<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Open Congress : News Articles for S.1145 Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1145/atom_news" rel="self"/>
  <link href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1145/news" rel="alternate"/>
  <updated>2008-05-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>opencongress.org</name>
  </author>
  <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007:/bill/news/42984</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Changes: Coming and Going</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/05/07/patent-changes-coming-and-going/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-06:/commentary/2189149</id>
    <updated>2008-05-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
It appears that the Senate has pulled the plug on the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid pulled the bill from the floor ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/05/07/patent-changes-coming-and-going/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Act Stalls in the Senate</title>
    <link href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/05/patent-reform-act-stalls-senate" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-05-01:/commentary/2189150</id>
    <updated>2008-05-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>EFF,&amp;nbsp;CA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The progress Congress was making on the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) has stalled and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has pulled the bill from the floor ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/05/patent-reform-act-stalls-senate&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Bill Should Die</title>
    <link href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26124" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-21:/commentary/2189151</id>
    <updated>2008-04-21T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Human Events,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In short, though, S. 1145 and HR 1908 would destroy what the Founding Fathers put into the Constitution with the specific intent of stimulating invention. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26124&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Prepares To Consider Patent Reform Act Of 2007, Circulates ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=59222" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-17:/commentary/2189153</id>
    <updated>2008-04-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (subscription),&amp;nbsp;UK</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
On March 13, 2008, the Senate Judiciary Committee released 15 proposed amendments to the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) in advance of full Senate ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=59222&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Legislation stalls in the Senate over negotiations on damage rates</title>
    <link href="http://www.dailytech.com/TechBacked+Patent+Reform+Bill+on+Ice/article11492c.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-15:/commentary/2189152</id>
    <updated>2008-04-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DailyTech,&amp;nbsp;IL</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Formally known as S.1145, the Patent Reform Act opened a rift in the business world: biotech companies, labor unions, inventors, and capital firms squared ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailytech.com/TechBacked+Patent+Reform+Bill+on+Ice/article11492c.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO Commends Senator Specter For Standing Firm On Patent Reform ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/bio-commends-senator-specter-for-standing-firm-on-patent-reform-legislation,348597.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2050219</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Earthtimes,&amp;nbsp;UK</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;#8220;BIO applauds the continuing efforts of Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) to improve and strengthen the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) to ensure that this ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/bio-commends-senator-specter-for-standing-firm-on-patent-reform-legislation,348597.shtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO Commends Senator Specter For Standing Firm On Patent Reform ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.centredaily.com/business/technology/story/518328.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2045758</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Centre Daily Times,&amp;nbsp;PA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&quot;BIO applauds the continuing efforts of Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) to improve and strengthen the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) to ensure that this ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centredaily.com/business/technology/story/518328.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Friday IP Round-Up</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/11/friday-ip-round-up-4/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-10:/commentary/2038718</id>
    <updated>2008-04-10T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Negotiations in the Senate on patent reform bill S. 1145 seemed to break down this week after Sen. Arlen Specter released a statement saying: The Chairman ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/11/friday-ip-round-up-4/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pennsylvania Bio Thanks Senator Specter for Continuing Efforts on ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.businesswire.com/news/google/20080410006131/en" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-09:/commentary/2030581</id>
    <updated>2008-04-09T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Wire (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;#8220;BIO applauds the continuing efforts of Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) to improve and strengthen the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) to ensure that this ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/news/google/20080410006131/en&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Stupiderest Patent Reform Provisions</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/07/stupiderest-patent-reform-provisions/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-06:/commentary/2018535</id>
    <updated>2008-04-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
After months of meetings and redrafting work, the US Senate is said to be ready to make a move on the patent reform bill, S. 1145. Various senators are said ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/07/stupiderest-patent-reform-provisions/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Commerce Secretary Gutierrez Letter to Senate Calls for Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.uspto.gov/main/homepagenews/2008apr03.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-02:/commentary/2003456</id>
    <updated>2008-04-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>United States Patent and Trademark Office,&amp;nbsp;VA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Reform Act (S. 1145), including the Applicant Quality Submissions (AQS) provision, which he cites as &amp;#8220;the strongest step toward improved patent quality. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uspto.gov/main/homepagenews/2008apr03.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO Says Patent Reform Legislation Not Ready for a Vote</title>
    <link href="http://www.pharmalive.com/News/index.cfm?articleid=527813&amp;amp;amp;categoryid=32" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-01:/commentary/1999942</id>
    <updated>2008-04-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PharmaLive.com (press release),&amp;nbsp;PA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A wide range of industries, labor unions and universities continue to have serious concerns about key provisions of the Patent Reform Act, S. 1145, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pharmalive.com/News/index.cfm?articleid=527813&amp;amp;amp;categoryid=32&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Coalition for Patent Fairness Thinks Patent Reform Is Near</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/02/coalition-for-patent-fairness-thinks-patent-reform-is-near/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-04-01:/commentary/1999941</id>
    <updated>2008-04-01T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A wide range of industries, labor unions and universities continue to have serious concerns about key provisions of the Patent Reform Act, S. 1145, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/04/02/coalition-for-patent-fairness-thinks-patent-reform-is-near/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO Says Patent Reform Legislation Not Ready for a Vote</title>
    <link href="http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/bio-says-patent-reform-legislation-not-ready-for-a-vote,335623.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-31:/commentary/1995703</id>
    <updated>2008-03-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Earthtimes,&amp;nbsp;UK</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
A wide range of industries, labor unions and universities continue to have serious concerns about key provisions of the Patent Reform Act, S. 1145, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/bio-says-patent-reform-legislation-not-ready-for-a-vote,335623.shtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mortal Blow</title>
    <link href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26100" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-18:/commentary/1995693</id>
    <updated>2008-03-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NetworkWorld.com,&amp;nbsp;MA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patent Deform legislation (S. 1145 and HR 1908) was dealt a mortal blow last week. The Coalition for Patent fairness &amp;amp; PIRACY (CPF or &quot;C-poof&quot;) and their ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26100&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>PharmaBiotech IP 2008</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/17/pharmabiotech-ip-2008/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-16:/commentary/1995689</id>
    <updated>2008-03-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Intellectual Property Owners association (IPO) recently reported on the fifteen possible Judiciary Committee Amendments to S. 1145, that were circulated ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/03/17/pharmabiotech-ip-2008/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Letter: RTP Firm Opposes Patent Bill</title>
    <link href="http://raleigh2.com/link.asp?smenu=1&amp;amp;amp;twindow=&amp;amp;amp;sdetail=655&amp;amp;amp;mad=&amp;amp;amp;wpage=1&amp;amp;amp;skeyword=&amp;amp;amp;sidate=" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-14:/commentary/1995692</id>
    <updated>2008-03-14T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Raleigh Chronicle,&amp;nbsp;NC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Now the Senate is considering so-called &quot;reform&quot; legislation (S. 1145) that would deepen that harm by changing the way that the costs of infringement are ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://raleigh2.com/link.asp?smenu=1&amp;amp;amp;twindow=&amp;amp;amp;sdetail=655&amp;amp;amp;mad=&amp;amp;amp;wpage=1&amp;amp;amp;skeyword=&amp;amp;amp;sidate=&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Technologists Present Policy Recommendations to Congress</title>
    <link href="http://www.govtech.com/gt/270752?topic=117671" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-06:/commentary/1995690</id>
    <updated>2008-03-06T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Government Technology,&amp;nbsp;CA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate should pass S. 1145 to update the US patent system, and Congress should support the President's $2.1 billion request to fund the Patent and ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.govtech.com/gt/270752?topic=117671&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>SPEAKOUT: Patent reform will aid innovation</title>
    <link href="http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/mar/07/speakout-patent-reform-will-aid-innovation/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-03-05:/commentary/1995694</id>
    <updated>2008-03-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Rocky Mountain News,&amp;nbsp;CO</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Last September, the US House of Representatives passed HR 1908, the Patent Reform Act of 2007 and the bill's Senate counterpart, S. 1145, is expected to be ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/mar/07/speakout-patent-reform-will-aid-innovation/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Cheats Inventors!</title>
    <link href="http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/02/25/patent-reform-cheats-inventors/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-24:/commentary/1663458</id>
    <updated>2008-02-24T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Men's News Daily,&amp;nbsp;CA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Eagle Forum has been following the developments regarding the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145), sponsored by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/02/25/patent-reform-cheats-inventors/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Are Patents Headed For Extinction?</title>
    <link href="http://www.forbes.com/opinions/2008/02/22/patent-laws-kiani-oped-cx_jki_0225patent.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-24:/commentary/1660862</id>
    <updated>2008-02-24T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Forbes,&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
That picture will change for the worse if the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145), now being considered by the Senate, is enacted in its present form. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/opinions/2008/02/22/patent-laws-kiani-oped-cx_jki_0225patent.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New Laws: Economic Stimulus and Assistance to Veterans - No New ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/02-19-2008/0004757980&amp;amp;amp;EDATE=" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-18:/commentary/1638041</id>
    <updated>2008-02-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR Newswire (press release),&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
New Items S. 1145 The Patent Reform Act of 2007 Costs $406.27 per family http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_1145.html HR 30 The Eastern ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/02-19-2008/0004757980&amp;amp;amp;EDATE=&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Big patent law reform on the way?</title>
    <link href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=2035" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-18:/commentary/1638040</id>
    <updated>2008-02-18T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ZDNet</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
So S. 1145 , the Patent Reform Act, may be heading into law. The other bit of news comes from the courts, and is reported upon expertly by Dennis Crouch at ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=2035&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Meaningful patent reform</title>
    <link href="http://washingtontimes.com/article/20080215/EDITORIAL/392558570/1013" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-14:/commentary/1619717</id>
    <updated>2008-02-14T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Washington Times,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145) is the product of years of deliberation and study within Congress and by many esteemed agencies and institutions, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtontimes.com/article/20080215/EDITORIAL/392558570/1013&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strong US Patent System Is Critical to Continued Innovation</title>
    <link href="http://www.dotmed.com/news/story/5457/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-13:/commentary/1619673</id>
    <updated>2008-02-13T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DOTmed.com (press release),&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The administration is right to oppose Section 4 of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) which contains language that would reduce the incentive to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dotmed.com/news/story/5457/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Help save EFF's Patent Busting Project</title>
    <link href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25049" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-13:/commentary/1617796</id>
    <updated>2008-02-13T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NetworkWorld.com,&amp;nbsp;MA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The bill is S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. Put the question any way you choose, but here's a suggestion: &quot;Does the senator support or oppose ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/25049&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Google, Microsoft Sued Over Keyword Auction Patent</title>
    <link href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206504250" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-13:/commentary/1617795</id>
    <updated>2008-02-13T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>InformationWeek,&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... of a letter sent to congressional leaders in January by the Coalition for Patent Fairness in support of S.1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206504250&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Administration Opposes Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://fdanews.com/newsletter/article?issueId=11303&amp;amp;amp;articleId=103996" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-11:/commentary/1606355</id>
    <updated>2008-02-11T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>FDA news (subscription),&amp;nbsp;VA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Judiciary Committee passed S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act, last summer, and the House later passed its version of the bill, HR 1908. Sen. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://fdanews.com/newsletter/article?issueId=11303&amp;amp;amp;articleId=103996&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>US Patent Reform Act faces opposition</title>
    <link href="http://www.eetasia.com/ART_8800503816_480100_NT_ece0d9b9.HTM" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-10:/commentary/1606356</id>
    <updated>2008-02-10T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Eetasia.com (subscription)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... scientists and designers, joined the other unions to sign a letter to members of the US Senate, urging their opposition to the bill, S. 1145. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eetasia.com/ART_8800503816_480100_NT_ece0d9b9.HTM&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strong US patent system critical to continued medical innovation</title>
    <link href="http://www.healthtechwire.com/Pressrelease.146+M5d24c185735.0.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-10:/commentary/1603986</id>
    <updated>2008-02-10T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>HealthTech Wire (press release),&amp;nbsp;Germany</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The administration is right to oppose Section 4 of the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) which contains language that would reduce the incentive to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.healthtechwire.com/Pressrelease.146+M5d24c185735.0.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Missouri's inventors need patent-law revision</title>
    <link href="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/business/stories.nsf/0/96E346FFE4431520862573EA000D7F6F?OpenDocument" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-09:/commentary/1600390</id>
    <updated>2008-02-09T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>St. Louis Post-Dispatch,&amp;nbsp; United States</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In September, the House of Representatives passed HR 1908, the Patent Reform Act of 2007, and the bill's Senate counterpart (S. 1145) is expected to be ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/business/stories.nsf/0/96E346FFE4431520862573EA000D7F6F?OpenDocument&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>POPA Joins Unions in Opposition to Patent Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=5465&amp;amp;amp;lang=en" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-09:/commentary/1600389</id>
    <updated>2008-02-09T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ag-IP-news Agency,&amp;nbsp;Jordan</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... The Patent Office Professional Association (POPA) has joined several other major labor unions in opposition to the Patent Reform Act of 2007, S. 1145. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=5465&amp;amp;amp;lang=en&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Unions and Businesses Form Coalitions to Oppose US Patent Reform ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/589905/unions_and_businesses_form_coalitions.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-08:/commentary/1597746</id>
    <updated>2008-02-08T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Associated Content,&amp;nbsp;CO</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Fourteen unions and more than 485 businesses and organizations expressed concerns about provisions in the proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/589905/unions_and_businesses_form_coalitions.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Unions Urge Senate To Oppose Patent Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206106322" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-07:/commentary/1594232</id>
    <updated>2008-02-07T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>InformationWeek,&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... scientists, and designers, joined the other unions to sign a letter to members of the Senate, urging their opposition to the bill, S. 1145. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=206106322&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FDA, Congress to Jointly Form Follow-on Biologics Proposal</title>
    <link href="http://www.bioworld.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines_article&amp;amp;amp;forceid=46825" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-07:/commentary/1594231</id>
    <updated>2008-02-07T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BioWorld Online,&amp;nbsp;GA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
At issue is Section 4 of the bill, known as S. 1145, which addresses the right of the inventor to obtain damages. &quot;The requirements in Section 4 of the bill ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bioworld.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines_article&amp;amp;amp;forceid=46825&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Blues</title>
    <link href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2008/02/patent-reform-b.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-05:/commentary/1594233</id>
    <updated>2008-02-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The BLT,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Section 4 of S. 1145 sets some specific standards for federal courts on how to determine reasonable royalties in patent infringement cases, ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2008/02/patent-reform-b.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Administration Shares Views on Senate Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=5457&amp;amp;amp;lang=en" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-05:/commentary/1580769</id>
    <updated>2008-02-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ag-IP-news Agency,&amp;nbsp;Jordan</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The letter states the Administration strongly opposes S. 1145 in its current form, but strongly supports passage of balanced patent modernization ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=5457&amp;amp;amp;lang=en&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>We&amp;#8217;d Prefer to Speak for Ourselves, Thanks</title>
    <link href="http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/02/06/patent" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-05:/commentary/1575103</id>
    <updated>2008-02-05T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Inside Higher Ed,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;#8220;University Concerns With S. 1145 Addressed by Bill as Reported by Committee,&amp;#8221; read the headline on the document, which went on to list the ways in which ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/02/06/patent&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bush Administration Calls For &amp;#8220;Tech Neutral&amp;#8221; Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/05/bush-administration-calls-for-tech-neutral-patent-reform/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-04:/commentary/1594234</id>
    <updated>2008-02-04T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
After the Department of Commerce sent a letter to the Committee on the Judiciary, on the views of the current Administration on S. 1145, the Patent Reform ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/05/bush-administration-calls-for-tech-neutral-patent-reform/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bush Administration To Patent Office: Hey, Hold Up There Mister On ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/04/bush-administration-to-patent-office-hey-hold-up-there-mister-on-that-there-reasonable-royalty-rate/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-02-03:/commentary/1569549</id>
    <updated>2008-02-03T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Patrick J. Leahy Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary, on the views of the current Administration on S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/02/04/bush-administration-to-patent-office-hey-hold-up-there-mister-on-that-there-reasonable-royalty-rate/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Proposed Patent Law Changes Could Help, Hurt Small Businesses</title>
    <link href="http://www.njbiz.com/weekly_article.asp?aID=79200265.2479581.949377.9245027.1013508.388&amp;amp;amp;aID2=73020" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-20:/commentary/1523027</id>
    <updated>2008-01-20T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>NJBIZ,&amp;nbsp;NJ</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As of last week, the Senate version (S. 1145) was awaiting Judiciary Committee review. The House passed its version (HR 1908) last year. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.njbiz.com/weekly_article.asp?aID=79200265.2479581.949377.9245027.1013508.388&amp;amp;amp;aID2=73020&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform: What Does First-To-File Mean To Me?</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/01/17/patent-reform-what-does-first-to-file-mean-to-me/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2008-01-16:/commentary/1523028</id>
    <updated>2008-01-16T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As we reported earlier, the Senate&amp;#8217;s Committee on the Judiciary, has issued its draft report on the Patent Reform bill (S. 1145), to amend the patent laws ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2008/01/17/patent-reform-what-does-first-to-file-mean-to-me/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Opposition to So-called &amp;#8220;Patent Reform Act&amp;#8221; Rapidly Growing</title>
    <link href="http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;amp;newsId=20070906005966&amp;amp;amp;newsLang=en" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-05:/commentary/1071798</id>
    <updated>2007-09-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Wire (press release),&amp;nbsp;CA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In these opinion pieces, he warned that the so-called Patent Reform Act (HR 1908 and S. 1145) now before Congress should be of great concern to individual ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;amp;newsId=20070906005966&amp;amp;amp;newsLang=en&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Examiners Oppose Patent Reform Proposal</title>
    <link href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201804307" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-04:/commentary/1071797</id>
    <updated>2007-09-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>InformationWeek,&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... stating that HR 1908 and S. 1145 includes a &quot;dangerous requirement that would effectively outsource the patent search, allowing applicants to contract ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201804307&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>House of Representatives to Consider Patent Reform Act</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/09/05/house-of-representatives-to-consider-patent-reform-act/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-09-04:/commentary/1071796</id>
    <updated>2007-09-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The patent reform bills (HR 1908 and S. 1145, the Patent Reform Acts of 2007) were favorably reported by the House and Senate Judiciary Committees prior to ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/09/05/house-of-representatives-to-consider-patent-reform-act/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Engineers Fight Patent Reform, Not Patent Trolls</title>
    <link href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/30/engineers-fight-patent-reform-not-patent-trolls/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-29:/commentary/1071795</id>
    <updated>2007-08-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>New York Times,&amp;nbsp;United States</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
We are concerned that S. 1145 favors the companies with the financial resources that enable them to tread on others&amp;#8217; patent rights by commercializing works ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/30/engineers-fight-patent-reform-not-patent-trolls/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Dog Ate My Homework Butt-Saving Bill to be Slipped into the ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/08/08/the-dog-ate-my-homework-butt-saving-bill-to-be-slipped-into-the-patent-reform-act/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-08-07:/commentary/966248</id>
    <updated>2007-08-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... untimely filed Patent Term Extension (PTE) applications has been added to the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) by Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/08/08/the-dog-ate-my-homework-butt-saving-bill-to-be-slipped-into-the-patent-reform-act/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&amp;#8220;Entrenched Patent Protected Companies Who Dominate Markets Want ...</title>
    <link href="http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;amp;newsId=20070801005402&amp;amp;amp;newsLang=en" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-31:/commentary/934664</id>
    <updated>2007-07-31T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Wire (press release),&amp;nbsp;CA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&amp;#8220;The so-called &amp;#8216;Patent Reform Act&amp;#8217; (HR 1908 and S. 1145) now before Congress proposes a major overhaul of our venerable Patent System, and this should be of ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;amp;newsId=20070801005402&amp;amp;amp;newsLang=en&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Sea Changes In Our Patent System: Has The Pendulum Reversed? - Part II</title>
    <link href="http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&amp;amp;amp;artMonth=August&amp;amp;amp;artYear=2007&amp;amp;amp;EntryNo=7021" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-29:/commentary/924988</id>
    <updated>2007-07-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>The Metropolitan Coporate Counsel,&amp;nbsp;NJ</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
S. 1145: The Patent Reform Act Of 2007 (Lahey-Hatch/Berman-Smith) The principal provisions of this legislation would (1) change our system of awarding ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/current.php?artType=view&amp;amp;amp;artMonth=August&amp;amp;amp;artYear=2007&amp;amp;amp;EntryNo=7021&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Act Of 2007</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=50854" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-29:/commentary/924987</id>
    <updated>2007-07-29T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (subcription),&amp;nbsp;UK</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Though both bills, the HR 1908 and S. 1145, were essentially the same when initially introduced on April 18, 2007, some important provisions are now ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=50854&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>IPO Posts Comparison of US House, Senate Patent Reform Bills</title>
    <link href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=703&amp;amp;amp;res=" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-26:/commentary/914123</id>
    <updated>2007-07-26T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Intellectual Property Watch,&amp;nbsp;Switzerland</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate Judiciary Committee approved its measure, S.1145 on 19 July. The IPO comparison shows a number of differences between the House and Senate ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=703&amp;amp;amp;res=&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patently offensive</title>
    <link href="http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56845" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-25:/commentary/904040</id>
    <updated>2007-07-25T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>WorldNetDaily,&amp;nbsp;OR</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The vehicle that would allow this to happen is HR1908 in the House and S.1145 in the Senate. A key provision in these so-called patent reform bills is that ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56845&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BSA Commends Congressional Action on Patent Reform Bill</title>
    <link href="http://www.huliq.com/27962/bsa-commends-congressional-action-on-patent-reform-bill" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-22:/commentary/896695</id>
    <updated>2007-07-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>HULIQ,&amp;nbsp;NC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (HR 1908/S. 1145) is designed to ensure America remains a leader in global innovation by updating US patent law for the modern ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huliq.com/27962/bsa-commends-congressional-action-on-patent-reform-bill&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Has the Plaintiff Chooses the Forum Rule Been Eliminated For ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/07/23/has-the-plaintiff-chooses-the-forum-rule-been-eliminated-for-patent-holders/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-22:/commentary/896694</id>
    <updated>2007-07-22T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
One of the less-noticed items during the Senate Judiciary Committee mark-up of the Patent Reform Bill (Senate Bill S. 1145) was the adoption of Senator ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/07/23/has-the-plaintiff-chooses-the-forum-rule-been-eliminated-for-patent-holders/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Bill Approved by House Committee</title>
    <link href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/20/0511250" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-19:/commentary/885812</id>
    <updated>2007-07-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Slashdot</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... (767092) on Friday July 20, @08:39AM (#19925561) The Senate Judiciary Committee passed their own version of the bill (S. 1145) yesterday afternoon. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/20/0511250&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Fast-tracked Through Senate Committee</title>
    <link href="http://www.betanews.com/article/Patent_Reform_Fasttracked_Through_Senate_Committee/1184950378" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-19:/commentary/884675</id>
    <updated>2007-07-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BetaNews</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... for an infringing product or process,&quot; S. 1145 now reads, &quot;damages may not be based upon the entire market value of that infringing product or process. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.betanews.com/article/Patent_Reform_Fasttracked_Through_Senate_Committee/1184950378&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Judiciary Committee Patent Bill Unsupportable</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/07-19-2007/0004629266&amp;amp;amp;EDATE=" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-18:/commentary/881854</id>
    <updated>2007-07-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PR Newswire (press release),&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... released the following statement today following US Senate Judiciary Committee's early evening mark up of S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/07-19-2007/0004629266&amp;amp;amp;EDATE=&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Panel Inches Toward Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/small-business/2007/07/senate_panel_inches_toward_pat.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-12:/commentary/857063</id>
    <updated>2007-07-12T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Wall Street Journal</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... the panel to approve the bill before Congress goes on its annual August recess and that debate on the bill, S.1145, likely will continue next week. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.washingtonpost.com/small-business/2007/07/senate_panel_inches_toward_pat.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Coalition for 21st Century Patent Reform Statement on Senate Mark ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/07-12-2007/0004624631&amp;amp;amp;EDATE=" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-11:/commentary/849992</id>
    <updated>2007-07-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Wall Street Journal</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... a variety of industry sectors, released the following statement after the Senate Judiciary Committee mark up of S. 1145, the Patent Reform Act of 2007. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&amp;amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/07-12-2007/0004624631&amp;amp;amp;EDATE=&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Nonsense</title>
    <link href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118420277223364135.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-11:/commentary/844406</id>
    <updated>2007-07-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Wall Street Journal</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Senate Judiciary Committee will take up S.1145 today. Congress needs to pass this bill, during this session, as the need for reform is clear. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118420277223364135.html?mod=googlenews_wsj&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DOJ: US Needs More Prior User Rights</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/07/05/doj-us-needs-more-prior-user-rights/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-04:/commentary/801511</id>
    <updated>2007-07-04T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... of Justice waded into the cesspool of patent reform throwing out its opinion on the provisions of the Patent Reform Act of 2007, S. 1145 and HR 1908. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/07/05/doj-us-needs-more-prior-user-rights/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Hollywood inventor protests the patent bill</title>
    <link href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/02/magazines/fsb/patent_interview/?postversion=2007070306" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-02:/commentary/851848</id>
    <updated>2007-07-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CNNMoney.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(For background on S. 1145 in the Senate and HR 1908 in the House, see &quot;Will Congress slam small inventors?&quot; FSB: Congress is contemplating a major overhaul ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/02/magazines/fsb/patent_interview/?postversion=2007070306&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Hollywood inventor protests the patent bill</title>
    <link href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/02/magazines/fsb/patent_interview/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-07-02:/commentary/801512</id>
    <updated>2007-07-02T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>CNNMoney.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
(For background on S. 1145 in the Senate and HR 1908 in the House, see &quot;Will Congress slam small inventors?&quot; FSB: Congress is contemplating a major overhaul ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/02/magazines/fsb/patent_interview/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Judiciary Puts Off Substantive Action On Patent Overhaul</title>
    <link href="http://public.cq.com/docs/cqm/cqmidday110-000002537301.html" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-20:/commentary/754930</id>
    <updated>2007-06-20T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Congressional Quarterly,&amp;nbsp;DC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The panel adopted the amendment, which made mostly technical changes to the underlying bill ( S 1145 ), by voice vote. Lengthy debate on several disputed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://public.cq.com/docs/cqm/cqmidday110-000002537301.html&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>MDMA Voices Concerns Over the Patent Reform Act of 2007</title>
    <link href="http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=4547&amp;amp;amp;lang=en" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-19:/commentary/754931</id>
    <updated>2007-06-19T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Nanotechnology News (press release)</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... in a Wednesday press release that it has joined over 200 other organizations to express concerns with The Patent Reform Act of 2007, S.1145 and HR 1908. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=4547&amp;amp;amp;lang=en&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>MDMA Voices Concerns Over The Patent Reform Act of 2007: Bill Will ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/news_press_release,125265.shtml" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-18:/commentary/758301</id>
    <updated>2007-06-18T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Earthtimes.org</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Devices Manufacturers Association (MDMA) joined over 200 other organizations to express concerns with The Patent Reform Act of 2007, S.1145 and HR 1908. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/news_press_release,125265.shtml&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Chief Justice Michel Writes to Committee on Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/06/18/chief-justice-michel-writes-to-committee-on-patent-reform/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-17:/commentary/754932</id>
    <updated>2007-06-17T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) would add the following provisions to 35 USC &amp;#167;284: (2) RELATIONSHIP OF DAMAGES TO CONTRIBUTIONS OVER PRIOR ART. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/06/18/chief-justice-michel-writes-to-committee-on-patent-reform/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Patent Reform Act Of 2007: Patent Reform Legislation Aims To ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=49284" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-13:/commentary/738159</id>
    <updated>2007-06-13T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Mondaq News Alerts (subcription),&amp;nbsp;UK</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... joined Representatives Howard Berman (D.-California) and Lamar Smith (R.-Texas) in introducing identical bills, HR 1908 and S. 1145, titled the &quot;Patent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=49284&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Senate Judiciary Republican Letter on Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/06/12/senate-judiciary-republican-letter-on-patent-reform/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-11:/commentary/738162</id>
    <updated>2007-06-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
As the Patent Reform Bill of 2007 (S. 1145) makes it&amp;#8217;s way through Congress, Senators Coburn, Grassley, Kyl, Sessions and Brownback letter to Senator ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/06/12/senate-judiciary-republican-letter-on-patent-reform/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Judge Michel Writes Letter on Damages in Patent Infringement Cases</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/06/12/judge-michel-writes-letter-on-damages-in-patent-infringement-cases/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-11:/commentary/738161</id>
    <updated>2007-06-11T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) would add the following provisions to 35 USC &amp;#167;284: (2) RELATIONSHIP OF DAMAGES TO CONTRIBUTIONS OVER PRIOR ART. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/06/12/judge-michel-writes-letter-on-damages-in-patent-infringement-cases/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform debate heats up</title>
    <link href="http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199902596" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-07:/commentary/738164</id>
    <updated>2007-06-07T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>EETimes.com</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Biberstein said the bill, S.1145, contains commendable improvements, but the potential harm of several provisions outweighs the good. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199902596&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent Reform Debate Heats Up</title>
    <link href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199901933" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-06:/commentary/774489</id>
    <updated>2007-06-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>InformationWeek,&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Biberstein said the bill, S.1145, contains commendable improvements, but the potential harm of several provisions outweighs the good. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199901933&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform debate heats up</title>
    <link href="http://www.my-esm.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199902165" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-06:/commentary/719407</id>
    <updated>2007-06-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Electronics Supply &amp;amp; Manufacturing</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Biberstein said the bill, S.1145, contains commendable improvements, but the potential harm of several provisions outweighs the good. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.my-esm.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199902165&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Patent reform debate heats up</title>
    <link href="http://www.itnews.com.au/newsstory.aspx?CIaNID=53847" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-06:/commentary/719406</id>
    <updated>2007-06-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>iT News,&amp;nbsp;Australia</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Biberstein said the bill, S.1145, contains commendable improvements, but the potential harm of several provisions outweighs the good. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itnews.com.au/newsstory.aspx?CIaNID=53847&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Alcatel-Lucent Strengthens #2 Position in Synergy's Services Edge ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.financialnewsusa.com/release.php?rlsid=546" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-06:/commentary/719405</id>
    <updated>2007-06-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Financial News USA (press release),&amp;nbsp;CA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... and Licensing Officer, Bruce Bernstein, recently testified in a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.financialnewsusa.com/release.php?rlsid=546&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Software Executives Press Forward on Policy Agenda</title>
    <link href="http://www.huliq.com/23917/software-executives-press-forward-on-policy-agenda" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-06:/commentary/719404</id>
    <updated>2007-06-06T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>HULIQ,&amp;nbsp;NC</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... the CEOs are delivering a letter to House and Senate leadership, signed by 23 industry executives, urging swift enactment of HR 1908/S. 1145, the Patent ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huliq.com/23917/software-executives-press-forward-on-policy-agenda&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Patent Reform Act of 2007 Will Weaken Patents and Jeopardize ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.medadnews.com/News/Index.cfm?articleid=449168" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-05:/commentary/777532</id>
    <updated>2007-06-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PharmaLive.com (press release),&amp;nbsp;PA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
&quot;While S.1145 contains many laudatory reforms, the potential harm of several of the provisions is so great that BIO must oppose the bill in its current form ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.medadnews.com/News/Index.cfm?articleid=449168&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>InterDigital Addresses US Senate Regarding Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/-interdigital-addresses-us-senate-regarding-patent-reform-/2007/06/06/2692802.htm" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-05:/commentary/774933</id>
    <updated>2007-06-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>TMC Net,&amp;nbsp;CT</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... and Licensing Officer, Bruce Bernstein, testified today in a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/-interdigital-addresses-us-senate-regarding-patent-reform-/2007/06/06/2692802.htm&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>InterDigital Addresses US Senate Regarding Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;amp;newsId=20070606005805&amp;amp;amp;newsLang=en" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-05:/commentary/738163</id>
    <updated>2007-06-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Wire (press release),&amp;nbsp;CA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... and Licensing Officer, Bruce Bernstein, testified today in a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S.1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;amp;newsId=20070606005805&amp;amp;amp;newsLang=en&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Patent Reform Act of 2007 Will Weaken Patents and Jeopardize ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.genengnews.com/news/bnitem.aspx?name=18580504" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-06-05:/commentary/738160</id>
    <updated>2007-06-05T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Genetic Engineering News (press release),&amp;nbsp;NY</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Provisions in the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) would unintentionally promote uncertainty surrounding - and weaken the enforceability of - validly ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.genengnews.com/news/bnitem.aspx?name=18580504&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>California Healthcare Institute Issues White Paper on Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.pharmalive.com/News/index.cfm?articleid=447115&amp;amp;amp;categoryid=32" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-30:/commentary/774490</id>
    <updated>2007-05-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PharmaLive.com (press release),&amp;nbsp;PA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Teleflex, Inc. Several of the provisions that are included in recently introduced patent reform legislation (HR 1908/S. 1145, The Patent Reform Act of 2007) ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pharmalive.com/News/index.cfm?articleid=447115&amp;amp;amp;categoryid=32&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>California Healthcare Institute Issues White Paper on Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;amp;newsId=20070531005766&amp;amp;amp;newsLang=en" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-30:/commentary/719410</id>
    <updated>2007-05-30T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Business Wire (press release),&amp;nbsp;CA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
Several of the provisions that are included in recently introduced patent reform legislation (HR 1908/S. 1145, The Patent Reform Act of 2007) are analyzed ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;amp;newsId=20070531005766&amp;amp;amp;newsLang=en&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BIO Joins with Broad Coalition to Preserve Innovation Incentives ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.pharmalive.com/News/index.cfm?articleid=443024&amp;amp;amp;categoryid=32" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-16:/commentary/741010</id>
    <updated>2007-05-16T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>PharmaLive.com (press release),&amp;nbsp;PA</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
In the letter, the organizations expressed concern that provisions of &quot;The Patent Reform Act of 2007&quot; (HR 1908/S. 1145) pose serious threats to medical ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pharmalive.com/News/index.cfm?articleid=443024&amp;amp;amp;categoryid=32&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Diverse Industries Unite in Concern Over Provisions in Patent ...</title>
    <link href="http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=4402&amp;amp;amp;lang=en" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-15:/commentary/719412</id>
    <updated>2007-05-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>ag-IP-news Agency,&amp;nbsp;Jordan</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... Harry Reid and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, expressed concern with certain provisions of The Patent Reform Act of 2007 (HR 1908/S. 1145). ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ag-ip-news.com/GetArticle.asp?Art_ID=4402&amp;amp;amp;lang=en&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Companies Send Concerns to Congress on Patent Reform</title>
    <link href="http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/05/16/companies-send-concerns-to-congress-on-patent-reform/" rel="alternate"/>
    <id>tag:opencongress.org,2007-05-15:/commentary/719409</id>
    <updated>2007-05-15T20:00:00Z</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Patent Baristas,&amp;nbsp;OH</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html">
... over certain provisions of patent reform legislation (HR 1908/S. 1145 &amp;#8211; The Patent Reform Act of 2007) currently under consideration by Congress. ...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.patentbaristas.com/archives/2007/05/16/companies-send-concerns-to-congress-on-patent-reform/&quot;&gt;Go to article&lt;/a&gt;    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

