch </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In its letter to Leahy and Specter, GSK applauds the Judiciary Committee for not giving the PTO substantative rulemaking authority in S. 1145 as the House bill on patent reform does. The company adds in a footnote that it is also ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2008/01/senators-oppose.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Patent Reform Bill on Prior Art Grace Period</title>
    <link href="http://www.lawnewsonline.net/2008/01/28/senate-patent-reform-bill-on-prior-art-grace-period/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-27:/commentary/1538326</id>
    <updated>2008-01-27T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Law News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As noted in the Congressional Reserach Service (&amp;amp;#34;CRS&amp;amp;#34;) Report on Patnet Reform,S. 1145 would change the current grace period by causing it only to apply to patent applicants themselves. Under this Read full entry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawnewsonline.net/2008/01/28/senate-patent-reform-bill-on-prior-art-grace-period/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 7</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/01/patently-o-bi-6.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-27:/commentary/1535457</id>
    <updated>2008-01-27T13:43:17Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Patent Reform: The Senate has now placed the Patent Reform Act (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;) on the senate Calendar.  Link .  &#8220;Minority views&#8221; have been filed but are not yet available.  BPAI Composition: The CAFC&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/01/patently-o-bi-6.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wegner: S.1145 to kill Cybor de novo review?</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1058885&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-26:/commentary/1550184</id>
    <updated>2008-01-26T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Harold Wegner has a post on IPFrontline suggesting an impact of S.1145 on Cybor, 138 F.3d 1448. Wegner describes the Leahy approach in S.1145 as taking a sledgehammer to a problem that could be fixed with a surgical needle. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1058885&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 7</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1059192&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-26:/commentary/1535455</id>
    <updated>2008-01-26T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia BlawgSearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Reform: The Senate has now placed the Patent Reform Act (S.1145) on the senate Calendar. [Link]. &amp;quot;Minority views&amp;quot; have been filed but are not yet available. BPAI Composition: The CAFC has denied an en banc request in the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1059192&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Wegner: S.1145 to kill Cybor de novo review?</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/01/wegner-s1145-to-kill-cybor-de-novo.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-26:/commentary/1535454</id>
    <updated>2008-01-26T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Harold Wegner has a post on IPFrontline suggesting an impact of S.1145 on Cybor, 138 F.3d 1448. Wegner describes the Leahy approach in S.1145 as taking a sledgehammer to a problem that could be fixed with a surgical needle. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/01/wegner-s1145-to-kill-cybor-de-novo.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CRS Report on Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/01/crs-report-on-patent-reform.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-25:/commentary/1532790</id>
    <updated>2008-01-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>I/P Updates </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Report concisely reviews the two currently pending bills: House of Representatives, HR 1908, titled the Patent Reform Act of 2007, was introduced on April 17, 2007, and passed the House on September 7, 2007; ans Senate, S. 1145 ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/01/crs-report-on-patent-reform.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CRS Report - Patent Reform in the 110th Congress.</title>
    <link href="http://anticipatethis.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/crs-report-patent-reform-in-the-110th-congress/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-25:/commentary/1532789</id>
    <updated>2008-01-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Anticipate This!&#8482; | Patent and Trademark... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The 46-page report covers both similarities and differences between HR 1908 (having already passed the House) and S. 1145 (widely predicted to pass the Senate this term). For example, the below chart provided by the report nicely lays ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://anticipatethis.wordpress.com/2008/01/26/crs-report-patent-reform-in-the-110th-congress/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Judiciary&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Draft Report on Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.techlawforum.net/patent-reform/in-the-news/senate-judiciary-draft-patent-reform/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-24:/commentary/1523024</id>
    <updated>2008-01-24T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tech LawForum Patent Reform </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate Judiciary Committee recently released a draft report on the status and amendments to the Senate version of the Patent Reform bill, otherwise known as S. 1145. The report details the history of the bill and enumerates the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techlawforum.net/patent-reform/in-the-news/senate-judiciary-draft-patent-reform/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Patent Reform Bill: Interlocutory Appeals of Claim ...</title>
    <link href="http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/01/senate-patent-reform-bill-interlocutory.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-24:/commentary/1523023</id>
    <updated>2008-01-24T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>I/P Updates </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Section 8 of the 106-page draft report of the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) provides for Interlocutory appeals of claim construction orders, giving district court judges discretion to certify ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/01/senate-patent-reform-bill-interlocutory.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Non-Smoking</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/01/nonsmoking.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-23:/commentary/1538327</id>
    <updated>2008-01-23T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... predictions are spreading around Washington, DC that Senator Leahy now has slightly more than the 60 votes needed for cloture - the procedural vote to permit rapid Senate passage of Leahy, S. 1145 patent reform legislation. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/01/nonsmoking.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Draft Report on Senate Patent Reform Bill: Applicant Quality ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/draft-report--6.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-23:/commentary/1532791</id>
    <updated>2008-01-23T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Kevin E. Noonan -- As we reported last week, a draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee&amp;#39;s report on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) has been circulated on the internet. The 106-page draft report contains sections on the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/draft-report--6.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What Does First-To-File Mean To Me?</title>
    <link href="http://informationtree.com/communicate/what-does-first-to-file-mean-to-me/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-22:/commentary/1614551</id>
    <updated>2008-01-22T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Work at Home Business Ideas </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As we reported earlier, the Senate&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Committee on the Judiciary, has issued its draft report on the Patent Reform bill (S. 1145), to amend the patent laws currently in Title 35 of the United States Code. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://informationtree.com/communicate/what-does-first-to-file-mean-to-me/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Business Ideas Jan 23</title>
    <link href="http://www.magandamagazine.com/2008/01/business-ideas-jan-23.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-22:/commentary/1575101</id>
    <updated>2008-01-22T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Ideas for Young Entrepreneur </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
PatentBaristas.com: As we reported earlier, the Senate&amp;#39;s Committee on the Judiciary, has issued its draft report on the Patent Reform bill (S. 1145), to amend the patent laws currently in Title 35 of the United States Code. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.magandamagazine.com/2008/01/business-ideas-jan-23.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What Does First-To-File Mean To Me?</title>
    <link href="http://www.business-opportunities.biz/2008/01/23/what-does-first-to-file-mean-to-me/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-22:/commentary/1518930</id>
    <updated>2008-01-22T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Opportunities Weblog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As we reported earlier, the Senate&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Committee on the Judiciary, has issued its draft report on the Patent Reform bill (S. 1145), to amend the patent laws currently in Title 35 of the United States Code. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.business-opportunities.biz/2008/01/23/what-does-first-to-file-mean-to-me/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Damages Apportionment Blowback</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/01/damages_apportionment_blowback_1.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-22:/commentary/1514310</id>
    <updated>2008-01-22T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
What appears new in the current incarnation of S. 1145 is prescription for methods determining &amp;quot;reasonable royalty,&amp;quot; particularly apportionment of damages if the value of infringement falls short of the whole infringing product. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/01/damages_apportionment_blowback_1.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Is RED One Really a 4K Camera?</title>
    <link href="http://so1g.kittann.com/Is-RED-One-Really-a-4K-Camera/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-22:/commentary/1514309</id>
    <updated>2008-01-22T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>software </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On December 18, Senators Patrick Leahy and Orrin Hatch briefly addressed the Senate version (S. 1145) of the Patent Reform Act during a floor speech. While the speeches were not very detailed, they suggested two things - (1) the Senate ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://so1g.kittann.com/Is-RED-One-Really-a-4K-Camera/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Draft Report on Senate Patent Reform Bill: Post-Grant Procedures</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/draft-report--5.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-22:/commentary/1514308</id>
    <updated>2008-01-22T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Sherri Oslick -- As we reported last week, a draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee&amp;#39;s report on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) has been circulated on the internet. The 106-page draft report contains sections on the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/draft-report--5.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Patent Reform Bill on Post-Grant Review</title>
    <link href="http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/01/senate-patent-reform-bill-on-post-grant.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-22:/commentary/1514306</id>
    <updated>2008-01-22T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>I/P Updates </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Noonan at Patent Docs for recently posting his analyses of the 106-page draft report of the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) which, under Section 5, would create a new post-grant review (PGR) system ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/01/senate-patent-reform-bill-on-post-grant.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Senate Mailbox Filling with Letters against Passage of Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1051583&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-22:/commentary/1514305</id>
    <updated>2008-01-22T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia BlawgSearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Noonan -- It appears that rising chorus of naysayers against S. 1145 is larger than we thought. After our post on Friday, Patent Docs has been contacted by two other groups who have organized a letter-writing campaign to Senate leaders ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1051583&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Legislation Update</title>
    <link href="http://www.techliberation.com/archives/043251.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-21:/commentary/1518931</id>
    <updated>2008-01-21T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Technology Liberation Front </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patrick Leahy (D-VT) will attempt to pass a revised version of S. 1145 in the Senate in February. Major amendments likely will not be available more than a few days in advance of Senate consideration....If the Senate does pass a bill, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techliberation.com/archives/043251.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patently-O Bits and Bytes</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/01/patently-o-bi-3.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-21:/commentary/1514307</id>
    <updated>2008-01-21T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Reform: The influential Intellectual Property Owners association (IPO) recently reported its belief that the Senator Leahy will &#226;&#8364;&#339;attempt to pass a revised version of S. 1145 in the Senate in February. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/01/patently-o-bi-3.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Patent Reform Bill on First-To-File</title>
    <link href="http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/01/senate-patent-reform-bill-on-first-to.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-21:/commentary/1510927</id>
    <updated>2008-01-21T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>I/P Updates </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Noonan at Patent Docs for discussing the first-to-file provisions of the 106-page draft report of the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) which, under Section 2, converts the United States&#226;&#8364;&#8482; patent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/01/senate-patent-reform-bill-on-first-to.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Draft Report on Senate Patent Reform Bill: Inequitable Conduct ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/draft-report--4.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-20:/commentary/1526896</id>
    <updated>2008-01-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Kevin E. Noonan -- As we reported last week, a draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee&amp;#39;s report on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) has been circulated on the internet. The 106-page draft report contains sections on the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/draft-report--4.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Draft Report on Senate Patent Reform Bill: Inequitable Conduct ...</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1049012&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-20:/commentary/1510928</id>
    <updated>2008-01-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia BlawgSearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Noonan -- As we reported last week, a draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee&amp;#39;s report on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) has been circulated on the internet. The 106-page draft report contains sections on the background and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1049012&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>www.video.google.com</title>
    <link href="http://onlinemelodylesourd.blogspot.com/2008/01/wwwvideogooglecom.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-18:/commentary/1503336</id>
    <updated>2008-01-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>online melody lesourd </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Pike, click to (See, Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act of 2005 [S. 1145]). TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview NPN director Rev. Ted Pike on the danger of the federal hate law. Call 503-631-3808. NATIONAL PRAYER NETWORK, PO Box 828, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://onlinemelodylesourd.blogspot.com/2008/01/wwwvideogooglecom.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Senate Mailbox Filling with Letters against Passage of Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/us-senate-mailb.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-18:/commentary/1498456</id>
    <updated>2008-01-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Noonan -- A rising chorus of naysayers from the patent bar, industry, and international opinion is beseeching the Senate leadership and the Chairman and ranking Republican member of the Judiciary committee not to pass S. 1145, so-called ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/us-senate-mailb.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Senate Mailbox Filling with Letters against Passage of Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1043220&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-17:/commentary/1503334</id>
    <updated>2008-01-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia BlawgSearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Noonan -- A rising chorus of naysayers from the patent bar, industry, and international opinion is beseeching the Senate leadership and the Chairman and ranking Republican member of the Judiciary committee not to pass S. 1145, so-called ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1043220&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NEWS REPORT: GSK Letter to Leahy &amp;amp; Spector</title>
    <link href="http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp?view=plink&amp;amp;id=238" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-17:/commentary/1498457</id>
    <updated>2008-01-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PLI Patent Practice Center RSS feed </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... of a GlaxoSmithKline letter dated January 16, 2008, which was delivered on January 17, 2007, sent from GlaxoSmithKline to Senators Leahy and Spector regarding the Senate Judiciary Report on the Patent Reform Bill (S. 1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp?view=plink&amp;amp;id=238&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Draft Report on Senate Patent Reform Bill: First Inventor to File ...</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1040745&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-17:/commentary/1474533</id>
    <updated>2008-01-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Recent Posts - Justia BlawgSearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Noonan -- As we reported on Monday, a draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee&amp;#39;s report on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) has begun to circulate on the internet. The 106-page draft report contains sections on the background and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=1040745&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Draft Report on Senate Patent Reform Bill: First Inventor to File ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/draft-report--3.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-16:/commentary/1507055</id>
    <updated>2008-01-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Kevin E. Noonan -- As we reported on Monday, a draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee&amp;#39;s report on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) has begun to circulate on the internet. The 106-page draft report contains sections on the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/draft-report--3.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Deform Ahead?</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/01/deform_ahead.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-16:/commentary/1474534</id>
    <updated>2008-01-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, has three primary goals: (i) to improve patent quality and the patent application process; (ii) to improve and clarify several aspects of patent litigation, including the creation of a less ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/01/deform_ahead.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Draft Report on Senate Patent Reform Bill: Assignee Filings ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/draft-report--2.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-16:/commentary/1465360</id>
    <updated>2008-01-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
By Donald Zuhn -- As we reported on Monday, a draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee&amp;#39;s report on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) has begun to circulate on the internet. The 106-page draft report contains sections on the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2008/01/draft-report--2.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform and the Ethos of the American Inventor</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/01/patent-reform-a.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-16:/commentary/1465358</id>
    <updated>2008-01-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Bill (S.1145) is intended to fix an understandable problem &#226;&#8364;&#8221; that of inventors who fail to fulfill their contractual obligation to assign patent rights to the Corporate owner. This is a serious problem as shown by the current issue ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/01/patent-reform-a.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>25 new messages in 24 topics - digest</title>
    <link href="http://askelvis.net/blog/pamc2/2008/01/25-new-messages-in-24-topics-digest_16.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-15:/commentary/1503337</id>
    <updated>2008-01-15T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Hanging in there </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While the Senate&amp;#39;s proposed &amp;quot;Patent Reform Act of 2007&amp;quot; (S.1145) will likely | wait until the early months of 2008 for further consideration, lawmakers have | introduced an additional proposal that may be offered as an additional ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://askelvis.net/blog/pamc2/2008/01/25-new-messages-in-24-topics-digest_16.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>25 new messages in 24 topics - digest</title>
    <link href="http://askelvis.net/blog/pamc1/2008/01/25-new-messages-in-24-topics-digest.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-15:/commentary/1474535</id>
    <updated>2008-01-15T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Hang out. Get Paid </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While the Senate&amp;#39;s proposed &amp;quot;Patent Reform Act of 2007&amp;quot; (S.1145) will likely | wait until the early months of 2008 for further consideration, lawmakers have | introduced an additional proposal that may be offered as an additional ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://askelvis.net/blog/pamc1/2008/01/25-new-messages-in-24-topics-digest.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Unpredictable Politics of Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/01/unpredictable-politics-of-patent-reform.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-15:/commentary/1465361</id>
    <updated>2008-01-15T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>I/P Updates </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s report on S. 1145 is available from the Intellectual Property Owners association which is in the delicate position of having membership from both camps. &amp;quot;IPO does not necessarily agree with ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2008/01/unpredictable-politics-of-patent-reform.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 2</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/01/patently-o-bi-1.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-15:/commentary/1465371</id>
    <updated>2008-01-15T07:48:10Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 Patent Reform: A draft report on &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt; is available here.   via PatentDocs . Although currently supported by more Democrats than Republicans, this is a bipartisan bill that could pass. A summary&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/01/patently-o-bi-1.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Draft Committee Report on The Patent Reform Act of 2007.</title>
    <link href="http://akamu.tekk.org/uncategorized/draft-committee-report-on-the-patent-reform-act-of-2007/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-14:/commentary/1538328</id>
    <updated>2008-01-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>akamu&#180;s favorites </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
I. Background and Purpose of S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007 II. History of the Bill and Committee Consideration III. Section-by-Section Summary of the Bill IV. Cost Estimate V. Regulatory Impact Evaluation ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://akamu.tekk.org/uncategorized/draft-committee-report-on-the-patent-reform-act-of-2007/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Draft Report of S. 1145 is (Unofficially) Available</title>
    <link href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/01/draft-report-of-s-1145-is-unofficially.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-14:/commentary/1465357</id>
    <updated>2008-01-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Peter Zura&amp;#39;s 271 Patent Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The IPO recently reported that a draft of the Senate Judiciary Committee&amp;#39;s report on S. 1145 has been circulated in the Washington lobbying community and on the internet. The draft report provides some interesting insight on the bill ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://271patent.blogspot.com/2008/01/draft-report-of-s-1145-is-unofficially.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>United States: Senate Seeks To Prohibit The Grant Of Future ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=55958" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-13:/commentary/1465359</id>
    <updated>2008-01-13T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq.Com - feed of articles on Intellectual... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While the Senate&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s proposed &#226;&#8364;&#339;Patent Reform Act of 2007&#226;&#8364;* (S.1145) will likely wait until the early months of 2008 for further consideration, lawmakers have introduced an additional proposal that may be offered as an additional amendment ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=55958&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fervor</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/01/fervor.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-07:/commentary/1507057</id>
    <updated>2008-01-07T23:30:13Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
  Let us praise CEO Jean-Pierre Garnier and IP VP Sherry Knowles of GlaxoSmithKline for carrying the torch as they scorch Senate Judiciary Committee ... . 2d 652 (E.D. Va. 2007)  GSK notes that &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, as reported out of th&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2008/01/fervor.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Washington State Patent Law Blog: Senators Discuss Need for Urgent ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.wapatents.com/2007/12/senators-discuss-need-for-urgent.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-25:/commentary/3392428</id>
    <updated>2007-12-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Washington State Patent Law Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
We again jointly introduced comprehensive patent reform this Congress in the form of S. 1145 in April of this year. Both bills had their foundations in numerous hearings with the testimony of dozens of witnesses and in innumerable ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wapatents.com/2007/12/senators-discuss-need-for-urgent.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Discussed on Senate Floor</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2007/12/patent-reform-d.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-22:/commentary/1465375</id>
    <updated>2007-12-22T00:38:57Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Docs</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Reform Discussed on Senate Floor        By Donald Zuhn --  [ Senchmb] On Tuesday, Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VT) ... .  Senator Leahy, the sponsor of the Senate patent reform bill (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;), opened the discussion by no&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentdocs.net/patent_docs/2007/12/patent-reform-d.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>United States: Patent Reform Legislation Stalled - McDermott Will &amp;amp; Emery</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=55046" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-17:/commentary/1474537</id>
    <updated>2007-12-17T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Articles on All Regions, Law, Accountancy, Management Consultancy Issues</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On November 7, six consumer groups sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell urging them to bring &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt; to the floor for a vote.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=55046&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>I N V E N T O R S' V O I C E [tm]: The REAL Purpose of S.1145/H.R. ...</title>
    <link href="http://inventorsvoice.blogspot.com/2007/10/real-purpose-of-s1145hr1908-patent.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-15:/commentary/3363448</id>
    <updated>2007-12-15T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>INVENTORS' VOICE [tm] </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1145 was RUSHED THROUGH COMMITTEE, before the Senators could DISCOVER that Nothing in it helps American Inventors or Invention or Innovation. And NOTHING IN IT is Good for America! It will only benefit its Gargantuan Goliath ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://inventorsvoice.blogspot.com/2007/10/real-purpose-of-s1145hr1908-patent.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proposed Patent Laws have a lot of fans (in China)</title>
    <link href="http://community.livejournal.com/patentgeeks/12172.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-12:/commentary/1465365</id>
    <updated>2007-12-12T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Got a Question? </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A semi-official analysis by the Beijing IP Institute of S.1145 and HR1908 is available at http://docs.PIAUSA.org/ChinaAnalysis12-4-07/. ; The author is Mr. Cheng Yongshun, one of China&amp;#39;s top IP experts and someone involved with ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://community.livejournal.com/patentgeeks/12172.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>News Flash! &amp;quot;Inventors&amp;quot; Oppose Patent Reform!</title>
    <link href="http://blog.mises.org/archives/007517.asp" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-12-09:/commentary/1465364</id>
    <updated>2007-12-09T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mises Economics Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;quot;These changes [to be wrought by the Patent Reform Act of 2007, S.1145], we believe, will erode much of the value of US patents, especially for independent inventors and small businesses, which currently create about 40% of the new ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.mises.org/archives/007517.asp&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dangerous &amp;quot;Hate&amp;quot; Laws</title>
    <link href="http://thenickmarkbrianreport.blogspot.com/2007/11/dangerous-hate-laws.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-25:/commentary/1465366</id>
    <updated>2007-11-25T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Nick, Mark, and Brian&amp;#39;s Reports </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The recent &amp;quot;Hate Bill,&amp;quot; a legislation [S.1145] devised to punish violent bias-motivated crimes, is extremely dangerous. This law is a drastic reinterpretation of federal authority, and is so vague that any crime between two people that ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thenickmarkbrianreport.blogspot.com/2007/11/dangerous-hate-laws.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CrunchGear &#194;&#187; Archive &#194;&#187; PatentMonkey: Patent Reform More than Just ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-09:/commentary/3614036</id>
    <updated>2007-11-09T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CrunchGear </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1145 is being RUSHED THROUGH COMMITTEE, before the Senators CAN DISCOVER that Nothing in it helps American Inventors or Invention or Innovation. And NOTHING IN IT is Good for America! It will only benefit its Goliath Multi- National ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crunchgear.com/2007/07/24/patentmonkey-patent-reform-more-than-just-in-the-air/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Consumer Groups Ask Senate to Take Up Patent Bill | Public Knowledge</title>
    <link href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1258" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-07:/commentary/3427869</id>
    <updated>2007-11-07T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Public Knowledge - Blogging, Events, and... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1145 takes a significant first step towards improving patent quality and reducing the costs and uncertainties of litigation. We greatly appreciate the Senate taking up this vital issue and wish to comment specifically on a few of its ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1258&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>VCs seek changes in S. 1145 on patent reform</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/11/vcs-seek-changes-in-s-1145-on-patent.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-07:/commentary/1465362</id>
    <updated>2007-11-07T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On November 6, 2007 a letter went out to Senators Leahy and Specter expressing concern on the present state of S. 1145 on patent reform. It was signed by a number of venture capital [VC] firms, including Kleiner Perkins ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/11/vcs-seek-changes-in-s-1145-on-patent.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Law News</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/11/patent-law-news.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-11-04:/commentary/1317511</id>
    <updated>2007-11-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1145: As the Senate Judiciary committee gets rolling again. Now is the time to contact your Senator to discuss the pros and cons of various aspects of patent reform. [Contact] Interestingly, the Senate has disbanded its Judiciary ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/11/patent-law-news.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1145: Patent Reform Act of 2007 - Update. &#194;&#171; Anticipate This ...</title>
    <link href="http://anticipatethis.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/s-1145-patent-reform-act-of-2007-update/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-31:/commentary/3392416</id>
    <updated>2007-10-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Anticipate This!&#8482; | Patent and Trademark... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1145 is presently being considered by the Senate. The bill is sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy [D-VT], Sen. Robert Bennett [R-UT], Sen. John Cornyn [R-TX], Sen. Larry Craig [R-ID], Sen. Michael Crapo [R-ID], Sen. Orrin Hatch [R-UT], ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://anticipatethis.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/s-1145-patent-reform-act-of-2007-update/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform in the Senate</title>
    <link href="http://factoidsonline.info/blogs/patent-law/20359/patent-reform-in-the-senate/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-30:/commentary/1317518</id>
    <updated>2007-10-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent law </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Although the Democrats have been more strongly supporting patent reform, the Senate Bill (S.1145) is clearly bi-partisan. Co-Sponsors include the following Republicans: Orrin Hatch; John Cornyn...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://factoidsonline.info/blogs/patent-law/20359/patent-reform-in-the-senate/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Harry, Pay Attention Please</title>
    <link href="http://choateweinberg.typepad.com/the_choateweinberg_report/2007/10/harry-pay-atten.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-30:/commentary/1317516</id>
    <updated>2007-10-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Choate-Weinberg Report </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Now, the bill is before the Senate as S. 1145. In a era when we are losing our manufacturing base and much of our traditional service work, such as accounting, to off shoring, weakening America&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s capacity to create new industries and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://choateweinberg.typepad.com/the_choateweinberg_report/2007/10/harry-pay-atten.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Bill To Impede Independent Inventors</title>
    <link href="http://www.floridaipblog.com/archives/-advanced-patent-issues-patent-reform-bill-to-impede-independent-inventors.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-29:/commentary/1317514</id>
    <updated>2007-10-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Florida Intellectual Property Law Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
An important Patent Reform Bill (S.1145) is under consideration in the Senate, and it carries with it serious implications for independent entrepreneurs and small businesses. Topping my list of concerns: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.floridaipblog.com/archives/-advanced-patent-issues-patent-reform-bill-to-impede-independent-inventors.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Bill To Hurt Independent Entrepreneurs</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=875870&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-29:/commentary/1317512</id>
    <updated>2007-10-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia BlawgSearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
An important Patent Reform Bill (S.1145) is under consideration in the Senate, and it carries with it serious implications for independent entrepreneurs and small businesses. At the top of my list of concerns are these: those in the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=875870&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform in the Senate</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/10/patent-reform-i.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-29:/commentary/1465376</id>
    <updated>2007-10-29T12:13:04Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 The Senate continues an internal struggle over patent reform ...  supporting patent reform, the Senate Bill (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;) is clearly bi-partisan. Co-Sponsors include&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/10/patent-reform-i.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Martek wins patent cases</title>
    <link href="http://tenpinbilliards.com/2007/10/martek-wins-patent-cases/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-24:/commentary/1278533</id>
    <updated>2007-10-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Todays News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Institute (CHI) today joined more than 430 companies, associations, venture capital firms, research institutes and universities in voicing concerns that certain provisions included in patent reform legislation (S. 1145, The ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tenpinbilliards.com/2007/10/martek-wins-patent-cases/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Debate Still Underway</title>
    <link href="http://techpolicysummit.blogs.com/tech_policy_summit/2007/10/post-6.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-23:/commentary/1273683</id>
    <updated>2007-10-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tech Policy Summit blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It&amp;#39;s been over six weeks since the House of Representatives passed the Patent Reform Act of 2007, and the focus now is on what the Senate will do with its patent reform bill, S. 1145. While the Senate Judiciary Committee approved S. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://techpolicysummit.blogs.com/tech_policy_summit/2007/10/post-6.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Round 2: Tech Companies Clash in Senate over S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2007/10/round-2-tech-companies-clash-in-senate_8174.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-23:/commentary/1273682</id>
    <updated>2007-10-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Peter Zura&amp;#39;s 271 Patent Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
While we welcome efforts to make improvements to the US patent system, we must make clear our opposition to S. 1145 as approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee. This bill contains provisions that will create uncertainty and weaken the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://271patent.blogspot.com/2007/10/round-2-tech-companies-clash-in-senate_8174.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Persistent Patent Reform Foes</title>
    <link href="http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/10/persistent_patent_reform_foes.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-22:/commentary/1269433</id>
    <updated>2007-10-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tech Daily Dose </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1145 already passed the Senate Judiciary Committee and a companion bill was approved by the House -- but resistance to the bill persists. The letter was signed by stakeholders in every US state and the District of Columbia in a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/10/persistent_patent_reform_foes.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Judiciary committee to hold hearings about federally-funded university research and patents</title>
    <link href="http://www.Filewrapper.com/index.cfm/2007/10/22/Sente-Judiciary-committee-to-hold-hearings-about-federallyfunded-university-research-and-patents" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-22:/commentary/1265881</id>
    <updated>2007-10-22T16:30:16Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Filewrapper.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 On Wednesday at 1:30 eastern time, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold hearings entitled &quot; ...  to be related to the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;), which has yet to be brought up in the Senate since&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.Filewrapper.com/index.cfm/2007/10/22/Sente-Judiciary-committee-to-hold-hearings-about-federallyfunded-university-research-and-patents&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What are the Issues in Bill S. 1145?</title>
    <link href="http://inventorsvoice.blogspot.com/2007/10/what-are-specific-issues-in-bill-s-1145.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-19:/commentary/1465363</id>
    <updated>2007-10-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>INVENTORS&amp;#39; VOICE [tm] </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Any one of the issues in S. 1145, alone, would be a major change to the US patent system. Many of the proposed changes in the Patent Reform Act of 2007 are tied-in to the worldwide &#226;&#8364;&#339;first-to-file&#226;&#8364;* system. This first-to-file &#226;&#8364;&#339;package of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://inventorsvoice.blogspot.com/2007/10/what-are-specific-issues-in-bill-s-1145.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Specific Information about Bill S. 1145 &amp;quot;Patent Reform Act of 2007&amp;quot;</title>
    <link href="http://inventorsvoice.blogspot.com/2007/10/specific-information-about-bill-s-1145.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-18:/commentary/1253865</id>
    <updated>2007-10-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>INVENTORS&amp;#39; VOICE [tm] </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
See an Overview of Bill S. 1145 at GovTrack.US Read a Summary of Bill S. 1145 at GovTrack.US Read and/or download the actual entire Bill S. 1145 in PDF Format.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://inventorsvoice.blogspot.com/2007/10/specific-information-about-bill-s-1145.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PatentCafe Announces First Software Application for US Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://infringement.blogs.com/philip_brooks_patent_infr/2007/10/patentcafe-anno.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-18:/commentary/1253864</id>
    <updated>2007-10-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Philip Brooks&amp;#39; Patent Infringement Updates </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The web-based application enables fast, cost-effective compliance with US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rules and search requirements in HR1908 and S.1145, the proposed Patent Reform Act. The Patent Office Rules, which take effect ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://infringement.blogs.com/philip_brooks_patent_infr/2007/10/patentcafe-anno.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform/Repercussions to Be Watched - BostonHerald.com ...</title>
    <link href="http://biosink.blogspot.com/2007/10/patent-reformrepercussions-to-be.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-17:/commentary/1244782</id>
    <updated>2007-10-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>biosink </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1145 is the proposed Senate bill and HR 1908, passed in September, is the House of Representatives bill. Research-intensive industries such as pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, which rely on strong patent rights, are very concerned ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://biosink.blogspot.com/2007/10/patent-reformrepercussions-to-be.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Politics</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/10/patent-politics.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-12:/commentary/1229816</id>
    <updated>2007-10-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O) </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Reform 2007: S.1145 is still hanging around the senate waiting for a couple of hours on the floor where it can be passed without debate&#226;&#8364;&#166;The Bill is still in the Judiciary Committee, but it will move quickly if proponents can find ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/10/patent-politics.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Hucksters</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2007/10/hucksters.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-11:/commentary/1225656</id>
    <updated>2007-10-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Growers Association (ACGA) has commended the actions of Senators Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Arlen Specter, R-Pa., as well as the Senate Judiciary Committee for recently completing action on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2007/10/hucksters.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Corn Growers: Better Late Than Never?</title>
    <link href="http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/10/corn_growers_better_late_than.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-11:/commentary/1225655</id>
    <updated>2007-10-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tech Daily Dose </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1145 would raise standards for &amp;quot;willfulness&amp;quot; and revise rules to prevent so-called &amp;quot;forum shopping&amp;quot; for courts. ACGA urged quick passage of the Senate bill, which the association believes would &amp;quot;help level the playing field for f&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/10/corn_growers_better_late_than.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Washington Post editorial: Patent Fight</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/10/washington-post-editorial-patent-fight.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-10-07:/commentary/1209232</id>
    <updated>2007-10-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
This would provide a needed opportunity to weed out low-quality patents. The editorial does NOT mention the already existing re-examination procedure, or the &amp;quot;second window&amp;quot; still in S. 1145.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/10/washington-post-editorial-patent-fight.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No-Part Harmony</title>
    <link href="http://www.inveslogic.com/sectors/directory/drug-wonks/906693?rsstype=latest&amp;amp;cid=12" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-27:/commentary/1236481</id>
    <updated>2007-09-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Biotechnology Sector - Latest Expert Blog... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) seeks to harmonize the American patent system with those of other nations. But, as Kevin Kearns of the US Business and Industry Council has written, do we really need to be harmonized with a ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inveslogic.com/sectors/directory/drug-wonks/906693?rsstype=latest&amp;amp;cid=12&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No-Part Harmony</title>
    <link href="http://drugwonks.com/2007/09/nopart_harmony.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-27:/commentary/1192888</id>
    <updated>2007-09-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>drugwonks </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) seeks to &#226;&#8364;&#339;harmonize&#226;&#8364;* the American patent system with those of other nations. But, as Kevin Kearns of the US Business and Industry Council has written, &#226;&#8364;&#339;do we really need to be &amp;quot;harmonized&amp;quot; wi&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drugwonks.com/2007/09/nopart_harmony.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mcdermott Will</title>
    <link href="http://mcdermott-will-901.blogspot.com/2007/09/mcdermott-will-on-august-21-2007-us.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-24:/commentary/1192893</id>
    <updated>2007-09-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mcdermott Will </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The momentum behind the most recent patent reform bill, S. 1145 and HR 1908, known as the Patent Reform Act of 2002 (the Act), appears to be slowing as a group of senators have called for a delay in implementing the legislation. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mcdermott-will-901.blogspot.com/2007/09/mcdermott-will-on-august-21-2007-us.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Biotechnology and Patent System Forum Scheduled</title>
    <link href="http://www.vaeng.com/news/biotechnology-and-patent-system-forum-scheduled" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-23:/commentary/1192890</id>
    <updated>2007-09-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Virginia Engineer </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Reacting to fears that patents and patent litigation could retard rather than support technological progress, legislators are poised to take action with the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (H. 1908, S. 1145). Proposed changes include the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vaeng.com/news/biotechnology-and-patent-system-forum-scheduled&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Irate Over Patent Reform Debate</title>
    <link href="http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/09/irate_over_patent_reform_debat.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-23:/commentary/1156176</id>
    <updated>2007-09-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tech Daily Dose </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill currently being considered by the Senate (S. 1145) &amp;quot;would kill America&amp;#39;s economy by facilitating theft and transfer of American ingenuity to developing countries,&amp;quot; PIA argued. When asked, a Leahy spokeswoman did not have ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/09/irate_over_patent_reform_debat.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>THE REAL PURPOSE OF S.1145 PATENT ACT</title>
    <link href="http://www.inventorsblog.org/2007/09/real-purpose-of-s1145-patent-act.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-21:/commentary/1149588</id>
    <updated>2007-09-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>INVENTORS BLOG </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S.1145 is being RUSHED THROUGH COMMITTEE, before the Senators CAN DISCOVER that Nothing in it helps American Inventors or Invention or Innovation. And NOTHING IN IT is Good for America ! It will only benefit its Goliath Multi- National ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inventorsblog.org/2007/09/real-purpose-of-s1145-patent-act.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Case for Patent Law Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.artdiamondblog.com/archives/2007/09/post_328.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-20:/commentary/1145406</id>
    <updated>2007-09-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>artdiamondblog.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate Judiciary Committee will take up S.1145 today. Congress needs to pass this bill, during this session, as the need for reform is clear. Nationwide, the number of patent lawsuits nearly tripled between 1991 and 2004, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.artdiamondblog.com/archives/2007/09/post_328.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Provisional Patent Applications Are Back in Style This Fall</title>
    <link href="http://mypatentpending.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/09/provisional-pat.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-20:/commentary/1145405</id>
    <updated>2007-09-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>mypatentpending </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
House of Representative of HR 1908 (and with the Senate&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s S.1145 in committee), the days of the. US. being a first to invent, rather than first to file jurisdiction may be coming to an end. If (or when) the US becomes a first to file ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mypatentpending.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/09/provisional-pat.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House Passes Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
    <link href="http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/house-passes-patent-reform-act-of-2007.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-18:/commentary/1133778</id>
    <updated>2007-09-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TN Health Law Update </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1145, while attempting to reform the use of the &#226;&#8364;&#339;inequitable conduct&#226;&#8364;* defense, does exactly the opposite. This judicially-created doctrine allows accused infringers to assert that otherwise-valid patents should be declared ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tnhealthlawupdate.blogspot.com/2007/09/house-passes-patent-reform-act-of-2007.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Here we go again (actual content of the new thought crime bill)</title>
    <link href="http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=57048" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-18:/commentary/1133777</id>
    <updated>2007-09-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Vanguard News Network Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Thus, in order to eliminate, to the extent possible, the badges, incidents, and relics of slavery, it is necessary to prohibit assaults on the basis of real or perceived religions or national origins, [Under S.1145, the federal ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=57048&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Office Of Court Administration</title>
    <link href="http://office-of-court-administration-955.blogspot.com/2007/09/office-of-court-administration-in.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-17:/commentary/1133780</id>
    <updated>2007-09-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Office Of Court Administration </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Office Of Court Administration Texas The Senate still has to act on S. 1145, and with lingering objections, including objections by the Bush administration and numerous professional organizations with substantial lobbying power, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://office-of-court-administration-955.blogspot.com/2007/09/office-of-court-administration-in.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intellectual Property Law Blog: Update: Patent Reform 2007</title>
    <link href="http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/archives/patents-update-patent-reform-2007.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-15:/commentary/3392420</id>
    <updated>2007-09-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As discussed in connection with a previous post (please click here), the Senate and the House of Representatives (&quot;House&quot;) were each considering their own versions of bills to reform the patent system (S. 1145 and H.R. 1908, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/archives/patents-update-patent-reform-2007.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US patent examiners against patent reform proposal</title>
    <link href="http://gen-eric.com/patents/index.php/2007/09/11/u_s_patent_examiners_against_patent_refo" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-10:/commentary/1095487</id>
    <updated>2007-09-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>GEN-ERIC Patent News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Patent Office Professional Association (POPA), which claims to represent more than 5000 members, distributed a patent policy paper (PDF) in Washington this week, stating that HR 1908 and S. 1145 includes a &amp;quot;dangerous requirement ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gen-eric.com/patents/index.php/2007/09/11/u_s_patent_examiners_against_patent_refo&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Letter: To Senate Judiciary Committee Leadership in Support of S ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1184" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-09:/commentary/3363450</id>
    <updated>2007-09-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Public Knowledge - Letters to Policy Makers </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The undersigned organizations submit this letter to express our support for S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. We represent a broad range of public interest groups dedicated to improving intellectual property policy to benefit ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1184&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PHOENIX CENTER POLICY PAPER SERIES Phoenix Center Policy Paper ...</title>
    <link href="http://biosink.blogspot.com/2007/09/phoenix-center-policy-paper-series.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-08:/commentary/1090356</id>
    <updated>2007-09-08T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>biosink </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Reform Act of 2007 (HR 1908/S. 1145), directed at improving patent quality and changing patent remedies, has been approved by the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. Analyzing and understanding the economic welfare costs of the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://biosink.blogspot.com/2007/09/phoenix-center-policy-paper-series.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Watch the Gobblers</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=755989&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-07:/commentary/1100452</id>
    <updated>2007-09-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
With the House having dumped its patent load, aka passed HR 1908, eyes roll to the Senate, to watch how S. 1145 fares, the Senate counterpart. Hal Wegner prognosticates in emphatic italics: &amp;quot;It is absolutely certain that HR 1908 as ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=755989&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Consumer Groups Back Senate Patent Bill</title>
    <link href="http://feeds.publicknowledge.org/~r/publicknowledge-releases/~3/153446478/1179" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-06:/commentary/1082451</id>
    <updated>2007-09-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Public Knowledge - Press Releases </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill, S. 1145, is sponsored by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT). The groups said the patent approval process will benefit from provisions in the bill that. &#226;&#8364;&#162; allow for more comprehensive reviews of patent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.publicknowledge.org/~r/publicknowledge-releases/~3/153446478/1179&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Trimming Patent Application Review Backlog Takes Center Stage In ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2007/09/trimming-patent.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-05:/commentary/1071786</id>
    <updated>2007-09-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FDALegislativeWatch </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
However, while both bills would allow post-grant reviews up to 12 months after an application is approved, S. 1145 would allow challenges for an indefinite period after the patent is granted if petitioners faced the likelihood of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fdalegislativewatch.com/2007/09/trimming-patent.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Copycense Clippings (Aug. 28 - Sept. 3)</title>
    <link href="http://www.copycense.com/2007/09/copycense_clippings_aug_28_-_sept_3.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-03:/commentary/1192892</id>
    <updated>2007-09-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CopyCense </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Why would the organization, which represents more than 215000 professional engineers, oppose (.pdf) the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145)? IEEE-USA&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s opposition counters support from Google, Apple, and Microsoft, and aligns the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.copycense.com/2007/09/copycense_clippings_aug_28_-_sept_3.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Group Opposes Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/09/patent_group_opposes_reform_bi.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-03:/commentary/1071789</id>
    <updated>2007-09-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tech Daily Dose </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
POPA, which opposes HR 1908 and S. 1145, said the bills contain provisions that would hurt &#226;&#8364;&#8220; not help &#226;&#8364;&#8220; America&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s economic well-being by weakening the US patent regime. The group sent its paper to House and Senate committee and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/09/patent_group_opposes_reform_bi.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>POPA: Patent Reform May Hurt More Than it Helps</title>
    <link href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2007/09/popa-patent-reform-may-hurt-more-than.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-03:/commentary/1071788</id>
    <updated>2007-09-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Peter Zura&amp;#39;s 271 Patent Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
USPTO Funding and Fee Setting Authority &#226;&#8364;&#8220; S. 1145 would provide a permanent end to fee diversion and permit the agency to set and adjust fees through the rule-making process rather than statute. POPA has always been in support of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://271patent.blogspot.com/2007/09/popa-patent-reform-may-hurt-more-than.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Office Professional Association comes out against Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=742606&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-31:/commentary/1071791</id>
    <updated>2007-08-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Support for the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145, HR 1908) continues to erode. Now, as reported on the Patent Prospector, POPA, the Patent Office Professional Association, has penned an open letter against the Act. The letter, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=742606&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Act of 2007 hitting a snag?</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=729826&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-26:/commentary/1042786</id>
    <updated>2007-08-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Law - Justia BlawgSearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In today&amp;#39;s Wall Street Journal, there is an article noting that the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145, HR 1908) may be coming up against some resistance when Congress returns from its August recess. The article notes that the AFL-CIO ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=729826&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Legislation that would dramatically overhaul US patent law appears ...</title>
    <link href="http://guidetocurrentpatentreformlegisl.blogspot.com/2007/08/legislation-that-would-dramatically.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-25:/commentary/1042787</id>
    <updated>2007-08-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Guide to Current Patent Reform Legislation </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In the Senate, Leahy and Hatch introduced S. 1145, while in the House Representatives Howard Berman (D-California) and Lamar Smith (R-Texas) introduced HR 1908. On May 16th, a House subcommittee approved the bill for further review by ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://guidetocurrentpatentreformlegisl.blogspot.com/2007/08/legislation-that-would-dramatically.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UPDATE: Patent reform bills move forward</title>
    <link href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1168" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-23:/commentary/1045068</id>
    <updated>2007-08-23T14:06:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Public Knowledge</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Similar versions of the Patent Reform Bill of 2007, introduced in April this year, reported out of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees recently. I gave a brief summary of bill introduced in April in my last post. The current bills, although amended, retain the essence of the provisions of the earlier bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1168&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Three Options for Inventors,Guide to Current Patent Reform Legislation</title>
    <link href="http://legal-india-no1.blogspot.com/2007/08/three-options-for-inventorsguide-to.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-21:/commentary/1016148</id>
    <updated>2007-08-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Legal </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In the Senate, Leahy and Hatch introduced S. 1145, while in the House Representatives Howard Berman (D-California) and Lamar Smith (R-Texas) introduced HR 1908. On May 16th, a House subcommittee approved the bill for further review by ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legal-india-no1.blogspot.com/2007/08/three-options-for-inventorsguide-to.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>United States: Senate Judiciary Committee Accepts Amendments To ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=51110" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-21:/commentary/1016147</id>
    <updated>2007-08-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq.Com - Intellectual Property </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... steps forward one step back insofar as the Senate Judiciary Committee&#8217;s consideration of patent reform is concerned. The committee did adopt two major amendments to the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) and reported out the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=51110&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intellectual Property (Mondaq)</title>
    <link href="http://busihealth.info/blogs/i-patent-search/930/intellectual-property-mondaq/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-16:/commentary/1120851</id>
    <updated>2007-08-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>I patent search </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) of the Senate Judiciary Committee submitted a substitute bill to S. 1145 (the &amp;quot;Substitute S. 1145&amp;quot;), and he and other senators also submitted ......&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://busihealth.info/blogs/i-patent-search/930/intellectual-property-mondaq/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Letters of Vandagriff, McKeown countering Intel's Sewell appear on August 14</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/08/letters-of-vandagriff-mckeown.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-14:/commentary/985639</id>
    <updated>2007-08-14T08:35:35Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On July 12, 2007, the Wall Street Journal published on op-ed by Bruce Sewell of Intel, exactly on the day the Senate took up &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt; on patent reform. On August 14, 2007, more than one month later&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/08/letters-of-vandagriff-mckeown.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Attention Inventors: Your Creation Is No Longer Your Own!</title>
    <link href="http://susanandbobby.wordpress.com/2007/08/14/attention-inventors-your-creation-is-no-longer-your-own/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-13:/commentary/1317517</id>
    <updated>2007-08-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Susan &amp;amp; Bobby </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
If senate bill S.1145 and house bill HR1908 become law, it will be almost impossible for individual Americans who invent things to get patents and protect their inventions. Only large companies and others with significant legal ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://susanandbobby.wordpress.com/2007/08/14/attention-inventors-your-creation-is-no-longer-your-own/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Finance Committee reluctantly passes landfill bill (Jacksonville ...</title>
    <link href="http://construct1on.org/build/questions-for-construction-references/28055/finance-committee-reluctantly-passes/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-09:/commentary/985637</id>
    <updated>2007-08-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Questions for construction references </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) of the Senate Judiciary Committee submitted a substitute bill to S. 1145 (the &amp;quot;Substitute S. It was a job that ...1145&amp;quot;), and he and other senators also submitted ...In its second meeting of the Council ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://construct1on.org/build/questions-for-construction-references/28055/finance-committee-reluctantly-passes/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Greedy Little People In A Sea Of Distress</title>
    <link href="http://theaurora.blogspot.com/2007/08/greedy-little-people-in-sea-of-distress.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-05:/commentary/958920</id>
    <updated>2007-08-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Aurora </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Globalists&amp;#39; Plan To Give Away US Patents Phyllis Schlafly Report In extraordinary Senate-House coordination, the two Judiciary committees in the same week voted out a bill (S.1145 and HR1908) which, if it becomes law, will spell the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://theaurora.blogspot.com/2007/08/greedy-little-people-in-sea-of-distress.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intellectual Property...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mp3board.com/comments.html?id=398049" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-04:/commentary/1004713</id>
    <updated>2007-08-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>mp3board.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) of the Senate Judiciary Committee submitted a substitute bill to S. 1145 (the &amp;quot;Substitute S. 1145&amp;quot;), and he and other senators also submitted ......&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mp3board.com/comments.html?id=398049&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Globalists&amp;#39; Plan To Give Away US Patents</title>
    <link href="http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&amp;amp;friendID=72271587&amp;amp;blogID=294823852" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-01:/commentary/941759</id>
    <updated>2007-08-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>J - MySpace Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Globalists&amp;#39; Plan To Give Away US Patentsby Phyllis SchlaflyAugust 1, 2007In extraordinary Senate-House coordination, the two Judiciary committees in the same week voted out a bill (S.1145 and H...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&amp;amp;friendID=72271587&amp;amp;blogID=294823852&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Globalists' Plan To Give Away U.S. Patents</title>
    <link href="http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/27001.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-01:/commentary/934663</id>
    <updated>2007-08-01T14:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Conservative Voice News and Columns</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In extraordinary Senate-House coordination, the two Judiciary committees in the same week voted out a bill (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt; and H.R.1908) which, if it becomes law, will spell&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/27001.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Globalists&amp;#39; Plan To Give Away US Patents</title>
    <link href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1875052/posts" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-31:/commentary/934658</id>
    <updated>2007-07-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>News/Activism </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In extraordinary Senate-House coordination, the two Judiciary committees in the same week voted out a bill (S.1145 and HR1908) which, if it becomes law, will spell the end of America&amp;#39;s world leadership in innovation. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1875052/posts&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patently Wrong? More Grassroots Action Needed.</title>
    <link href="http://shieldoftruth.org/SOTblog/?p=20" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-28:/commentary/916932</id>
    <updated>2007-07-28T22:03:23Z</updated>
    <content type="html">
Patently Wrong? More Grassroots Action Needed. July 28th, ...  and &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt; in the Senate. An important requirement in these so-called patent reform bills&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://shieldoftruth.org/SOTblog/?p=20&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Baristas &#194;&#187; Has the Plaintiff Chooses the Forum Rule Been ...</title>
    <link href="http://patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/07/23/has-the-plaintiff-chooses-the-forum-rule-been-eliminated-for-patent-holders/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-27:/commentary/3766020</id>
    <updated>2007-07-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
One of the less-noticed items during the Senate Judiciary Committee mark-up of the Patent Reform Bill (Senate Bill S. 1145) was the adoption of Senator Specter&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s amendment on venue. Following is an analysis of that amendment: ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/07/23/has-the-plaintiff-chooses-the-forum-rule-been-eliminated-for-patent-holders/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IPO Posts Comparison of US House, Senate Patent Reform Bills</title>
    <link href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=703" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-27:/commentary/914122</id>
    <updated>2007-07-27T11:17:39Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Watch</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Inside Views     Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea on any relevant topic to info@ip-watch ...  Reform Act of 2007,&#8221; H.R.1908, on 18 July. The Senate Judiciary Committee approved its measure, &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=703&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Judiciary Committee passes Patent Reform Act of 2007 out of ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.rssmicro.com/?f=0&amp;amp;st=Senate+Committee&amp;amp;fid=71437775" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-25:/commentary/910263</id>
    <updated>2007-07-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Senate Committee </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On Thursday, the Senate Judiciary Committee passed its version of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 ( S. 1145 , House version HR 1908 ) out of Committee by a vote of 13-5. The bill is cosponsored by the chairman of that Committee, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rssmicro.com/?f=0&amp;amp;st=Senate+Committee&amp;amp;fid=71437775&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>                </title>
    <link href="http://heavyfeather.blog38.fc2.com/blog-entry-767.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-24:/commentary/934659</id>
    <updated>2007-07-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>heavy monologue </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.1145: Massive patent reform bill passes House committee http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070718-massive-patent-reform-bill-passes-house-committee.html              -     ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://heavyfeather.blog38.fc2.com/blog-entry-767.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Watching US Patent Reform From Abroad</title>
    <link href="http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/07/watching_us_pat.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-24:/commentary/904039</id>
    <updated>2007-07-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ShopFloor.org: The Manufacturers Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... PC&#8217;s Washington DC Office managing principal Dr Raj S Dave. The House bill is HR 1908, and the Senate bill is S. 1145. CNET covered the nuts and bolts of the legislation in this story Monday, &amp;quot;US presses ahead with patent reforms.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.nam.org/archives/2007/07/watching_us_pat.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate, House Committees Pass Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.fdanews.com/newsletter/article?articleId=96238&amp;amp;issueId=10486" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-23:/commentary/899924</id>
    <updated>2007-07-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Generic Line </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate and House Judiciary Committees voted last Thursday to pass the Patent Reform Act, S. 1145 and HR 1908 after making changes unfavorable to the generic industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fdanews.com/newsletter/article?articleId=96238&amp;amp;issueId=10486&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Panel OKs Patent Reform Bill - Washington Post</title>
    <link href="http://tenpinbilliards.com/2007/07/senate-panel-oks-patent-reform-bill-washington-post/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-22:/commentary/985638</id>
    <updated>2007-07-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Todays News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Baristas, OH - 12 hours ago One of the less-noticed items during the Senate Judiciary Committee mark-up of the Patent Reform Bill (Senate Bill S. 1145) was the adoption of Senator &#8230; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tenpinbilliards.com/2007/07/senate-panel-oks-patent-reform-bill-washington-post/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Himachal entrepreneur gets patent for chapatti roller - Hindu</title>
    <link href="http://tenpinbilliards.com/2007/07/himachal-entrepreneur-gets-patent-for-chapatti-roller-hindu/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-22:/commentary/916931</id>
    <updated>2007-07-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Todays News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Has the Plaintiff Chooses the Forum Rule Been Eliminated For &#8230; Patent Baristas, OH - 1 hour ago One of the less-noticed items during the Senate Judiciary Committee mark-up of the Patent Reform Bill (Senate Bill S. 1145) was the adoption ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tenpinbilliards.com/2007/07/himachal-entrepreneur-gets-patent-for-chapatti-roller-hindu/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Et Seq.</title>
    <link href="http://etseq.law.harvard.edu/index.php/patent_reform_act_of_2007/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-19:/commentary/3392429</id>
    <updated>2007-07-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Et Seq. </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Manager&#226;&#8364;&#8482;s Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (From Fish &amp; Richardson web site). Statement by U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy: Senate Judiciary Panel Passes Bipartisan Patent Reform Bill ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://etseq.law.harvard.edu/index.php/patent_reform_act_of_2007/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Hate Bill. Kennedy (Shabbos Goy) And ADL.</title>
    <link href="http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=52756" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-18:/commentary/928854</id>
    <updated>2007-07-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Vanguard News Network Forum </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Kennedy wanted to attach his hate bill, S. 1145, to this very popular child-protecting legislation. Frist delayed in order to deny him the chance. (See, How Kennedy and His Pedophiles Weakened the Child Safety Bill) ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=52756&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Green Conferencing Is Smart Business for Va. Firm</title>
    <link href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/small-business/2007/07/green_conferencing_is_one_comp.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-16:/commentary/868087</id>
    <updated>2007-07-16T06:30:04Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Small Business - (washingtonpost.com)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Permalink |  Comments (0)  Share This: [ Technorati talk bubble] Technorati | Tag in Del.icio ...  on its annual August recess and that debate on the bill, &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, likely will continue next week.  While&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/small-business/2007/07/green_conferencing_is_one_comp.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Hate Crime Laws: Criminalizing Free Speech</title>
    <link href="http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&amp;amp;friendID=35206701&amp;amp;blogID=287080488" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-12:/commentary/852318</id>
    <updated>2007-07-12T23:16:36Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Barry's Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 This is hot right now, so here we go...Now if you know me, you know I am for enforcing the law, if you hurt, murder, ... . Despite all odds, the Senate Judiciary stripped the hate bill &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt; from the Children's Safety Act&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&amp;amp;friendID=35206701&amp;amp;blogID=287080488&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Commentary - Patent Nonsense by Bruce Sewell</title>
    <link href="http://iplawreport.blogspot.com/2007/07/commentary-patent-nonsense-by-bruce.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-12:/commentary/1133779</id>
    <updated>2007-07-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IP Law Report </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate Judiciary Committee will take up S.1145 today. Congress needs to pass this bill, during this session, as the need for reform is clear. Nationwide, the number of patent lawsuits nearly tripled between 1991 and 2004, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://iplawreport.blogspot.com/2007/07/commentary-patent-nonsense-by-bruce.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sphinctering Venue</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2007/07/sphinctering_venue.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-12:/commentary/861410</id>
    <updated>2007-07-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The original language of S.1145 provided jurisdiction where either the infringer *or* patent holder resides (for a corporation, this means the principal place of business or state of incorporation). The amendment eliminates jurisdiction ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2007/07/sphinctering_venue.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Marks Up Patent Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2007/07/senate-marks-up-patent-reform-act.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-12:/commentary/857120</id>
    <updated>2007-07-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Peter Zura&amp;#39;s 271 Patent Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Yesterday, the Senate was hoping to complete the panel&amp;#39;s markup of the The Patent Reform Act (S. 1145), but managed to work only two amendments after adopting a manager&amp;#39;s amendment that eliminated the provision that would have given the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://271patent.blogspot.com/2007/07/senate-marks-up-patent-reform-act.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intel's Sewall publishes &quot;Patent Nonsense&quot; in WSJ on day Senate takes up S. 1145</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/07/intels-sewall-publishes-patent-nonsense.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-12:/commentary/851893</id>
    <updated>2007-07-12T05:32:29Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Bruce Sewall, general counsel for Intel Corp., has a commentary in the Wall Street Journal entitled &quot;Patent Nonsense,&quot; which appears [surprise!] ...  wind up in litigation. The Senate Judiciary Committee will take up &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/07/intels-sewall-publishes-patent-nonsense.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>United States: Recent Developments In Patent Reform Legislation ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/i_article.asp_Q_articleid_E_50060_A_rss_E_0" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-11:/commentary/868086</id>
    <updated>2007-07-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq.Com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The momentum behind the most recent patent reform bill, S. 1145 and HR 1908, known as the Patent Reform Act of 2002 (the Act), appears to be slowing as a group of senators have called for a delay in implementing the legislation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/i_article.asp_Q_articleid_E_50060_A_rss_E_0&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>United States: Recent Developments In Patent Reform Legislation ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/i_article.asp_Q_articleid_E_50060_A_rss_E_11" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-11:/commentary/849991</id>
    <updated>2007-07-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq.Com - Intellectual Property </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The momentum behind the most recent patent reform bill, S. 1145 and HR 1908, known as the Patent Reform Act of 2002 (the Act), appears to be slowing as a group of senators have called for a delay in implementing the legislation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/i_article.asp_Q_articleid_E_50060_A_rss_E_11&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Venue restrictions added to S.1145 patent reform package</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/07/venue-restrictions-added-to-s1145.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-11:/commentary/849990</id>
    <updated>2007-07-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
An amendment to S. 1145 by Sen. Specter tightening venue in patent infringement litigations was incorporated, over objections by by Sen. Cornyn. Although Sen. Leahy seems to want to push S. 1145 right through, there is some opposition ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/07/venue-restrictions-added-to-s1145.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DOJ: US Needs More Prior User Rights</title>
    <link href="http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=610731&amp;amp;type=post" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-04:/commentary/801505</id>
    <updated>2007-07-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Recent Posts - Justia blawgsearch.com </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In a letter to Senator Patrick J. Leahy, Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary, the Department of Justice waded into the cesspool of patent reform throwing out its opinion on the provisions of the Patent Reform Act of 2007, S. 1145 and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blawgsearch.justia.com/visit.aspx?id=610731&amp;amp;type=post&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Hollywood inventor protests the patent bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.gong.com/wordpress/?p=32988" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-02:/commentary/801509</id>
    <updated>2007-07-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>My Business News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... protection above those who came up with ideas first. (For background on S. 1145 in the Senate and HR 1908 in the House, see &#8220;Will Congress slam small inventors?&#8221; Original post by foxnewsonline@foxnews.com A Blogger Software Product.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gong.com/wordpress/?p=32988&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Hollywood inventor protests patent bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.rssmicro.com/?f=0&amp;amp;st=Hollywood&amp;amp;fid=64379670" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-02:/commentary/801508</id>
    <updated>2007-07-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Hollywood </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... that would favor inventors who were the &amp;quot;first to file&amp;quot; for patent protection above those who came up with ideas first. (For background on S. 1145 in the Senate and HR 1908 in the House, see &amp;quot;Will Congress slam small inventors?&amp;quot; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rssmicro.com/?f=0&amp;amp;st=Hollywood&amp;amp;fid=64379670&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent-bin-Laden?</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/07/patent-bin-laden.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-01:/commentary/801510</id>
    <updated>2007-07-01T20:19:11Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
IPBiz noted a citation of sorts to IPBiz in the article &quot;Patent Terrorism -- Terror of the Intangibles,&quot; by Qaiser and Chandran, ...  v. Teleflex, etc. ), Congress (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;, etc.), and the USPTO (rules changes now before OMB&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/07/patent-bin-laden.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Conservatives Bash Patent Bill</title>
    <link href="http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/06/conservatives_bash_patent_bill.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-27:/commentary/776586</id>
    <updated>2007-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Tech Daily Dose </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bills, HR 1908 and S. 1145, will &amp;quot;severely hamper US competitiveness and threaten American businesses -- along with the jobs they create -- by undermining intellectual property rights,&amp;quot; they wrote. The measures &amp;quot;will cripple most of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2007/06/conservatives_bash_patent_bill.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Chicago Tribune commentary blasts S.1145 patent reform bill</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/06/chicago-tribune-commentary-blasts-s1145.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-27:/commentary/774176</id>
    <updated>2007-06-27T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The breadth of opposition to this legislation [S. 1145] indicates the need for a fuller debate, but Sen. Leahy has tossed his lot with Microsoft, Intel and their allies. His desire to rush the bill through the Senate does a grave ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/06/chicago-tribune-commentary-blasts-s1145.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Second Window another bad idea in Patent Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.disco-tech.org/2007/06/second_window_another_bad_idea.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-25:/commentary/777331</id>
    <updated>2007-06-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>disco-tech | Discovery Institute&amp;#39;s... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A centerpiece of the Leahy-Hatch/Berman-Smith Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145 and HR 1908) is the establishment of an injudicious post-grant opposition procedure (also known as a &#8220;second window&#8221;). According to Chairman Howard L. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.disco-tech.org/2007/06/second_window_another_bad_idea.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&amp;quot;Second Window&amp;quot; Will Lead to More Uncertainty</title>
    <link href="http://www.techliberation.com/archives/042521.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-25:/commentary/774177</id>
    <updated>2007-06-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Technology Liberation Front </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A centerpiece of the Leahy-Hatch/Berman-Smith Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145 and HR 1908) is the establishment of an injudicious post-grant opposition procedure (also known as a &#8220;second window&#8221;). According to Chairman Howard L. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techliberation.com/archives/042521.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>This Week In The Senate Judiciary Committee</title>
    <link href="http://proctoringcongress.blogspot.com/2007/06/this-week-in-senate-judiciary-committee.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-24:/commentary/776587</id>
    <updated>2007-06-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Watching Those We Chose </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
That meeting will focus on S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. The hearing on &#8220;Executive Nomination&#8221; scheduled by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary for Tuesday, June 26, 2007 at 10:00 am has been cancelled. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://proctoringcongress.blogspot.com/2007/06/this-week-in-senate-judiciary-committee.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>I don&#8217;t want to start any desperate rumors&#8230;.</title>
    <link href="http://blog.stanford.edu/unofficial/2007/06/i_dont_want_to_start_any_desperate_rumors.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-24:/commentary/774178</id>
    <updated>2007-06-24T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Unofficial Stanford Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Changes in patent law sought by universities incorporated into Senate bill S 1145. &amp;quot;Universities are.. trying to narrow the right to challenge a patent after it is issued.&amp;quot; (via Chronicle of Higher Education) [this is dangerous stuff ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.stanford.edu/unofficial/2007/06/i_dont_want_to_start_any_desperate_rumors.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Group of &amp;gt;200 writes Leahy about needed changes in S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://eb5m.ee.wonez.com/Group-of-%3E200-writes-Leahy-about-needed-changes-in-S1145/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-23:/commentary/953549</id>
    <updated>2007-06-23T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ebay </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Removal of language in the proposed legislation (S.1145/HR 1908) pertaining to the apportionment of damages;. - Removal of the open-ended post-grant review process;. - Removal of rulemaking authority for the Patent and Trademark Office; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://eb5m.ee.wonez.com/Group-of-%3E200-writes-Leahy-about-needed-changes-in-S1145/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Group of &amp;gt;200 writes Leahy about needed changes in S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://eb7f.ee.wonez.com/Group-of-%3E200-writes-Leahy-about-needed-changes-in-S1145/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-22:/commentary/801504</id>
    <updated>2007-06-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ebay </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Removal of language in the proposed legislation (S.1145/HR 1908) pertaining to the apportionment of damages;. - Removal of the open-ended post-grant review process;. - Removal of rulemaking authority for the Patent and Trademark Office; ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://eb7f.ee.wonez.com/Group-of-%3E200-writes-Leahy-about-needed-changes-in-S1145/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Apportionment of damages is one of the bad ideas in Patent Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.disco-tech.org/2007/06/according_to_senate_judiciary.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-20:/commentary/776588</id>
    <updated>2007-06-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>disco-tech | Discovery Institute&amp;#39;s... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Leahy-Hatch/Berman-Smith Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145 and HR 1908) fails to reflect this basic point. The bills misguidedly treat the goals of improving patent quality and reducing litigation as mutually exclusive goals to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.disco-tech.org/2007/06/according_to_senate_judiciary.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Rushed &amp;amp; Wrong</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2007/06/rushed_wrong.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-20:/commentary/754923</id>
    <updated>2007-06-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Judiciary Chair Pat Leahy, Vermont Democrat, held a hearing June 6 on the bill, his proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145). Though testimony revealed many serious drawbacks in the legislation, Mr. Leahy wants a quick markup of the ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2007/06/rushed_wrong.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Apportionment of Damages is One of the Bad Ideas in Patent Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.techliberation.com/archives/042507.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-20:/commentary/754922</id>
    <updated>2007-06-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Technology Liberation Front </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Leahy-Hatch/Berman-Smith Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145 and HR 1908) fails to reflect this basic point. The bills misguidedly treat the goals of improving patent quality and reducing litigation as mutually exclusive goals to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techliberation.com/archives/042507.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Drowning</title>
    <link href="http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2007/06/drowning_1.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-19:/commentary/758300</id>
    <updated>2007-06-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Prospector </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Smelling blood in the water, sharks circle the wounded whale known as the Patent Reform Act of 2007, S. 1145 and HR 1908. Over 200 organizations write Judiciary committee chairmen and leading committee members of both houses to exclaim ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2007/06/drowning_1.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NanoNews Custom 6/20/07</title>
    <link href="http://ftcuananotechnology23.blogspot.com/2007/06/nanonews-custom-62007.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-19:/commentary/757428</id>
    <updated>2007-06-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FTCuaNanotechnology23 </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Medical Devices Manufacturers Association (MDMA) June 19, 2007 The Medical Devices Manufacturers Association (MDMA) joined over 200 other organizations to express concerns with The Patent Reform Act of 2007, S.1145 and HR 1908. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ftcuananotechnology23.blogspot.com/2007/06/nanonews-custom-62007.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Another Bump in the Road to Reform Patent Law</title>
    <link href="http://www.postgrant.com/2007/06/another_bump_in_the_road_to_re.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-19:/commentary/754926</id>
    <updated>2007-06-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Post Grant </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The letter addresses concerns with respect to the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145 and HR 1908) including apportionment of damages, open-ended post-grant review, granting rule making authority to the PTO, and the need to include grace ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.postgrant.com/2007/06/another_bump_in_the_road_to_re.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>MDMA Voices Concerns Over The Patent Reform Act of 2007: Bill Will ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=23348" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-19:/commentary/754925</id>
    <updated>2007-06-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Nanotechnology Now Recent News </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Medical Devices Manufacturers Association (MDMA) joined over 200 other organizations to express concerns with The Patent Reform Act of 2007, S.1145 and HR 1908.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=23348&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Group of &gt;200 writes Leahy about needed changes in S.1145</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/06/group-of-200-writes-leahy-about-needed.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-19:/commentary/778345</id>
    <updated>2007-06-19T08:16:29Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A group of over 200 organizations wrote Senator Leahy (and others) ...  organizations to express concerns with The Patent Reform Act of 2007, &lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt; and H.R. 1908&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/06/group-of-200-writes-leahy-about-needed.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Judge Michel writes Senators Leahy, Specter on June 13</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/06/judge-michel-writes-senators-leahy.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-16:/commentary/754924</id>
    <updated>2007-06-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Berman&amp;#39;s staff, Judge Michel has written a letter to Senators Leahy and Specter, dated June 13, 2007, which touches on interlocutory appeal and damages apportionment provisions of S.1145. Judge Michel states that the proposed provision ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/06/judge-michel-writes-senators-leahy.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Innovation Alliance Sends Open Letter to Congress</title>
    <link href="http://cars2l.wonez.com/Innovation-Alliance-Sends-Open-Letter-to-Congress/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-13:/commentary/738158</id>
    <updated>2007-06-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>real estate </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Minority Leader John Boehner, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, expressed concern with certain provisions of The Patent Reform Act of 2007 ( HR 1908/ S. 1145): ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cars2l.wonez.com/Innovation-Alliance-Sends-Open-Letter-to-Congress/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Post-Grant Opposition, Post-KSR.</title>
    <link href="http://leethomason.com/?p=90" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-13:/commentary/738153</id>
    <updated>2007-06-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ISinIP </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The primary point was the represented financiers support for the post-grant opposition procedures in S. 1145. No longer will patentees have to wait for an infringement to defend or to lose their patent, it could be immediate. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://leethomason.com/?p=90&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Article by Tom Still on patent reform</title>
    <link href="http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/06/article-by-tom-still-on-patent-reform.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-12:/commentary/738156</id>
    <updated>2007-06-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>IPBiz </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... written in mid-May, about 70 organizations ranging from venture capital firms to biotech companies to academic institutions such as the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation expressed strong concerns about bill (HR 1908/S. 1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2007/06/article-by-tom-still-on-patent-reform.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Shakes Up Device Vendors</title>
    <link href="http://srbenda.net/blogs/application--card-citibank-credit/231811/patent-reform-shakes-up/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-07:/commentary/754928</id>
    <updated>2007-06-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Application&amp;#39; card citibank credit </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Medical Devices Today reports that identical bills introduced in the House and Senate April 18 (HR 1908and S 1145) could weaken the value of patents and jeopardize firms&amp;#39; access to venture capital. Th...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://srbenda.net/blogs/application--card-citibank-credit/231811/patent-reform-shakes-up/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Shakes Up Device Vendors</title>
    <link href="http://medicalconnectivity.com/categories/standards/2007/06/08.html#a1041" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-07:/commentary/738530</id>
    <updated>2007-06-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Medical Connectivity Consulting: Standards... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Medical Devices Today reports that identical bills introduced in the House and Senate April 18 (HR 1908 and S 1145) could weaken the value of patents and jeopardize firms&amp;#39; access to venture capital. The reforms are backed by IT giants ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://medicalconnectivity.com/categories/standards/2007/06/08.html#a1041&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Innovation Alliance Sends Open Letter to Congress</title>
    <link href="http://cars1i.wonez.com/Innovation-Alliance-Sends-Open-Letter-to-Congress/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-05:/commentary/719400</id>
    <updated>2007-06-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>real estate </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Minority Leader John Boehner, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, expressed concern with certain provisions of The Patent Reform Act of 2007 ( HR 1908/ S. 1145): ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cars1i.wonez.com/Innovation-Alliance-Sends-Open-Letter-to-Congress/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>InterDigital Addresses US Senate Regarding Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.smartbrief.com/news/CTIA/industryBW-detail.jsp?id=EE89C8FF-E7D4-48C5-B4AE-A971ED83B348&amp;amp;sb_code=RSS&amp;amp;i=Communications%20Chips" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-05:/commentary/719395</id>
    <updated>2007-06-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Communications Chips Press Releases from... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
InterDigital Communications Corporation?s (NASDAQ:IDCC) Chief Intellectual Property and Licensing Officer, Bruce Bernstein, testified today in a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.smartbrief.com/news/CTIA/industryBW-detail.jsp?id=EE89C8FF-E7D4-48C5-B4AE-A971ED83B348&amp;amp;sb_code=RSS&amp;amp;i=Communications%20Chips&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patents Pending: Patent Reform for the Innovation Economy</title>
    <link href="http://www.itif.org/files/PatentsPending.pdf" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-21:/commentary/719388</id>
    <updated>2007-05-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ITIF Reports </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Recently introduced legislation &#8220;The Patent Reform Act of 2007&#8221; (S. 1145 and HR 1908), would provide significant needed reforms to the system. A new ITIF paper examines the issue of patent reform and discusses recommendations. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itif.org/files/PatentsPending.pdf&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Innovation Alliance Sends Open Letter to Congress</title>
    <link href="http://blogxn.nojo.cz/2007/05/18/innovation-alliance-sends-open/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-17:/commentary/740280</id>
    <updated>2007-05-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adsila log </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Minority Leader John Boehner, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, expressed concern with certain provisions of The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (HR 1908/S. 1145): ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogxn.nojo.cz/2007/05/18/innovation-alliance-sends-open/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/showthread.php?t=19796" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-15:/commentary/719397</id>
    <updated>2007-05-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>neurotalk Communities </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In the letter, the organizations expressed concern that provisions of &amp;quot;The Patent Reform Act of 2007&amp;quot; (HR 1908/S. 1145) pose serious threats to medical innovation and American technological leadership. The letter was addressed to House ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/showthread.php?t=19796&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Innovation Alliance Sends Open Letter to Congress</title>
    <link href="http://271patent.blogspot.com/2007/05/innovation-alliance-sends-open-letter.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-15:/commentary/719387</id>
    <updated>2007-05-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Peter Zura&amp;#39;s 271 Patent Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Speaker Nancy Pelosi, House Minority Leader John Boehner, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, expressed concern with certain provisions of The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (HR 1908/S. 1145): ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://271patent.blogspot.com/2007/05/innovation-alliance-sends-open-letter.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>THE AUTHORITY ON OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, HEALTH AND LOSS PREVENTION (Occupational</title>
    <link href="http://www.lifesettlementsnews.com/-the-authority-on-occupational-safety-health-and-loss-prevention-occupational.php" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-08:/commentary/719402</id>
    <updated>2007-05-08T20:36:05Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Viatical Settlements | Life Insurance Settlements | Structured Settlement News</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
 THE AUTHORITY ON OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, HEALTH AND LOSS PREVENTION (Occupational Hazards)  ADD OH ISSUE HEADLINES ON YOUR DESKTOP! ...  introduced into the House (H.R. 1908) and Senate (&lt;strong class=&quot;keyword&quot;&gt;S.1145&lt;/strong&gt;) and associated bipartisan supp&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lifesettlementsnews.com/-the-authority-on-occupational-safety-health-and-loss-prevention-occupational.php&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform: Is this the year?</title>
    <link href="http://www.edadesignline.com/199500108?cid=RSSfeed_EDAdesignline_edadlALL" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-07:/commentary/947171</id>
    <updated>2007-05-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>EDA DesignLine </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Many people are optimistic that 2007 will be the year of patent reform. And the prospects do look favorable, with identical bills being introduced into the House (HR 1908) and Senate (S.1145) and associated bipartisan support.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edadesignline.com/199500108?cid=RSSfeed_EDAdesignline_edadlALL&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform: Is this the year?</title>
    <link href="http://www.embedded.com/rss/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199400184&amp;amp;cid=RSSfeed_embedded_news" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-07:/commentary/738157</id>
    <updated>2007-05-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Embedded </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Many people are optimistic that 2007 will be the year of patent reform. And the prospects do look favorable, with identical bills being introduced into the House (HR 1908) and Senate (S.1145) and associated bipartisan support.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.embedded.com/rss/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199400184&amp;amp;cid=RSSfeed_embedded_news&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform: Is this the year? (EETimes)</title>
    <link href="http://withe.net/blog/2007/05/08/patent-reform-is-this-the-year-eetimes/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-07:/commentary/719392</id>
    <updated>2007-05-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WITHE BLOG </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
And the prospects do look favorable, with identical bills being introduced into the House (HR 1908) and Senate (S.1145) and associated bipartisan support. Source: Yahoo! News Search Results for ebay productS. Related Entries ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://withe.net/blog/2007/05/08/patent-reform-is-this-the-year-eetimes/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform: Is this the year?</title>
    <link href="http://www.planetanalog.com/rss/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199500986&amp;amp;cid=RSSfeed_planetanalog_news" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-07:/commentary/719386</id>
    <updated>2007-05-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Planet Analog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Many people are optimistic that 2007 will be the year of patent reform. And the prospects do look favorable, with identical bills being introduced into the House (HR 1908) and Senate (S.1145) and associated bipartisan support.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.planetanalog.com/rss/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199500986&amp;amp;cid=RSSfeed_planetanalog_news&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>2007 Patent Reform: Proposed Amendments on Damages</title>
    <link href="http://blogxn.nojo.cz/2007/05/06/2007-patent-reform-proposed-amendments/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-05:/commentary/740995</id>
    <updated>2007-05-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Adsila log </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[1] The proposed amendments in both Senate (S. 1145) and the House (HR 1908) that relate to monetary relief are identically worded. [2] Willfulness is not treated here. [3] Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., Inc., 56 F.3d 1538, 1550 (Fed. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogxn.nojo.cz/2007/05/06/2007-patent-reform-proposed-amendments/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Newport fashion island - Letters: Expanding and preserving patches ...</title>
    <link href="http://newport-beachcentral.com/2007/05/06/newport-fashion-island-letters-expanding-and-preserving-patches-of-oc-parkland/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-04:/commentary/719390</id>
    <updated>2007-05-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Newport Beach Central </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Connors, Esq. has emphatically registered his clients&#8217; opposition to patent bills (Leahy S.1145 and Berman HR1908) introduced in both houses of Congress on April 20. In. Phone theft leads to arrest Orange County Register - newport beach ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newport-beachcentral.com/2007/05/06/newport-fashion-island-letters-expanding-and-preserving-patches-of-oc-parkland/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lesbian Rights: From Legislation to Action</title>
    <link href="http://lesbiandatingsite.net/blogs/522/lesbian/lesbian-rights-from-legislation-to-action.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-03:/commentary/719389</id>
    <updated>2007-05-03T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lesbian Dating Site </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
and S.1145 (Kennedy, D-Mass.) would provide federal assistance to states and local jurisdictions to prosecute hate crimes, including those committed on the basis of sexual orientation, gender or disability. The House version of the bill ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://lesbiandatingsite.net/blogs/522/lesbian/lesbian-rights-from-legislation-to-action.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Act of 2007, S. 1145 and HR 1908 - Helicopter ...</title>
    <link href="http://ie-monitor.ncw.com.pl/46119/patent-reform-act-of/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-02:/commentary/719382</id>
    <updated>2007-05-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Ie Monitor </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Helicopter Association International, Patent Reform Act of 2007, S. 1145 and HR 1908 Helicopter Association International, VA -14 hours ago Helicopter Association International (HAI) will continue to closely monitor this legislation and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ie-monitor.ncw.com.pl/46119/patent-reform-act-of/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&amp;#39;First to File&amp;#39; Lives</title>
    <link href="http://drawstraw.blogspot.com/2007/04/first-to-file-lives.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-04-29:/commentary/719401</id>
    <updated>2007-04-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>drawstraw( ) </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
First-to-file is one of several reforms promised by the freshly refried &amp;quot;Patent Reform Act of 2007&amp;quot; introduced (a third time, now as S. 1145 with the 110th Congress) by Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Orrin Hatch (R-UT), ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://drawstraw.blogspot.com/2007/04/first-to-file-lives.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>2007 Patent Reform: Proposed Amendments on Damages</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/04/2007_patent_ref.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-04-28:/commentary/719385</id>
    <updated>2007-04-28T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patently-O: Patent Law Blog </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
[1] The proposed amendments in both Senate (S. 1145) and the House (HR 1908) that relate to monetary relief are identically worded. [2] Willfulness is not treated here. [3] Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., Inc., 56 F.3d 1538, 1550 (Fed. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2007/04/2007_patent_ref.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WashingtonWatch.com - S. 1145, The Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/200504699.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-04-19:/commentary/3736498</id>
    <updated>2007-04-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Subject: Foreign policy </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
US Congress: S. 1145, The Patent Reform Act of 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/200504699.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>WashingtonWatch.com - S. 1145, The Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
    <link href="http://washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1145.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-04-19:/commentary/3363440</id>
    <updated>2007-04-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WashingtonWatch.com - Subject Group: Welfare </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
US Congress: S. 1145, The Patent Reform Act of 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1145.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Act of 2007.</title>
    <link href="http://anticipatethis.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/patent-reform-act-of-2007/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-04-18:/commentary/719391</id>
    <updated>2007-04-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Anticipate This! </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Joe Scott Miller at The Fire of Genius has provided the text versions of the the Senate and House Patent Reform Acts of 2007 here: Senate S.1145 and House H.1908. We also suggest perusal of an interesting article on the Patent Reform ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://anticipatethis.wordpress.com/2007/04/19/patent-reform-act-of-2007/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ISRAEL CELEBRATES THEIR STOOGE ED KENNEDY TO DESTROY FREE SPEECH ...</title>
    <link href="http://clifylq.livejournal.com/44301.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-04-18:/commentary/595787</id>
    <updated>2007-04-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>AWAKENING OF AMERICA </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Contact her at harmony@truthtellers.org. AMERICA To read the hate bill for yourself, with commentary in red by Rev. Pike, see Local Law Enforcement Enhancement Act of 2005 [S. 1145]). http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/11reasons.html ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://clifylq.livejournal.com/44301.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>ISRAEL CELEBRATES ED KENNEDY&amp;#39;S SUPPORT FOR PEDOPHILES/END OF FREE ...</title>
    <link href="http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2007/04/israel-celebrates-ed-kennedys-support.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-04-18:/commentary/595786</id>
    <updated>2007-04-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>clifylq </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On October 20th, in a stunning victory for freedom, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted not to add Senator Edward Kennedy&#8217;s &#8220;anti-hate&#8221; bill, S.1145, onto the Children&#8217;s Safety Act, HR3132. This effectively blocked further movement of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://supportbordercontrols.blogspot.com/2007/04/israel-celebrates-ed-kennedys-support.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>S. 1145, A bill to amend title 35, United States Code, to provide ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1145.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-04-16:/commentary/738154</id>
    <updated>2007-04-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>washingtonwatch.com - Welcome to washingtonwatc... </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1145 would amend title 35, United States Code, to provide for patent reform....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1145.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bill Action: Introduced: S. 1145: A bill to amend title 35, United ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-1145" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-04-16:/commentary/595785</id>
    <updated>2007-04-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Senate Judiciary -- Monitored by GovTrack.us </name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Sen. Patrick Leahy [D-VT] introduced this bill. [This event matched these monitors: Senate Judiciary ]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-1145&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

